Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
2.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 161(8): 1657-1667, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31243562

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Spheno-orbital meningiomas are complex tumours involving the sphenoid wing and orbit. Various surgical strategies are available but treatment remains challenging and patients often require more than one surgical procedure. This study evaluated whether smaller surgical approaches and newer reconstructive methods impacted the surgical and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing repeat surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for a spheno-orbital meningioma at a single tertiary centre between 2005 and 2016. We recorded procedural details and analysed complications, postoperative visual status and patient-reported cosmetic outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-four procedures were performed in 31 patients (M:F 12:22, median age 49 years) including 19 (56%) primary operations and 15 (44%) repeat procedures. Seven patients (20.5%) had a pterional craniotomy, 19 (56%) had a standard orbitozygomatic craniotomy and 8 (23.5%) underwent a modified mini-orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Calvarial reconstruction was required in 19 cases with a variety of techniques used including titanium mesh (63%), PEEK (26%) and split calvarial bone graft (5%). Total tumour resection (Simpson grade I-II) was significantly higher in patients undergoing primary surgery compared with those having repeat surgery (41% and 0%, respectively; p = 0.0036). Complications occurred in 14 cases (41%). Proptosis improved in all patients and visual acuity improved or remained stable in 93% of patients. Cosmetic outcome measures were obtained for 18 patients (1 = very poor; 5 = excellent): 1-2, 0%; 3, 33%; 4, 28%; 5, 39%. Tumour recurrence requiring further surgery occurred in four patients (12%). There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between patients undergoing primary or repeat surgery. CONCLUSION: Spheno-orbital meningiomas are highly complex tumours. Surgical approaches should be tailored to the patient but good clinical and cosmetic outcomes may be achieved with a smaller craniotomy and custom-made implants, irrespective of whether the operation is the patient's first procedure.


Subject(s)
Craniotomy/methods , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery , Meningioma/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Orbital Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Craniotomy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sphenoid Bone/surgery , Visual Acuity
3.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 101(3): 220-225, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30698457

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are of profound significance in neurosurgical departments, resulting in high morbidity and mortality. There are limited public data regarding the incidence of SSIs in neurosurgery. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of SSIs (particularly those requiring reoperation) over a seven-year period and identify factors leading to an increased risk. METHODS: An age matched retrospective analysis was undertaken of a series of 16,513 patients at a single centre. All patients who required reoperation for suspected SSIs within a 7-year period were identified. Exclusion criteria comprised absence of infective material intraoperatively and patients presenting with primary infections. Clinical notes were reviewed to confirm presence or absence of suspected risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 16,513 patients in the study, 1.20% required at least one further operation to treat a SSI. Wound leak (odds ratio [OR]: 27.41), dexamethasone use (OR: 3.55), instrumentation (OR: 2.74) and operative duration >180 minutes (OR: 1.85) were statistically significant risk factors for reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first UK study of such a duration that has documented a SSI reoperation rate in a cohort of this size. Various risk factors are associated with the development of SSIs, making it essential to have robust auditing and monitoring of high risk patients to ensure excellent standards of healthcare. Departmental and public registers to record all SSIs may be beneficial, particularly for those treated solely by general practitioners, allowing units to address potential risk factors prior to surgical intervention.


Subject(s)
Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Operative Time , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Female , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Humans , Incidence , Male , Medical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Neurosurgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/instrumentation , Neurosurgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , United Kingdom/epidemiology
4.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 100(3): 216-220, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29493353

ABSTRACT

Introduction Conservative management of patients with a stable vestibular schwannoma (VS) places a significant burden on National Health Service (NHS) resources and yet patients' surveillance management is often inconsistent. Our unit has developed a standardised pathway to guide surveillance imaging of patients with stable VS. In this article, we provide the basis for our imaging protocol by reviewing the measurement, natural history and growth patterns of VS, and we present a cost analysis of implementing the pathway both regionally and nationally. Methods Patients with an extrameatal VS measuring ≤20mm in maximal diameter receive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) six months after their index imaging, followed by three annual MRI scans, two two-year interval MRI scans, a single three-year interval MRI scan and then five-yearly MRI scans to be continued lifelong. Patients with purely intrameatal tumours follow the same protocol but the initial six-month imaging is omitted. A cost analysis of the new pathway was modelled on our unit's retrospective data for 2015 and extrapolated to reflect the cost of VS surveillance nationally. Results Based on an estimation that imaging surveillance would last approximately 25 years (+/- 10 years), the cost of implementing our regional surveillance programme would be £151,011 per year (for 99 new referrals per year) and it would cost the NHS £1,982,968 per year if implemented nationally. Conclusions A standardised surveillance pathway promotes safe practice in the conservative management of VS. The estimated cost of a national surveillance programme compares favourably with other tumour surveillance initiatives, and would enable the NHS to provide a safe and economical service to patients with VS.


Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment/standards , Critical Pathways/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Neuroma, Acoustic/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Conservative Treatment/economics , Conservative Treatment/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Critical Pathways/economics , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Neuroma, Acoustic/economics , Neuroma, Acoustic/therapy , Retrospective Studies , State Medicine/economics , Time Factors , United Kingdom
5.
Tech Coloproctol ; 8 Suppl 1: s164-6, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15655610

ABSTRACT

In the past two years two patients with carcinoid tumours have been operated in Chios General Hospital. These two cases gave rise to our review of the literature concerning the therapy and follow-up of colorectal carcinoid tumours. We demonstrate the differences among surgeons concerning the acceptable and relevant indications for a hemicolectomy in appendiceal carcinoids and the prevailing aspects in the therapy of carcinoid of the colon and rectum. Finally we present the imaging techniques and the biochemical examinations that are proven of value and therefore should be used in the post-surgery follow-up.


Subject(s)
Appendiceal Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoid Tumor/surgery , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Appendiceal Neoplasms/mortality , Appendiceal Neoplasms/pathology , Biopsy, Needle , Carcinoid Tumor/mortality , Carcinoid Tumor/pathology , Colectomy/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL