ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of ustekinumab and vedolizumab for treating complex perianal fistula in Crohn's disease has been barely studied. We aimed to assess treatment persistence, clinical remission, and safety of these drugs in this context. METHODS: Crohn's disease patients who had received ustekinumab or vedolizumab for the indication of active complex perianal fistula, were included. Clinical remission was defined according to Fistula Drainage Assessment Index (no drainage through the fistula upon gentle pressure) based on physicians' assessment. RESULTS: Of 155 patients, 136 received ustekinumab, and 35 vedolizumab (16 received both). Median follow-up for ustekinumab was 27 months. Among those on ustekinumab, 54 % achieved remission, and within this group, 27 % relapsed during follow-up. The incidence rate of relapse was 11 % per patient-year. Multivariate analysis found no variables associated with treatment discontinuation or relapse. Median follow-up time for patients receiving vedolizumab was 19 months. Remission was achieved in 46 % of the patients receiving vedolizumab, and among them, 20 % relapsed during follow-up. The incidence rate of relapse was 7 % per patient-year. Adverse events were mild in 6 % on ustekinumab and 8 % on vedolizumab. CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab and vedolizumab appear effective, achieving remission in around half of complex perianal fistula patients, with favorable safety profiles.
ABSTRACT
Background Thiopurines such as azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) are commonly utilized to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Their use is frequently restricted due to gastrointestinal intolerance (GI). Previous retrospective studies have reported that AZA-intolerant patients may benefit from a switch to MP; yet the effectiveness of this strategy has not been prospectively evaluated.AimsTo assess GI tolerance to MP in patients who are intolerant to AZA, and to identify clinical predictors of GI intolerance to AZA or MP.MethodsA prospective, observational, single-cohort study was performed in 92 thiopurine-naïve IBD patients. They were started on a 50mg dose of AZA and escalated to 2.5mg/kg per day by week 2. Those with GI intolerance were rechallenged with a 50% dose of AZA, after which another dose escalation attempt was made. If symptoms persisted, they were switched to MP.ResultsThirty (32.6%) of the recruited patients suffered from GI intolerance to AZA. Of these, 15 did not present recurrence of symptoms after rechallenge with lower doses. Of 15 intolerant patients, 14 were switched to MP. Within the MP cohort, 8 patients (57%) were also intolerant to MP, 5 (36%) had no symptoms, and 1 (7%) was lost to follow-up. Female gender was the only independent predictor of GI intolerance to AZA.ConclusionsUp to half of the AZA-intolerant patients tolerated a 50% dose rechallenge that was successfully escalated. A switch to MP was tolerated in over a third of cases whom rechallenge failed. Our strategy (challengerechallengeswitch) achieved an overall GI tolerance to thiopurines in most of the patients. (AU)
Antecedentes Las tiopurinas como la azatioprina (AZA) y la mercaptopurina (MP) se utilizan comúnmente para tratar la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII). Su uso está frecuentemente restringido debido a la intolerancia gastrointestinal. Estudios retrospectivos anteriores han informado que los pacientes intolerantes a la AZA pueden beneficiarse de un cambio a MP; sin embargo, la eficacia de esta estrategia no ha sido evaluada prospectivamente.ObjetivosEvaluar la tolerancia gastrointestinal a MP en pacientes que son intolerantes a AZA e identificar predictores clínicos de intolerancia gastrointestinal a AZA o MP.MétodosSe realizó un estudio prospectivo, observacional y de cohorte única en 92 pacientes con EII que nunca habían recibido tiopurinas. Comenzaron con una dosis de 50mg de AZA y se aumentó a 2,5mg/kg por día en la semana 2. En aquellos con intolerancia gastrointestinal se administró una dosis del 50% de AZA que se fue incrementando en función de la tolerancia. Si los síntomas persistían, se cambiaba a MP.ResultadosTreinta (32,6%) de los pacientes reclutados presentaron intolerancia gastrointestinal a la AZA. De estos, 15 no presentaron recurrencia de los síntomas después de la nueva exposición. De los 15 pacientes que no toleraron una dosis más baja, 14 recibieron MP. De los que recibieron MP, 8 pacientes (57%) también eran intolerantes a MP, 5 (36%) no tenían síntomas y uno (7%) se perdió durante el seguimiento. El género femenino fue el único predictor independiente de intolerancia gastrointestinal a la AZA.ConclusionesHasta la mitad de los pacientes intolerantes a la AZA toleran una nueva exposición al 50% de la dosis. Se toleró un cambio a MP en más de un tercio de los casos en los que la reexposición fracasó. Nuestra estrategia logró la tolerancia gastrointestinal a tiopurinas en la mayoría de los pacientes. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Azathioprine/administration & dosage , Azathioprine/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Mercaptopurine/administration & dosage , Mercaptopurine/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the digestive tract usually characterized by diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and abdominal pain. IBD includes Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis as the main entities. IBD is a debilitating condition that can lead to life-threatening complications, involving possible malignancy and surgery. The available therapies aim to achieve long-term remission and prevent disease progression. Biologics are bioengineered therapeutic drugs that mainly target proteins. Although they have revolutionized the treatment of IBD, their potential therapeutic benefits are limited due to large interindividual variability in clinical response in terms of efficacy and toxicity, resulting in high rates of long-term therapeutic failure. It is therefore important to find biomarkers that provide tailor-made treatment strategies that allow for patient stratification to maximize treatment benefits and minimize adverse events. Pharmacogenetics has the potential to optimize biologics selection in IBD by identifying genetic variants, specifically single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which are the underlying factors associated with an individual's drug response. This review analyzes the current knowledge of genetic variants associated with biological agent response (infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab) in IBD. An online literature search in various databases was conducted. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 28 reports from the 1685 results were employed for the review. The most significant SNPs potentially useful as predictive biomarkers of treatment response are linked to immunity, cytokine production, and immunorecognition.
Subject(s)
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/genetics , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Pharmacogenetics/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite research, there are still controversial areas in the management of Crohn's disease (CD). OBJECTIVE: To establish practical recommendations on using anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs in patients with moderate-to-severe CD. METHODS: Clinical controversies in the management of CD using anti-TNF therapies were identified. A comprehensive literature review was performed, and a national survey was launched to examine current clinical practices when using anti-TNF therapies. Their results were discussed by expert gastroenterologists within a nominal group meeting, and a set of statements was proposed and tested in a Delphi process. RESULTS: Qualitative study. The survey and Delphi process were sent to 244 CD-treating physicians (response rate: 58%). A total of 14 statements were generated. All but two achieved agreement. These statements cover: (1) use of first-line non-anti-TNF biological therapy; (2) role of HLA-DQA1*05 in daily practice; (3) attitudes in primary non-response and loss of response to anti-TNF therapy due to immunogenicity; (4) use of ustekinumab or vedolizumab if a change in action mechanism is warranted; (5) anti-TNF drug level monitoring; (6) combined therapy with an immunomodulator. CONCLUSION: This document sought to pull together the best evidence, experts' opinions, and treating physicians' attitudes when using anti-TNF therapies in patients with CD.
Subject(s)
Crohn Disease , Humans , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Delphi Technique , NecrosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Ustekinumab was recently approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Although data from the UNIFI clinical trial are encouraging, real-world data assessing effectiveness and safety are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness, safety and pharmacokinetics of ustekinumab in a large cohort of refractory UC patients. METHODS: Multicenter observational study of UC patients who received ustekinumab for active disease. The Partial Mayo Score (PMS), endoscopic activity, C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC) were recorded at baseline and at different time points. Demographic and clinical data, adverse events (AEs) and surgeries were documented. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were analyzed from 4 referral Spanish hospitals. The clinical remission rates were 59%, 56.5%, 57% and 69% of patients at weeks 8, 16, 24 and 52, respectively. Normalization of FC was achieved in 39.6%, 41% and 51% at weeks 8, 24 and 52, respectively. CRP normalization was observed in 79%, 75% and 76.5% of patients at weeks 8, 24 and 52, respectively. Fewer previous anti-TNF agents and loss of response to anti-TNF were associated with clinical response and normalization of FC, respectively. AEs were observed in 5 patients, and 9 underwent colectomy. Ustekinumab persistence rates were 91%, 83% and 81% at 24, 48 and 96 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab demonstrated, in the real-world setting, long-term effectiveness and a favorable safety profile in a cohort of refractory UC patients.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Ustekinumab , Humans , Ustekinumab/therapeutic use , Colitis, Ulcerative/surgery , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Remission Induction , C-Reactive ProteinABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, affecting millions of individuals throughout the world, and producing an impaired health-related quality of life. Granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA) is a therapeutic option for UC management to induce remission by selective removal of activated leukocytes from bloodstream. Despite the knowledge of the important role of epigenetics in UC pathogenesis, and in the response to different treatments, nothing is known about the role of microRNAs in GMA therapy in UC patients. METHODS: Seven consecutively UC patients who started GMA in combo therapy with infliximab were recruited. Peripheral blood samples were taken before the apheresis session, at the start of the induction (S0) and at the end (S10). They were follow-up during the induction phase (10 sessions: 2 sessions for a week during 3 wk and 1 session for a week during 4 wk) of the treatment at a tertiary hospital (Hospital la Fe) and 6 mo after finishing the GMA induction therapy. MiRNA was extracted and analyzed by RT-PCR. R software and GraphPad were used. RESULTS: Clinical disease activity significantly decreased after induction therapy with GMA (median partial Mayo score 2 (IQR, 1-6) (P < .05). Fecal calprotectin value and CRP value significantly decreased after induction therapy. Five microRNAs modified their expression during GMA (unsupervised analysis): miR-342-3p, miR-215-5p, miR-376c-3p, miR-139-5p, and miR-150-5p. When a sub-analysis was performed in those patients who showed good response to apheresis treatment (n = 5), two microRNAs showed to be implicated: miR-215-5p and miR-365a-3p. These are preliminary but promising and novel results, as it is the first time, to our knowledge that microRNA profiles have been studied in the context of GMA treatment for IBD.
Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Colitis, Ulcerative , MicroRNAs , Humans , Monocytes , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors , Adsorption , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Blood Component Removal/methods , Granulocytes , Remission Induction , Leukapheresis/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thiopurines such as azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) are commonly utilized to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Their use is frequently restricted due to gastrointestinal intolerance (GI). Previous retrospective studies have reported that AZA-intolerant patients may benefit from a switch to MP; yet the effectiveness of this strategy has not been prospectively evaluated. AIMS: To assess GI tolerance to MP in patients who are intolerant to AZA, and to identify clinical predictors of GI intolerance to AZA or MP. METHODS: A prospective, observational, single-cohort study was performed in 92 thiopurine-naïve IBD patients. They were started on a 50mg dose of AZA and escalated to 2.5mg/kg per day by week 2. Those with GI intolerance were rechallenged with a 50% dose of AZA, after which another dose escalation attempt was made. If symptoms persisted, they were switched to MP. RESULTS: Thirty (32.6%) of the recruited patients suffered from GI intolerance to AZA. Of these, 15 did not present recurrence of symptoms after rechallenge with lower doses. Of 15 intolerant patients, 14 were switched to MP. Within the MP cohort, 8 patients (57%) were also intolerant to MP, 5 (36%) had no symptoms, and 1 (7%) was lost to follow-up. Female gender was the only independent predictor of GI intolerance to AZA. CONCLUSIONS: Up to half of the AZA-intolerant patients tolerated a 50% dose rechallenge that was successfully escalated. A switch to MP was tolerated in over a third of cases whom rechallenge failed. Our strategy (challenge-rechallenge-switch) achieved an overall GI tolerance to thiopurines in most of the patients.
ABSTRACT
The immune system and environmental factors are involved in various diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), through their effect on genetics, which modulates immune cells. IBD encompasses two main phenotypes, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, which are manifested as chronic and systemic relapse-remitting gastrointestinal tract disorders with rising global incidence and prevalence. The pathophysiology of IBD is complex and not fully understood. Epigenetic research has resulted in valuable information for unraveling the etiology of this immune-mediated disease. Thus, the main objective of the present review is to summarize the current findings on the role of epigenetic mechanisms in IBD to shed light on their potential clinical relevance. This review focuses on the latest evidence regarding peripheral blood mononuclear cells and epigenetic changes in histone modification, DNA methylation, and telomere shortening in IBD. The various identified epigenetic DNA profiles with clinical value in IBD could be used as biomarkers for more accurately predicting disease development, treatment response, and therapy-related adverse events. Ultimately, the information presented here could be of potential relevance for future clinical practice in developing more efficient and precise medicine to improve the quality of life for patients with IBD.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Humans , Leukocytes, Mononuclear , Quality of Life , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/genetics , Epigenesis, Genetic/geneticsABSTRACT
Aim: Stricture is one of the main complications of Crohn's disease (CD). Among the main conservative therapeutic alternatives, endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) of the strictures stands out, which can improve the symptoms and delay or even avoid the need for more surgeries. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the EBD in CD patients with post-surgical anastomotic strictures from a previous surgery. Patients and methods: An observational study of a cohort of 32 patients with CD who underwent EBD due to uncomplicated strictures at a tertiary hospital, since 2009. Demographic, clinical and disease variables, medical treatments and previous surgeries and types, analytical variables at the time of dilation, number of dilations, complications and need for subsequent surgery were collected by searching data in clinical records. Results: Thirty-two patients were included, performing a total of 63 endoscopic dilations. A technical success of 63.5%, a therapeutic success by dilation of 58.75% and a therapeutic success per patient of 62.5% were achieved. Regarding complications, the percentage of post-dilation adverse events was 3.2% and post-dilation incidents were 4.8%. Thirty EBD did not need any medical treatment modification, 9 EBD remained untreated and 12 EBD required further surgery. The length of the strictures, but not the ongoing treatment, was the only statistically significant factor of therapeutic success by dilation and per patient. Conclusions: EBD seems a safe technique in short post-surgical strictures, can avoid the need for new surgery and prevents unnecessary immunosuppression in patients with CD anastomotic strictures.(AU)
Objetivo: La estenosis es una de las principales complicaciones de la enfermedad de Crohn (EC). La dilatación endoscópica con balón (DEB) es una de las principales alternativas terapéuticas para mejorar los síntomas y retrasar o evitar nuevas cirugías. El objetivo principal fue evaluar la eficacia de la DEB en pacientes con EC y estenosis anastomótica posquirúrgica. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio observacional de una cohorte de 32 pacientes con EC tratados con DEB por estenosis no complicadas en un hospital terciario, desde 2009. Se recogieron variables demográficas, clínicas y de la enfermedad, tratamientos médicos y cirugías previas, variables analíticas en el momento de la dilatación, número de dilataciones, complicaciones y necesidad de cirugía posterior mediante la búsqueda de datos en las historias clínicas. Resultados: Se incluyó a 32 pacientes, con un total de 63 dilataciones endoscópicas. Se obtuvo un éxito técnico del 63,5%, un éxito terapéutico por dilatación del 58,75% y un éxito terapéutico por paciente del 62,5%. En cuanto a las complicaciones, el porcentaje de eventos adversos fue del 3,17% y de incidentes del 4,8%. No necesitaron ninguna modificación del tratamiento médico 30 DEB, 9 permanecieron sin tratamiento y 12 requirieron una nueva cirugía. La longitud de la estenosis, pero no el tratamiento en curso, fue el único factor estadísticamente significativo del éxito terapéutico por dilatación y por paciente. Conclusiones: La DEB parece una técnica segura en las estenosis posquirúrgicas cortas, ya que podría evitar nuevas cirugías y evitar la inmunosupresión innecesaria en pacientes con estenosis anastomóticas de EC.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Crohn Disease , Constriction, Pathologic , 29161 , General Surgery , Crohn Disease/complications , Crohn Disease/therapy , Single-Balloon Enteroscopy , Treatment Outcome , GastroenterologyABSTRACT
