ABSTRACT
Sterility is a commonly observed phenotype in interspecific hybrids. Sterility may result from chromosomal or genic incompatibilities, and much progress has been made toward understanding the genetic basis of hybrid sterility in various taxa. The underlying mechanisms causing hybrid sterility, however, are less well known. The pachytene checkpoint is a meiotic surveillance system that many organisms use to detect aberrant meiotic products, in order to prevent the production of defective gametes. We suggest that activation of the pachytene checkpoint may be an important mechanism contributing to two types of hybrid sterility. First, the pachytene checkpoint may form the mechanistic basis of some gene-based hybrid sterility phenotypes. Second, the pachytene checkpoint may be an important mechanism that mediates chromosomal-based hybrid sterility phenotypes involving gametes with non-haploid (either non-reduced or aneuploid) chromosome sets. Studies in several species suggest that the strength of the pachytene checkpoint is sexually dimorphic, observations that warrant future investigation into whether such variation may contribute to differences in patterns of sterility between male and female interspecific hybrids. In addition, plants seem to lack the pachytene checkpoint, which correlates with increased production of unreduced gametes and a higher incidence of polyploid species in plants versus animals. Although the pachytene checkpoint occurs in many animals and in fungi, at least some of the genes that execute the pachytene checkpoint are different among organisms. This finding suggests that the penetrance of the pachytene checkpoint, and even its presence or absence can evolve rapidly. The surprising degree of evolutionary flexibility in this meiotic surveillance system may contribute to the observed variation in patterns of hybrid sterility and in rates of polyploidization.
Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Chimera/genetics , Infertility/genetics , Meiosis , Ploidies , Animals , Evolution, Molecular , Female , Fungi/genetics , Genetic Speciation , Hybridization, Genetic , Male , Plants/geneticsABSTRACT
The Drosophila melanogaster mutation Hmr rescues inviable hybrid sons from the cross of D. melanogaster females to males of its sibling species D. mauritiana, D. simulans, and D. sechellia. We have extended previous observations that hybrid daughters from this cross are poorly viable at high temperatures and have shown that this female lethality is suppressed by Hmr and the rescue mutations In(1)AB and D. simulans Lhr. Deficiencies defined here as Hmr(-) also suppressed lethality, demonstrating that reducing Hmr(+) activity can rescue otherwise inviable hybrids. An Hmr(+) duplication had the opposite effect of reducing the viability of female and sibling X-male hybrid progeny. Similar dose-dependent viability effects of Hmr were observed in the reciprocal cross of D. simulans females to D. melanogaster males. Finally, Lhr and Hmr(+) were shown to have mutually antagonistic effects on hybrid viability. These data suggest a model where the interaction of sibling species Lhr(+) and D. melanogaster Hmr(+) causes lethality in both sexes of species hybrids and in both directions of crossing. Our results further suggest that a twofold difference in Hmr(+) dosage accounts in part for the differential viability of male and female hybrid progeny, but also that additional, unidentified genes must be invoked to account for the invariant lethality of hybrid sons of D. melanogaster mothers. Implications of our findings for understanding Haldane's rule-the observation that hybrid breakdown is often specific to the heterogametic sex-are also discussed.
Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Genes, Lethal , Animals , Female , Gene Deletion , Gene Duplication , Genes, Dominant , Hot Temperature , Hybridization, Genetic , Male , Species SpecificityABSTRACT
Snf, encoded by sans fille, is the Drosophila homolog of mammalian U1A and U2B" and is an integral component of U1 and U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs). Surprisingly, changes in the level of this housekeeping protein can specifically affect autoregulatory activity of the RNA-binding protein Sex-lethal (Sxl) in an action that we infer must be physically separate from Snf's functioning within snRNPs. Sxl is a master switch gene that controls its own pre-mRNA splicing as well as splicing for subordinate switch genes that regulate sex determination and dosage compensation. Exploiting an unusual new set of mutant Sxl alleles in an in vivo assay, we show that Snf is rate-limiting for Sxl autoregulation when Sxl levels are low. In such situations, increasing either maternal or zygotic snf(+) dose enhances the positive autoregulatory activity of Sxl for Sxl somatic pre-mRNA splicing without affecting Sxl activities toward its other RNA targets. In contrast, increasing the dose of genes encoding either the integral U1 snRNP protein U1-70k, or the integral U2 snRNP protein SF3a(60), has no effect. Increased snf(+) enhances Sxl autoregulation even when U1-70k and SF3a(60) are reduced by mutation to levels that, in the case of SF3a(60), demonstrably interfere with Sxl autoregulation. The observation that increased snf(+) does not suppress other phenotypes associated with mutations that reduce U1-70k or SF3a(60) is additional evidence that snf(+) dose effects are not caused by increased snRNP levels. Mammalian U1A protein, like Snf, has a snRNP-independent function.
Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Gene Dosage , Ribonucleoprotein, U1 Small Nuclear/physiology , Ribonucleoprotein, U2 Small Nuclear/physiology , Alleles , Animals , Drosophila/genetics , Homeostasis , Male , RNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , RNA-Binding Proteins/physiology , Ribonucleoprotein, U1 Small Nuclear/genetics , Sex Determination Processes , TransgenesABSTRACT
Adenine nucleotide translocases (ANT) are required for the exchange of ADP and ATP across the inner mitochondrial membrane. They are essential for life, and most eukaryotes have at least two different Ant genes. Only one gene had been described from Drosophila, and this had not been characterized genetically. We show that mutations in this gene correspond to the previously described loci, sesB and l(1)9Ed. Immediately adjacent to this gene is another encoding a second ANT protein, which has 78% identity to that encoded by sesB/l(1)9Ed. These two genes are transcribed from a common promoter, and their mRNAs are produced by differential splicing. Hutter and Karch suggested that the sesB ANT gene corresponded to Hmr, a gene identified by an allele that rescues otherwise inviable interspecific hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species. This hypothesis is not supported by our study of the ANT genes of D. melanogaster.
Subject(s)
Mitochondrial ADP, ATP Translocases/genetics , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Base Sequence , Evolution, Molecular , Humans , Mice , Mitochondrial ADP, ATP Translocases/chemistry , Molecular Sequence Data , Phenotype , Phylogeny , Rats , Restriction Mapping , Sequence Alignment , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid , Sequence Homology, Nucleic AcidABSTRACT
The Drosophila protein Sex-lethal (Sxl) contains two RNP consensus-type RNA-binding domains (RBDs) separated by a short linker sequence. Both domains are essential for high-affinity binding to the single-stranded polypyrimidine tract (PPT) within the regulated 3' splice site of the transformer (tra) pre-mRNA. In this paper, the effect of RNA binding to a protein fragment containing both RBDs from Sxl (Sxl-RBD1 + 2) has been characterized by heteronuclear NMR. Nearly complete (85-90%) backbone resonance assignments have been obtained for unbound and RNA-bound states of Sxl-RBD1 + 2. A comparison of amide 1H and 15N chemical shifts between free and bound states has highlighted residues which respond to RNA binding. The beta-sheets in both RBDs (RBD1 and RBD2) form an RNA interaction surface, as has been observed in other RBDs. A significant number of residues display different behavior when comparing RBD1 and RBD2. This argues for a model in which RBD1 and RBD2 of Sxl have different or nonanalogous points of interaction with the tra PPT. R142 (in RBD2) exhibits the largest chemical shift change upon RNA binding. The role of R142 in RNA binding was tested by measuring the Kd of a mutant of Sxl-RBD1 + 2 in which R142 was replaced by alanine. This mutant lost the ability to bind RNA, showing a correlation with the chemical shift difference data. The RNA-binding affinities of two other mutants, F146A and T138I, were also shown to correlate with the NMR observations.
Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Protein Structure, Secondary , RNA Precursors/chemistry , RNA Precursors/metabolism , RNA-Binding Proteins/chemistry , RNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Base Sequence , Binding Sites , Computer Simulation , Drosophila melanogaster , Insect Hormones/chemistry , Insect Hormones/metabolism , Models, Molecular , Molecular Sequence Data , Mutagenesis, Site-Directed , Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular , Recombinant Proteins/chemistry , Recombinant Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
The abdomen of adult Drosophila, like that of other insects, is formed by a continuous epithelium spanning several segments. Each segment is subdivided into an anterior (A) and posterior (P) compartment, distinguished by activity of the selector gene engrailed (en) in P but not A compartment cells. Here we provide evidence that Hedgehog (Hh), a protein secreted by P compartment cells, spreads into each A compartment across the anterior and the posterior boundaries to form opposing concentration gradients that organize cell pattern and polarity. We find that anteriorly and posteriorly situated cells within the A compartment respond in distinct ways to Hh: they express different combinations of genes and form different cell types. They also form polarised structures that, in the anterior part, point down the Hh gradient and, in the posterior part, point up the gradient - therefore all structures point posteriorly. Finally, we show that ectopic Hh can induce cells in the middle of each A compartment to activate en. Where this happens, A compartment cells are transformed into an ectopic P compartment and reorganise pattern and polarity both within and around the transformed tissue. Many of these results are unexpected and lead us to reassess the role of gradients and compartments in patterning insect segments.
