To what extent do typical components of shoulder clinical evaluation explain upper-extremity disability? A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Physical therapists use several evaluation measures to identify the most important factors related to disability. However, the degree to which these evaluation components explain shoulder disability is not well known and that may detract clinicians from the best clinical reasoning. OBJECTIVE: To determine how much evaluation components explain shoulder function. METHODS: Eighty-one individuals with unilateral shoulder pain for at least four weeks and meeting clinical exam criteria to exclude cervical referred pain, adhesive capsulitis, and shoulder instability, participated in this study. Several typical clinical evaluation components were assessed as potential independent variables in a regression model using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score as a proxy to shoulder function. Two multivariate models were built to include (1) evaluation components from physical exam plus clinical history and (2) a model considering all previous variables and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. RESULTS: Pain catastrophizing was the best variable in the model explaining at least 10% of the DASH variance. Sex and lower trapezius muscle strength explained considerably less of shoulder function. The MRI data did not improve the model performance. CONCLUSION: The complexity of shoulder function is not independently explained by pathoanatomical abnormalities. Psychological aspects may explain more of shoulder function even when combined with physical components in some patients.

Is the angular onset of pain during arm elevation associated to functioning in individuals with rotator cuff related shoulder pain?

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is the main diagnosis for shoulder pain. A painful arc during active arm elevation is a common finding in RCRSP. The angular onset of pain during arm elevation may play an important role on functioning of the upper extremities. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to: 1) determine and characterize the association between the angular onset of pain during arm elevation and upper-limb self-reported functioning, 2) verify whether demographic and clinical characteristics contribute to this association, and 3) investigate whether these characteristics differ considering distinct ranges of angular onset of pain in individuals with RCRSP. METHODS: 252 individuals with RCRSP were divided in 3 groups based on the angular onset of pain during arm elevation in the sagittal plane: <60°, 60°-120°, and >120°. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was used to assess functioning of the upper limbs. Demographic and clinical characteristics were selected for the multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Individuals with an angular onset of pain above 120° of arm elevation presented lower DASH score (lesser disability) than individuals with an angular onset of pain between 60°- 120°. Male sex, age, dominance of the side affected, duration of symptoms, and the angular onset of pain during arm elevation explained 31% of the DASH score variance. CONCLUSION: Individuals with RCRSP and angular onset of pain above 120° of arm elevation present better functioning than individuals with onset of pain between 60°-120°, and similar functioning as those with pain below 60°. Male sex, lower age, non-dominant side being affected and longer duration of symptoms are also associated to better functioning as assessed by the DASH questionnaire.

Effectiveness of physical therapy given by telerehabilitation on pain and disability of individuals with shoulder pain: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effects of physical therapy given by telerehabilitation on pain and disability in individuals with shoulder pain. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane, Web of Science, SCOPUS, SciELO and Ibecs were searched in January/2022. METHODS: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of physical therapy given by telerehabilitation on pain and disability in patients with shoulder pain were included. The quality and level of the evidence were assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and GRADE, respectively. The effect sizes of the main outcomes were also calculated. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials were included with a total sample of 368 patients with shoulder pain. Four and two randomized controlled trials were assessed as low and high risk of bias, respectively. Three randomized controlled trials assessed shoulder post-operative care, two assessed chronic shoulder pain, and one assessed frozen shoulder. Very low to low evidence suggests that there is no difference between telerehabilitation and in-person physical therapy or home-based exercises programs to improve pain and disability in patients with shoulder pain. Low evidence suggests that telerehabilitation is superior to advice only to improve shoulder pain (effect size: 2.42; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.72, 3.06) and disability (effect size: 1.61; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.01, 2.18). CONCLUSIONS: Although telerehabilitation may be a promising tool to treat patients with shoulder pain and disability, the very low to low quality of evidence does not support a definite recommendation of its use in this population.

