Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis composite disease activity indices and residual activity in a Brazilian multicenter study- REAL study.

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) composite disease activity indices have become handy tools in daily clinical practice and crucial in defining remission or low disease activity, the main target of the RA treatment. However, there is no definition of the best index to assess disease activity in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To compare the residual activity among the indices with the ACR/EULAR remission criteria (Boolean method) to identify the most feasible for assessing remission in daily practice, also considering correlation and concordance, sensibility, and specificity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We selected 1116 patients with established RA from the real-life rheumatoid arthritis study database-REAL. The composite disease activity indices-DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI-and their components were compared to the Boolean method to identify residual activity using binomial regression. The indices were analyzed for correlation and agreement using the Spearman index and weighted kappa. The chi-square test evaluated sensibility and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. RESULTS: DAS28-CRP overestimated remission and confirmed higher residual activity than SDAI and CDAI. The indices showed good correlation and agreement, with a better relationship between SDAI and CDAI (k:0,88). CDAI and SDAI showed higher sensitivity and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. CDAI was performed in 99% of patients, while DAS28 and SDAI were completed in approximately 85%. CONCLUSIONS: Although all composite indices of activity can be used in clinical practice and showed good agreement, CDAI and SDAI have better performance in evaluating remission based on the Boolean method, showing less residual activity and higher sensibility and specificity. In addition, CDAI seems to be more feasible for disease activity evaluation in daily clinical practice, especially in developing countries.

18F-FDG PET/CT in Late Acquisition Identifies Sites of Active Disease in Treated Takayasu Arteritis.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have taken advantage of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography associated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to personalize patient evaluation and identify sites of more active disease in Takayasu arteritis (TA)-treated patients. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in late acquisition in identifying sites of active disease in patients under full treatment for TA. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, patients under full treatment underwent whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. Sites of increased 18F-FDG uptake were classified by a score of 3 on the visual scale using the liver uptake as reference. A quantitative analysis was also performed by measuring the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of the vascular wall of affected arteries. Disease activity using the National Institutes of Health criteria was also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, there were 18 female and 2 male patients, with a mean age of 43.6 (±11.58) years and a disease duration of 8.3 (±6.25) years. Thirteen participants (65%) were in inflammatory activity according to the criteria proposed by the National Institutes of Health. All patients received immunosuppressive agents, and one of them received immunobiological treatment. The highest SUV value was 6.2 in the aortic arch, and the lowest was 1.0 in the subclavian artery. The mean maximum SUV did not differ between clinically active and inactive patients. In the visual analysis, all participants had at least 1 vascular site with inflammatory activity, with an uptake ≥2 in relation to the liver. The aortic arch was the most frequently involved site. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that 18F-FDG PET/CT in late acquisition is an effective imaging method to assess TA activity even in fully treated patients.

The effect of foot orthoses on balance, foot pain and disability in elderly women with osteoporosis: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of insoles with medial arch support and metatarsal pad on balance, foot pain and disability in elderly women with osteoporosis. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled clinical trial. Ninety-four elderly women (>60 years) with osteoporosis in treatment in the outpatient clinic of the Rheumatology Division of UNICAMP were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) with foot orthoses or to a control group (CG) without orthoses. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI) and a numeric pain scale (NPS) were assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks. The chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test were applied to compare baseline values between the two groups. Repeated measures of analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test for multiple comparisons and the contrast profile test were used to compare the longitudinal measures. For numeric variable relationship analysis, the Spearman correlation coefficient was used. RESULTS: The groups were similar at baseline. Only subjects from the IG displayed improvements in balance (both BBS and TUG), foot pain (NPS) and disability (MFPDI) (P < 0.001). Minor adverse effects were noted. CONCLUSION: Foot orthoses were effective for improving balance and for reducing pain and disability in elderly women. Orthoses can be used as an adjuvant strategy to improve balance and to prevent falls in the elderly.