BDP/FF NEXThaler to Improve Asthma Control Status in the Real World: The NEWTON Study.

In this article, we discuss the importance of real-world data in the treatment of patients with asthma and specifically the role of maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) with beclometasone dipropionate (BDP)/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (FF) delivered through a dry-powder inhaler (DPI) that contains an extrafine formulation. We also present the design of the NEWTON study. This multinational, multicenter, prospective, observational study will evaluate the real-world use of extrafine BDP/FF via a DPI as maintenance therapy and MART in patients with moderate to severe asthma. The study's primary outcome will be the proportion of patients improving their asthma control. Digitally collected patient-reported outcomes, such as the 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire, the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level, and the Test of the Adherence to Inhalers, will be used to assess the patient's asthma control, quality of life, and treatment adherence. Moreover, a new patient-reported outcome, the "Speed of change in health feeling" questionnaire, will be validated in a subgroup of patients. Overall, the results of this study will provide a real-life assessment of patients who perceived clinical benefits in a large cohort of asthmatics in Europe treated as per current clinical practice.

Exploring quality of life and satisfaction with treatment in asthmatic patients receiving dry powder inhalers: a multinational survey.

INTRODUCTION: The quality of life (QoL) and device needs have not been characterized in asthmatic patients treated via dry powder inhalers (DPIs). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of asthma on health-related QoL, device satisfaction, and preference in adult asthmatic patients using DPI devices, and to identify any DPI-associated unmet needs. METHODS: An online survey was conducted between November and December 2019 on eligible patients from the Cint consumer panel across Europe. Newly designed, as well as validated questionnaires were used to collect data on QoL and inhaler satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 1063 asthmatic patient took part in the survey; 66% of the patients reported medium or high impact of asthma on the overall QoL. The majority of patients (61%) reported high level of satisfaction with their current device. The patients with medium-to-high impact of asthma on QoL were significantly less likely to be satisfied with their current device (55%) than those who reported low-to-medium impact of asthma on QoL (67%; p-value < 0.001). "Higher number of available doses," "usability," "clear dose counter," and "feedback on correct inhalation" were the attributes mostly requested from a new device. The demand for user-friendly devices that provide feedback on correct drug administration was identified as an unmet need. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In asthmatic patients with medium to high impact of asthma on the overall QoL, the satisfaction with the device is highly affected.

Targeting the Small Airways with Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Beta Agonist Dry Powder Inhalers: A Functional Respiratory Imaging Study.

Background: Peripheral deposition of inhaled medication is important as small airway disease has a key role in asthma. In this study, we compared the lung deposition at different mean flow rates of three inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) combinations delivered by dry powder inhaler (DPI), that is, Foster NEXThaler® (extrafine formulation of beclomethasone/formoterol), Relvar Ellipta® (fluticasone furoate/vilanterol trifenatate), and Symbicort Turbohaler® (budesonide/formoterol). Materials and Methods:In vitro drug delivery parameters were applied to lung computerized tomography (CT) scans of 20 asthma patients by functional respiratory imaging (FRI). Aerosol airway deposition patterns were calculated as percentage (standard deviation) intrathoracic versus extrathoracic deposition, percentage peripheral deposition, and central-to-peripheral (C/P) ratio at different inspiratory mean flow rates. Results: At 60 and 40 L/min, intrathoracic deposition of ICS/LABA was significantly higher with NEXThaler versus Ellipta. Peripheral deposition (60 L/min) with NEXThaler was higher than Ellipta for ICS (24.7% [3.5%] vs. 5.0% [2.0%]; p < 0.001) and LABA (25.3% [3.5%] vs. 13.0% [3.0%]; p < 0.001). C/P ratio with NEXThaler was lower (indicating higher peripheral deposition) than Ellipta (ICS: 0.63 vs. 1.63; LABA: 0.63 vs. 0.99). Inspiratory flow rate did not impact lung deposition with NEXThaler or Ellipta. In contrast, Turbohaler performance was negatively impacted by decreasing inspiratory flow rate. In fact, although lung deposition with Turbohaler was similar to that of NEXThaler at 60 L/min, lung deposition with Turbohaler was significantly lower than NEXThaler at both 40 L/min (∼30%) and 30 L/min (∼50%). Conclusions: Using FRI, we demonstrated better peripheral deposition and C/P ratios of ICS/LABA with NEXThaler versus Ellipta. NEXThaler demonstrated inspiratory flow rate independency of lung deposition versus Turbohaler. These findings suggest that the extrafine formulation is superior to large particle formulations in delivering ICS/LABA consistently both to the large and small airways.

Inspiratory flow profile and usability of the NEXThaler, a multidose dry powder inhaler, in asthma and COPD.

BACKGROUND: Inhaler selection is important when managing respiratory conditions; a patient's inhalation technique should be appropriate for the selected device, and patients should ideally be able to use a device successfully regardless of disease severity. The NEXThaler is a multidose dry-powder inhaler with a breath-actuated mechanism (BAM) and dose counter that activates only following inhalation, so effectively an 'inhalation counter'. We assessed inspiratory flow through the NEXThaler in two studies and examined whether inhalation triggered the BAM. METHODS: The two studies were open-label, single-arm, and single visit. One study recruited patients with asthma aged ≥ 18 years; the other recruited patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) aged ≥ 40 years. All patients inhaled twice through a placebo NEXThaler. The inspiratory profile through the device was assessed for each inhalation using acoustic monitoring, with flow at and time to BAM firing, peak inspiratory flow (PIF), and total inhalation time assessed. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled in the asthma study: 20 with controlled asthma and 20 with partly controlled/uncontrolled asthma. All patients were able to trigger the BAM, as evidenced by the inhalation counter activating on closing the device. Mean flow at BAM firing following first inhalation was 35.0 (range 16.3-52.3) L/min; mean PIF was 64.6 (35.0-123.9) L/min. A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the COPD study, with data analysed for 69 (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s 48.7% predicted [17-92%]). As with the asthma study, all patients, regardless of airflow limitation, were able to trigger the BAM. Mean flow at BAM firing following first inhalation was 41.9 (26.6-57.1) L/min; mean PIF was 68.0 (31.5-125.4) L/min. Device usability was rated highly in both studies, with 5 min sufficient to train the patients, and a click heard shortly after inhalation in all cases (providing feedback on BAM firing). CONCLUSIONS: Inhalation flows triggering the BAM in the NEXThaler were similar between patients with controlled and partly controlled/uncontrolled asthma, and were similar across COPD airflow limitation. All enrolled patients were able to activate the device.

ICS/formoterol in the management of asthma in the clinical practice of pulmonologists: an international survey on GINA strategy.

BACKGROUND: The treatment with short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) alone is no longer recommended due to safety issues. Instead, the current Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Report recommends the use of the combination of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with the rapid/long-acting beta-2 agonist formoterol, although the use in steps 1 and 2 is still off-label in the EU and in many countries. It is important to understand clinicians' knowledge and opinions on the issue with the ultimate goal to encourage the implementation of the new approach in clinical practice. METHODS: We performed an international survey, directed to pulmonologists interested in the management of patients with asthma. RESULTS: Most participants reported that SABA alone should not be used in GINA Step 1 asthma treatment. As-needed low-dose ICS/formoterol combination to patients in step 1, and as-needed low-dose ICS/formoterol as reliever therapy in any step were found to be of current use prescribed in their real-life settings. SABA alone was still prescribed to a proportion of patients, although the pulmonologists' opinion was that it should no longer be used. CONCLUSIONS: Most specialists are up to date and understand the relevance of the changes in GINA reports from 2019. Nevertheless, dissemination and implementation of GINA novel management strategy is still needed.