Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 48(8): 414-419, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37055185

ABSTRACT

This study reports the needs-based development, effectiveness and feasibility of a novel, comprehensive spinal cord stimulation (SCS) digital curriculum designed for pain medicine trainees. The curriculum aims to address the documented systematic variability in SCS education and empower physicians with SCS expertise, which has been linked to utilization patterns and patient outcomes. Following a needs assessment, the authors developed a three-part SCS e-learning video curriculum with baseline and postcourse knowledge tests. Best practices were used for educational video production and test-question development. The study period was from 1 February 2020 to 31 December 2020. A total of 202 US-based pain fellows across two cohorts (early-fellowship and late-fellowship) completed the baseline knowledge assessment, while 122, 96 and 88 participants completed all available post-tests for Part I (Fundamentals), Part II (Cadaver Lab) and Part III (Decision Making, The Literature and Critical Applications), respectively. Both cohorts significantly increased knowledge scores from baseline to immediate post-test in all curriculum parts (p<0.001). The early-fellowship cohort experienced a higher rate of knowledge gain for Parts I and II (p=0.045 and p=0.027, respectively). On average, participants viewed 6.4 out of 9.6 hours (67%) of video content. Self-reported prior SCS experience had low to moderate positive correlations with Part I and Part III pretest scores (r=0.25, p=0.006; r=0.37, p<0.001, respectively). Initial evidence suggests that Pain Rounds provides an innovative and effective solution to the SCS curriculum deficit. A future controlled study should examine this digital curriculum's long-term impact on SCS practice and treatment outcomes.


Subject(s)
Physicians , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Humans , Pain , Curriculum , Treatment Outcome , Pain Management
2.
Neuromodulation ; 26(1): 206-214, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35840522

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is a prevalent disorder manifesting with widespread musculoskeletal pain and central sensitization, as well as fatigue, sleep issues, psychologic distress, and poor quality of life. Patients with fibromyalgia also may be diagnosed with other painful conditions amenable to treatment with spinal cord stimulation (SCS), although it is unclear how these patients respond to SCS compared with patients without fibromyalgia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an 11-year, multicenter, retrospective matched cohort study comparing SCS-treated patients with fibromyalgia and those without fibromyalgia. The primary outcome was comparison in mean calculated percentage pain relief between cohorts at six months after SCS implantation. Secondary outcomes included comparison of patient satisfaction between six and 12 months after SCS implantation, and percentage of patients reporting opioid intake and neuropathic medication intake at six months and 12 months after SCS implantation. Adjusted regression analysis was performed to make comparisons while adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, preoperative opioid intake, and preoperative neuropathic medication intake. RESULTS: Of 90 patients with fibromyalgia who underwent SCS trial, 18 patients (20%) failed their SCS trial and did not proceed toward implantation. Sixty-eight patients with fibromyalgia were matched to 141 patients in the control cohort based on age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score. At six months after SCS implantation, there was no statistical difference in calculated percentage change in pain intensity between the fibromyalgia cohort (46.6 ± 29.0) and the control cohort (50.9 ± 32.8; ß, -18.4; 95% CI, -44.3 to 7.6; p = 0.157). At baseline, a greater percentage of patients in the fibromyalgia cohort reported preoperative opioid intake (51.5% vs 22.7%, p < 0.001) and preoperative neuropathic medication intake (67.6% vs 15.6%, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference between cohorts in the percentage of patients taking opioid or neuropathic medications at six months and 12 months after SCS implantation. Similarly, there was no difference between cohorts in the percentage of patients reporting satisfaction between six and 12 months. CONCLUSION: Patients with fibromyalgia who received a diagnosis approved for treatment with SCS may expect similar post-SCS-implantation pain relief, overall satisfaction, and analgesic use rate to those of patients without fibromyalgia.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Fibromyalgia , Neuralgia , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Humans , Fibromyalgia/drug therapy , Fibromyalgia/etiology , Spinal Cord Stimulation/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , Neuralgia/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Spinal Cord , Chronic Pain/therapy
3.
Adv Ther ; 39(10): 4440-4473, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35994195

ABSTRACT

Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a form of selective neuromodulation therapy that targets the dorsal root ganglion. DRG-S offers analgesia in a variety of chronic pain conditions and is approved for treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There has been increasing utilization of DRG-S to treat various neuropathic pain syndromes of the lower extremity, although evidence remains limited to one randomized controlled trial and 39 observational studies. In this review, we appraised the current evidence for DRG-S in the treatment of lower extremity neuropathic pain using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity after DRG-S compared to baseline. We stratified presentation of results based of type of neuropathy (CRPS, painful diabetic neuropathy, mononeuropathy, polyneuropathy) as well as location of neuropathy (hip, knee, foot). Future powered randomized controlled trials with homogeneous participants are warranted.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes , Neuralgia , Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/therapy , Ganglia, Spinal/physiology , Humans , Lower Extremity , Neuralgia/therapy
4.
J Evid Based Integr Med ; 27: 2515690X221078006, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35225720

