Mapping Resection Progress by Tool-Tip Tracking during Brain Tumor Surgery for Real-Time Estimation of Residual Tumor.

Surgical resection continues to be the primary initial therapeutic strategy in the treatment of patients with brain tumors. Computerized cranial neuronavigation based on preoperative imaging offers precision guidance during craniotomy and early tumor resection but progressively loses validity with brain shift. Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) and intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) can update the imaging used for guidance and navigation but are limited in terms of temporal and spatial resolution, respectively. We present a system that uses time-stamped tool-tip positions of surgical instruments to generate a map of resection progress with high spatial and temporal accuracy. We evaluate this system and present results from 80 cranial tumor resections. Regions of the preoperative tumor segmentation that are covered by the resection map (True Positive Tracking) and regions of the preoperative tumor segmentation not covered by the resection map (True Negative Tracking) are determined for each case. We compare True Negative Tracking, which estimates the residual tumor, with the actual residual tumor identified using iMRI. We discuss factors that can cause False Positive Tracking and False Negative Tracking, which underestimate and overestimate the residual tumor, respectively. Our method provides good estimates of the residual tumor when there is minimal brain shift, and line-of-sight is maintained. When these conditions are not met, surgeons report that it is still useful for identifying regions of potential residual.

Tractography methods and findings in brain tumors and traumatic brain injury.

White matter fiber tracking using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) provides a noninvasive approach to map brain connections, but improving anatomical accuracy has been a significant challenge since the birth of tractography methods. Utilizing tractography in brain studies therefore requires understanding of its technical limitations to avoid shortcomings and pitfalls. This review explores tractography limitations and how different white matter pathways pose different challenges to fiber tracking methodologies. We summarize the pros and cons of commonly-used methods, aiming to inform how tractography and its related analysis may lead to questionable results. Extending these experiences, we review the clinical utilization of tractography in patients with brain tumors and traumatic brain injury, starting from tensor-based tractography to more advanced methods. We discuss current limitations and highlight novel approaches in the context of these two conditions to inform future tractography developments.

Challenges and Opportunities of Intraoperative 3D Ultrasound With Neuronavigation in Relation to Intraoperative MRI.

INTRODUCTION: Neuronavigation greatly improves the surgeons ability to approach, assess and operate on brain tumors, but tends to lose its accuracy as the surgery progresses and substantial brain shift and deformation occurs. Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) can partially address this problem but is resource intensive and workflow disruptive. Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) provides real-time information that can be used to update neuronavigation and provide real-time information regarding the resection progress. We describe the intraoperative use of 3D iUS in relation to iMRI, and discuss the challenges and opportunities in its use in neurosurgical practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients who underwent image-guided brain tumor resection in which both 3D iUS and iMRI were used. The study was conducted between June 2020 and December 2020 when an extension of a commercially available navigation software was introduced in our practice enabling 3D iUS volumes to be reconstructed from tracked 2D iUS images. For each patient, three or more 3D iUS images were acquired during the procedure, and one iMRI was acquired towards the end. The iUS images included an extradural ultrasound sweep acquired before dural incision (iUS-1), a post-dural opening iUS (iUS-2), and a third iUS acquired immediately before the iMRI acquisition (iUS-3). iUS-1 and preoperative MRI were compared to evaluate the ability of iUS to visualize tumor boundaries and critical anatomic landmarks; iUS-3 and iMRI were compared to evaluate the ability of iUS for predicting residual tumor. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were included in this study. Fifteen patients had tumors located in eloquent or near eloquent brain regions, the majority of patients had low grade gliomas (11), gross total resection was achieved in 12 patients, postoperative temporary deficits were observed in five patients. In twenty-two iUS was able to define tumor location, tumor margins, and was able to indicate relevant landmarks for orientation and guidance. In sixteen cases, white matter fiber tracts computed from preoperative dMRI were overlaid on the iUS images. In nineteen patients, the EOR (GTR or STR) was predicted by iUS and confirmed by iMRI. The remaining four patients where iUS was not able to evaluate the presence or absence of residual tumor were recurrent cases with a previous surgical cavity that hindered good contact between the US probe and the brainsurface. CONCLUSION: This recent experience at our institution illustrates the practical benefits, challenges, and opportunities of 3D iUS in relation to iMRI.

Single-center outcomes for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in metastatic spinal lesions: can spontaneous facet fusion occur?

OBJECTIVE: Survival of cancer patients continues to improve with systemic treatment advancements, leading to an increase in cancer-related complications such as pathological spinal fractures. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the outcome of percutaneous stabilization with cement augmentation of the pedicle screws in the management of patients with metastatic cancer to the spine. METHODS: The authors reviewed a retrospective case series of 74 patients with symptomatic pathological spine fractures treated with cement-augmented pedicle screws implanted with a percutaneous technique. The mean imaging follow-up was 11.3 months. Data on demographics, clinical outcomes, and complications were collected. Cement extravasation, spinal hardware integrity, and fusion rates were assessed on CT scans. RESULTS: Among 50 patients with follow-up imaging, 23 patients (46%) showed facet joint fusion. The length of segmental stabilization was not a significant predictor of the occurrence of fusion. Pre- or postoperative radiation therapy, postoperative chemotherapy, and the location of spinal lesions did not have a statistically significant effect on the occurrence of fusion. Patients older than 60 years of age were more likely to have fusion across facet joints compared with younger patients. There was a significant difference in the mean visual analog scale pain score, with 6.28 preoperatively and 3.41 postoperatively, regardless of fusion status (p < 0.001). Cement extravasation was seen in 51% of the cohort, but in all instances, patients remained asymptomatic. Most importantly, the incidence of hardware failure was low (4%). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous fixation with cement-augmented pedicle screws in patients with pathological spine fractures provides an improvement in mechanical back pain, with a low incidence of failure, and in some patients, spontaneous facet fusion was observed. Further research is necessary with regard to both short-term benefits and long-term outcomes.

