Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
iScience ; 25(7): 104580, 2022 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35789843

ABSTRACT

Cerebral organoids differentiated from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) provide a unique opportunity to investigate brain development. However, organoids usually lack microglia, brain-resident immune cells, which are present in the early embryonic brain and participate in neuronal circuit development. Here, we find IBA1+ microglia-like cells alongside retinal cups between week 3 and 4 in 2.5D culture with an unguided retinal organoid differentiation protocol. Microglia do not infiltrate the neuroectoderm and instead enrich within non-pigmented, 3D-cystic compartments that develop in parallel to the 3D-retinal organoids. When we guide the retinal organoid differentiation with low-dosed BMP4, we prevent cup development and enhance microglia and 3D-cysts formation. Mass spectrometry identifies these 3D-cysts to express mesenchymal and epithelial markers. We confirmed this microglia-preferred environment also within the unguided protocol, providing insight into microglial behavior and migration and offer a model to study how they enter and distribute within the human brain.

2.
Nat Commun ; 10(1): 1931, 2019 04 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31036804

ABSTRACT

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins play critical roles in the epigenetic inheritance of cell fate. The Polycomb Repressive Complexes PRC1 and PRC2 catalyse distinct chromatin modifications to enforce gene silencing, but how transcriptional repression is propagated through mitotic cell divisions remains a key unresolved question. Using reversible tethering of PcG proteins to ectopic sites in mouse embryonic stem cells, here we show that PRC1 can trigger transcriptional repression and Polycomb-dependent chromatin modifications. We find that canonical PRC1 (cPRC1), but not variant PRC1, maintains gene silencing through cell division upon reversal of tethering. Propagation of gene repression is sustained by cis-acting histone modifications, PRC2-mediated H3K27me3 and cPRC1-mediated H2AK119ub1, promoting a sequence-independent feedback mechanism for PcG protein recruitment. Thus, the distinct PRC1 complexes present in vertebrates can differentially regulate epigenetic maintenance of gene silencing, potentially enabling dynamic heritable responses to complex stimuli. Our findings reveal how PcG repression is potentially inherited in vertebrates.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/metabolism , Epigenesis, Genetic , Gene Silencing , Polycomb Repressive Complex 1/genetics , Polycomb Repressive Complex 2/genetics , Protein Processing, Post-Translational , Animals , Cell Line , Chromatin/chemistry , Feedback, Physiological , Histones/genetics , Histones/metabolism , Inheritance Patterns , Mice , Mitosis , Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Polycomb Repressive Complex 1/metabolism , Polycomb Repressive Complex 2/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic
3.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 107(14): 6520-5, 2010 Apr 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20308537

ABSTRACT

Upon mating, females of many animal species undergo dramatic changes in their behavior. In Drosophila melanogaster, postmating behaviors are triggered by sex peptide (SP), which is produced in the male seminal fluid and transferred to female during copulation. SP modulates female behaviors via sex peptide receptor (SPR) located in a small subset of internal sensory neurons that innervate the female uterus and project to the CNS. Although required for postmating responses only in these female sensory neurons, SPR is expressed broadly in the CNS of both sexes. Moreover, SPR is also encoded in the genomes of insects that lack obvious SP orthologs. These observations suggest that SPR may have additional ligands and functions. Here, we identify myoinhibitory peptides (MIPs) as a second family of SPR ligands that is conserved across a wide range of invertebrate species. MIPs are potent agonists for Drosophila, Aedes, and Aplysia SPRs in vitro, yet are unable to trigger postmating responses in vivo. In contrast to SP, MIPs are not produced in male reproductive organs, and are not required for postmating behaviors in Drosophila females. We conclude that MIPs are evolutionarily conserved ligands for SPR, which are likely to mediate functions other than the regulation of female reproductive behaviors.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Peptides/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , CHO Cells , Central Nervous System/metabolism , Consummatory Behavior , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Drosophila Proteins/agonists , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/chemistry , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Female , Ligands , Male , Models, Molecular , Molecular Sequence Data , Peptides/agonists , Peptides/chemistry , Peptides/genetics , Phylogeny , Protein Structure, Tertiary , Receptors, Peptide , Sex Attractants/genetics , Sex Attractants/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL