Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 98: 325-333, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37536433

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the eventual added benefit of antigranulocyte monoclonal antibodies scintigraphy for the diagnostic imaging of aortic graft infection (AGI) and its role in evaluation of treatment outcome. METHODS: A population-based, retrospective, register-based analysis was carried out of all patients with infected aortic grafts after treatment for aneurysmal or aortoiliac occlusive disease at Karolinska University Hospital, covering the greater Stockholm area during November 2012-December 2020. Cases were based on the definitions in the 2016 Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaborations consensus. Using the in-hospital electronic patient registry (Take Care®) and the Swedish National Registry for Vascular Surgery (Swedvasc), 835 patients who had been treated for aortic aneurysms or aortoiliac occlusive disease were identified. The diagnostic arsenal of laboratory tests, computed tomography (CT), and clinical signs has been supplemented by antigranulocyte monoclonal antibodies (anti-G mAb) scintigraphy. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics. RESULTS: Eighteen cases of AGI out of 835 operations incorporating aortic grafts during the period were identified. Fourteen patients (78%) were categorized as diagnosed AGI (AGI-D), and the remaining 4 (22%) were classified as suspected AGI (AGI-S). In the AGI-D group (n = 14), 10 patients (71%) had positive CTs and 4 (29%) had low-probability CTs. In the group of 10 positive CTs, 9 patients also had positive scintigraphy scans with only one negative scintigraphy scan. There were no negative scintigraphy scans without ongoing antibiotic treatment at the time of investigation. In 15 of 18 cases, a culprit agent was identified, either preoperatively or perioperatively. Thirteen of the 18 patients were treated solely by antibiotics, whereas 5 underwent surgical treatment in addition to antibiotic treatment. The outcome has been divided into 3 groups: infection-free (n = 6; 33%), lifelong antibiotic treatment (n = 7; 39%), and deceased (n = 5; 28%). CONCLUSIONS: The imaging modalities in AGI diagnostics are a cornerstone of the investigative work-up, complemented by clinical signs and laboratory methods. The main advantage conveyed by anti-G mAb scintigraphy is in postoperative imaging and its ability to differentiate between infection and general postoperative changes in the areas of concern. We have identified 6 patients in our cohort in whom antibiotic therapy was discontinued after a negative anti-G mAb scintigraphy scan. Anti-G mAb scintigraphy may fulfill a unique need for diagnosis in suspected cases, evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in patients requiring long-term antibiotic treatment, and aiding in the decision to discontinue antibiotic therapy.


Subject(s)
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Humans , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Radionuclide Imaging , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
2.
Phys Med Biol ; 64(23): 235018, 2019 12 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31362272

ABSTRACT

One of the most commonly used imaging techniques for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) is ventilation/perfusion (V/P) scintigraphy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the currently used imaging protocols for V/P single photon emission computed tomography (V/P SPECT) at two nuclear medicine department sites and to investigate the effect of altering important protocol parameters. The Monte Carlo technique was used to simulate 4D digital phantoms with perfusion defects. Six imaging protocols were included in the study and a total of 72 digital patients were simulated. Six dually trained radiologists/nuclear medicine physicians reviewed the images and reported all perfusion mismatch findings. The radiologists also visually graded the image quality. No statistically significant differences in diagnostic performance were found between the studied protocols, but visual grading analysis pointed out one protocol as significantly superior to four of the other protocols. Considering the study results, we have decided to harmonize our clinical protocols for imaging patients with suspected PE. The administered Technegas and macro aggregated albumin activities have been altered, a low energy all purpose collimator is used instead of a low energy high resolution collimator and the acquisition times have been lowered.


Subject(s)
Perfusion Imaging/methods , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/methods , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/physiopathology , Monte Carlo Method , Perfusion Imaging/standards , Phantoms, Imaging , Pulmonary Ventilation , Reproducibility of Results , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...