(1) Aims: Patients receiving antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy are at risk of developing tuberculosis (TB), usually due to the reactivation of a latent TB infection (LTBI). LTBI screening and treatment decreases the risk of TB. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of different LTBI screening strategies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). (2) Methods: Patients in the Spanish ENEIDA registry with IBD screened for LTBI between January 2003 and January 2018 were included. The diagnostic yield of different strategies (dual screening with tuberculin skin test [TST] and interferon-×¥-release assay [IGRA], two-step TST, and early screening performed at least 12 months before starting biological treatment) was analyzed. (3) Results: Out of 7594 screened patients, 1445 (19%; 95% CI 18−20%) had LTBI. Immunomodulator (IMM) treatment at screening decreased the probability of detecting LTBI (20% vs. 17%, p = 0.001). Regarding screening strategies, LTBI was more frequently diagnosed by dual screening than by a single screening strategy (IGRA, OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.50−0.73, p < 0.001; TST, OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.66−0.88, p < 0.001). Two-step TST increased the diagnostic yield of a single TST by 24%. More cases of LTBI were diagnosed by early screening than by routine screening before starting anti-TNF agents (21% [95% CI 20−22%] vs. 14% [95% CI 13−16%], p < 0.001). The highest diagnostic performance for LTBI (29%) was obtained by combining early and TST/IGRA dual screening strategies in patients without IMM. (4): Conclusions: Both early screening and TST/IGRA dual screening strategies significantly increased diagnostic performance for LTBI in patients with IBD, with optimal performance achieved when they are used together in the absence of IMM.
ABSTRACT
AIM: Stricture is one of the main complications of Crohn's disease (CD). Among the main conservative therapeutic alternatives, endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) of the strictures stands out, which can improve the symptoms and delay or even avoid the need for more surgeries. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the EBD in CD patients with post-surgical anastomotic strictures from a previous surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational study of a cohort of 32 patients with CD who underwent EBD due to uncomplicated strictures at a tertiary hospital, since 2009. Demographic, clinical and disease variables, medical treatments and previous surgeries and types, analytical variables at the time of dilation, number of dilations, complications and need for subsequent surgery were collected by searching data in clinical records. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included, performing a total of 63 endoscopic dilations. A technical success of 63.5%, a therapeutic success by dilation of 58.75% and a therapeutic success per patient of 62.5% were achieved. Regarding complications, the percentage of post-dilation adverse events was 3.2% and post-dilation incidents were 4.8%. Thirty EBD did not need any medical treatment modification, 9 EBD remained untreated and 12 EBD required further surgery. The length of the strictures, but not the ongoing treatment, was the only statistically significant factor of therapeutic success by dilation and per patient. CONCLUSIONS: EBD seems a safe technique in short post-surgical strictures, can avoid the need for new surgery and prevents unnecessary immunosuppression in patients with CD anastomotic strictures.
Subject(s)
Crohn Disease , Intestinal Obstruction , Constriction, Pathologic/complications , Constriction, Pathologic/surgery , Crohn Disease/therapy , Dilatation/adverse effects , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Skin Diseases , Dermatitis , Psoriasis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Gastroenterology , Steroids , Treatment FailureABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A significant percentage of patients treated with ustekinumab may lose response. Our aim was to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of intravenous re-induction with ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease who have lost the response to the treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational, multicenter study. Treatment efficacy was measured at week 8 and 16; clinical remission was defined when the Harvey-Bradshaw Index was ≤4 points, and clinical response was defined as a decrease of ≥3 points in the index compared with the baseline. Adverse events and treatment decisions after re-induction were also collected. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients from 13 centers were included. Forty-nine percent had previously failed to respond to 2 biological treatments, and 24.5% had failed to respond to 3. The average exposure time to ustekinumab before re-induction was 17.7 ± 12.8 months. In 56.6% of patients, the administration interval had been shortened to every 4 to 6 weeks before re-induction. At week 8 and 16 after re-induction, 49.0% (n = 26) and 43.3% (n = 23), respectively, were in remission, whereas 64.1% (n = 34) and 52.8% (n = 28) had a clinical response. Patients who achieved remission at week 16 had lower C-reactive protein levels than those who did not respond (2.8 ± 1.6 vs 12.5 ± 9.5 mg/dL; P = 0.001). No serious adverse events related to re-induction were observed. CONCLUSION: Intravenous re-induction with ustekinumab is an effective and safe strategy that recovers the response in approximately half of the patients with refractory Crohn's disease who experience a loss of response. Re-induction can be attempted before switching out of the therapy class.
Subject(s)
Crohn Disease , Ustekinumab , Administration, Intravenous , Crohn Disease/therapy , Humans , Remission Induction , Treatment Outcome , Ustekinumab/adverse effectsSubject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Foot Dermatoses/chemically induced , Gastrointestinal Agents/adverse effects , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Adult , Drug Eruptions/pathology , Foot Dermatoses/pathology , Humans , Male , Psoriasis , Syphilis, Cutaneous/diagnosis , Treatment Failure , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common manifestation of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Oral iron supplements are the treatment of choice, but are not always well tolerated. Sucrosomial® iron (SI) may represent an alternative. This prospective study assessed the tolerability and effectiveness of SI, and quality of life (QoL) of IDA-IBD patients who were intolerant to oral iron salts. The study included 52 individuals treated with 1 capsule/day for 12 weeks. Tolerability was assessed through a gastrointestinal symptom severity questionnaire. Hemoglobin (Hb) levels and clinical symptoms of IDA were analyzed. QoL was assessed using IBDQ-9 and EuroQoL questionnaires. The percentage of patients with excellent/good health increased from 42.9% to 94.3%. Mean Hb concentration significantly increased at all follow-up visits (p < 0.05). Almost all participants (96.9%) were adherent to the study medication. Patients' QoL improved (IBDQ-9: from 60.9 to 65.5). Patients also improved in mobility (71.8% to 78.1%), usual activities (51.3% to 68.7%), pain/discomfort (41.0% to 53.1%), and extreme depression/anxiety problems (7.7% to 3.2%); they worsened in self-care (100% to 90.6%), but perceived an enhancement in their global health [EQ-VAS score: 61.9 (±26.1) to 66.9 (±20.3)]. SI was well tolerated and improved IDA symptoms, IBD activity, and patients' QoL. In conclusion, SI should be considered in IDA-IBD patients.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/drug therapy , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Iron/administration & dosage , Quality of Life , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/complications , Dietary Supplements , Female , Ferric Compounds , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Trace Elements/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Las manifestaciones extraintestinales en general, y entre ellas las articulares en particular, suponen un problema frecuente en los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. De hecho, la relación entre ambas entidades parece estrecha y cada vez hay más datos que sugieren que el intestino desempeña un importante papel en la patogenia de las espondiloartritis. La asociación de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal con algún tipo de espondiloartritis supone un escenario clínico complejo. Es necesario, por tanto, que gastroenterólogos y reumatólogos puedan trabajar juntos y establecer una comunicación fluida que permita a cada paciente recibir el tratamiento más adecuado para cada situación concreta. El objetivo de esta revisión es el de establecer unas recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento de los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y espondiloartritis asociada, en cada uno de los distintos escenarios clínicos
Extraintestinal manifestations, in general, and in particular arthropathies, are a common problem in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. In fact, the relationship between those 2entities is close and there are increasingly more data which suggest that the bowel plays a significant role in the aetiopathogenesis of spondyloarthritis. The association of inflammatory bowel disease with any kind of spondyloarthritis represents a challenging clinical scenario. It is therefore necessary that both gastroenterologists and rheumatologists work together and establish a fluent communication that enables the patient to receive the most appropriate treatment for each specific situation. The aim of this review is to make some recommendations about the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease and associated spondyloarthritis, in each different clinical scenario
Subject(s)
