In Situ Pulmonary Thrombolysis and Perfusion Lung Angiography in Severe COVID-19 Respiratory Failure.

A proof-of-concept study using thrombolysis with catheter-directed tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and pulmonary angiography imaging was performed to visualize perfusion deficits and reperfusion/therapeutic effects of tPA. DESIGN: A prospective, open-label, compassionate study. Descriptive statistics were presented for categorical variables and as means with sds for continuous variables. The Wilcoxon test was used to determine the differences between the two-related samples and a t test for continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at p value of less than 0.05. Agreement between observations was evaluated using the Kappa Cohen index and overall agreement using the Fleiss Kappa coefficient. SETTING: A single COVID-19 ICU of Mexico´s General Hospital Dr Eduardo Liceaga. SUBJECTS: Fifteen patients with severe Delta variant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, 18-75 years old, requiring mechanical ventilation with a persistent Fio2 requirement of 70% or higher and Pao2/Fio2 ratio (or imputed ratio) less than 150 for more than 4 hours. The coagulation inclusion criteria were International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis score greater than 5, and presence of a d-dimer greater than 1,200, with viscoelastic testing using rotational thromboelastometry (Instrumentation Laboratories, Mexico City, Mexico) showing both hypercoagulability (EXTEM amplitude at 5 min > 65 FIBTEM > 30) and hypofibrinolysis (EXTEM maximum lysis < 8%). INTERVENTIONS: Catheter-directed tPA angiography and iFlow system analysis to assess pre-tPA baseline pulmonary perfusion and changes in response to thrombolysis. RESULTS: Nine patients had microvascular filling defects demonstrated by angiography, and good agreement was found with iFlow analysis (ƙ = 0.714). Statistically significant differences were identified in the area under the curve (AUC) region of interest/AUC reference tissue with and without filling defects in phase 2 DM -0.09206 (sd ± 0.16684) (p = 0.003). The Pao2/Fio2 values measured immediately and 48 hours after the procedure were significantly higher (p = 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). Statistically significant differences were found in d-dimer values (p = 0.007), Fio2 (p = 0.002), and oxygen saturation in arterial blood/Fio2 (p = 0.045), as well as in the number of patients who required prone positioning before, immediately after the procedure, and at 48 hours after the procedure (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolysis with catheter-directed tPA resulted in imaging evidence via pulmonary angiography and iFlow technology of improved lung perfusion in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure.

Clot activators do not expedite the time to predict massive transfusion in trauma patients analyzed with tissue plasminogen activator thrombelastography.

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients with hypersensitivity to tissue plasminogen activator mediated fibrinolysis quantified by tissue plasminogen activator thromboelastography are at increased risk of massive transfusion. The tissue plasminogen activator thromboelastography assay has been tested in trauma patients using native thromboelastography with no exogenous activator. We hypothesize that adding an activator will expedite the time to results. METHODS: Healthy whole blood was assayed with and without exogenous plasmin, which acts to deplete inhibitors of fibrinolysis, mimicking trauma blood. Samples were assessed using native, kaolin, and rapid thromboelastography with and without tissue plasminogen activator. The tissue plasminogen activator thromboelastography indices of time to maximum amplitude and lysis at 30 minutes were contrasted between healthy blood with and without plasmin using the three different activators. The activators were then used with a tissue plasminogen activator thromboelastography in 100 trauma patients to assess performance in predicting massive transfusion. RESULTS: In healthy blood, regardless of activator, lysis at 30 minutes did not increase with plasmin alone, but did increase with tissue plasminogen activator (P = .012). Adding tissue plasminogen activator and plasmin increased lysis at 30 minutes (P = .036). Time to maximum amplitude was reduced with tissue plasminogen activator and plasmin compared with tissue plasminogen activator alone (P = .012). Activated thromboelastographies had increased lysis at 30 minutes (P = .002), but no difference in time to maximum amplitude compared with native thromboelastographies. In trauma patients, native tissue plasminogen activator thromboelastography had greater performance in predicting massive transfusion than activated tissue plasminogen activator thromboelastographies with no difference in time to maximum amplitude. CONCLUSION: Adding an activator to tissue plasminogen activator thromboelastography does not expedite time to maximum amplitude in healthy blood depleted of fibrinolysis inhibitors. Activated tissue plasminogen activator thromboelastographies are inferior to native tissue plasminogen activator thromboelastography for predicting massive transfusion and do not reduce the time to results.

A material cost-minimization analysis for hernia repairs and minor procedures during a surgical mission in the Dominican Republic.

INTRODUCTION: Expenditures on material supplies and medications constitute the greatest per capita costs for surgical missions. We hypothesized that supply acquisition at non-profit organization (NPO) costs would lead to significant cost-savings compared with supply acquisition at US academic institution costs from the provider perspective for hernia repairs and minor procedures during a surgical mission in the Dominican Republic. METHODS: Items acquired for a surgical mission were uniquely QR-coded for accurate consumption accounting. Both NPO and US academic institution unit costs were associated with each item in an electronic inventory system. Medication doses were recorded and QR codes for consumed items were scanned into a record for each sampled procedure. Mean material costs and cost-savings ± SDs were calculated in US dollars for each procedure type. Cost-minimization analyses between the NPO and the US academic institution platforms for each procedure type ensued using a two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs test with α = 0.05. Item utilization analyses generated lists of most frequently used materials by procedure type. RESULTS: The mean cost-savings of supply acquisition at NPO costs for each procedure type were as follows: $482.86 ± $683.79 for unilateral inguinal hernia repair (n = 13); $332.46 ± $184.09 for bilateral inguinal hernia repair (n = 3); $127.26 ± $13.18 for hydrocelectomy (n = 9); $232.92 ± $56.49 for femoral hernia repair (n = 3); $120.90 ± $30.51 for umbilical hernia repair (n = 8); $36.59 ± $17.76 for minor procedures (n = 26); and $120.66 ± $14.61 for pediatric inguinal hernia repair (n = 7). CONCLUSION: Supply acquisition at NPO costs leads to significant cost-savings compared with supply acquisition at US academic institution costs from the provider perspective for inguinal hernia repair, hydrocelectomy, umbilical hernia repair, minor procedures, and pediatric inguinal hernia repair during a surgical mission in the Dominican Republic. Item utilization analysis can generate minimum-necessary material lists for each procedure type to reproduce cost-savings for subsequent missions.