Incisional Complications and Cosmetic Evaluation After Hand-assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic (HARP) donor nephrectomy prevents major complications, but incision site complications may be more frequent in hand-assisted approach. We evaluated long-term incisional complication rates and cosmetic outcomes after HARP donor nephrectomy in our series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 609 donors who underwent nephrectomy between February 2009 and June 2016 were invited for physical examination and face-to-face interview. A total of 209 donors (35.3%) participated to the study. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), mean follow-up period, incision-related outcomes of cosmesis, and postoperative complications were evaluated. Body image scale (BIS) and cosmetic scale (CS) (scar test) questionnaires were applied. Higher cosmesis and body image scores indicated greater satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 191 donors had paramedian (91.4%), and 18 donors had Pfannenstiel incision (8.6%); 121 donors were female (57.9%). The donor mean age and BMI were 49.1 (SD, 1.8) years and 29.7 (SD, 5.1), respectively. Body mass index was significantly lower in the Pfannenstiel group (P < .001). The mean BIS score was 18.9 (SD, 1.8), and the CS questionnaire score was 19.3 (SD, 4,7). The BIS score was significantly better in donors with Pfannenstiel incisions (P < .001), but there was no statistical significance in CS score. The total rate of wound infection was 4.8%, and rate of incisional hernia was 4.8%. The rate of incisional hernia was more frequent in donors with paramedian incision (5.2%), but there was no statistical significance. Six donors (2.9%) required rehospitalization because of incision site complications. CONCLUSION: Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy avoids intra-abdominal complications, but rate of incision site complications can be higher in hand-assisted procedure. The donors were convinced from the cosmetic outcome after HARP donor nephrectomy. The ones who had Pfannenstiel incision had better satisfaction according to BIS score.

Introducing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy after Experience in Hand-Assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Approach.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RALDN) can help to improve donor safety by enabling enhanced precision, flexibility, control, and vision. We are presenting our initial series during the introduction of RALDN by comparing our adopted surgical technique, hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (HARPDN), performed at the same time interval. METHODS: We performed 12 RALDN and 27 HARPDN with Pfannenstiel incision between March 2018 and July 2018. We evaluated the demographics, operation duration, warm/cold ischemia time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and donor and recipient serum creatinine levels retrospectively. RESULTS: Demographics including sex, mean of age, and body mass index of the 2 groups were similar. Five cases were right sided nephrectomy in the HARPDN group. We performed only left sided donor nephrectomy in the RALDN group. The duration of operation and warm ischemia time was significantly longer in the robot-assisted group (P < .001). Postoperative major complications were not detected in any of the donors. The function of the transplanted kidneys in both groups was good on the fifth day and 1 month postoperatively. CONCLUSION: We introduced the robot-assisted approach for donor candidates who are not suitable candidates for HARPDN in our center. The operation time and warm ischemia time was longer in the RALDN group, but it did not have any impact on outcome. The robot-assisted donor nephrectomy technique can be introduced safely in centers experienced in the hand-assisted approach.

Hand-Assisted Nephrectomy Predisposes Incisional Herniation in Obese Living Donors.

BACKGROUND: Living kidney donation from donors with a body mass index (BMI) over 30 can bring risks for the donor and the recipients. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the effect of a donor's obesity on a donor's long-term surveillance and the recipient outcomes. METHOD: We performed hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy in 565 living kidney transplantations between February 2009 and December 2015. One hundred fifty-two donors (26.9%) had a BMI > 30 and were described as the obese group. Four hundred thirteen donors (73.1%) were described as the nonobese group and had a BMI < 30. Incision to kidney removal time, mean follow-up period, postoperative complications, weight gained after surgery, and serum creatinine level (postop day 1-end of follow-up) were recorded for the donors. Serum creatinine level (postop day 5-end of follow-up) and immediate function of transplanted kidney were recorded for the recipients. RESULTS: The obese donors were older, and the female sex was dominant. Mean incision to kidney removal period was longer in the obese patients (P = .012). The mean follow-up period was 49.97 ± 28.40 months for the donors. There was no significant difference in donor kidney function between the groups. The incidence of herniation was significantly higher in the obese group (P = .021). There was no significant difference between the recipient early and late serum creatinine levels and slow and delayed graft functions after the transplantation. CONCLUSION: Postoperative kidney functions concerning the outcomes of the obese and nonobese living donors were similar in our series. Donor BMI had no influence on early and late kidney functions of the recipients. There was no difference in postoperative complications, except incisional hernia, that was statistically more significant in the obese donors.

