THE ROLE OF FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY PERIMETRY IN EARLY DETECTION OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY.

The aim was to assess whether standard automated perimetry (SAP) and frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry are able to detect the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on retinal function in DM patients in the early stage of disease and to analyze which method is more specific and sensitive. A randomized cross-sectional study was conducted in three different groups of patients to compare the capability of these two methods to examine visual field and to detect the change in light sensitivity. Visual function was assessed in 60 adults with normal retinal finding, 60 adults with DM without clinically detectable retinopathy and 60 adults with DM and non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy but normal visual acuity. FDT perimetry and SAP were performed in all study patients. The presence and severity of diabetic retinopathy was determined by taking and evaluating two 50° field color photographs per eye, macula-centered and disc-centered. The following results were obtained by analyzing parameters in the groups of diabetic patients: sensitivity and specificity of SAP and FDT for medium sensitivity 86.7/33.3 (p<0.061) and 71.7/41.7 (p<0.228), respectively; for medium deficit 41.7/76.7 (p<0.063) and 65/50 (p<0.362), respectively; for loss of variance/pattern standard deviation (LV/PSD) 51.7/61.7 (p<0.536) and 61.7/51.7 (p<0.666), respectively; and for foveal sensitivity 81.7/36.7 (p<0.096) and 23.3/86.7 (p<0.839), respectively. Analysis of parameters between diabetics and control group yielded sensitivity and specificity for medium sensitivity 71.7/61.7 (p<0.001) and 70.8/55 (p<0.002), respectively; for medium deficit 56.7/60 (p<0.058) and 77.5/43.3 (p<0.037), respectively; for LV/PSD 58.3/58.3 (p<0.042) and 33.3/83.3 (p<0.437), respectively; and for foveal sensitivity 82.5/53.3 (p<0.001) and 28.3/85 (p<0.195), respectively. We concluded that neither of these methods was sensitive and specific enough to distinguish diabetics without retinopathy from diabetics with retinopathy. Both of these methods were highly specific and sensitive to distinguish diabetics from healthy subjects, but neither of these methods proved superior.

Prevalence of Open Angle Glaucoma in Risk Groups in Slavonia and Baranya Region.

The aim of this prospective study was to detect primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) in its early stage in patients at a higher risk of its development, and to identify the risk group with the highest prevalence of POAG. The study was conducted at Department of Ophthalmology, Osijek University Hospital Centre, and included 250 patients divided into five groups, as follows: group 1, patients with diabetes type 1 and type 2; group 2, patients with arterial hypertension (blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg); group 3, patients with positive family history of POAG; group 4, patients with myopia between -3.0 and -8.0 diopters; and group 5, control group including patients aged 40 with no risk factors for POAG development. Study results showed that distribution of glaucoma patients was not equal across the groups. The prevalence of POAG in all patients was 5.6%, whereas in patients with positive family history of POAG it was 14%, which was statistically significantly higher than in patients with diabetes and myopia (4% both), as well as in control group. The difference was greatest in comparison to control group. There was no statistically significant difference in glaucoma incidence between the group of patients with positive family history (14%) and patients with systemic hypertension (6%). The results obtained suggest that of all risk factors analyzed, positive family history of POAG is the most important risk factor for glaucoma development in all risk groups.