Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Sex Transm Infect ; 89(6): 504-8, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23354525

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Submission of self-collected penile samples collected at home could remove barriers that men face in getting tested for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). METHODS: From December 2006 to July 2012, sexually active men aged ≥14 years were recruited by an educational internet program (http://www.iwantthekit.org) which offered free testing for Trichomonas vaginalis infection. Kits were ordered online and swabs were sent via US mail to the laboratory and tested by nucleic acid amplification tests. Demographics and sexual risk factors were accessed by questionnaires. Men called or were contacted to receive their results. Risk factors for trichomonas infection were determined by multivariate logistic regression RESULTS: Of 4398 men requesting kits, 1699 (38.6%) returned swabs by mail (55.4% returned in 2012). Forty-one percent of men were aged <25 years, 43% were black subjects and 45% were white. The overall prevalence for trichomonas in the 1699 men was 3.7%; the highest prevalence by age group was for men aged 40-49 years (5.2%) and, by year, 216 men screened in 2008 had the highest prevalence (12.5%). Risk factors for 919 men whose risk information was collected by questionnaire (prevalence 6.0%) indicated that 9.6% had a concurrent chlamydia infection. Significantly associated risks factors included: black race (adjusted OR 2.67), residence in Illinois (OR 12.02), age 30-39 years (OR 6.63) and age >40 years (OR 5.31). CONCLUSIONS: A fairly high prevalence of trichomonas and sexual risk factors were demonstrated from internet recruitment of men. This method of engaging men to get screened for trichomonas may augment screening in STI clinics.


Subject(s)
Penis/parasitology , Self Administration/methods , Specimen Handling/methods , Trichomonas Infections/diagnosis , Trichomonas vaginalis/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Illinois , Internet , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Parasitology/methods , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
2.
Sex Transm Infect ; 89(4): 305-7, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23093735

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Self-obtained penile-meatal swabs and urine specimens have been used for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) for outreach screening in men. OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity of self-collected male penile-meatal swabs and urine for the detection of CT, NG and TV. METHODS: Matching penile-meatal swabs and urines were collected at home after recruitment to the study; via the internet programme, http://www.iwantthekit.org. The instructions directed the participant to place the tip of a Copan flocked swab at the meatal opening of the urethra to collect the penile-meatal sample. Two ml of urine was collected after the swab onto a Copan sponge-on-a-shaft collection device. Both swab and urine were placed into individual Aptima transport media tubes and mailed to the laboratory for testing. All specimens were tested for CT and NG using the GenProbe Aptima Combo2 Assay and for TV using GenProbe Aptima Analyte Specific Reagents with TV oligonucleotides. RESULTS: Of 634 men, 86 (13.6%) were positive for CT, 9 (1.4%) were positive for NG and 56 (9.3%) positive for TV. For CT, swab sensitivity was 81/86 (94.2%), and urine sensitivity was 66/86 (76.7%). For NG, swab sensitivity was 9/9 (100%) and urine sensitivity was 8/9 (88.9%). For TV, swab sensitivity was 45/56 (80.4%) and urine sensitivity was 22/56 (39.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Self-obtained penile-meatal swabs provided for the detection of more CT, NG and TV, than urine specimens.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia trachomatis/metabolism , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/metabolism , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Penis , Specimen Handling/methods , Trichomonas vaginalis/metabolism , Urethra/microbiology , Urethra/parasitology , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Chlamydia trachomatis/genetics , Humans , Male , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genetics , Penis/microbiology , Penis/parasitology , Self Care , Sensitivity and Specificity , Trichomonas vaginalis/genetics
3.
Sex Transm Infect ; 89(2): 108-14, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22984085

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a promising new point-of-care (POC) chlamydia test with traditional nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), and to determine the characteristics that would make a POC test most cost-effective. METHODS: A decision tree was constructed to model chlamydia screening visits to a sexually transmitted disease clinic by a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 women. The model incorporated programmatic screening costs, treatment costs and medical costs averted through prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and its sequelae. Parameter values and costs were estimated for each node in the decision tree based on primary data, published data and unpublished health data. RESULTS: For the base-case scenario (POC sensitivity 92.9%; 47.5% of women willing to wait 40 min for test results; test cost $33.48), POC was estimated to save US$5050 for each case of PID averted compared with NAAT. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated that POC would dominate NAAT if the POC test cost is

Subject(s)
Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Lymphogranuloma Venereum/diagnosis , Point-of-Care Systems/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/economics , Female , Humans , United States , Young Adult
4.
Sex Transm Dis ; 38(9): 815-20, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21844736

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recommended population-wide Chlamydia trachomatis screening of sexually active women less than 26 years of age, more than half of sexually active young women are not routinely screened. A Website (IWTK, www.iwantthekit.org), was developed in 2004 to promote home-based sample collection. METHODS: A decision tree was designed to model a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 women per year who order an internet-based C. trachomatis screening kit. We compared the incremental cost-effectiveness of 2 screening strategies: self-sampling via the IWTK website, and traditional, clinic-based screening by the same cohort of women who used IWTK. Probabilities and costs were estimated for each node in the decision tree. Estimates were derived from primary data, published data, and unpublished health data. RESULTS: The internet-based screening strategy prevented 35.5 more cases of pelvic inflammatory disease and saved an additional $41,000 in direct medical costs as compared with the clinic-based screening strategy. CONCLUSION: Our model estimates demonstrated that an internet-based, self-swab screening strategy was cost-effective compared with the traditional, clinic-based screening strategy. Assuming that the popularity of the use of the internet as a resource for information about healthcare and sexually transmitted infections leads to an increased use of IWTK, the public health benefit of this cost-effective strategy will be even greater.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Internet , Mass Screening/economics , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Chlamydia Infections/economics , Chlamydia Infections/prevention & control , Chlamydia trachomatis/genetics , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Decision Trees , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Public Health , Self Administration/economics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vaginal Smears/economics
5.
Sex Transm Dis ; 35(7): 649-55, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18461013

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia screening strategies that use different methods of specimen collection: cervical swabs, urines, and self-obtained vaginal swabs. METHODS: A decision analysis was modeled for a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 per year of women attending sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics. Incremental cost-effectiveness of 4 screening strategies were compared: 1) Endocervical DNA probe test (PACE2, Gen-Probe), 2) Endocervical AC2 (Aptima Combo 2, Gen-Probe), 3) Self-Obtained Vaginal AC2, and 4) Urine AC2. Sensitivities of the vaginal, urine, and cervical AC2 tests were derived from 324 women attending STD clinics. The primary outcome was cases of pelvic inflammatory disease prevented. The model incorporated programmatic screening and treatment costs and medical cost savings from sequelae prevented. RESULTS: Chlamydia prevalence in the sampled population was 11.1%. Sensitivities of vaginal, urine, and cervical AC2 were 97.2%, 91.7%, and 91.7%, respectively. The sensitivity of the DNA probe was derived from the literature and estimated at 68.8%. The self-obtained vaginal AC2 strategy was the least expensive and the most cost-effective, preventing 17 more cases of pelvic inflammatory disease than the next least expensive strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a vaginal swab to detect Chlamydia in this STD clinic population was cost-saving and cost-effective.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Mass Screening/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Chlamydia Infections/economics , Chlamydia Infections/prevention & control , Chlamydia trachomatis/genetics , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Female , Humans , Maryland/epidemiology , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/microbiology , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/prevention & control , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Self Administration , Sensitivity and Specificity , Urinalysis/economics , Urinalysis/methods , Vaginal Smears/economics , Vaginal Smears/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL