Outcome improvement with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in primary, localized, radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast region: a retrospective case series analysis.

BACKGROUND: We report on a series of consecutive patients with localized radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast region (BR) treated at two Italian sarcoma reference centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of primary, localized, resectable RAAS of the BR, treated at one of the two participating institutions from 2000 to 2019. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. The prognostic role of several variables was investigated. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was carried out. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were retrospectively identified. Nineteen out of 84 patients (22.6%) were pretreated with an anthracycline-based regimen for previous cancer. All patients but one underwent surgery, with 37/84 (44.1%) receiving surgery alone and 46/84 (54.8%) a multimodal approach: 18/84 (21.4%) received radiation therapy (RT) and 46/84 (54.9%) received chemotherapy. An anthracycline-based regimen was used in 10/84 patients (11.9%), while a gemcitabine-based regimen was used in 33/84 (39.3%). With a median follow-up of 51 months (interquartile range: 30-126 months), 36/84 patients (42.9%) relapsed and 35/84 patients (41.7%) died (8/84, 9.5% in the lack of metastatic disease). Five-year OS and 5-year RFS were 57% [95% confidence interval (CI) 43% to 68%] and 52% (95% CI 39% to 63%), respectively. Both (neo)adjuvant RT and chemotherapy were associated with better RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.83; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.89] with a trend towards a better OS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.18-1.46; HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.29-1.24). Gemcitabine-based regimens seemed to perform better (HR 4.28, 95% CI 1.29-14.14). PSM analysis retained the above results. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study supports the use of (neo)adjuvant RT and chemotherapy, in primary, localized resectable RAAS of the BR. An effort to prospectively validate the role of (neo)adjuvant RT and chemotherapy is warranted.

Diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous biopsy in retroperitoneal sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous biopsy is recommended before surgery for suspected retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) to confirm the histological diagnosis and guide surgical strategy. The present study aimed to establish the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy with respect to histological diagnosis and tumour grade. METHODS: Data on patients with suspected RPS who underwent percutaneous biopsy followed by surgical resection between 2005 and 2016 at one of two tertiary European sarcoma units were reviewed. Histological tumour type and tumour grade on biopsy were correlated with postoperative histology to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients underwent percutaneous core biopsy followed by surgical resection in Milan (163, 68·2 per cent) or Birmingham (76, 31·8 per cent). Diagnostic accuracy varied with histological diagnosis (P < 0·001), but demonstrated overall concordance with final pathology following resection in 67·2 per cent of biopsies (κ = 0·606). The majority of discrepancies occurred in dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), owing to under-recognition of dedifferentiation in this group. Concordance between pathology on biopsy and resection improved to 81·1 per cent when DDLPS and well differentiated liposarcoma were grouped together as liposarcoma. Grade on biopsy was concordant with grade on resection specimen in 60·4 per cent of tumours (κ = 0·640). Diagnosis of high-grade tumours on biopsy had a high specificity (98 per cent), and moderate positive predictive value (85 per cent) and negative predictive value (78 per cent). CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of DDLPS or leiomyosarcoma on percutaneous biopsy is highly reliable. High-grade sarcomas can be identified with high specificity, which opens the door to a study on neoadjuvant therapy in these patients.

Activity of axitinib in progressive advanced solitary fibrous tumour: Results from an exploratory, investigator-driven phase 2 clinical study.

BACKGROUND: To explore the activity of axitinib in advanced solitary fibrous tumour (SFT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this investigator-driven phase II study on axitinib in advanced and progressive SFT, patients received axitinib, 5 mg bis in day (BID), until progression or limiting toxicity. Pathologic diagnosis was centrally reviewed, distinguishing malignant SFT (M-SFT) and high-grade/dedifferentiated SFT (HG/D-SFT) subtypes. The primary end-point was the overall response rate (ORR) by Choi criteria (Choi). Secondary end-points were response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: From April 2015 and October 2017, 17 eligible patients entered the study (metastatic: 17; SFT subtype: 13 M-SFT, 4 HG/D-SFT; prior treatment: 9 antiangiogenics, 5 cytotoxics). All patients were evaluable for response. The best Choi response was seven partial response (PR) (ORR, 41.2%), six stable disease (SD) and four progressions. Choi-ORR was 54% (7/13) when only M-SFTs were considered. Four of seven responsive patients were pretreated with pazopanib. No responses were detected in HG/D-SFT. Best RECIST response was one PR (5.9%), 14 SD and two progressions. Toxicity was as expected. Median Choi-PFS was 5.1 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.5-14.8) months. Median Choi-PFS was 14.8 (IQR: 5.1-18.0) and 2.8 (IQR: 2.0-5.9) months for patients responsive and non-responsive by Choi, respectively (p = 0.0416). At a 14.4-month median follow-up, median OS was 25.3 months. CONCLUSION: This study showed that axitinib is active in progressive advanced SFT. One-half of patients carrying the malignant variant of the disease responded, with a >12-month median progression arrest. Responses were better detected with Choi and seen even in patients resistant to other antiangiogenics. Tolerability was good.

Correlation between radiological assessment and histopathological diagnosis in retroperitoneal tumors: analysis of 291 consecutive patients at a tertiary reference sarcoma center.

OBJECTIVES: Aim of study was to assess the correlation between computed tomography scan (CT) findings and histopathology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected on consecutive patients with suspected retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) referred to a tertiary sarcoma center. Patients underwent contrast enhanced multi-detector CT scans. Radiological features of lesions were classified according to the presence of a fatty (Group A) mass, or non-fatty (Group B) mass, both subdivided according to homogeneity and intralesional high-contrasted appearance. Radiological classification was compared with histopathological diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 291 patients, 103/291 (35.4%) masses were classified in Group A and 188/291 (64.6%) in Group B. Diagnosis of mesenchymal tumor was obtained in 231/291 cases (79%) and non-mesenchymal tumor in 60/291 (21%). Sensitivity and specificity of Group A for liposarcoma were 76.7% and 92.0%; PPV and NPV were 86.4% and 85.6%. Sensitivity of Group B for a mesenchymal tumor was 55.4% and specificity was 0%; PPV and NPV were 68.1% and 0%. CONCLUSIONS: None of radiological criteria were sufficient to anticipate a specific diagnosis, with the only exception of well differentiated liposarcoma and angiomyolipoma. In a series of suspected RPS, 21% of the lesions were finally non-mesenchymal tumors.

Head and neck soft tissue sarcomas: prognostic factors and outcome in a series of patients treated at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a rare disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty-seven patients underwent surgery at our institution with an eradicating intent between 1990 and 2010. Local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM) and disease-specific mortality (DSM) incidence were studied along with clinicopathological prognostic factors. RESULTS: Ten-year crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of LR, DM and DSM were 19%, 11% and 26%, respectively (median follow-up 66 months). Independent prognostic factors for DSM were tumor size (P < 0.001) and grade (P = 0.032), while surgical margins obtained a border-line significance (0.070); LR was affected by the tumor size (P = 0.001), while DM only by grade (P = 0.047). The median survival after LR and DM were 14 months and 7 months, respectively. Tumors sited in the paranasal sinus and supraclavicular region had the worst survival. CONCLUSIONS: Head and neck represent a very critical anatomical site for STS. Achievement of local disease control appears to be crucial, since even LR could be a life-threatening event.