Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Saudi Med J ; 44(12): 1254-1259, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38016740

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the pathophysiological factors leading to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) recurrence with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and compare the clinical and imaging findings between both groups. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out at a tertiary hospital. Patients with recurrent nasal polyps were compared to those with no recurrence by demographics, risk factors, anatomical abnormalities, clinical features, and Lund-Mackey (LM) scores. Both groups were followed up for 24 months after the primary surgery to detect recurrence. RESULTS: Among the 134 patients who underwent ESS for CRSwNP, 69 patients were in the recurrence group and 65 in the non-recurrence group. No significant difference was found in demographics, comorbidities, and anatomical abnormalities between both groups. However, asthma was more prevalent in the recurrence group (73.9% vs. 29.2%; p<0.01). All clinical features were similar between both groups. However, the recurrence group had more patients with bilateral polyps than non-recurrence (95.7% vs. 80%; p<0.01). We found that 26.1% (n=18) of the 69 patients with recurrence needed revision surgery. Smoking rates were significantly different between reoperated vs. non-reoperated patients (16.7% (3/18) vs. 2% (1/51); p=0.02), and the extent of primary ESS was different between them. CONCLUSION: Asthma is a significant risk factor for CRS recurrence. Furthermore, smoking and inadequate primary surgery increase the chance of revision surgery in case of recurrence.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Nasal Polyps/complications , Nasal Polyps/epidemiology , Nasal Polyps/surgery , Rhinitis/complications , Rhinitis/epidemiology , Rhinitis/surgery , Sinusitis/complications , Sinusitis/epidemiology , Sinusitis/surgery , Risk Factors , Endoscopy/methods , Chronic Disease , Asthma/complications , Asthma/epidemiology
2.
Ear Nose Throat J ; : 1455613231155855, 2023 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36872078

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effect of tranexamic acid on postoperative bleeding, and any adverse effects, in patients undergoing head-and-neck surgery. METHODS: We searched databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, the Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane database) from their dates of inception to August 31, 2021. We analyzed studies that compared bleeding-related morbidity between perioperative tranexamic acid and placebo (control) groups. We subanalyzed tranexamic acid administration methods. RESULTS: The extent of postoperative bleeding (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.7817, [-1.4237; -0.1398], P = 0.0170, I2 = 92.2%) was significantly less in the treatment group. However, there were no significant between-group differences in terms of operative time (SMD = -0.0463 [-0.2147; 0.1221]; P = 0.5897, I2 = 0.0% [0.0%; 32.9%]); intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -0.7711 [-1.6274; 0.0852], P = 0.0776, I2 = 94.4%); drain removal timing (SMD = -0.3382 [-0.9547; 0.2782], P = 0.2822, I2 = 81.7%); or the amount of infused perioperative fluid (SMD = -0.0622 [-0.2615; 0.1372], P = 0.5410, I2 = 35.5%). Also, there were no significant between-group differences in laboratory findings (serum bilirubin, creatinine, and urea levels; and the coagulation profiles) between the tranexamic acid and control groups. Topical application was associated with a shorter postoperative drain tube dwell time than was systemic administration. CONCLUSION: Perioperative tranexamic acid significantly reduced postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing head-and-neck surgery. Also, topical administration might be more effective in postoperative bleeding and postoperative drain tube dwell time.

