Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 17(7): e0268479, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35901037

ABSTRACT

Gulf War Illness (GWI) affects 25-35% of the 1991 Gulf War Veteran (GWV) population. Patients with GWI experience pain, fatigue, cognitive impairments, gastrointestinal dysfunction, skin disorders, and respiratory issues. In longitudinal studies, many patients with GWI have shown little to no improvement in symptoms since diagnosis. The gut microbiome and diet play an important role in human health and disease, and preliminary studies suggest it may play a role in GWI. To examine the relationship between the gut microbiota, diet, and GWI, we conducted an eight-week prospective cohort study collecting stool samples, medications, health history, and dietary data. Sixty-nine participants were enrolled into the study, 36 of which met the case definition for GWI. The gut microbiota of participants, determined by 16S rRNA sequencing of stool samples, was stable over the duration of the study and showed no within person (alpha diversity) differences. Between group analyses (beta diversity) identified statistically significant different between those with and without GWI. Several taxonomic lineages were identified as differentially abundant between those with and without GWI (n = 9) including a greater abundance of Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in those without GWI. Additionally, there were taxonomic differences between those with high and low healthy eating index (HEI) scores including a greater abundance of Ruminococcaceae in those with higher HEI scores. This longitudinal cohort study of GWVs found that participants with GWI had significantly different microbiomes from those without GWI. Further studies are needed to determine the role these differences may play in the development and treatment of GWI.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Persian Gulf Syndrome , Veterans , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Gulf War , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Persian Gulf Syndrome/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics
4.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(8): 1052-1057, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33524451

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Advanced practice providers in the outpatient setting play a key role in antibiotic stewardship, yet little is known about how to engage these providers in stewardship activities and what factors influence their antibiotic prescribing practices. METHODS: We used mixed methods to obtain data on practices and perceptions related to antibiotic prescribing by nurse practitioners (NP) and Veteran patients. We interviewed NPs working in the outpatient setting at one Veterans Affairs facility and conducted focus groups with Veterans. Emerging themes were mapped to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety framework. We examined NP antibiotic prescribing data from 2017 to 2019. RESULTS: We interviewed NPs and conducted Veteran focus groups. Nurse practitioners reported satisfaction with resources, including ready access to pharmacists and infectious disease specialists. Building patient trust was reported as essential to prescribing confidence level. Veterans indicated the need to better understand differences between viral and bacterial infections. NP prescribing patterns revealed a decline in antibiotics prescribed for upper respiratory illnesses over a 3-year period. CONCLUSION: Outpatient NPs focus on educating the patient while balancing organizational access challenges. Further research is needed to determine how to include both NPs and patients when implementing outpatient antibiotic stewardship strategies. Further research is also needed to understand factors associated with the decline in nurse practitioner antibiotic prescribing observed in this study.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Nurse Practitioners , Physicians , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing , Perception , Practice Patterns, Physicians'
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(6): 775-783, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33359552

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Daily use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has been shown to reduce risk of healthcare-associated infections. We aimed to assess moving CHG bathing into routine practice using a human factors approach. We evaluated implementation in non-intensive care unit (ICU) settings in the Veterans Health Administration. METHODS: Our multiple case study approach included non-ICU units from 4 Veterans Health Administration settings. Guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety, we conducted focus groups and interviews to capture barriers and facilitators to daily CHG bathing. We measured compliance using observations and skin CHG concentrations. RESULTS: Barriers to daily CHG include time, concern of increasing antibiotic resistance, workflow and product concerns. Facilitators include engagement of champions and unit shared responsibility. We found shortfalls in patient education, hand hygiene and CHG use on tubes and drains. CHG skin concentration levels were highest among patients from spinal cord injury units. These units applied antiseptic using 2% CHG impregnated wipes vs 4% CHG solution/soap. DISCUSSION: Non-ICUs implementing CHG bathing must consider human factors and work system barriers to ensure uptake and sustained practice change. CONCLUSIONS: Well-planned rollouts and a unit culture promoting shared responsibility are key to compliance with daily CHG bathing. Successful implementation requires attention to staff education and measurement of compliance.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Cross Infection , Baths , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Ergonomics , Humans , Intensive Care Units
6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(7): 805-812, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32389140

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In colorectal surgery, the composition of the most effective bundle for prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis to identify bundle interventions most associated with SSI reduction. METHODS: We systematically reviewed 4 databases for studies that assessed bundles with ≥3 elements recommended by clinical practice guidelines for adult colorectal surgery. The main outcome was 30-day postoperative SSI rate (overall, superficial, deep, and/or organ-space). RESULTS: We included 40 studies in the qualitative review, and 35 studies (54,221 patients) in the quantitative review. Only 3 studies were randomized controlled trials. On meta-analyses, bundles were associated with overall SSI reductions of 44% (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48-0.65); superficial SSI reductions of 44% (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.42-0.75); deep SSI reductions of 33% (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98); and organ-space SSI reductions of 37% (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50-0.81). Bundle composition was heterogeneous. In our meta-regression analysis, bundles containing ≥11 elements, consisting of both standard of care and new interventions, demonstrated the greatest SSI reduction. Separate instrument trays, gloves with and without gown change for wound closure, and standardized postoperative dressing change at 48 hours correlated with the highest reductions in superficial SSIs. Mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral antibiotics, and preoperative chlorhexidine showers correlated with highest organ-space SSI reductions. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive bundles emphasizing guideline-recommended elements from both standard of care as well as new interventions were most effective for SSI reduction following colorectal surgery. High clinical-bundle heterogeneity and low quality for most observational studies significantly limit our conclusion.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Patient Care Bundles , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy
7.
BMJ Open ; 9(8): e031114, 2019 08 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31431446

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 25%-35% of the 1991 Gulf War Veteran population report symptoms consistent with Gulf War Illness (GWI), a chronic, multi-symptom illness characterised by fatigue, pain, irritable bowel syndrome and problems with cognitive function. GWI is a disabling problem for Gulf War Veterans, and there remains a critical need to identify innovative, novel therapies.Gut microbiota perturbation plays a key role in the symptomatology of other chronic multi-symptom illnesses, including myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Given similarities between ME/CFS and GWI and the presence of gastrointestinal disorders in GWI patients, Veterans with GWI may also have gut abnormalities like those seen with ME/CFS. In this longitudinal cohort study, we are comparing the diversity (structure) and the metagenomes (function) of the gut microbiome between Gulf War Veterans with and without GWI. If we find differences in Veterans with GWI, the microbiome could be a target for therapeutic intervention to alleviate GWI symptoms. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants answer questions about diet, exercise and lifestyle factors. Participants also complete a questionnaire (based on the Kansas case definition of GWI) regarding their medical history and symptoms; we use this questionnaire to group participants into GWI versus healthy control cohorts. We plan to enrol 52 deployed Gulf War Veterans: 26 with GWI and 26 healthy controls. Participants provide stool and saliva samples weekly for an 8-week period for microbiome analyses. Participants also provide blood samples at the beginning and end of this period, which we will use to compare measures of inflammation markers between the groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Health Sciences Institutional Review Board and the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital Research and Development Committee. Results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Persian Gulf Syndrome/microbiology , Veterans , Biomarkers/blood , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Case-Control Studies , Feces/microbiology , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Prospective Studies , Research Design
8.
BMJ Open ; 9(5): e026193, 2019 05 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31092653

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine what barriers and facilitators to antibiotic stewardship exist within a healthcare facility. SETTING: 1300-bed tertiary care private hospital located in the state of Kerala, India. PARTICIPANTS: 31 semistructured interviews and 4 focus groups with hospital staff ranging from physicians, nurses, pharmacists and a clinical microbiologist. RESULTS: Key facilitators of antibiotic stewardship (AS) at the hospital included a dedicated committee overseeing appropriate inpatient antibiotic use, a prompt microbiology laboratory, a high level of AS understanding among staff, established guidelines for empiric prescribing and an easily accessible antibiogram. We identified the following barriers: limited access to clinical pharmacists, physician immunity to change regarding stewardship policies, infrequent antibiotic de-escalation, high physician workload, an incomplete electronic medical record (EMR), inadequate AS programme (ASP) physical visibility and high antibiotic use in the community. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities for improvement at this institution include increasing accessibility to clinical pharmacists, implementing strategies to overcome physician immunity to change and establishing a more accessible and complete EMR. Our findings are likely to be of use to institutions developing ASPs in lower resource settings.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship/standards , Attitude of Health Personnel , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Focus Groups , Humans , India , Interviews as Topic , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Program Evaluation , Qualitative Research
10.
WMJ ; 117(5): 224-228, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30674101

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Education related to antimicrobial stewardship-the judicious use of antimicrobials-is essential to stem the rising tide of resistance. METHODS: Using a scoping review method that includes a consultation component, we explored the extent to which antimicrobial stewardship is incorporated in undergraduate medical education. RESULTS: We found 4 studies evaluating stewardship content in undergraduate medical school curricula along with 2 studies assessing the effectiveness of specific stewardship training programs in medical education. DISCUSSION: We highlight three recommendations: (1) if applicable, identify an institutional "champion" and incorporate antibiotic stewardship-related content into medical school curriculum; (2) evaluate the status and effectiveness of antibiotic stewardship curricular components in medical education; (3) conduct research evaluating the long-term outcomes of antibiotic stewardship training in medical education.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship/standards , Curriculum/trends , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/trends , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL