Parental preference and perspectives on continuous pulse oximetry in infants and children with bronchiolitis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate parental preference of continuous pulse oximetry in infants and children with bronchiolitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at Hamad Medical Corporation in Qatar. Parents of infants and children <24 months old and hospitalized with bronchiolitis were offered an interview survey. RESULTS: A total of 132 questionnaires were completed (response rate 100%). Approximately 90% of participants were 20-40 years of age, and 85% were females. The mean age of children was 7.2±5.8 months. Approximately eight in ten parents supported the idea of continuous pulse oximetry in children with bronchiolitis. Almost 43% of parents believed that continuous pulse-oximetry monitoring would delay their children's hospital discharge. Interestingly, approximately 85% of caregivers agreed that continuous pulse oximetry had a good impact on their children's health. In addition, around one in two of the participants stated that good bedside examinations can obviate the need for continuous pulse oximetry. Furthermore, 80% of parents believed that continuous pulse-oximetry monitoring would give the health-care provider a good sense of security regarding the child's health. Finally, being a male parent was associated with significantly increased risk of reporting unnecessary fatigue, attributed to the sound of continuous pulse oximetry (P=0.031). CONCLUSION: Continuous pulse-oximetry monitoring in children with bronchiolitis was perceived as reassuring for parents. Involving parents in decision-making is considered essential in the better management of children with bronchiolitis or any other disease. The first step to decrease continuous pulse oximetry will require provider education and change as well. Furthermore, we recommend proper counseling for parents, emphasizing that medical technology is not always essential, but is a complementary mode of managing a disease.

How to manage peroperative haemorrhage when vaginally treating genital prolapse.

Surgery of genital prolapse causes haemorrhagic complications in about 1% of cases. The pelvis is highly vascular and accessing the usual landmarks of vaginal surgery, in particular the sciatic spine, is delicate work. Meticulous dissection of closed spaces is often difficult, and exposure and haemostatic procedures will be challenging in the event of any bleeding complication. When fixing prosthesis to the sacrospinous ligament, the inferior gluteal artery and its coccygeal branch are at risk. Fixation to the sacrospinous ligament must be performed more than 25mm away from the sciatic spine and, if possible, must not transfixiate it. Safe insertion of prosthesis requires sufficient experience, and an adequate learning curve. Being aware of vascular anatomy allows one to understand and treat haemorrhagic incidents. Packing or selective embolization seem to be the two methods to adopt, depending on the severity of bleeding and the conditions of exposure on the one hand, and on the technical resources available for embolization, on the other. Hypogastric ligature appears to be ineffective in this context.

Inhibition of colonic motility and defecation by RS-127445 suggests an involvement of the 5-HT2B receptor in rodent large bowel physiology.

BACKGROUND: 5-HT(2B) receptors are localized within the myenteric nervous system, but their functions on motor/sensory neurons are unclear. To explore the role of these receptors, we further characterized the 5-HT(2B) receptor antagonist RS-127445 and studied its effects on peristalsis and defecation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Although reported as a selective 5-HT(2B) receptor antagonist, any interactions of RS-127445 with 5-HT(4) receptors are unknown; this was examined using the recombinant receptor and Biomolecular Interaction Detection technology. Mouse isolated colon was mounted in tissue baths for isometric recording of neuronal contractions evoked by electrical field stimulation (EFS), or under an intraluminal pressure gradient to induce peristalsis; the effects of RS-127445 on EFS-induced and on peristaltic contractions were measured. Faecal output of rats in grid-bottom cages was measured over 3 h following i.p. RS-127445 and separately, validation of the effective doses was achieved by determining the free, unbound fraction of RS-127445 in blood and brain. KEY RESULTS: RS-127445 (up to 1 micromol x L(-1)) did not interact with the 5-HT(4) receptor. RS-127445 (0.001-1 micromol x L(-1)) did not affect EFS-induced contractions of the colon, although at 10 micromol x L(-1) the contractions were reduced (to 36 +/- 8% of control, n= 4). RS-127445 (0.1-10 micromol x L(-1)) concentration-dependently reduced peristaltic frequency (n= 4). RS-127445 (1-30 mg x kg(-1)), dose-dependently reduced faecal output, reaching significance at 10 and 30 mg x kg(-1) (n= 6-11). In blood and brain, >98% of RS-127445 was protein-bound. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: High-protein binding of RS-127445 indicates that relatively high doses are required for efficacy. The results suggest that 5-HT(2B) receptors tonically regulate colonic motility.

Activation of prostaglandin EP receptors by lubiprostone in rat and human stomach and colon.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lubiprostone (Amitiza), a possible ClC-2 channel opener derived from prostaglandin E(1) and indicated for the treatment of constipation, increases chloride ion transport and fluid secretion into the intestinal lumen. As lubiprostone may also directly modulate gastrointestinal motility, we investigated its actions and the possible involvement of prostaglandin EP receptor activation on rat and human isolated gastrointestinal preparations. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Rat and human isolated preparations were mounted in tissue baths for isometric recording. The effects of lubiprostone on muscle tension and on electrically stimulated, neuronal contractions were investigated in the absence and presence of EP receptor antagonists. KEY RESULTS: In rat and human stomach longitudinal muscle, lubiprostone induced a contraction (pEC(50) of 7.0+/-0.0, n=4 and 6.4+/-0.2, n=3, respectively), which was inhibited by pretreatment with the EP(1) receptor antagonist, EP(1)A 300 nM (pEC(50) reduced to 6.2+/-0.2, n=6), but not by the EP(3) or EP(4) receptor antagonists (L-798106 and GW627368X, respectively, 1 microM, P>0.05). Lubiprostone also reduced electrically stimulated, neuronal contractions in rat and human colon circular muscle preparations (pIC(50) of 8.9+/-0.4, n=7 and 8.7+/-0.9, n=6, respectively), an effect mediated pre-junctionally. This effect was reduced by the EP(4) receptor antagonist (pIC(50) of 6.7+/-1.1, n=7 and 7.7+/-0.4, n=6, respectively) but not by EP(1) or EP(3) receptor antagonists. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In rats and humans, lubiprostone contracts stomach longitudinal muscle and inhibits neuronally mediated contractions of colon circular muscle. Experiments are now needed to determine if this additional activity of lubiprostone contributes to its clinical efficacy and/or side-effect profile.

Differences between the abilities of tegaserod and motilin receptor agonists to stimulate gastric motility in vitro.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Motilin or 5-HT4 receptor agonists stimulate gastrointestinal motility. Differences in activity are suggested but direct comparisons are few. A method was devised to directly compare the gastric prokinetic activities of motilin, the motilin receptor agonist, erythromycin, and the 5-HT4 receptor agonist, tegaserod. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Gastric prokinetic-like activity was assessed by measuring the ability to facilitate cholinergically-mediated contractions evoked by electrical field stimulation (EFS) in rabbit isolated stomach. Comparisons were made between potency, maximal activity and duration of responses. KEY RESULTS: Rabbit motilin (r.motilin) 0.003-0.3 microM, [Nle13]motilin 0.003-0.3 microM, erythromycin 0.3-10 microM and tegaserod 0.1-10 microM caused concentration - dependent potentiation of EFS-evoked contractions. The potency ranking was r.motilin = [Nle13]motilin > tegaserod > erythromycin. The Emax ranking was r.motilin = [Nle13]motilin = erythromycin > tegaserod. Responses to r.motilin and [Nle13]motilin faded rapidly (t1/2 9 and 11 min, respectively) whereas those to erythromycin and tegaserod were maintained longer (t1/2 24 and 28 min). The difference did not appear to be due to peptide degradation. A second application of [Nle13]motilin was excitatory after 60 min contact and fade of the initial response (responses to 0.03 and 0.1 microM [Nle13]motilin were not different from those caused by the first application). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Prokinetic-like activities of the 5-HT4 agonist tegaserod and the motilin receptor agonists were compared by measuring changes in cholinergically-mediated contractions. This novel approach highlighted important differences between classes (greater Emax of motilin, compared with tegaserod) and for the first time, within each class (short t1/2 for motilin, compared with erythromycin).

Neuromedin U can exert colon-specific, enteric nerve-mediated prokinetic activity, via a pathway involving NMU1 receptor activation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The neuromedin U (NMU) receptors, NMU1 and NMU2, are expressed in the gut but their functions are unclear. This study explores the role of NMU in gastrointestinal motility. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effects of NMU were examined in the forestomach and colon isolated from NMU2R wild-type and NMU2R-/- (knockout) mice, looking for changes in muscle tension and in nerve-mediated responses evoked by electrical field stimulation (EFS), and in models of peristalsis in mouse colon and faecal pellet transit in guinea-pig colon. KEY RESULTS: In the mouse forestomach, NMU (1 nM-10 microM) concentration-dependently induced muscle contraction, in the presence of tetrodotoxin and atropine, in preparations from both wild-type and NMU2R-/- mice (pEC50: 7.9, 7.6, Emax: 0.26, 0.20g tension, respectively, n=8 each concentration). The same concentrations of NMU had no consistent effects on the responses to EFS (n=8). In the mouse colon, NMU (0.1 nM-1 microM) had no significant effect on baseline muscle tension (n=8), but concentration-dependently potentiated EFS-evoked contractions in preparations from both wild-type and NMU2R-/- mice, pEC50: 8.1, 7.8, Emax: 24%, 21%, respectively, n=6-11. NMU (0.01 nM-0.1 microM, n=5-7) concentration-dependently decreased the interval between waves of peristalsis in the mouse colon (pEC50: 8.8) and increased the rate at which a faecal pellet moved along the guinea-pig colon. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results demonstrate that NMU exerts colon-specific, nerve-mediated, prokinetic activity, via a pathway involving activation of NMU1 receptors. This suggests that this receptor may represent a molecular target for the treatment of intestinal motility disorders.

Little or no ability of obestatin to interact with ghrelin or modify motility in the rat gastrointestinal tract.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Obestatin, encoded by the ghrelin gene may inhibit gastrointestinal (GI) motility. This activity was re-investigated. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Rat GI motility was studied in vitro (jejunum contractility and cholinergically-mediated contractions of forestomach evoked by electrical field stimulation; EFS) and in vivo (gastric emptying and intestinal myoelectrical activity). Ghrelin receptor function was studied using a GTPgammaS assay and transfected cells. KEY RESULTS: Contractions of the jejunum or forestomach were unaffected by obestatin 100 nM or 0.01-1000 nM, respectively (P>0.05 each; n=4-18). Obestatin (0.1-1 nM) reduced the ability of ghrelin 1 microM to facilitate EFS-evoked contractions of the stomach (increases were 42.7+/-7.8% and 21.2+/-5.0 % in the absence and presence of obestatin 1 nM; P<0.05; n=12); higher concentrations (10-1000 nM) tended to reduce the response to ghrelin but changes were not statistically significant. Similar concentrations of obestatin did not significantly reduce a facilitation of contractions caused by the 5-HT(4) receptor agonist prucalopride, although an inhibitory trend occurred at the higher concentrations (increases were 69.3+/-14.0% and 42.6+/-8.7% in the absence and presence of 1000 nM obestatin; n=10). Obestatin (up to 10 microM) did not modulate recombinant ghrelin receptor function. Ghrelin increased gastric emptying and reduced MMC cycle time; obestatin (1000 and 30,000 pmol kg(-1) min(-1)) had no effects. Obestatin (2500 pmol kg(-1) min(-1), starting 10 min before ghrelin) did not prevent the ability of ghrelin (500 pmol kg(-1) min(-1)) to shorten MMC cycle time. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Obestatin has little ability to modulate rat GI motility.

The relationship between the effects of short-chain fatty acids on intestinal motility in vitro and GPR43 receptor activation.

The G protein-coupled receptors, GPR41 and GPR43, are activated by short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), with distinct rank order potencies. This study investigated the possibility that SCFAs modulate intestinal motility via these receptors. Luminal SCFA concentrations within the rat intestine were greatest in the caecum (c. 115 mmol L(-1)) and proximal colon. Using similar concentrations (0.1-100 mmol L(-1)), SCFAs were found to inhibit electrically evoked, neuronally mediated contractions of rat distal colon, possibly via a prejunctional site of action; this activity was independent of the presence or absence of the mucosa. By contrast, SCFAs reduced the amplitude but also reduced the threshold and increased the frequency of peristaltic contractions in guinea-pig terminal ileum. In each model, the rank-order of activity was acetate (C2) approximately propionate (C3) approximately butyrate (C4) > pentanoate (C5) approximately formate (C1), consistent with activity at the GPR43 receptor. GPR43 mRNA was expressed throughout the rat gut, with highest levels in the colon. However, the ability of SCFAs to inhibit neuronally mediated contractions of the colon was similar in tissues from wild-type and GPR43 gene knockout mice, with identical rank-orders of potency. In conclusion, SCFAs can modulate intestinal motility, but these effects can be independent of the GPR43 receptor.

5-HT4 receptor agonists enhance both cholinergic and nitrergic activities in human isolated colon circular muscle.

Previous studies have demonstrated mixed inhibitory and facilitatory effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine-4 (5-HT(4)) receptor agonists on electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced responses in human isolated colon. Here we report three types of responses to EFS in human isolated colon circular muscle: monophasic cholinergic contraction during EFS, biphasic response (nitrergic relaxation during EFS followed by cholinergic contraction after termination of EFS) and triphasic response (cholinergic contraction followed by nitrergic relaxation during EFS and a tachykininergic contraction after EFS). The effects of two 5-HT(4) receptor agonists, prucalopride and tegaserod were then investigated on monophasic responses only. Each compound inhibited contractions during EFS in a concentration-dependent manner. In the presence of N(omega)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) however, prucalopride and tegaserod enhanced the contractions in a concentration-dependent manner. In strips where the tone was elevated with substance-P and treated with scopolamine, EFS-induced relaxations were enhanced by the two agonists. The above observed effects by the two agonists were abolished by 5-HT(4) receptor antagonist SB-204070. The two agonists did not alter the tone raised by substance-P in the presence of scopolamine and l-NAME and did not affect carbachol-induced contractions in the presence of tetrodotoxin. These results suggest that in the circular muscle of human colon, 5-HT(4) receptor agonists simultaneously facilitate the activity of neurones which release the inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitters, nitric oxide and acetylcholine respectively.

Growth hormone secretagogue receptors in rat and human gastrointestinal tract and the effects of ghrelin.

The peptide hormone ghrelin is known to be present within stomach and, to a lesser extent, elsewhere in gut. Although reports suggest that gastric function may be modulated by ghrelin acting via the vagus nerve, the gastrointestinal distribution and functions of its receptor, the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), are not clear and may show signs of species-dependency. This study sought to determine the cellular localisation and distribution of GHS-R-immunoreactivity (-Ir) using immunofluorescent histochemistry and explore the function of ghrelin in both human and rat isolated gastric and/or colonic circular muscle preparations in which nerve-mediated responses were evoked by electrical field stimulation. The expression of GHS-R-Ir differed to a greater extent between species than between gut regions of the same species. Both the human and rat gastric and colonic preparations (n=3 each) expressed GHS-R-Ir within neuronal cell bodies and fibres, cells associated with gastric glands and putative entero-endocrine and/or mast cells. Smooth muscle cells and epithelia were devoid of GHS-R-Ir and only rat preparations expressed GHS-R-Ir on nerve fibres associated with the muscle layers. GHS-R-Ir was fully competed in all cases in pre-adsorption studies and antiserum specificity was confirmed using a cell line transiently expressing the rat GHS-R. In rat isolated forestomach circular muscle, ghrelin 0.1-10 microM had no effect on smooth muscle tension but concentration-dependently facilitated the amplitude of contractions evoked by excitatory nerve stimulation (n=4-7; P<0.05 for each concentration versus vehicle; n=18). When examined under similar conditions, in both rat distal colon (n=4-6, P>0.05 each) and human ascending (n=3) and sigmoid (n=1) colon, these concentrations of ghrelin were without effect (P>0.05 each). The data suggest that ghrelin has the potential to profoundly affect gastrointestinal functions in both species and at least one of these functions is to exert a gastric prokinetic activity. Moreover, we suggest that this activity of ghrelin is mediated via the enteric nervous system, in addition to known vagus nerve-dependent mechanisms.

Propofol versus thiopentone for induction of anesthesia in patients undergoing outpatient surgery.

Investigation was carried out on 40 females undergoing dilation and curettage or laparoscopy on outpatient basis. All patients were premedicated with pethidine and atropine. In 20 patients, anesthesia was induced with intravenous propofol 2 mg/kg (Group I), and in the other 20 patients thiopentone 4 mg/kg was used (Group II). Prior to induction of anesthesia, 80 mg of lignocaine (4 ml of 2%) was injected intravenously to be followed by the induction agent. No pain followed the injection of propofol or thiopentone and smooth induction of anesthesia was achieved within 60 seconds. Injection of suxamethonium 100 mg and tracheal intubation was then performed and anesthesia was maintained with 66% N2O in O2 supplemented by suxamethonium drip. In the thiopentone group, SBP decreased after induction and tracheal intubation was followed by a significant increase of SBP and HR. In the propofol group, both SBP and HR decreased after induction and tracheal intubation was also followed by an increase of SBP and HR. However, the increase of SBP was less than that observed in the thiopentone group and the increase of HR was not significant when compared to the control value. At the end of surgery and cessation of anesthesia, recovery was scored. After 10 minutes, all patients in the propofol group were awake and initiated conversation while 12 patients of the thiopentone group were still sleepy. The results suggest that propofol may be preferred to thiopentone for induction of anesthesia in outpatient surgery.