ABSTRACT
abstract: Primary synovial chondromatosis of the hip is a rare joint condition characterized by the abnormal proliferation of cartilaginous tissue within the synovial membrane, which leads to the formation of clusters of chondrocytes floating in the joint space. This commentary provides a comprehensive overview of the pathology, including symptoms, diagnosis, treatment options and long-term management. Patients with primary synovial chondromatosis complaint pain and functional impairment, together with a peculiar joint popping sensation during movement, so determining early disability. The early treatment can lead to better clinical outcomes, with increased preservation of joint function and reduced risk of long-term disability, but strictly depend on symptoms acknowledgement and proper imaging interpretation. As a chronic pathology, surgical approach must necessarily be part of a larger medical and rehabilitative care planning, with long period follow-up. Multidisciplinary team management, with the active involvement of the patient is pivotal in improving the clinical outcomes and quality of life.
Subject(s)
Chondromatosis, Synovial , Hip Joint , Physical Therapy Modalities , Humans , Chondromatosis, Synovial/surgery , Chondromatosis, Synovial/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of the treatment of radial head comminuted fractures is the restoration of anatomical normalcy to avoid the risk of several complications such as joint instability. Among the options for the treatment of such fractures, it is worth mentioning osteosynthesis, resection of the radial head or prosthetic replacement. In the presence of comminution or severe dislocation of the fracture's fragments, as in our patient's type III Mason fracture, prosthesis implantation is the treatment of choice. CASE REPORT: This clinical case reports a 22-year-old volleyball player, who during training suffered a comminuted fracture of the radial head, type III according to Mason's classification. A prosthesis was implanted. The post-operative course took place regularly. However, approximately three months after surgery, the patient experienced sudden pain and functional limitation following a normal elbow extension movement, so much so that he required medical attention in our emergency room. Following all the appropriate clinical-instrumental tests, a complete dissociation of the bipolar prosthesis of the radial head was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical case shows the disassembly of a bipolar radial head prosthesis, a rather rare complication. From a medicolegal perspective, the patients should be aware of the increased risk of requiring further surgery after radial head replacement. When patients are thoroughly informed, they can cooperate and comply with indications more effectively, thus taking an active role in recovery management.
Subject(s)
Elbow Joint , Fractures, Comminuted , Radius Fractures , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Elbow Joint/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Fractures, Comminuted/surgery , Prostheses and Implants , Prosthesis Implantation , Radius/surgery , Radius Fractures/surgery , Range of Motion, Articular , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objetivo: Determinar la prevalencia del trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT) en una muestra de médicos residentes del Hospital de Clínicas, José de San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina, un año después del cierre total durante la cuarentena por COVID-19. Materiales y métodos: Se administraron los siguientes cuestionarios autoadministrados: una encuesta demográfica, el cuestionario de la Escala de Trauma de Davidson y la Escala de Experiencias Disociativas (EED). Se excluyeron a los residentes de primer año de especialidades básicas, a aquellos que por su especialidad no tienen contacto con pacientes y a los médicos con licencia fueron excluidos. Resultados: La prevalencia de TEPT fue de 24.3% (n=25). Las medianas de las puntuaciones de DES fueron mayores en los participantes con puntaje positivo para TEPT en comparación con los que no lo presentaban (Mann-Whitney U:13.30, p = 0.001). Se encontraron asociaciones entre el género (X2:6.074, p = 0.013), el TEPT y el tipo de especialidad (prueba exacta de Fisher, p = 0.017). No se encontraron otras asociaciones entre las demás variables analizadas y el TEPT. Conclusion: La prevalencia del TEPT fue similar a los informes previos. Se hallaron asociaciones entre este desorden, el género y el tipo de especialidad. Estos resultados deberían llamar la atención de los sistemas de salud para establecer medidas preventivas y terapéuticas para manejar esta situación.
Objective: Determine the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in a sample of resident doctors of the Hospital de Clínicas, José de San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina, one year after the total closure during the quarantine by COVID-19. Materials and Methods: The following self-administered questionnaires were dispensed: a demographic survey, the Davidson Trauma Scale questionnaire, and the Scale of Dissociative Experiences (EED). First year residents of basic specialties were excluded, those who for their specialty do not have contact with patients and licensed doctors were excluded. Results: PTSD prevalence was 24.3% (n = 25). The medium-sized ones were greater in the participants with positive score for PTSD compared to those who did not present it (Mann-Whitney U: 13.30, p = 0.001). Associations between the genre were found (X2: 6,074, p = 0.013), the PTSD and the type of specialty (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.017). No other associations were found between the other variables analyzed and the PTSD. Conclusion: The prevalence of the PTSD was similar to the previous reports. Associations between this disorder, gender and type of specialty were found. These results should draw the attention of health systems to establish preventive and therapeutic measures to handle this situation
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Dissociative Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Assistance , COVID-19 , Medical Staff, HospitalABSTRACT
Las medidas angulares y el uso de los planos de referencia craneales, no son confiables en la determinación de un correcto diagnóstico. Por consiguiente, no siempre las medidas cefalométricas de los tejidos duros reflejan lo que vemos en la cara del paciente. Los tratamientos basados sólo en las relaciones dentoesqueletales, suelen conducir a resultados estéticamente inadecuados(AU)