The use of laser interstitial thermal therapy in the treatment of brain metastases: a literature review.

PURPOSE: The aim of this paper is to discuss the current evidence for Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) in the treatment of brain metastases, our current recommendations for patient selection and the future perspectives for this therapy. We have also touched upon the possible complications and role of systemic therapy coupled with LITT for the treatment of brain metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two authors carried out the literature search using two databases independently, including PubMed, and Web of Science. The review included prospective and retrospective studies using LITT to treat brain metastases. RESULTS: Twenty-two original articles were analyzed in this review, particularly clinical outcomes and complications. We have also provided our institutional experience in the use of LITT to treat brain metastases and addressed future perspectives for the use of this technology. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature supports LITT as a safe and effective therapy for patients with brain metastases that have failed SRS. Larger studies are still required to better evaluate the use of systemic therapy in concomitance with LITT. New images modalities may enable optimized treatment and outcomes.

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in the treatment of brain metastases and radiation necrosis.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery has become the main treatment for patients with limited number of brain metastases (BM). Recently, with the increasing use of this modality, there is a growth in recurrence cases. Recurrence after radiation therapy can be divided in changes favoring either tumor recurrence or radiation necrosis (RN). Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) is minimally invasive treatment modality that has been used to treat primary and metastatic brain tumors. When associated with real-time thermometry using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, the extent of ablation can be controlled to provide maximum coverage and avoid eloquent areas. The objective of this study was to investigate the use of LITT in the treatment of BM. An extensive review of the relevant literature was conducted and the outcome results are discussed. There is an emphasis on safety and local control rate of patients treated with this modality. The findings of our study suggest that LITT is a viable safe technique to treat recurrent BM, especially in patients with deep-seated lesions where surgical resection is not an option.

Predictors of Local Control of Brain Metastasis Treated With Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) has been used to treat recurrent brain metastasis after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Little is known about how best to assess the efficacy of treatment, specifically the ability of LITT to control local tumor progression post-SRS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive factors associated with local recurrence after LITT. METHODS: Retrospective study with consecutive patients with brain metastases treated with LITT. Based on radiological aspects, lesions were divided into progressive disease after SRS (recurrence or radiation necrosis) and new lesions. Primary endpoint was time to local recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 61 consecutive patients with 82 lesions (5 newly diagnosed, 46 recurrence, and 31 radiation necrosis). Freedom from local recurrence at 6 mo was 69.6%, 59.4% at 12, and 54.7% at 18 and 24 mo. Incompletely ablated lesions had a shorter median time for local recurrence (P < .001). Larger lesions (>6 cc) had shorter time for local recurrence (P = .03). Dural-based lesions showed a shorter time to local recurrence (P = .01). Tumor recurrence/newly diagnosed had shorter time to local recurrence when compared to RN lesions (P = .01). Patients receiving systemic therapy after LITT had longer time to local recurrence (P = .01). In multivariate Cox-regression model, the HR for incomplete ablated lesions was 4.88 (P < .001), 3.12 (P = .03) for recurrent tumors, and 2.56 (P = .02) for patients not receiving systemic therapy after LITT. Complication rate was 26.2%. CONCLUSION: Incompletely ablated and recurrent tumoral lesions were associated with higher risk of treatment failure and were the major predicting factors for local recurrence. Systemic therapy after LITT was a protective factor regarding local recurrence.

Biological subtypes and survival outcomes in breast cancer patients with brain metastases in the targeted therapy era.

BACKGROUND: There is recognition that breast cancer is a collection of heterogeneous diseases divided in subtypes based on combined molecular features such as hormonal receptors (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. We aimed to study clinical differences among biological subtypes in brain metastasis from breast cancer after targeted therapy introduction. METHODS: This was a retrospective study with 406 consecutive patients with brain metastasis from breast cancer treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1998 to 2013. Overall, 315 of these patients met the study criteria and were analyzed. Subtypes were classified as HER2-/HR+ (96 patients), HER2+/HR+ (57 patients), HER2+/HR- (63 patients), and triple negative (HER2-/HR-) (99 patients). End points were time to development of brain metastasis (TDBM), brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), and overall survival from start of treatment of brain metastasis (OSBM). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: TDBM was 41 months for HER2-/HR+; 58 months for HER2+/HR+; 30 months for HER2+/HR-; and 27 months for triple negative (P < .001). BMFS was 9 months for HER2-/HR+; 24 months for HER2+/HR+; 9 months for HER2+/HR-; and 7 months for triple negative (P = .06). OSBM was 20 months for HER2-/HR+; 22 months for HER2+/HR+; 24 months for HER2+/HR-; and 9 months for triple negative (P < .001). On multivariate analyses, triple negative showed lower OSBM compared with other subtypes, with a hazard ratio of 1.9 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Comparing all breast cancer subgroups we noticed that HR and HER2 are the most significant biomarkers in brain metastasis behavior. Patients who received targeted therapy had better outcomes, but not in the triple negative group. Prospective studies with different treatment modalities for each subgroup are recommended.