Evaluation of Soft-Tissue Hematomas With Real-Time, Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Pilot Study With Preliminary Findings.

ABSTRACT: In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to detect active hemorrhage in patients presenting with soft-tissue hematomas. Adult patients with clinically suspected, actively bleeding hematomas were prospectively enrolled. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound was used to assess for contrast extravasation. Ultrasound results were compared with those of multidetector computed tomographic (MDCT) imaging, operative findings, and clinical course. Sixteen patients (9 women, 7 men; mean age, 69 [SD, 13] years) were enrolled. Thirteen patients underwent MDCT imaging during their initial visit, and for 11, CEUS and computed tomography (CT) findings were concordant. The remaining patients had a negative CEUS study that was consistent with their clinical course. In 8 patients, CT imaging showed active extravasation (6 arterial, 1 indeterminate, 1 slow venous). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and CT findings were concordant for all cases of arterial bleeding. For 1 patient, CEUS provided superior diagnostic information by identifying a pseudoaneurysm. The 2 discrepant patient cases had a ≥3-hour delay between CT and CEUS, and in 1 patient, CEUS was limited by body habitus. The second patient had no active bleeding identified in the operating room. Compared with CT, CEUS had a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 100%, respectively, and positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 71%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 85% in this limited study. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a promising alternative to MDCT in select patients and may sometimes provide superior clinical information. Limiting factors are large hematoma size, unfavorable anatomic location, and body habitus.

Ultrasound-Guided Great Saphenous Vein Access: Revisiting an Old Friend in a New Location.

BACKGROUND: Early recognition of difficult intravenous (i.v.) access and use of ultrasound-guided techniques prior to multiple attempts are important steps in improving patient care in the emergency department (ED). Success rates for ultrasound-guided peripheral i.v. (PIV) cannulation are affected by depth, size of target vessel, and predictability of anatomy. The great saphenous vein (GSV) in the medial distal thigh may provide an alternative site for ultrasound-guided cannulation in cases of difficult peripheral venous access. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine the feasibility of ultrasound-guided GSV PIV placement as an alternative site for patients with difficult i.v. access. METHODS: Participants were prospectively enrolled from a convenience sample of patients presenting to the ED in June and July 2019. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years and older, and a history of difficult i.v. access or two unsuccessful nursing staff attempts. Ultrasound-guided access was conducted with an in-plane or out-of-plane approach on the basis of proceduralist preference. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled; 1 patient withdrew consent prior to cannulation. GSV cannulation was successful in 14 (73.7%) of the 19 patients. Phlebotomy, blood transfusion, i.v. medications including norepinephrine, and i.v. computed tomography contrast medium were successfully performed via GSV access. No reported infection, thrombosis, or extravasation was identified throughout the cannulation dwell time, hospitalization, or for 72 h after discharge. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided GSV PIV placement is a feasible alternative in situations of difficult i.v. access. No unforeseen complication or safety issue was identified. Blood products, medications, and contrast medium were successfully administered safely.