Prevalence, Indications, and Complications of Conversional Surgery After Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: A MBSAQIP Analysis.

PURPOSE: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) was once the most popular bariatric procedure in the 1980's, with many patients subsequently requiring conversional surgery. However, knowledge regarding the prevalence and outcomes of these procedures remains limited. This study aims to determine the prevalence, indications, rate of 30-day serious complications, and mortality of conversional surgery after VBG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP database from 2020 to 2022 was conducted. Individuals undergoing conversional or revisional surgery after VBG were included. The primary outcomes were 30-day serious complications and mortality. RESULTS: Of 716 VBG conversions, the common procedures included 660 (92.1%) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and 56 (7.9%) sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The main indication for conversion was weight gain for RYGB (31.0%) and for SG (41.0%). RYGB had longer operative times than SG (223.7 vs 130.5 min, p < 0.001). Although not statistically significant, serious complications were higher after RYGB (14.7% vs 8.9%, p = 0.2). Leak rates were higher after SG (5.4 vs 3.5%) but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.4). Mortality was similar between RYGB and SG (1.2 vs 1.8%, p = 0.7). Multivariable regression showed higher body mass index, longer operative time, previous cardiac surgery and black race were independently associated with serious complications. Conversion to RYGB was not predictive of serious complications compared to SG (OR 0.96, 95%CI 0.34-2.67, p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Conversional surgery after VBG is uncommon, and the rate of complications and mortality remains high. Patients should be thoroughly evaluated and informed about these risks before undergoing conversion from VBG.

Bariatric Surgical Outcomes in the Elderly: A Comparison Study Between Primary and Revisional Procedures in the United Arab Emirates.

PURPOSE: Data reported on comparing primary and revisional procedures in the elderly is still limited. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between primary and revisional bariatric surgery in a cohort of older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients ≥ 60 years old were divided into two cohorts, primary surgery cohort (PSC) and revisional surgery cohort (RSC). Baseline and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included (34 PSC and 24 RSC) in the study. Forty-two (25 PSC and 17 RSC) 72.4% were female. The mean age was 64 (± 3.3 years) in the PSC and 65 (± 4.2 years) in the RSC, the median initial BMI was 46.7 and 47.4 kg/m2 (p < 0.848), respectively. The mean hospital stay was (3 PSC vs. 5 RSC, p < 0.022) days. Readmissions occurred in (1 PSC vs. 3 RSC, p = 0.158) patients within 30 days of discharge. Postoperative major complications included (1 PSC vs. 5 RSC, p < 0.0278) patients. Reoperations were reported in (0 PSC vs. 3 RSC, p < 0.034) patients. Patients who underwent surgery for weight management, the initial mean BMI was (46.7 PSC vs. 47.4 RSC kg/m2, p = 0.848). At 12-months post-procedure, the mean BMI was (34.3 PSC vs. 37.7 RSC kg/m2, p = 0.372) and (23.7 PSC vs. 19.1 RSC, p = 0.231) %TBWL. The mean overall follow-up was (12.4 PSC vs. 27.5 RSC, p < 0.004) months, and one unrelated death (cancer) was reported in the RSC. CONCLUSION: PSC and RSC are effective in the elderly, however postoperative complications occurred more often in the RSC group.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Severe Obesity Compared to Patients with Non-Severe Obesity at A New Institution in The United Arab Emirates.

Background: Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for weight loss, but a higher body mass index (BMI) may lead to higher postoperative complication rates. This study aims to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes between UAE patients with severe obesity (SO) [BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2] and non-severe obesity (NSO) [BMI < 50 kg/m2] undergoing primary bariatric surgery. Methods: From September 2015 to July 2019, 542 patients, 94 SO (56.5 ± 6.2 kg/m2) and 448 NSO (41.8 ± 4.1 kg/m2), were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Patients with SO were younger (33.8 ± 13.4 vs. 37.0 ± 11.5 years, p = 0.02) but otherwise had similar demographic characteristics. Their rates of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (39.4% SO vs. 44.4% NSO, p = 0.37) and sleeve gastrectomy (60.6% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.37) were similar. There were no differences between perioperative complications (6.4% SO vs. 5.8% NSO, p = 0.83), major postoperative complications (5.3% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.42), readmissions (5.3% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.36), or reoperations (3.2% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.78). There were no mortalities. Their total body weight loss was comparable at 12 months (28.1 ± 10.2% vs. 29.0 ± 7.7%, p = 0.58). Conclusions: Although a higher BMI may pose operative challenges, UAE patients with SO do not have worsened outcomes in bariatric surgery, demonstrating similarly low morbidity to patients with NSO, and similar rates of improvement in their BMI.

The Effects of Post-Surgical Pregnancy on Weight Loss Trajectories after Bariatric Surgery: Are Initial Weight and Age Prognostic Factors?

Introduction: A substantial percentage of patients undergoing bariatric surgery are of childbearing age. Pregnancy outcomes after bariatric surgery are known. However, there are limited data on the impact of pregnancy on weight loss after surgery. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effects of pregnancy on post-bariatric surgery weight loss trajectories (WLTs) and to determine the association with age and initial weight. Methods: All who had primary bariatric surgeries (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve) between September 2015 and July 2020 were classified into two groups: post-surgery gravid (GG) and post-surgery non-gravid (NG). WLTs were examined using a random intercept mixed-effects model with repeated measures nested within patients. The post-surgery/pre-gravid time phase (PoPG) was modelled using a third-degree polynomial. For GG, two third-degree spline functions modelled the post-surgery while gravid (PoWG) and post-partum (PoPP) time phases. Age and initial weight were used to control for pre-existing differences during PoPG. Weight differences at 6 months PoPP were examined by applying general linear hypothesis testing to the mixed-model results. Results: A total of 508 patients were included, 20 in GG and 488 in NG. The mean age at surgery was 33 years in GG and 37 years in NG. The mean initial BMI was 47 kg/m2 and 43 kg/m2, respectively. During PoPG, adjusted average weight in both groups follows the path across time. For GG, weight decreases and then increases during PoWG. For GG during PoPP, weight immediately decreases after delivery and then increases over time to levels similar to NG. Weight differences at 6 months PoPP for GG and NG were not statistically different. Older age was associated with reduced weight loss during PoPG by Baseline Age, while higher initial weight was associated with increased weight loss during PoPG by Baseline Weight. In both instances, these effects attenuate over time. Conclusions: This model indicates that pregnancy following bariatric surgery affects WLT during PoWG and PoPP, and no difference in weight is expected after 6 months post-gravid. Age and initial weight could be considered prognostic factors during PoPG. Patients wishing to conceive should undergo preconception counselling and be advised to avoid pregnancy during the period of rapid weight loss. They also should be informed that WLT may vary during pregnancy and early post-partum.

Cardiovascular disease risk scores in patients with optimal vs suboptimal weight loss after bariatric surgery: Translating improvements into clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk modification in patients with optimal weight loss (OWL) versus suboptimal weight loss SWL following MBS. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis. The 10-year risk CVD was estimated before and after one year of surgery using the "Framingham Score". RESULTS: 191 patients were included in our study. Mean baseline Framingham score was 7.2 â€‹± â€‹6.9%. According to the score, 54% of patients were classified as low risk (n â€‹= â€‹104), 23% as moderate (n â€‹= â€‹43), 20% moderately high (n â€‹= â€‹39) and 3% as high risk (n â€‹= â€‹5). One year after surgery, 91% of the patients showed reduction of their Framingham score. Mean CVD risk score decreased significantly to 4.1 â€‹± â€‹3.7% when compared to baseline (p-value is â€‹< â€‹0.001); 80% of patients classified as low risk (n â€‹= â€‹153), 13% as moderate (n â€‹= â€‹25), 7% moderately high (n â€‹= â€‹13) and 0% as high risk (n â€‹= â€‹0). CONCLUSION: Weight loss after bariatric surgery reduces CVD risk scores and the magnitude of effect correlates with the degree of weight loss.

Ventilation-Based Strategy to Manage Intraoperative Aerosol Viral Transmission in the Era of SARS-CoV-2.

In operating theaters, ventilation systems are designed to protect the patient from airborne contamination for minimizing risks of surgical site infections (SSIs). Ventilation systems often produce an airflow pattern that continuously pushes air out of the area surrounding the operating table, and hence reduces the resident time of airborne pathogen-carrying particles at the patient's location. As a result, patient-released airborne particles due to the use of powered tools, such as surgical smoke and insufflated CO2, typically circulate within the room. This circulation exposes the surgical team to airborne infection-especially when operating on a patient with infectious diseases, including COVID-19. This study examined the flow pattern of functional ventilation configurations in view of developing ventilation-based strategies to protect both the patient and the surgical team from aerosolized infections. A favorable design that minimized particle circulation was deduced using experimentally validated numerical models. The parameters adapted to quantify circulation of airborne particles were particles' half-life and elevation. The results show that the footprint of the outlet ducts and resulting flow pattern are important parameters for minimizing particle circulation. Overall, this study presents a modular framework for optimizing the ventilation systems that permits a switch in operation configuration to suit different operating procedures.

Safety of limb lengthening after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an analysis of the MBSAQIP database.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) effectively treats severe obesity, but some patients may require revisional surgery like limb lengthening (LL) for postoperative weight gain. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare 30-day serious complications and mortality rates between LL and primary RYGB, given limited safety data on LL. METHODS: Patients who underwent LL and RYGB were identified from the 2020 and 2021 MBSAQIP databases, the only years in which LL data were available. Baseline characteristics and 30-day rates of serious complications and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 86,990 patients underwent RYGB and 455 underwent LL. Patients undergoing RYGB were younger (44.4 versus 49.8 yr, P < .001), had a higher body mass index (BMI) (45.5 versus 41.8 kg/m2, P < .001) and higher rates of comorbidities including diabetes (30.0 versus 13.6%, P < .001). RYGB and LL had similar operative duration (125.3 versus 123.2 min, P = .5). There were no statistical differences between cohorts for length of stay (LOS) (1.6 RYGB versus 1.6 LL d, P = .6). After LL, there were higher 30-day rates of reoperation (3.3 versus 1.9%, P = .03) and deep surgical site infections (1.3 versus .5%, P = .03) compared to RYGB. There were no differences in overall serious complications (5.1 LL versus 5.0% RYGB, P = 1.0) and mortality (.2 LL versus .1% RYGB, P = .5). Multivariable logistic regression adjustment found that previous venous thromboembolism was associated with serious complications after LL. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to primary RYGB, LL has a favorable safety profile with similar 30-day rates of serious complications and mortality.

Machine learning prediction of major adverse cardiac events after elective bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) is an emerging technology with the potential to predict and improve clinical outcomes including adverse events, based on complex pattern recognition. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after bariatric surgery have an incidence of 0.1% but carry significant morbidity and mortality. Prior studies have investigated these events using traditional statistical methods, however, studies reporting ML for MACE prediction in bariatric surgery remain limited. As such, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare MACE prediction models in bariatric surgery using traditional statistical methods and ML. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of the MBSAQIP database, from 2015 to 2019. A binary-outcome MACE prediction model was generated using three different modeling methods: (1) main-effects-only logistic regression, (2) neural network with a single hidden layer, and (3) XGBoost model with a max depth of 3. The same set of predictor variables and random split of the total data (50/50) were used to train and validate each model. Overall performance was compared based on the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 755,506 patients were included, of which 0.1% experienced MACE. Of the total sample, 79.6% were female, 47.8% had hypertension, 26.2% had diabetes, 23.7% had hyperlipidemia, 8.4% used tobacco within 1 year, 1.9% had previous percutaneous cardiac intervention, 1.2% had a history of myocardial infarction, 1.1% had previous cardiac surgery, and 0.6% had renal insufficiency. The AUC for the three different MACE prediction models was: 0.790 for logistic regression, 0.798 for neural network and 0.787 for XGBoost. While the AUC implies similar discriminant function, the risk prediction histogram for the neural network shifted in a smoother fashion. CONCLUSION: The ML models developed achieved good discriminant function in predicting MACE. ML can help clinicians with patient selection and identify individuals who may be at elevated risk for MACE after bariatric surgery.

Hiatal hernia repair after previous laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic hiatal hernia (HH) with pouch migration after previous laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an uncommon complication, with limited extant evidence for the utility of surgical repair. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presentation and resolution of symptoms in patients with HH repair after previous RYGB. SETTING: Multicenter University Hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted from 2010 to 2022. Patients with prior RYGB who were undergoing subsequent isolated HH repair were included. Patients undergoing incidental HH repair during concomitant revisional bariatric surgery were excluded. Baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes were evaluated and presented as medians (25th-75th percentile). RESULTS: Forty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. The time from RYGB to HH repair was 59 months (39-88). Body mass index at HH repair was 31 kg/m2 (27-39). The most common presenting symptoms of hernia were dysphagia (52%), gastric reflux (39%), and abdominal pain (36%). All HH repairs were completed with a minimally invasive approach (98% laparoscopic, 2% robotic). Nonabsorbable suture was used in 98% of patients, with bioabsorbable mesh in 30%. At a median 28-day (12-117) follow-up, 70% of patients reported full symptom resolution and 23% partial resolution. At follow-up, 2 patients had radiologic HH recurrence, with 1 requiring reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series of isolated HH repair for symptomatic pouch migration after previous RYGB. Common presenting symptoms are dysphagia and reflux, and surgical repair yields a high rate of symptom resolution in the short term. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the durability of this intervention.

The role of dietitian follow-ups on nutritional outcomes post-bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Current evidence recommends dietary counselling with a registered dietitian (RD) for successful weight loss after metabolic bariatric surgery; however, there are limited data on the effect of RD follow-ups on micronutrient deficiencies. This study evaluated the effects of the number of postoperative RD visits on nutritional outcomes, including weight loss and micronutrient deficiencies. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the number of postoperative registered dietitian visits on nutritional outcomes, including weight loss and micronutrient deficiencies after metabolic and bariatric surgery. SETTING: Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent bariatric surgery between September 2015 and June 2020. Demographics, weight loss, micronutrients, and the number of postoperative RD visits were evaluated. Baseline and 12-month postsurgery outcomes were compared based on the number of RD follow-ups. RESULTS: A total of 174 primary and 46 revisions were included. Patients were 73.6% female, with a mean age of 40 years. The initial mean body mass index was 42.8 kg/m2. Number of RD visits were as follows: 0-1 (39 patients), 2 (59 patients), 3 (55 patients), and 4 or more (67 patients). Baseline (pre-operative) micronutrient values were within normal range. In comparison with the reference group (REF = 0-1 post-op RD visits), patients with 3 RD visits had 7% higher total body weight loss (P < .001) and maintained micronutrients within the normal range at 12 months postoperative. Mean differences in postoperative values were statistically significant (P < .05) for weight, vitamin B12, and vitamin D but not for hemoglobin, ferritin, calcium, folate, vitamin B1, copper, and zinc. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that three or more RD visits during the first 12 months after bariatric surgery are associated with improved outcomes, including significant percent total body weight loss and lower rates of micronutrient deficiencies.

Revisional Procedures after Sleeve Gastrectomy for Weight Recurrence or Inadequate Weight Loss: An Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database.

INTRODUCTION: The safety of conversional bariatric procedures after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for weight recurrence (WR) or inadequate weight loss (IWL) is debated due to limited evidence. Conversion options include Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). We aimed to compare serious complications and mortality rates between these procedures within 30 days. METHODS: Using the 2020 and 2021 MBSAQIP databases, we identified patients who underwent a conversion from SG to RYGB, SADI, or BPD-DS. We performed a multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors of 30-day complications and mortality. RESULTS: Among 7388 patients (77.6% RYGB, 8.7% SADI, 13.7% BPD-DS), those undergoing SADI and BPD-DS had higher preoperative body mass index. Conversion reasons included WR (63.0%) and IWL (37.0%). SADI and BPD-DS patients had longer operative times (p < 0.001) and higher leak rates (p = 0.001). Serious complications, reoperations, readmissions, and 30-day mortality were similar across groups. Conversion procedure type was not an independent predictor of complications. CONCLUSION: RYGB was the most performed conversional procedure after SG. The study indicated a similar safety profile for revisional RYGB, SADI, and BPD-DS, with comparable 30-day complications and mortality rates. However, SADI and BPD-DS patients had longer operative time and higher leak rates.

Safety and Efficacy of Metabolic Surgery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the Middle East and North Africa Region: An Analysis of Primary Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic medical condition that results in significant health implications and reduced life expectancy. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimated that in 2021, 51.8% of all deaths of people under 60 years old in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region were related to diabetes. Bariatric surgery has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective treatment for T2D in different populations worldwide, though few specific data exist on outcomes of procedures in the MENA region. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and postoperative outcomes between patients with and without T2D undergoing primary bariatric surgery at a tertiary referral academic medical center in the United Arab Emirates. METHODS: All patients who underwent primary metabolic surgery between September 2015 and July 2020 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective database. Group 1 included patients with T2D, and Group 2 included patients without T2D. Patients undergoing revisional or correctional operations were excluded. The procedure performed was based on surgeon discretion in discussion with a multidisciplinary team and the patient. Demographics as well as perioperative and postoperative results were examined. RESULTS: Our study included 542 patients, 160 (29.5%) with T2D and 382 (70.5%) with non-T2D. Mean age was 44.5 years (range 16-70) in the T2D group and 33.3 years (range 15-63) in the non-T2D group; median BMI was 41.8 ± 7.3 and 43.2 ± 7.2, respectively. The T2D group was 37.5% male and 62.5% female, and the non-T2D group was 38.7% male and 61.3% female. There were no significant differences in comorbidities. In the T2D group, 45.6% of patients underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 54.4% sleeve gastrectomy. In the non-TD2 group, 42.7% of patients received Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 57.3% sleeve gastrectomy. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative ED visits (21.8% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.21), minor complications within 30 days (4.3% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.67), readmission rates (5.6% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.77), re-operation rates (3.7% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.11), median hospital stay (2.0 days vs. 3.0, p = 0.05), or complications after 30 days (6.2% vs. 11.2%, p = 0.07). There were no deaths either group. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients from the MENA region, bariatric surgery in T2D patients is safe and effective, with perioperative outcomes comparable to those of non-T2D patients. To the best of our knowledge, our postoperative findings, which are the first report in the MENA region, are consistent with studies published in North America and Europe.

Primary single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus sleeve gastrectomy to SADI conversions: a comparison study of prevalence and safety.

BACKGROUND: Conversion from sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) is becoming increasingly common, but data regarding safety is of these conversions is scarce. As such, the objective of this study was to compare the 30-day rate of serious complications and mortality of primary SADI (p-SADI-S) with SG to SADI (SG-SADI) conversions. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the MBSAQIP database. Patients undergoing p-SADI-S and SG-SADI were included. Data collection was limited to 2020 and 2021. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed between groups to determine if SG-SADI was an independent predictor of 30-day serious complications or mortality. RESULTS: A total of 783 patients were included in this study, 488 (62.3%) underwent p-SADI-S and 295 (37.6%) underwent SG-SADI. The mean body mass index (BMI) at the time of surgery was lower in the SG-SADI cohort (45.1 vs 51.4 kg/m2, p < 0.001). Indications for revision in the SG-SADI cohort included weight recurrence (50.8%), inadequate weight loss (41.0%), other (3.0%), GERD (2.7%), and persistent comorbidities (2.5%). SG-SADI had longer operative times (156.7 vs 142.1 min, p < 0.001) and was not associated with a higher rate of serious complications (5.7 vs 6.9%, p = 0.508) compared to p-SADI-S. p-SADI-S was associated with a higher rate of pneumonia (1.2 vs 0.0%, p < 0.001), and SG-SADI was not correlated with higher rates of reoperation (3.0 vs 3.2%, p = 0.861), readmission (5.4 vs 5.5%, p = 0.948) and death (0.0 vs 0.2%, p = 0.437). On multivariable analysis, SG-SADI was not independently predictive of serious complications (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.52, p = 0.514) when adjusting for age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, and operative time. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of SG-SADI is high, representing 37.6% of SADI-S procedures. Conversion from sleeve to SADI, is safe, and as opposed to other studies of revisional bariatric surgery, has similar 30-day complication rates to primary SADI-S.

Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in abdominal tissues and biologic fluids during abdominal surgery: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Viral transmission to healthcare providers during surgical procedures was a major concern at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The presence of the severe acute respiratory disease syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, in the abdominal cavity as well as in other abdominal tissues which surgeons are exposed has been investigated in several studies. The aim of the present systematic review was to analyze if the virus can be identify in the abdominal cavity. METHODS: We performed a systematic review to identify relevant studies regarding the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in abdominal tissues or fluids. Number of patients included as well as patient's characteristics, type of procedures, samples and number of positive samples were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 36 studies were included (18 case series and 18 case reports). There were 357 samples for detection of SARS-CoV-2, obtained from 295 individuals. A total of 21 samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (5.9%). Positive samples were more frequently encountered in patients with severe COVID-19 (37.5% vs 3.8%, p < 0.001). No health-care provider related infections were reported. CONCLUSION: Although a rare occurrence, SARS-CoV-2 can be found in the abdominal tissues and fluids. It seems that the presence of the virus in the abdominal tissues or fluids is more likely in patients with severe disease. Protective measures should be employed in the operating room to protect the staff when operating patients with COVID-19.

Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Indications, Prevalence, and Safety.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) frequently requires conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or weight recurrence. Current evidence evaluating the safety of conversion from SG to RYGB and its indications is limited to single centers. METHODS: The objective was to determine the rate of serious complications and mortality of conversion of SG to RYGB (SG-RYGB) compared to primary RYGB (P-RYGB). This was a retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP database which includes 30-day outcomes. Individuals undergoing P-RYGB or SG-RYGB were included. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine if revisional surgery was an independent predictor of serious complications or mortality. RESULTS: In 2020 and 2021, 84,543 (86.3%) patients underwent P-RYGB and 13,432 (13.7%) underwent SG-RYGB. SG-RYGB cohort had lower body mass index, lower rates of diabetes and hypertension, and higher rates of GERD. GERD was the most common indication for revision (55.3%) followed by weight regain (24.4%) and inadequate weight loss (12.7%). SG-RYGB had longer operative times (145 vs. 125 min, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of serious complications (7.2 vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001). This included higher rates of anastomotic leak (0.5 vs. 0.4%, p = 0.002), bleeding (2.0 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), and reoperation (3.0 vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001) but not death (0.1 vs. 0.1%, p = 0.385). On multivariable analysis, SG-RYGB was independently predictive of serious complications (OR 1.21, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.32, p < 0.001) but not mortality (p = 0.316). CONCLUSIONS: While SG-RYGB is safe with a low complication rate, SG-RYGB was associated with a higher rate of serious complications compared to P-RYGB.

A nationwide analysis of median arcuate ligament release between 2010 and 2020: a NSQIP Study.

BACKGROUND: Median arcuate ligament syndrome is a rare disease with overlapping symptoms of broad foregut pathology. Appropriately selected patients can benefit from a laparoscopic or open median arcuate ligament release. Institutional series have reported the outcomes of open and laparoscopic techniques but there are no nationwide analysis comparing both techniques and overall trends in treatment. METHODS: Cross-sectional study using the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project from 2010 to 2020. Celiac artery compression syndrome cases were identified by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes and categorized as open or laparoscopic. Trends in the use of each technique and 30-day complications were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 578 open cases (76%) and 185 laparoscopic cases (24%) were identified. There was an increase adoption of the laparoscopic approach, with 22% of the cases employing this technique at the end of the study period, compared to 7% at the beginning of the study period. The open group had a higher prevalence of hypertension (26% vs 18%, p = 0.04) and bleeding disorders (5% vs 2%, p 0.03). Laparoscopic approach had a shorter length of stay (2.3 days vs 5.2 days, p < 0.0001), lower major complication rates (0.5% vs 4.0%, p = 0.02) and lower reoperation rates (0% vs 2.6%, p = 0.03). Overall mortality was 0.1%. CONCLUSION: Overall numbers of surgical intervention for treatment of median arcuate ligament increased during this timeframe, as well as increased utilization of the laparoscopic approach. It appears to be an overall safe procedure, offering lower rates of complications and shorter length of stay.

Redefiniendo la era de la cirugía digital: el rol de la inteligencia artificial, la realidad aumentada y el aprendizaje automático en el campo quirúrgico / Redefining the Era of Digital Surgery: The Role of Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Reality, and Machine Learning in the Surgical Field / Redefinindo a era da cirurgia digital: o papel da inteligência artificial, realidade aumentada e aprendizado de máquina no campo cirúrgico

La era de la cirugía digital se caracteriza por la implementación de nuevas tecnologías que tienen el potencial de mejorar la planeación prequirúrgica, incrementar la disponibilidad de alternativas terapéuticas, mejorar el entrenamiento quirúrgico en aprendices, optimizar los resultados postoperatorios de los pacientes y, a su vez, reducir posibles eventos adversos (1). A pesar de que la incorporación de estas tecnologías tiene como premisa principal mejorar los resultados clínicos de los pacientes, el uso de estos avances se ha visto acelerado por intereses comerciales y por las oportunidades que tienen las grandes compañías de generar ganancias a nivel mundial (2). Entre las tecnologías que en la actualidad están teniendo un impacto directo en el campo quirúrgico se resaltan la inteligencia artificial (IA), la realidad aumentada (RA) y el aprendizaje automatizado (AA), sin dejar de lado la disponibilidad de dispositivos robóticos de uso cotidiano (3). A pesar de que la cirugía digital cada vez gana más popularidad en la práctica clínica, en la actualidad aún existe una falta de conocimiento de esta, de sus beneficios y de las potenciales barreras para su adopción.

The era of digital surgery is characterized by the implementation of new technologies that have the potential to improve preoperative planning, increase the availability of therapeutic alternatives, improve surgical training in apprentices, optimize postoperative results for patients, and reduce possible adverse events (1). Although the incorporation of these technologies has the main premise of improving patients' clinical outcomes, the use of these advances has been accelerated by commercial interests and the opportunities that large companies have to generate profits worldwide (2). The technologies that are currently having a direct impact on the surgical field are artificial intelligence (AI), augmented reality (AR), and machine learning (ML), without forgetting the availability of other robotic devices (3). Although digital surgery is gaining more popularity in the clinical practice, there is still a lack of knowledge about it, its benefits, and potential barriers to its adoption.

A era da cirurgia digital é caracterizada pela implementação de novas tecnologias que têm o potencial de melhorar o planejamento pré-cirúrgico, aumentar a disponibilidade de alternativas terapêuticas, melhorar o treinamento cirúrgico dos aprendizes, otimizar os resultados pós-operatórios dos pacientes e, por sua vez, reduzir possíveis eventos adversos (1). Embora a incorporação dessas tecnologias tenha como principal objetivo melhorar os resultados clínicos dos pacientes, a utilização desses avanços tem sido acelerada por interesses comerciais e pelas oportunidades que grandes empresas têm de gerar lucros em todo o mundo (2). Entre as tecnologias que atualmente têm impacto direto no campo cirúrgico se destacam a inteligência artificial (IA), a realidade aumentada (RA) e o aprendizagem de máquinas (AM), sem deixar de lado a disponibilidade de dispositivos robóticos para uso cotidiano (3). Embora a cirurgia digital esteja ganhando cada vez mais popularidade na prática clínica, atualmente ainda há falta de conhecimento sobre ela, seus benefícios e possíveis barreiras para sua adoção.

Stiffness Assessment and Lump Detection in Minimally Invasive Surgery Using In-House Developed Smart Laparoscopic Forceps.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) incorporates surgical instruments through small incisions to perform procedures. Despite the potential advantages of MIS, the lack of tactile sensation and haptic feedback due to the indirect contact between the surgeon's hands and the tissues restricts sensing the strength of applied forces or obtaining information about the biomechanical properties of tissues under operation. Accordingly, there is a crucial need for intelligent systems to provide an artificial tactile sensation to MIS surgeons and trainees. This study evaluates the potential of our proposed real-time grasping forces and deformation angles feedback to assist surgeons in detecting tissues' stiffness. A prototype was developed using a standard laparoscopic grasper integrated with a force-sensitive resistor on one grasping jaw and a tunneling magneto-resistor on the handle's joint to measure the grasping force and the jaws' opening angle, respectively. The sensors' data are analyzed using a microcontroller, and the output is displayed on a small screen and saved to a log file. This integrated system was evaluated by running multiple grasp-release tests using both elastomeric and biological tissue samples, in which the average force-to-angle-change ratio precisely resembled the stiffness of grasped samples. Another feature is the detection of hidden lumps by palpation, looking for sudden variations in the measured stiffness. In experiments, the real-time grasping feedback helped enhance the surgeons' sorting accuracy of testing models based on their stiffness. The developed tool demonstrated a great potential for low-cost tactile sensing in MIS procedures, with room for future improvements. Significance: The proposed method can contribute to MIS by assessing stiffness, detecting hidden lumps, preventing excessive forces during operation, and reducing the learning curve for trainees.

Resuming Bariatric Surgery Procedures During COVID-19 Pandemic: Early Surgical Outcomes at a Tertiary Referral Center in the Middle East.

Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, elective surgical procedures have been delayed. Even with the implementation of surgical societies' recommendations, patient safety remains a concern. This study evaluates the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing bariatric surgery after reopening (RO) elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: All patients who underwent bariatric surgery from September 2015 to July 2020 were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts: the pre-COVID-19 (PC) cohort and the RO cohort. Propensity score weighting was used to evaluate postoperative outcomes. Results: Our study included 1076 patients, 1015 patients were in the PC and 61 patients in the RO. Sixty-four percent were female with a mean age of 37 years and median body mass index of 41 kg/m2. There were no statistically significant differences in 30 days perioperative outcomes, including emergency department visits 24.8% PC versus 19.7% RO (p = 0.492), readmission 4.2% PC versus 8.2% RO (p = 0.361), reoperation 2.6% PC versus 0% RO (p = 0.996), and major complications 4.0% PC versus 4.9% RO (p = 0.812). No patients in the RO contracted COVID-19. Conclusions: With the appropriate policies and precautionary measures, there appear to be no differences in the 30-day postoperative outcomes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.