Creation of a tool to evaluate supportive care.

RATIONAL: The absence of a specific tool to evaluate the impact of supportive care in general and socioesthetics (SE) in particular is undoubtedly at the origin of the lack of published research based on scientific standards. OBJECTIVE: We developed a supportive-care, patient-reported outcome questionnaire using the multistep methods, following COSMIN recommendations. METHODS: The Patient Centricity Questionnaire (PCQ) was developed using the standardized methodology for designing patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires according to the following steps: elaboration of the questionnaire, measurement properties of the questionnaire, internal and external validation, test-retest validation and translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and cognitive debriefing. A multidisciplinary work group was designed including professionals, such as physicians, public health experts, sociologists, supportive-care experts, and socioestheticians. RESULTS: Our questionnaire includes 11 items. It is scored by adding each Visual Analogue Scale [VAS], making it range from 0 to 110, with a higher benefit when the score is higher. The Cronbach's α coefficient is 0.88 for the entire questionnaire. As the questionnaire is a reflection of the patient's feelings, it is quite natural that the name "Patient Centricity Questionnaire" (PCQ) was retained and validated by the Scientific Committee. The PCQ correlated negatively and moderately with the Perceived Stress Scale [PSS], positively and moderately with the mental dimension of the Short Form-12, and poorly with the Well Beng 12 [WB12], the physical dimension of the SF-12, and the satisfaction VAS. CONCLUSION: Constructed according to the recommendations, the PCQ meets the prerequisite for this type of questionnaire. Its short format and simplicity of use allow it to be used by a large number of people. The PCQ is a simple, reliable, easy-to-use, and validated tool for research teams, making it possible for randomized studies to prove the impact of supportive care in general and SE in particular, on the patient's quality of life.

[Training and practice of socio-aesthetics]. / Formation et pratique de la socio-esthétique.

Socio-aesthetics has become very popular in recent years. Suffering from a lack of recognition and in the absence of a regulatory framework, it is still too often associated, in a somewhat caricatured way, with softness, relaxation or cocooning. While it is certainly a profession whose vocation is to "cause well-being", this is not its only mission.