Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 163(5): 986-991, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32600116

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) at a high-volume facility affects survival. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. SETTING: National Cancer Database (2004-2014). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for sinonasal SCC from 2004 to 2014. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and classification, resection margins, treatment regimen, and facility case-specific volume-averaged per year and grouped in tertiles as low (0%-33%), medium (34%-66%), and high (67%-100%)-were compared. Overall survival was compared with Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 3835 patients treated for sinonasal SCC between 2004 and 2014 were identified. Therapeutic options included surgery alone (18.6%), radiotherapy (RT) alone (29.1%), definitive chemoradiation (15.4%), surgery with adjuvant RT (22.8%), and combinations (14.1%) of the aforementioned treatments. Patients who underwent surgery with adjuvant RT had better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; P < .001; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86). As for treatment volume per facility, 7.4% of patients were treated at a low-volume center, 17.5% at a medium-volume center, and 75.1% at a high-volume center. Univariate analysis showed that treatment at a high-volume facility conferred a significantly better overall survival (HR, 0.77; P = .002). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex, tumor classification, and treatment regimen, demonstrated that patients who underwent treatment at a high-volume facility (HR, 0.81; P < .001) had significantly improved survival. CONCLUSION: This study shows a better overall survival for sinonasal SCC treated at high-volume centers. Further study may be needed to understand the effect of case volume on the paradigms of sinonasal SCC management.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Hospitals, High-Volume , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Chemoradiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/mortality , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/surgery , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL