Structural dynamics of clinically-reported VUS in the BARD1 ARD-BRCT region to predict the molecular basis of alterations.

The functional domains of BARD1, comprise the Ankyrin Repeat Domain (ARD), C-Terminal domains (BRCTs), and a linker between ARD and the BRCTs, which are known to bind to Cleavage stimulation Factor complex-subunit of 50 kDa (CstF-50). The pathogenic mutation Q564H in the BARD1 ARD-linker-BRCT region has been reported to abrogate the binding between BARD1 and CstF-50. Intermediate penetrance variants of BARD1 are associated with the occurrence of breast cancer. Therefore, seven missense variants of unknown significance (VUS), L447V, P454L, N470S, V507M, I509T, C557S, and Q564H of BARD1, reported in the ARD domain and the linker region were evaluated via molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The mutants revealed statistically significantly different distributions of RMSD (root mean square deviation), residuewise RMSF (root mean square fluctuation), Rg (radius of gyration), SASA (solvent accessible surface area), and COM (centre of mass)-to-COM distance between the ARD and the BRCT repeat, between the wild type and each mutant. The secondary structural composition of the mutants was slightly altered relative to that of the wild type. However, the reported in-silico based prediction require further validation using in-vitro, biophysical and structure-based approachCommunicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

In Silico and Structure-Based Assessment of Similar Variants Discovered in Tandem Repeats of BRCT Domains of BRCA1 and BARD1 To Characterize the Folding Pattern.

BRCA1 and BARD1 are important proteins in the homologous DNA damage repair pathways. Different genetic variants identified in these proteins have been clinically correlated with the occurrence of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Variants of unknown significance (VUS) reported in the BRCT domains of BRCA1 and BARD1 substantiate the importance of BRCT domain-containing proteins for genomic integrity. To classify the pathogenicity of variants, in silico, structural and molecular dynamics (MD)-based approaches were explored. Different variants reported in the BRCT region were retrieved from cBioPortal, LOVD3, BRCA Exchange, and COSMIC databases to evaluate the pathogenicity. Multiple sequence alignment and superimposition of the structures of BRCA1 BRCT and BARD1 BRCT domains were performed to compare alterations in folding patterns. From 11 in silico predictions servers, variants reported to be pathogenic by 70% of the servers were considered for structural analysis. To our observations, four residue pairs of both the proteins were reported, harboring 11 variants, H1686Y, W1718L, P1749L, P1749S, and W1837L variants for BRCA1 BRCT and H606D, H606N, W635L, P657L, P657S, and W762F for BARD1 BRCT. MD simulations of the BRCT repeat regions of these variants and wild-type proteins were performed to evaluate the differences of folding patterns. Root mean square deviation (RMSD), R g, solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), and root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) of variants showed slight differences in the folding patterns from the wild-type proteins. Furthermore, principal components analysis of H1686Y, P1749S, and W1718L variants of BRCA1 showed less flexibility than the wild type, whereas that of H606D, W635L, and W762F of BARD1 showed more flexibility than the wild type. Normal mode analysis of the energy minima from the simulation trajectories revealed that most of the variants do not show much differences in the flexibility compared to the wild-type proteins, except for the discrete regions in the BRCT repeats, most prominently in the 1798-1801 amino acid region of BRCA1 and at the residue 744 in BARD1.