[Case report on traumatic complete laryngotracheal separation with a positive outcome]. / Fallbericht zum traumatischen Totalabriss der Trachea vom Kehlkopf mit positivem Ausgang.

HISTORY: A 21-year-old female was injured by accidental strangulation. Dyspnea and stridor occurred with delay, and led to emergency intubation. FINDINGS: Physical examination showed strangulation marks and neck emphysema. Computed tomography confirmed laryngotracheal separation and revealed misplacement of the ventilation tube. DIAGNOSIS: Further surgical exploration revealed complete laryngotracheal (cricotracheal) separation. TREATMENT: After initial emergency tracheotomy, cricotracheal reanastomosis was achieved by a two-stage surgical approach. CONCLUSION: Laryngotracheal separation is associated with high mortality. In the case presented herein, the patient survived and was discharged from hospital without a tracheostomy tube despite bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.

Speech Development in Cleft Palate with and without Robin Sequence.

BACKGROUND: Robin sequence is defined as the triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and upper airway obstruction. In up to 85 percent, it is associated with cleft palate. Many studies have reported worse speech development in Robin sequence children after cleft palate repair. The authors investigated speech development in isolated Robin sequence with cleft palate versus children with cleft palate only at the age of 5 to 6 years. METHODS: All Robin sequence children were treated with the Tübingen palatal plate after birth. Data were collected using the German version of the Great Ormond Street Speech Assessment. Audio and video recordings were reviewed and analyzed separately by two blinded senior phoniatricians based on the German version of the Universal Reporting Parameters for Cleft Palate Speech, and scored to enable comparability of speech outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-four children (Robin sequence, n = 22; cleft palate only, n = 22) were included. Robin sequence children were significantly older at surgery (11.8 months versus 7.1 months; p < 0.001) but younger at study (70.5 months versus 75.2 months; p = 0.035). They also had more severe cleft of the palate (p = 0.006). All children studied showed good to very good speech development without serious impairment. None of the reported parameters on the German version of the Universal Reporting Parameters for Cleft Palate Speech showed significant group differences; the median total score in the Robin sequence group was 23 (interquartile range, 16.5 to 27.5) versus 19 (interquartile range, 17 to 23) in the cleft palate-only group. Statistical analysis revealed no significant effect of group (Z = -1.47; p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: No group differences in speech development were found at age 5 to 6 years. Isolated Robin sequence does not necessarily represent a risk for impaired speech development. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in geriatric patients and real-life associations with diseases and drugs.

Risk factors for oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in elderly patients are mainly central nervous system (CNS) and structural organic diseases or presbyphagia. We analysed the OD prevalence and association of OD with multimorbidity and polypharmacy using real-life data to complete this spectrum, with a focus on further and iatrogenic risk. This was a cross-sectional retrospective study based on a random sample of 200 patients admitted to a geriatric hospital. Data analysis included diagnoses, the detailed list of drugs, and an intense clinical investigation of swallowing according to Stanschus to screen for OD in each patient. The mean patient age was 84 ± 6.5 years. The prevalence of OD was 29.0%, without an effect of age, but a higher rate was found in men and in nursing home residents and an elevated risk of pneumonia. OD risk was slight in diabetes mellitus and COPD, and pronounced in CNS diseases. A relevant OD association was found, even after adjusting for CNS diseases, with antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, anti-Parkinson drugs, antidepressants, and antiepileptics. Further risk of OD was found with beta-blockers, alpha-blockers, opioids, antiemetics, antivertiginosa or antihistamines, metoclopramide, domperidone, anticholinergics, loop diuretics, urologics, and ophthalmics. From real-life data in patients with and without CNS diseases, we identified drug groups associated with a risk of aggravating/inducing OD. Restrictive indications for these drugs may be a preventative contribution, requiring implementation in dysphagia guidelines and an integrative dysphagia risk scale that considers all associated and cumulative medication risks in addition to diseases.

Imaging of otosclerosis. / Bildgebung der Otosklerose.

BACKGROUND: Otosclerosis is an important cause of hearing loss and a widespread pathology in ENT medicine. Although a high diagnostic value of CT with impact on therapy is emphasized in the literature, the disease is seldom seen in the radiological routine diagnostics due to ENT findings often being diagnostic. Radiologists detect it rather more often in cases of unclear hearing loss or cochlear implant candidates. The findings may be very subtle. They require a target search and an optimal imaging technique. METHODS: This review article is based on a selective search of the literature in PubMed without any time frame restrictions as well as on the long clinical experience of the authors. RESULTS: The paper focuses on imaging aspects of otosclerosis: current role, advice for imaging technique, characteristic imaging signs, radiological differential diagnoses and findings after stapedoplasty. Pathology, clinical signs and therapeutic options are summarized briefly. CONCLUSIONS: With an optimal technique and sufficient radiological experience otosclerosis can be correctly diagnosed by imaging in a high percentage of cases. Radiology plays the key role in the diagnosis of retrofenestral otosclerosis. It can provide valuable information for the management of complications after stapedotomy. KEY POINTS: · X-ray cross-sectional imaging continues to be the method of first choice in the radiological diagnostics of otosclerosis. · With an optimal imaging technique and sufficient experience otosclerosis can be radiologically detected. · In complications after stapedoplasty, causes can be identified supporting the indication for a reoperation. CITATION FORMAT: · Kösling K, Plontke SK, Bartel S. Imaging of otosclerosis. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 745 - 753.

Population-based cross-sectional study to assess newborn hearing screening program in central Germany.

OBJECTIVES: Early diagnosis of congenital hearing loss is fundamental to minimize the negative consequences on the speech development. To lower the age at diagnosis and at intervention in hearing impaired children, not only universal newborn hearing screening (NHS) but also tracking is considered essential. The aim of the study was to evaluate the first six years after implementation of the population based newborn hearing screening program in Saxony-Anhalt, one German Federal State. METHODS: The cross-sectional cohort study consisted of three cohort samples. Overall 102,301 infants born between January 2010 and December 2015 were included. NHS protocol was developed as dual target group protocol with two sub-protocols. The screening technique included Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) test. Newborns were assigned to the sub-protocols according to their audiological risk factors. Additionally, to evaluate the quality of NHS and tracking (false-negative screening) we were analysing data from a cohort of hearing impaired children diagnosed up to the age of three years. We calculated quality indicators and compared them with international guidelines. RESULTS: 101,102 (98.8%) infants were screened. The prevalence of bilateral neonatal hearing loss was 2.32 per 1000 newborns. The median age was two days at first screening, three month at diagnostic testing, and four month at intervention onset. 2.6% infants were lost to follow-up. 56.3% had a final diagnosis of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The sensitivity of 0.85 (KI 95%: 0.76­0.91) and a specificity of 0.84 (KI 95%: 0.84­0.85) was calculated for the NHS program. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of benchmarks and outcomes of NHS demonstrated that the program reaches its main goal to identify the hearing impaired newborns in a timely manner.