3.
Laryngoscope ; 133(10): 2470-2479, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36892037

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive and remote surgical approaches for thyroid tumors have been developed primarily for cosmetic benefit. However, conventional meta-analysis could not provide comparative data between new techniques. This network meta-analysis would be able to provide data for clinicians and patients to compare cosmetic satisfaction and morbidity by comparing surgical methods. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Cochrane Trials, and Google Scholar. REVIEW METHODS: The nine interventions included minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVA), endoscopic and robotic bilateral axillo-breast-approach thyroidectomy (EBAB and RBAB, respectively), endoscopic and robotic retro-auricular thyroidectomy (EPA and RPA, respectively), endoscopic or robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy (EAx and RAx, respectively), endoscopic and robotic transoral approaches (EO and RO, respectively), and a conventional thyroidectomy. We recorded the operative outcomes and perioperative complications; pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: EO, RBAB, and RO were associated with good patient cosmetic satisfaction. EAx, EBAB, EO, RAx, and RBAB were associated with significantly more postoperative drainage than the other methods. Postoperatively, more flap problems and wound infections were found in the RO than control group, and more transient vocal cord palsy was found in the EAx and EBAB groups. MIVA ranked first in terms of operative time, postoperative drainage amount, postoperative pain, and hospitalization, but cosmetic satisfaction was low. EAx, RAx, and MIVA ranked higher than the other approaches in terms of operative bleeding. CONCLUSION: It was confirmed that minimally invasive thyroidectomy achieves high cosmetic satisfaction and is not inferior to conventional thyroidectomy in terms of surgical results or perioperative complications. Laryngoscope, 133:2470-2479, 2023.


Subject(s)
Robotics , Thyroid Neoplasms , Humans , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Network Meta-Analysis , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Robotics/methods , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Thyroidectomy/adverse effects , Thyroidectomy/methods , Treatment Outcome
4.
Saudi Med J ; 43(1): 9-30, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35022280

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of self-collected saliva in coronavirus desease-19 (COVID-19) screening procedures. METHODS: A total of 6 databases were reviewed from their inception until August 2021. Sensitivity and specificity were measured by extracting items (true-positive, true-negative, false-positive and false-negative) from each paper. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy based on Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, version 2. RESULTS: A total of 41 studies were included in the final analysis. The diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of self-collected saliva was 196.2022 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 117.8833-326.5546). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.955. For detecting COVID-19, self-collected saliva had a moderate sensitivity of 0.8476 [0.8045-0.8826] and positive predictive value of 0.9404 [0.9122-0.9599] but high specificity of 0.9817 [0.9707-0.9887] and negative predictive value of 0.9467 [0.9130-0.9678]. In a subgroup analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of self-collected saliva tended to be higher for symptomatic (vs. asymptomatic) examinees. CONCLUSION: Although naso/oropharyngeal swab tests are the most accurate and important diagnostic tools, the saliva-based testing method can be used as a suitable alternative test, with the advantages of increased patient convenience, efficient testing, and the need for fewer medical staff and resources. In particular, simple collecting method such as drooling or spitting without coughing would be effective in evaluating the symptomatic patients.PROSPERO no.: CRD42021279287.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Saliva , Humans , Nasopharynx , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Specimen Handling
5.
Saudi Med J ; 42(9): 981-985, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34470836

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the ethmoid infundibulum (EI) and maxillary sinus natural ostium (MSNO) dimensions in normal sinuses of the Asian population; identified variation between sides, gender, and age groups; and to assess the effects of such variation on the measurements. METHODS: We assessed EI dimension and MSNO diameter in computed tomography (CT) scans of the normal paranasal sinus of 100 patients who underwent trans-sphenoid endoscopic surgery. We compared demographic data and multiple anatomical variations. RESULTS: The gap difference in EI length between the right and left sides significantly differed from 0 (0.47±1.38 mm). We found wider EI in people aged ≥60 years (2.44±0.59 mm), compared to people aged <60 years (2.25±0.31 mm). Ethmoid infundibulum length was greater among individuals with Haller cells (8.84±1.56 mm) than in individuals without them (7.92±1.47 mm). Furthermore, MSNO diameter was greater with accessory ostium (3.48±0.77 mm versus 3.02±0.72 mm, presence versus accessory ostium absence). CONCLUSION: Multiple factors may affect EI and MSNO dimensions. Ethmoid infundibulum length differed between both sides. Ethmoid infundibulum width differed between individuals aged ≥60 years and individuals aged <60 years. Haller cells and accessory ostium presence were associated with significant differences in those measurements.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy , Maxillary Sinus , Humans , Maxillary Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Pituitary Gland , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL