ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lithium is an old proven medication, but it is infrequently used in current practice. This review examines evidence for its benefits and risks and provides clinical guidance to its use. METHOD: Narrative review. RESULTS: Besides its benefit in bipolar illness, lithium has important underappreciated proven benefits in prevention of unipolar depression and suicide. Emerging data support neurobiological benefits for cognition and possible dementia prevention. Likely benefits also exist in low doses for mood temperaments (cyclothymia and hyperthymia). High doses (over 1.0 mmol/L) should be avoided since they increase side effects, complications associated with long-term use, and risk of toxicity. Conversely, low dosing can be legitimate, especially for suicide and dementia prevention. Nuisance side effects of lithium may affect adherence, and medically serious side-effects can occur. Managing strategies are available for side effects. CONCLUSION: Lithium is the most effective medication in psychiatry, because it has disease-modifying, not just symptomatic, effects. It is effective not only for bipolar illness but also for prevention of suicide, episodes of unipolar depression, mood temperaments, and possibly dementia. Its many benefits need better appreciation, while lowered dosing can reduce risks.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Depressive Disorder , Suicide Prevention , Antimanic Agents/adverse effects , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Humans , Lithium/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The differential diagnosis of bipolar illness vs. borderline personality is controversial. Both conditions manifest impulsive behavior, unstable interpersonal relationships, and mood symptoms. This study examines whether and which mood clinical features can differentiate between both conditions. METHOD: A total of 260 patients (mean ± standard deviation age 41 ± 13 years, 68% female) attending to a mood clinic were examined for diagnosis of bipolar illness and borderline personality disorder using SCID-I, SCID-II, and clinical mood criteria extracted from Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ). They were analyzed using diagnoses as dependent variables. Predictors of bipolar and borderline diagnoses were identified by multivariable logistic regressions, and predictive validity of models was assessed using ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: Bipolar illness was strongly predicted by elevated mood (OR = 4.02, 95% CI: 1.80-9.15), increased goal-directed activities (OR = 3.90, 95% CI: 1.73-8.96), and episodicity of mood symptoms (OR = 3.48, 95% CI 1.49-8.39). This triad model predicted bipolar illness with 88.7% sensitivity, 81.4% specificity, and obtained an auROC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.76-0.96) and a positive predictive value of 85.1%. For borderline personality disorder, only female gender was a statistically significant predictor (OR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.29-13.7), and the predictive model obtained an auROC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.53-0.74). CONCLUSION: In a mood disorder clinic setting, manic criteria and episodic mood course distinguished bipolar illness from borderline personality disorder.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Borderline Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Mood Disorders/diagnosis , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/physiopathology , Borderline Personality Disorder/physiopathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Mood Disorders/physiopathology , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
In two females aged 27 and 32 years old, an aggravation of their panic disorder coincided with the appearance of clinical signs of hyperthyroidism. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed with the finding of raised thyroid hormone levels and undetectable TSH levels. These two cases highlight the importance of routine thyroid function assessment in patients with panic disorder, mainly in those with partial response to medications or when symptoms aggravate, despite an adequate treatment.
Subject(s)
Hyperthyroidism/complications , Panic Disorder/complications , Adult , Female , Humans , Panic Disorder/psychology , Panic Disorder/therapy , Thyroid Function TestsABSTRACT
The aim of the present study was to establish the prevalence of thyroid disturbances in patients consulting for panic and mood disorders. These data may be relevant because thyroid functional alterations affect the success of treatment in these pathologies. We studied prospectively 268 psychiatric outpatients (204 females and 64 males) diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria. We excluded patients with addictive disorders and major medical disease. We measured TSH, Free T4 (FT4) and antimicrosomal antibodies (AMA). We diagnosed classical hypothyroidism when the TSH value was >10 microUI/ml (NV=0.25-4.3) and subclinical hypothyroidism when the TSH value was between 5-10 microUI/ml. Hyperthyroidism was diagnosed when FT4 >1.4 (NV=0.8-1.4), the TSH suppressed and the radioiodine uptake >20% (NV=5-15). Positive antimicrosomal antibodies (AMA) titres were >1:100 dilution. Hypothyroidism was diagnosed in 26/268 patients (9.7%); 10 cases corresponded to the classical form (38.5%) and 16 cases to the subclinical form (61.5%). Hyperthyroidism was found in 6/268 patients (2.2%). Normal thyroid function with positive AMA was found in 28/268 patients (10.4%). Hypothyroidism was more common in patients with mood disorders, and hyperthyroidism in patients with panic disorders. Patients with panic disorder had significant higher levels of FT4. The prevalence of positive AMA, hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism was higher in women than men. We found a high frequency of thyroid abnormalities in a psychiatric outpatient population. These data suggests that routine evaluation of thyroid function should be considered in patients consulting for mood and panic disorders.