Effects of electromyographic biofeedback interventions for shoulder pain and function: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effectiveness of electromyographic biofeedback interventions to improve pain and function of patients with shoulder pain. DESIGN: Systematic review of controlled clinical trials. LITERATURE SEARCH: Databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS) were searched in December 2020. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized clinical trials that investigated the effects of electromyographic biofeedback for individuals with shoulder pain. Patient-reported pain and functional outcomes were collected and synthesized. DATA SYNTHESIS: The level of evidence was synthesized using GRADE and Standardized Mean Differences and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects inverse variance model for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Five studies were included with a total sample of 272 individuals with shoulder pain. Very-low quality of evidence indicated that electromyographic biofeedback was not superior to control for reducing shoulder pain (standardized mean differences = -0.21, 95% confidence interval: -0.67 to 0.24, P = 0.36). Very-low quality of evidence indicated that electromyographic biofeedback interventions were not superior to control for improving shoulder function (standardized mean differences = -0.11, 95% confidence interval: -0.41 to 0.19, P = 0.48). CONCLUSION: Electromyographic biofeedback may be not effective for improving shoulder pain and function. However, the limited number of included studies and very low quality of evidence does not support a definitive recommendation about the effectiveness of electromyographic biofeedback to treat individuals with shoulder pain.

Comparison of scapular kinematics and muscle strength between those with a positive and a negative Scapular Assistance Test.

BACKGROUND: The Scapular Assistance Test was suggested to directly assess the influence of scapular motion on pain and indirectly measure the function of the scapular rotators. However, it is still not clear if individuals with a positive Scapular Assistance Test actually present changes in scapular motion and muscle strength. This study compared scapular kinematics and muscle strength between those with a positive Scapular Assistance Test and those with a negative Scapular Assistance Test. METHODS: Fifty individuals with shoulder pain were randomly allocated to: positive (n = 25) or negative Scapular Assistance Test (n = 25) group. Scapular kinematics was measured during elevation and lowering of the arm. Strength of the serratus anterior and lower trapezius was also measured. Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare kinematics between groups. Unpaired Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare strength of serratus anterior and lower trapezius, respectively. FINDINGS: There were no differences (P > 0.05) in scapular internal rotation and upward rotation between both groups. For scapular tilt, there was group main effect (P < 0.05) during elevation and lowering of the arm, whereas the positive Scapular Assistance Test group presented greater scapular anterior tilt. There was no difference (P > 0.05) in strength between groups. INTERPRETATION: Individuals with a positive Scapular Assistance Test are more likely to present decreased scapular posterior tilt in those with shoulder pain. Strength of the scapular muscles seems to be same in those with a positive and a negative Scapular Assistance Test.

Bilateral magnetic resonance imaging findings in individuals with unilateral shoulder pain.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to diagnose structural abnormalities in the shoulder. However, subsequent findings may not be the source of symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine comparative MRI findings across both shoulders of individuals with unilateral shoulder symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 123 individuals from the community who had self-reported unilateral shoulder pain with no signs of adhesive capsulitis, no substantial range-of-motion deficit, no history of upper-limb fractures, no repeated shoulder dislocations, and no neck-related pain. Images in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes with T1, T2, and proton density sequences were generated and independently and randomly interpreted by 2 examiners: a board-certified, fellowship-trained orthopedic shoulder surgeon and a musculoskeletal radiologist. Absolute and relative frequencies for each MRI finding were calculated and compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders. Agreement between the shoulder surgeon and the radiologist was also determined. RESULTS: Abnormal MRI findings were highly prevalent in both shoulders. Only the frequencies of full-thickness tears in the supraspinatus tendon and glenohumeral osteoarthritis were higher (approximately 10%) in the symptomatic shoulder according to the surgeon's findings. Agreement between the musculoskeletal radiologist and shoulder surgeon ranged from slight to moderate (0.00-0.51). CONCLUSION: Most abnormal MRI findings were not different in frequency between symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders. Clinicians should be aware of the common anatomic findings on MRI when considering diagnostic and treatment planning.

Effects of whole body vibration in individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Whole-body vibration (WBV) is an alternative intervention for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) but its clinical efficacy is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the effects of WBV on important outcomes for patients with DPN. DATA SOURCES: Medline, PEDro, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google Scholar were searched up to July 2017. Search terms included diabetic neuropathies and WBV. STUDY SELECTION: Interventional studies that utilized WBV for treating DPN outcomes with at least one-week follow-up were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were independently extracted by two reviewers using a standardized checklist. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-two registers were identified. Three studies (83 patients) satisfied the selection criteria. Studies assessed the effect of WBV on the glycemic profile, neuropathic pain, and balance. WBV presented positive effects on these outcomes, but a high risk of bias was identified in most studies. No study assessed plantar tactile sensitivity. LIMITATIONS: Most studies have a high level of bias. No pooling data was possible due to few studies included. CONCLUSIONS: Very low-quality evidence suggests that WBV has a slight positive effect on glycemic control in patients with DPN, improving neuropathic pain and balance. Future studies may change the WBV estimated effect on DPN outcomes.

The Brazilian version of the Constant-Murley Score (CMS-BR): convergent and construct validity, internal consistency, and unidimensionality.

OBJECTIVES: To translate and culturally adapt the CMS and assess the validity of the Brazilian version (CMS-BR). METHODS: The translation was carried out according to the back-translation method by four independent translators. The produced versions were synthesized through extensive analysis and by consensus of an expert committee, reaching a final version used for the cultural adaptation. A field test was conducted with 30 subjects in order to obtain semantic considerations. For the psychometric analyzes, the sample was increased to 110 participants who answered two instruments: CMS-BR and the Disabilities of the Arm, shoulder and Hand (DASH). The CMS-BR and DASH score range from 0 to 100 points. For the first, higher points reflect better function and for the latter, the inverse is true. The validity was verified by Pearson's correlation test, the unidimensionality by factorial analysis, and the internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The explained variance was 60.28% with factor loadings ranging from 0.60 to 0.91. The CMS-BR exhibited strong negative correlation with the DASH score (-0.82, p < 0.05), Cronbach's alpha 0.85, and its total score was strongly correlated with the patient's range of motion (0.93, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CMS was satisfactorily adapted for Brazilian Portuguese and demonstrated evidence of validity that allows its use in this population.

OBJETIVOS: Traduzir e adaptar culturalmente o Constant-Murley Score (CMS) e verificar a validade da versão brasileira (CMS-BR). MÉTODOS: A tradução foi feita de acordo com o método de retrotradução por quatro tradutores independentes. As versões produzidas foram sintetizadas por análise extensiva e consenso de um comitê de especialistas e geraram uma versão final usada para a adaptação cultural. Fez-se um teste em campo com 30 sujeitos para observação de possíveis considerações em relação à semântica. Para a posterior análise psicométrica, ampliou-se a amostra para 110 participantes que responderam a dois instrumentos: CMS-BR e Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). O CMS-BR e o DASH variam de 0 a 100 pontos. Para o primeiro, altas pontuações refletem melhor função, para o segundo, o contrário. A validade foi verificada com o teste de correlação de Pearson, a unidimensionalidade com a análise fatorial e a consistência interna com o Alfa de Cronbach. RESULTADOS: A variância explicada foi de 60,28% com cargas fatoriais entre 0,60 e 0,91. O CMS-BR demonstrou correlação forte e negativa com o DASH (-0,82, p < 0,05), com o alfa de Cronbach de 0,85 e seu escore total teve correlação forte com a amplitude de movimento dos pacientes (0,93, p < 0,001). CONCLUSÃO: O CMS-BR foi adaptado de forma satisfatória e demonstrou evidências de validade que permitem seu uso nessa população.

