Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 123(6): e878-e882, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35659531

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The elderly population, which is more active than before, is increasingly suffering from trauma (loss of reflexes and systemic pathologic conditions). Surgical management may be more controversial due to the potential consequences of general anesthesia and the sometimes negligible consequences of functional management. The main objective of this study was to analyze the causes and location of facial fractures in subjects older than 65 years. The secondary objective was to evaluate the management of these fractures (surgical or functional) according to comorbidities. MATERIAL & METHODS: In this retrospective study (over a five-year period), we analyzed the causes and management of facial fractures in patients aged over 65 years, and the medical history of each patient was investigated. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients with 198 facial fractures were included. The main cause of fractures was a fall (50%). The zygomatic region (39.9%) and mandible (27.8%) were the sites of the most frequent fractures. Comorbidities were found in 84.9% of patients, the majority of which were cardiovascular diseases (82.3%). 75.8% of fractures were treated surgically and 4.8% of patients had complications. DISCUSSION: This work is a help to understanding the causes and consequences of facial trauma in the elderly population. The management of these facial fractures requires a multidisciplinary assessment, taking into account the patient's medical history and evaluating the risks and benefits of a surgical procedure with general anesthesia.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries , Skull Fractures , Traumatology , Aged , Humans , Maxillofacial Injuries/epidemiology , Maxillofacial Injuries/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Skull Fractures/etiology , Skull Fractures/surgery , Accidental Falls
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 50(2): 205-211, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32921556

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of mobile cone beam computed tomography (MCBCT) versus multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in orbital floor fractures. Twenty-four fresh cadaver heads were used, and one orbital floor was fractured for each head by transconjunctival approach. MDCT and MCBCT were performed on each of the heads. The images obtained were then analysed independently by eight evaluators. The radiological characteristics of the orbital floor fractures were visualized with good interpretation agreement between the two images. The location of the fracture and enophthalmos were identified in a comparable manner with strong agreement (κ=0.93 and κ=0.85, respectively). Measurements of fatty hernias and bone defects showed a strong correlation between the two imaging modalities (Pearson coefficient between 0.64 and 0.71 and between 0.67 and 0.71, respectively). The fracture limits and the presence of bone fragments, an intrasinus fatty hernia, and a fracture of the associated medial orbital wall were visualized in both examinations with good agreement (κ=0.68, κ=0.51, κ=0.57, and κ=0.46, respectively). The soft tissue study showed superiority for MDCT, with a κ<0.0009. MCBCT showed good diagnostic performance in the study of orbital floor fracture characteristics.


Subject(s)
Enophthalmos , Orbital Fractures , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Facial Bones , Humans , Orbit
3.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 50(2): 198-204, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32605822

ABSTRACT

Intraoperative imaging is increasingly used by surgeons and has become an integral part of many surgical procedures. This study was performed to provide an overview of the current literature on the intraoperative use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in maxillofacial surgery. A bibliographic search of PubMed was conducted in March 2020, without time limitation, using "intraoperative imaging" AND "maxillofacial surgery" AND "cone beam computed tomography" as key words. Ninety-one articles were found; after complete reading, 16 articles met the eligibility criteria and were analysed. The results showed that the majority of the indications were related to maxillofacial trauma, particularly zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Final verification with intraoperative CBCT before wound closure was the most common use of this device. However, innovative uses of intraoperative CBCT are expanding, such as CBCT coupling with mirror computational planning, and even the combined use of initial intraoperative CBCT acquisition with navigation. Immediate, fast, and easy evaluation of bone repositioning to avoid the need for further surgical revision is the main advantage of this technique. Imaging quality is comparable to that of multi-slice computed tomography, but with lower radiation exposure. Nevertheless, CBCT is still not widely available in maxillofacial centres, probably because of its cost, and perhaps because not everyone is aware of its advantages and versatility, which are reported in this review.


Subject(s)
Maxillofacial Injuries , Surgery, Oral , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 121(6): 626-633, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32205300

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The potential drawbacks of surgical approaches to neck and base fractures of the mandibular condyle (visible scare, facial nerve injury) are still considered by many surgeons as a brake for open reduction and internal fixation. The aim of our study was to analyze the results in terms of access, scare quality and complications that could be noticed in a 12 years period of time with the use of the high sub-mandibular approach (HSMA) we first described in 2006 for the surgical treatment of neck and base fractures. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All the files of patients operated on for condylar neck and base fractures approached by mean of a HSMA between January 2006 and December 2018 in our department and containing information concerning age, sex, type of fracture, kind of osteosynthesis material, operating time, name of the surgeon, postoperative complication linked to the approach, scare quality at 6 months follow-up at least were included. The skin incision and the dissection planes followed the original publication of Meyer et al. in 2006. RESULTS: 434 patients (sex ratio: 2.06, mean age: 32, 496 approaches) met the inclusion criteria. Following the AO classification, 21.2% of the fractures were classified as neck fractures and 78.8% as base fractures. 97.6% of all fractures were stabilized by mean of a 3D plate (TCP® plate, Medartis, Basel-CH), the remaining ones by mean of a combination of 1.2, 1.5 and 2.0 straight plates. Mean operating time was 40minutes per side. Patients were operated on by senior surgeons in 71.7% of the cases and by trainees under supervision for the others. Concerning the complications linked to the approach, we noticed 11 (2.2%) temporary (0 definitive) paresis of the facial nerve, 1 (0.2%) hematoma and 1 (0.2%) abscess that both needed revision. Scare was hypertrophic or considered as unaesthetic by the patient in 5 cases (1%). DISCUSSION: The HSMA, if performed as initially described, is a safe and quick procedure compared to other cutaneous approaches. It gives access to all base fractures and to most of neck fractures. The very low rate of facial nerve complications is mainly explained by the plane by plane dissection making it very easy to avoid the facial nerve branches or to check them when encountered. The HSMA is particularly suited to the use of TCP plates as the upper holes of these plates, placed horizontally, are easy to reach from below. The HSMA is therefore still our preferred cutaneous approach to the condylar process.


Subject(s)
Mandibular Fractures , Adult , Bone Plates/adverse effects , Facial Nerve , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Humans , Infant , Mandibular Condyle , Mandibular Fractures/epidemiology , Mandibular Fractures/surgery
5.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 121(1): 49-52, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31035021

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Maxillofacial surgery plays an important role in humanitarian surgery because this specialty includes common procedures such as facial reconstruction after burns, facial clefts or Noma's sequelae, which do not require complex infrastructures and thus can be carried out in sub-optimal conditions. Nevertheless, there is a mortality rate during those missions and few studies evaluating their rate and circumstances have been published. The aim of our study was threefold: to study the deaths reported during humanitarian missions, to analyze the circumstances of those deaths, and to determine the risk factors in order to propose possible adaptations in operative indications and therapeutic attitudes so that those mortalities may be avoided in the future. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We evaluated the early deaths (between day 0 and day 8) observed among 3,494 patients operated on during humanitarian missions conducted between 2007 and 2018 in Africa and Asia by the charity organization "Les Enfants du Noma" (EDN). Information (patient, type of surgery, circumstances of death) was collected from the medical files and by questioning the medical teams who took part in the missions. RESULTS: Five deaths were recorded from 2007 to 2018, representing a mortality rate of 0.14%. The deceased were between 1 and 20 years of age and the deaths occurred between the day of the surgical procedure and the third post-operative day. The causes of death were as follows: two cases of respiratory failure due to mucous plugs (one in the endotracheal tube and one in the tracheotomy canule), one cardio-respiratory failure, one bilateral tension pneumothorax and one peritonitis from several duodenal perforations. DISCUSSION: In order to minimize the risks of lethal complications, it is important to identify as early as possible certain high-risk situations, to ensure the adequacy of the means available, and to establish an indication for surgery by a concerted discussion among the surgeons and anesthetists involved. One of the general limitations of humanitarian missions is the lack of resuscitation facilities and the lack of availability of further exams. Rites, beliefs, superstitions, gri-gri and ancestral practices often hold a prominent place in these cultures. The absence of well-kept medical records (including personal and family histories), language barriers, large volumes of patients to manage, the inexperience of first-time teams, the lack of knowledge of the terrain and local health conditions, and an inability to empathize with patients, limit the quality of preoperative assessment and sometimes lead to poor decisions.


Subject(s)
Surgery, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Young Adult
6.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 119(5): 384-388, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29753777

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Maxillary transverse deficiency (MTD) is a common facial disharmony that may need surgical assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE). The aim of this study was to present our SARPE technique and to report about our experience. MATERIEL AND METHOD: Medical records of all class III patients who underwent SARPE in our department from 2010 to 2015 and for whom a follow-up of at least 1year was available, were included in a retrospective study. The technique consisted, after short orthodontic preparation allowing for divergence of the upper central incisors, in a complete Le Fort I osteotomy without down fracture, and medial sagittal submucosal separation of the hard palate under general anesthesia in an inpatient procedure. Teeth-supported distracters were sealed preoperatively while bone-supported devices were inserted peroperatively. Activation of the distracter was allowed from day 2 at the rate of 2×0.25 per day during 4days and 2×0.5mm per day the following days. Distracters were left in place for about 4months. Orthodontic treatment resumption was allowed from the second month. The initial malocclusion, the amount and type (parallel or angular) of distraction that was needed, the type of distracter used, the amount of distraction obtained, the per- and postoperative complications and the clinical stability of the end result were analyzed. RESULTS: The records of 23 patients (18 women, 5 men - average age: 25.4years, extremes: 16-55years) could be included. MTD was isolated in 6 cases, associated with a maxillary retrognathism in 5 cases, with a mandibular prognathism in 6 cases, and with both in 6 cases. The average amount of distraction needed was 7.2mm (range: 4-12), parallel in 20 cases and angular in 3 cases. The distracters were bone-supported (Rapid Palatal Expander®, KLS Martin Group, Tuttlingen, Germany) in 3 patients and custom-made tooth-supported in 20 patients. The average amount of distraction obtained at the level of the distracter cylinder was 7.7mm (range: 5-13). We noted 2 cases of palatal fibromucosa perforations, 1 case of posterior excess of distraction, 1 case of nasal septum deviation, 1 case of iatrogenic necrosis of tooth No.°11, 1 case of naso-genial sulcus hematoma, 1 case of intraoperative mobility of tooth No.°21, 5 cases of asymmetric distraction. Seventeen patients needed a second orthognathic procedure and 22 had stable Class I occlusion after removal of appliances at 18 months follow-up on average. DISCUSSION: SARPE is a quite safe procedure that allows for transverse coordination without dental extraction. Transverse discrepancies greater than 4mm are for us clear indications for SARPE. When a sagittal discrepancy is associated, we prefer performing SARPE first and correcting the sagittal plane in a second operation. The recent development of Le Fort I sliding osteosynthesis plates opens the way to one time correction and the development of double-action distracters fitted out with 2 cylinders will be helpful for performing angular distractions.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion , Palatal Expansion Technique , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Humans , Male , Maxilla , Osteotomy, Le Fort , Retrospective Studies
7.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 118(4): 206-212, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28732777

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: 3D printing seems to have more and more applications in maxillofacial surgery (MFS), particularly since the release on the market of general use 3D printers several years ago. The aim of our study was to answer 4 questions: 1. Who uses 3D printing in MFS and is it routine or not? 2. What are the main clinical indications for 3D printing in MFS and what are the kinds of objects that are used? 3. Are these objects printed by an official medical device (MD) manufacturer or made directly within the department or the lab? 4. What are the advantages and drawbacks? METHODOLOGY: Two bibliographic researches were conducted on January the 1st, 2017 in PubMed, without time limitation, using "maxillofacial surgery" AND "3D printing" for the first and for the second "maxillofacial surgery" AND "computer-aided design" AND "computer-aided manufacturing" as keywords. Articles in English or French dealing with human clinical use of 3D printing were selected. Publication date, nationality of the authors, number of patients treated, clinical indication(s), type of printed object(s), type of printing (lab/hospital-made or professional/industry) and advantages/drawbacks were recorded. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-seven articles from 35 countries met the criteria. The most represented country was the People's Republic of China (16% of the articles). A total of 2889 patients (10 per article on average) benefited from 3D printed objects. The most frequent clinical indications were dental implant surgery and mandibular reconstruction. The most frequently printed objects were surgical guides and anatomic models. Forty-five percent of the prints were professional. The main advantages were improvement in precision and reduction of surgical time. The main disadvantages were the cost of the objects and the manufacturing period when printed by the industry. DISCUSSION: The arrival on the market of low-cost printers has increased the use of 3D printing in MFS. Anatomic models are not considered to be MDs and do not have to follow any regulation. Nowadays, they are easily printed with low-cost printers. They allow for better preoperative planning and training for the procedures and for pre-shaping of plates. Occlusal splints and surgical guides are intended for the smooth transfer of planning to the operating room. They are considered to be MDs and even if they are easy to print, they have to follow the regulations applying to MDs. Patient specific implants (custom-made plates and skeletal reconstruction modules) are much more demanding objects and their manufacturing remains nowadays in the hands of the industry. The main limitation of in-hospital 3D printing is the restrictive regulations applying to MDs. The main limitations of professional 3D printing are the cost and the lead time. 3D printed objects are nowadays easily available in MFS. However, they will never replace a surgeon's skill and should only be considered as useful tools.


Subject(s)
Oral Surgical Procedures/methods , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Computer-Aided Design , Humans , Mandibular Reconstruction/methods , Models, Anatomic , Oral Surgical Procedures/trends , Printing, Three-Dimensional/trends , Surgery, Oral/methods , Surgery, Oral/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...