ABSTRACT

Slow deep breathing (SDB) may help patients with acute pain. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the effects of SDB on acute pain. Secondary aims include investigating the effects of SDB on acute pain-related physical and emotional functioning. An a priori protocol was registered and a database search was conducted by a reference librarian. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were eligible for inclusion and exclusion criteria included studies of SDB for non-pain indications and studies that applied SDB as a component of an encompassing intervention. The risk or bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects model. A total of 11 968 studies were screened and seven RCTs met inclusion criteria; five were judged to have low risk of bias. Meta-analysis of post-intervention pain scores demonstrated that SDB was associated with significantly lower pain scores compared with a control group, but with high levels of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyzes demonstrated that trials of burn pain were associated with a larger reduction in pain which partially explains the heterogeneity. Very low certainty evidence suggests that SDB may reduce acute pain intensity. Further research is needed to identify patients who are candidates for SDB and determine the best approach to deliver this therapy.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain , Acute Pain/therapy , Adult , Bias , Humans , Pain Measurement , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
5.
Clin J Pain ; 38(5): 320-327, 2022 02 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35132023

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High-frequency (10-kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) continues to be an emerging therapy in chronic pain management. The same complications that plagued earlier SCS systems may affect newer stimulation technologies, although there is limited data on the type of complications and surgical management of these complications. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically examine real-world complications associated with 10-kHz SCS reported on the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MAUDE database was queried for entries reported between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. Entries were classified into procedural complications, device-related complications, patient complaints, surgically managed complications, serious adverse events, and/or other complications. Primary outcomes included type and frequency of complications, and surgical management of complications. RESULTS: A total of 1651 entries were analyzed. Most entries were categorized as procedural complications (72.6%), followed by serious adverse events (10.5%), device-related complications (10.5%), and patient complaints (9.9%). Most complications were managed surgically with explant (50.9%) rather than revision (5.0%) or incision/drainage (6.6%). Of procedural complications, the most common entries included non-neuraxial infection (52.9%), new neurological symptoms (14.7%), and dural puncture (9.5%). Of device-related complications, the most common entries included lead damage (41.6%), erosion (18.5%), and difficult insertion (11.5%). CONCLUSION: This retrospective 5-year analysis of complications from10-kHz SCS provides a real-world assessment of safety data unique for this stimulation modality. This analysis may help inform future clinical decisions, lead to device enhancement and optimization, and improve mitigation of risks to provide safe and efficacious use of 10-kHz SCS.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Stimulation , Databases, Factual , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Cord Stimulation/adverse effects , Spinal Nerve Roots , Spinal Puncture
6.
Neuromodulation ; 25(7): 965-969, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34077614

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chronic neuropathic groin pain develops in a significant number of postsurgical patients; however, multiple etiologies have been identified, and this makes it a challenging condition to treat. While treatment often involves a multimodal approach, advancements in neuromodulation technology, particularly dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation, have benefited patients plagued by chronic pain refractory to standard treatment modalities. Our goal was to provide a definitive source of information for interventional pain physicians regarding groin pain and the use of DRG stimulation for its treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this narrative review, we provide an overview of groin pain and discuss potential pain generators. We also outline appropriate treatment options with particular interest on DRG stimulation. Lastly, we provide a narrative review of the published literature regarding DRG stimulation for chronic groin pain from a variety of etiologies. CONCLUSION: DRG stimulation has emerged as an alternative neuromodulatory technique for patients with chronic groin pain. While previous studies suggest substantial sustained pain relief with DRG stimulation in this patient population, prospective randomized controlled studies are necessary before formal recommendations can be made.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Neuralgia , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Chronic Pain/therapy , Ganglia, Spinal/physiology , Groin , Humans , Neuralgia/therapy , Pelvic Pain , Prospective Studies , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods
8.
J Anesth ; 34(6): 841-848, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32696093

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) is a central sleep-related breathing disorder, characterized by either the persistence or emergence of central sleep apnea during the initiation of positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. The purpose of this study was to review the perioperative course of patients diagnosed with TECSA. METHODS: We reviewed medical records of patients with TECSA who had a procedure or surgery with general anesthesia between January 1, 2009 and May 1, 2018. We describe postoperative outcomes including respiratory complications, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and other postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 150 (116 male, 34 female) patients with TECSA. Of these, 39 (26%) had their anesthesia recovery associated with moderate to profound sedation, 22 (14.7%) required unplanned transfer to ICU (8 for hypoxemia). Compared to patients without ICU admissions, patients with unplanned ICU admissions had higher rates of cardiovascular disease, Charlson comorbid scores, and perioperative benzodiazepines. Within the first 30 postoperative days there were 23 (16%) hospital re-admissions, and 7 (4.6%) deaths. CONCLUSION: Patients with TECSA have high rates of postoperative complications, characterized by an increased rate of unplanned intensive care admissions and both high 30-day readmission and mortality rates. When dealing with these patients perioperative physicians should implement an increased level of respiratory monitoring, and early postoperative use of their home prescribed non-invasive ventilation devices.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Sleep Apnea, Central , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Female , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Postoperative Period , Sleep Apnea, Central/epidemiology , Sleep Apnea, Central/therapy , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...