Humans , Spondylarthritis/complications , Spondylarthritis/therapy , Spondylarthropathies/diagnosis , Spondylarthritis/epidemiology , Spain , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Rheumatology/standardsABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the impact of comorbidities and extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease on the response of patients with inflammatory bowel disease to antitumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) therapy. Design: Data from 310 patients (194 with Crohn's disease and 116 with ulcerative colitis) treated consecutively with the first anti-TNFα in 24 Spanish hospitals were retrospectively analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the associations between inflammatory bowel disease comorbidities and extraintestinal manifestations with anti-TNFα treatment outcomes. Key clinical features, such as type of inflammatory bowel disease and concomitant treatments, were included as fixed factors in the model. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analyses (OR, 95% CI) showed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2.67, 1.33 to 5.35) and hepato-pancreato-biliary diseases (1.87, 1.48 to 2.36) were significantly associated with primary non-response to anti-TNFα, as was the use of corticosteroids and the type of inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis vs Crohn's disease). It was also found that myocardial infarction (3.30, 1.48 to 7.35) and skin disease (2.73, 1.42 to 5.25) were significantly associated with loss of response, along with the use of corticosteroids and the type of inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis vs Crohn's disease). Conclusions: Our results suggest that the presence of some comorbidities in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and myocardial infarction, and of certain extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease, such as hepato-pancreato-biliary conditions and skin diseases, appear to be related to failure to anti-TNFα treatment. Therefore, their presence should be considered when choosing a treatment. Trial registration number: NCT02861118.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Comorbidity , Crohn Disease/complications , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Recurrence , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Extraintestinal manifestations, in general, and in particular arthropathies, are a common problem in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. In fact, the relationship between those 2entities is close and there are increasingly more data which suggest that the bowel plays a significant role in the aetiopathogenesis of spondyloarthritis. The association of inflammatory bowel disease with any kind of spondyloarthritis represents a challenging clinical scenario. It is therefore necessary that both gastroenterologists and rheumatologists work together and establish a fluent communication that enables the patient to receive the most appropriate treatment for each specific situation. The aim of this review is to make some recommendations about the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease and associated spondyloarthritis, in each different clinical scenario.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative/therapy , Crohn Disease/therapy , Spondylarthropathies/therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Crohn Disease/complications , Disease Progression , Drug Therapy, Combination , Gastroenterology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , HLA-B27 Antigen/analysis , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Interdisciplinary Communication , Rheumatology , Spondylarthropathies/complications , Spondylarthropathies/diagnosis , Uveitis, Anterior/complicationsABSTRACT
Background: Despite the continuous adaptation of eHealth systems for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a significant disconnection persists between users and developers. Since non-adherence remains high, it is necessary to better understand the patients' perspective on telemonitoring for IBD. Accordingly, this study aimed to adapt the TECCU telemonitoring app to the preferences and needs of IBD patients. Methods: A qualitative study was carried out using successive focus groups of IBD patients. Meetings were audio-recorded and a thematic analysis was employed until data saturation was achieved. The first group included patients who had used the TECCU App in a pilot clinical trial, and subsequent meetings included patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis recruited from the Spanish Confederation of patient associations. The information collected at each meeting guided consecutive changes to the platform. Results: Data saturation was reached after three focus groups involving a total of 18 patients. Three main themes emerged: (1) platform usability, (2) the communication process, and (3) platform content. All participants indicated that TECCU is easy to use, permitting continuous and personalized feedback. According to patients´ perspectives, the platform was adapted to foster a flexible follow-up and shared decision-making using open and safe communication networks. Many participants appreciated the educational elements and, consequently, the app was connected to reliable and continuously updated webpages. Conclusions: IBD patients valued the usability and personalized monitoring offered by the TECCU App. Improvements in the messaging system and continuously updated educational content were introduced to address patients´ needs and favor their engagement.