Mental Distress Symptoms and Life Satisfaction Among Living Kidney Donors: Frequency and Association With Subjective Evaluations.

The aims of this study were to (1) determine psychological states and wellbeing of living kidney donors and (2) assess their interaction and association with subjective evaluations of donors. This retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted with 208 living kidney donors (123 women; 59.1%), aged between 22 and 79 years (48.74 ± 11.78) who underwent a nephrectomy between 2006 and 2017. All donors were evaluated face-to-face. The sociodemographic data collection form, a 4-question survey developed by researchers for subjective evaluations, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Contentment with Life Assessment Scale (CLAS) were administered. Only few donors, 3.8% and 7.2% respectively, were above the clinical cut off scores of the BDI and BAI. This was equivalent to the normal population. Eighty percent of respondents were satisfied with life. Only 5 donors (2.4%) claimed to have any regrets about their experience and scored higher for depression and lower for life satisfaction (P < .001). Similarly, 33 (15.9%) donors having thoughts of getting ill easily after the operation were found to be more depressive and anxious, with lower life satisfaction (P < .001). In most cases their relationship to the recipient was reported not to be changed (64.4%) or even improved (32.5%), and that was found to be related to lower depression scores (P < .001). Respondents within the first year of donation reported higher depression (P = .019) and lower life satisfaction (P = .001) scores. Finally, postoperative complications were found to increase anxiety and lower life satisfaction (P = .018, P = .026). Degree of affinity between donors and recipients showed no difference in postoperative psychological outcomes and life satisfaction. These results suggest that overall, living kidney donation does not have a negative impact on donors' life satisfaction and mental status in the long term. However, the results of the unvalidated additional survey questions underlined the importance of follow-up of donors, especially in the first year, and screening of donors' subjective experiences in gaining additional insight about donors' mental well-being.

Short- and long-term results of harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy versus stapler hemorrhoidopexy in treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.

PURPOSE: In this prospective randomized study, our aim is to compare the short- and long-term results of harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy (HSH) and stapler hemorrhoidopexy (SH) methods in the surgical treatment of Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoidal disease. METHODS: Ninety-nine consecutive patients diagnosed with Grade III or Grade IV internal hemorrhoidal disease were included in the study. Patients were randomized to HSH (n = 48) or SH (n = 51) treatments. Data on patient demographic and clinical characteristics, operative details, postoperative pain score on a visual analog scale, additional analgesic requirement, postoperative short- and long-term complications, and recurrence of hemorrhoidal disease were also recorded. Patients were regularly followed for a total period of 24 (6-36) months. RESULTS: The patient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups. The operative time was significantly shorter in the HSH group compared with the SH group. Overall pain scores were not significantly different between the groups, although severe pain was significantly more common in the HSH group. Recurrence was significantly lower in the HSH group compared with the SH group. CONCLUSION: HSH and SH are both safe and effective methods for surgical treatment of Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoidal disease. In our study, the HSH method was determined to be safer, easier, and faster to perform, and associated with fewer long-term recurrences than the SH method.

Clinical evaluation of a temporary fecal containment device for non-surgical fecal diversion in perineal burns.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of a temporary fecal containment device (Flexi-Seal® FMS) in our burn center. METHODS: All patients in whom temporary fecal containment devices were applied for perineal burns between August 2008 and August 2009 in our institution were reviewed. Demographics, etiology of burns, total body surface area (TBSA) burned, intensive care unit (ICU) need, early mortality, and post-application data were obtained from a prospectively designed database. In addition, some variables were investigated as potential risks factors for fecal leakage. RESULTS: The mean age of patients (n=15) was 43.1±22.1 years, and 66.7% of the patients were male. The mean %TBSA burned was 40.7±16.6. Fecal leakage was seen in 6 patients. Local infection in the perineum was observed in 6 patients, including 4 of the 6 patients with fecal leakage. The mortality rate was 33% (5 deaths). All exitus patients had 50% or more TBSA burned. Electrical burn injury was found as a significant risk factor for fecal leakage in surviving patients (p<0.05). Autologous split-thickness grafting was performed in 8 patients without complication. The mean duration of catheterization was 22.5±5.7 days. Except for superficial mucosal erosion in the distal rectum in 2 cases, no complication was observed. The mean hospitalization time was 46.7±12.7 days. CONCLUSION: If the safety of these devices is proven in further prospective, high-volume studies, they may reduce the necessity of diverting stoma operation in burn patients.