Adolescents with spondylolysis have lower SRS-22 scores than controls and peers with pre-operative idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: The Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22) is a health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) tool for scoliosis patients. Since no equivalent questionnaire exists for spondylolysis patients, we characterized patient-reported scores in pediatric spondylolysis patients using the SRS-22, and compared these scores to previously published values for age-matched controls and patients with pre-operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: A single-institution cross-sectional observational study was performed using SRS-22 data from spondylolysis patients aged 12-18 years. Mean SRS-22 domain scores were compared to the existing literature values for adolescent control and AIS cohorts via unpaired Student t tests (α = 0.05) and against minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). RESULTS: Thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Mean (± SD) spondylolysis patients' scores met the MCID across all domains except Mental Health (α= 0.05). Spondylolysis patient scores for Pain, Function, and Self-Image were significantly lower (p < 0.01) than AIS patients (Pain; 2.99 ± 0.66 vs 4.14 ± 0.79; Function; 3.81 ± 0.61 vs 4.09 ± 0.54; Self-Image; 3.45 ± 0.70 vs 3.80 ± 0.68). CONCLUSION: The adolescent spondylolysis population has clinically significantly lower SRS-22 scores compared to age-matched controls and AIS patients, suggesting that the SRS-22 questionnaire should be given to this population to assess patients' HRQL. Further research is needed to assess the utility of the SRS-22 in measuring treatment effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A Systematic Review of the Utility of Postoperative Imaging in the Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Recently published studies call into question the clinical utility of postoperative radiographs in the management of pediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures. This topic has been addressed as part of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Appropriate Use Criteria, although recommendations regarding serial radiographs were not included as part of the discussion. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the recent literature regarding the utility of postoperative radiographs as part of the management of SCH fractures. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2017 was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases to identify studies relevant to postoperative management of SCH. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, from which data pooled estimates and an analysis of heterogeneity were calculated. RESULTS: The pooled estimate of changes in fracture management on the basis of postoperative radiographs was 1% (0.98±0.33). Significant interstudy heterogeneity was observed with an I test statistic of 76%. Changes in fracture management included prolonged immobilization following pin removal and return to the operating room. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of articles focusing on the utility or appropriate use of postoperative radiographs in changing management of SCH fractures, one of the most common upper extremity fractures in children. There is a very low rate of change in management on the basis of imaging, and frequently authors commented that the management change could have been prompted without routine serial radiographs. The cumulate findings of these studies suggest routine postoperative radiographs after SCH fractures are infrequently associated with changes in management. Practitioners should consider postoperative protocols with the intention of identifying early postoperative alignment loss or when the complication is suspected to prevent excessive routine radiography in the management of pediatric SCH fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-systematic review of level III studies.

Utility of Follow-up Radiographs After Pin Removal in Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Displaced supracondylar humerus fractures (SCFs) are common pediatric injuries, typically treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). Radiographs are obtained at pin removal and subsequently to evaluate fracture healing. We evaluated the utility of radiographs obtained after pin removal in pediatric SCF management. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of children aged 2 to 11 years with SCF requiring CRPP at a single institution from January 2007 to July 2017 was conducted. Radiographs were taken at pin removal and minimum 3 weeks later. Demographic and treatment data were collected via chart review. Radiographic measures were Baumann and lateral humeral-capitellar angles, anterior humeral line alignment, and number of cortices with callus. The McNemar-Bowker test analyzed anterior humeral line alignment and cortices with callus. The paired t-test analyzed Baumann and lateral humeral-capitellar angles. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included (47 males and 53 females, mean 5.7 years). The mean time to pin removal was 23.8 days, and the median clinical and radiographic follow-up periods were 109.0 and 52.2 days, respectively. Fracture patterns were extension type II (21%), III (73%), IV (1%), flexion (4%), and varus (1%). No patients' fracture management changed in the acute or long-term postoperative period because of findings on post-pin removal (PPR) radiographs. Fewer cortices with callus were seen at pin removal versus PPR (<0.001). At pin removal, no differences were found in the Baumann angle (75.8 ± 5.0 versus 74.6 ± 5.9; P = 0.053), lateral humeral-capitellar angles (30.7 ± 12.5 versus 31.6 ± 1.3; P = 0.165), or anterior humeral line alignment (P = 0.261). DISCUSSION: No patients' fracture management was modified because of findings evident on PPR radiographs. The number of cortices with callus was the only radiographic measure to differ over time, as is anticipated with routine healing. Elbow radiographic alignment measures did not differ in the interval between radiographs. Therefore, PPR radiographs may not provide clinical utility in the absence of other clinical findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.