The Brazilian version of the Constant-Murley Score (CMS-BR): convergent and construct validity, internal consistency, and unidimensionality / Versão brasileira do Constant-Murley Score (CMS-BR): validade convergente e de constructo, consistência interna e unidimensionalidade

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To translate and culturally adapt the CMS and assess the validity of the Brazilian version (CMS-BR). METHODS: The translation was carried out according to the back-translation method by four independent translators. The produced versions were synthesized through extensive analysis and by consensus of an expert committee, reaching a final version used for the cultural adaptation. A field test was conducted with 30 subjects in order to obtain semantic considerations. For the psychometric analyzes, the sample was increased to 110 participants who answered two instruments: CMS-BR and the Disabilities of the Arm, shoulder and Hand (DASH). The CMS-BR and DASH score range from 0 to 100 points. For the first, higher points reflect better function and for the latter, the inverse is true. The validity was verified by Pearson's correlation test, the unidimensionality by factorial analysis, and the internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The explained variance was 60.28% with factor loadings ranging from 0.60 to 0.91. The CMS-BR exhibited strong negative correlation with the DASH score (-0.82, p < 0.05), Cronbach's alpha 0.85, and its total score was strongly correlated with the patient's range of motion (0.93, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The CMS was satisfactorily adapted for Brazilian Portuguese and demonstrated evidence of validity that allows its use in this population.

RESUMO OBJETIVOS: Traduzir e adaptar culturalmente o Constant-Murley Score (CMS) e verificar a validade da versão brasileira (CMS-BR). MÉTODOS: A tradução foi realizada de acordo com o método de retrotradução por quatro tradutores independentes. As versões produzidas foram sintetizadas por análise extensiva e consenso de um comitê de especialistas, gerando uma versão final usada para a adaptação cultural. Realizou-se um teste em campo com 30 sujeitos para observação de possíveis considerações em relação à semântica. Para a posterior análise psicométrica, ampliou-se a amostra para 110 participantes, que responderam a dois instrumentos: CMS-BR e Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). O CMS-BR e o DASH possuem variação de 0 a 100 pontos. Para o primeiro, altas pontuações refletem melhor função, para o segundo, o contrário. A validade foi verificada através do teste de correlação de Pearson, a dimensionalidade através de análise fatorial e a consistência interna através do alfa de Cronbach. RESULTADOS: A variância explicada foi de 60,28% com cargas fatoriais entre 0,60 e 0,91. O CMS-BR demonstrou correlação forte e negativa com o DASH (-0,82, p < 0,05), alfa de Cronbach de 0,85 e seu escore total teve correlação forte com a amplitude de movimento dos pacientes (0,93, p < 0,001). CONCLUSÃO: O CMS-BR foi adaptado de forma satisfatória e demonstrou evidências de validade que permitem seu uso nessa população.

Dynamic hip screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a prospective study with 96 patients.

UNLABELLED: Objectives. To study the correlation between avascular necrosis and the demographics, time elapsed from fracture to surgery, quality of reduction, Garden classification, and the position of the screw following use of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of subcapital neck fractures. Methods. A prospective study of 96 patients with subcapital neck fractures was carried out in a faculty hospital. Patients underwent surgery with closed reduction and internal fixation with DHS. Results. There were 58% male and 42% female patients, with a mean age of 53 years (+/-14). In terms of Garden classification, 60% were Garden IV, 26% were Garden III, and 14% were Garden II. Nonunion was observed in three cases (3%) and was treated with valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy, in all cases leading to successful healing. Avascular necrosis was observed in 16% of patients. The positioning of the screw into the femoral head showed a significant correlation with necrosis. Conclusions. The incidence of necrosis in patients under the age of 50 years is twice as high as that in older patients. Displacement is a predictive factor regarding osteonecrosis and is associated with a high and anterior position of the screw in the femoral head. Level II of evidence. STUDY TYPE: therapeutic study.