Subject(s)
Body Patterning/physiology , Cell Polarity/physiology , Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila/growth & development , Epidermal Cells , Insect Proteins/analysis , Transcription Factors , Abdomen/growth & development , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Drosophila/chemistry , Embryonic Induction , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Hedgehog Proteins , Homeodomain Proteins/analysis , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Insect Proteins/genetics , PleuraABSTRACT
The epidermis of the adult Drosophila abdomen is formed by a chain of anterior (A) and posterior (P) compartments, each segment comprising one A and one P compartment. In the accompanying paper (Struhl et al., 1997), we provide evidence that Hedgehog protein (Hh), being secreted from P compartment cells, organises the pattern and polarity of A compartment cells. Here we test whether Hh acts directly or by a signal relay mechanism. We use mutations in Protein Kinase A (PKA) or smoothened (smo) to activate or to block Hh signal transduction in clones of A compartment cells. For cell type, a scalar property, both manipulations cause strictly autonomous transformations: the cells affected are exactly those and only those that are mutant. Hence, we infer that Hh acts directly on A compartment cells to specify the various types of cuticular structures that they differentiate. By contrast, these same manipulations cause non-autonomous effects on cell polarity, a vectorial property. Consequently, we surmise that Hh influences cell polarity indirectly, possibly by inducing other signalling factors. Finally, we present evidence that Hh does not polarise abdominal cells by utilising either Decapentaplegic (Dpp) or Wingless (Wg), the two morphogens through which Hh acts during limb development. We conclude that, in the abdomen, cell type and cell polarity reflect distinct outputs of Hh signalling and propose that these outputs are controlled by separable gradient and signal relay mechanisms.
Subject(s)
Body Patterning/physiology , Cell Polarity/physiology , Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila/growth & development , Insect Proteins/analysis , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled , Signal Transduction/physiology , Abdomen/growth & development , Animals , Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases/genetics , Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases/physiology , Drosophila/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Hedgehog Proteins , Insect Proteins/genetics , Insect Proteins/physiology , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Mutation , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/physiology , Receptors, Cell Surface/genetics , Receptors, Cell Surface/physiology , Smoothened Receptor , Wnt1 ProteinABSTRACT
Drosophila sex is determined by the action of the X:A chromosome balance on transcription of Sex-lethal (Sxl), a feminizing switch gene. We obtained loss-of-function mutations in denominator elements of the X:A signal by selecting for dominant suppressors of a female-specific lethal mutation in the numerator element, sisterlessA (sisA). Ten suppressors were recovered in this extensive genome-wide selection. All were mutations in deadpan (dpn), a pleiotropic locus previously discovered to be a denominator element. Detailed genetic and molecular characterization is presented of this diverse set of new dpn alleles including their effects on Sxl. Although selected only for impairment of sex-specific functions, all were also impaired in nonsex-specific functions. Male-lethal effects were anticipated for mutations in a major denominator element, but we found that viability of males lacking dpn function was reduced no more than 50% relative to their dpn- sisters. Moreover, loss of dpn activity in males caused only a modest derepression of the Sxl "establishment" promoter (Sxlpe), the X:A target. By itself, dpn cannot account for the masculinizing effect of increased autosomal ploidy, the effect that gave rise to the concept of the X:A ratio; nevertheless, if there are other denominator elements, our results suggest that their individual contributions to the sex-determination signal are even less than that of dpn. The time course of expression of dpn and of Sxl in dpn mutant backgrounds suggests that dpn is required for sex determination only during the later stages of X:A signaling in males to prevent inappropriate expression of Sxlpe in the face of increasing sis gene product levels.