ABSTRACT
Prospective data are lacking on early somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (BP-NETs; typical carcinoids and atypical carcinoids (TCs and ACs)). SPINET (EudraCT: 2015-004992-62; NCT02683941) was a phase III, double-blind study of lanreotide autogel/depot (LAN; 120 mg every 28 days) plus best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo plus BSC, with an optional open-label treatment phase (LAN plus BSC). Patients had metastatic/unresectable, somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive TCs or ACs. Recruitment was stopped early owing to slow accrual; eligible patients from the double-blind phase transitioned to open-label LAN. The adapted primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) during either phase for patients receiving LAN. Seventy-seven patients were randomized (LAN, n = 51 (TCs, n = 29; ACs, n = 22); placebo, n = 26 (TCs, n = 16; ACs, n = 10)). Median (95% CI) PFS during double-blind and open-label phases in patients receiving LAN was 16.6 (11.3; 21.9) months overall (primary endpoint), 21.9 (12.8, not calculable (NC)) months in TCs, and 13.8 (5.4; 16.6) months in ACs. During double-blind treatment, median (95% CI) PFS was 16.6 (11.3; 21.9) months for LAN vs 13.6 (8.3; NC) months for placebo (not significant); corresponding values were 21.9 (13.8; NC) and 13.9 (13.4; NC) months, respectively, in TCs and 13.8 (5.4; 16.6) and 11.0 (2.8; 16.9) months, respectively, in ACs. Patients' quality of life did not deteriorate and LAN was well tolerated. Although recruitment stopped early and the predefined sample size was not met, SPINET is the largest prospective study to date of SSA therapy in SSTR-positive TCs and ACs and suggests clinical benefit in TCs.
Subject(s)
Neuroendocrine Tumors , Peptides, Cyclic , Somatostatin , Humans , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Somatostatin/therapeutic use , Somatostatin/administration & dosage , Peptides, Cyclic/administration & dosage , Peptides, Cyclic/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Double-Blind Method , Aged , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Treatment for fluoroquinolone-resistant multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR TB) often lasts longer than treatment for less resistant strains, yields worse efficacy results, and causes substantial toxicity. The newer anti-tuberculosis drugs, bedaquiline and delamanid, and repurposed drugs clofazimine and linezolid, show great promise for combination in shorter, less-toxic, and effective regimens. To date, there has been no randomized, internally and concurrently controlled trial of a shorter, all-oral regimen comprising these newer and repurposed drugs sufficiently powered to produce results for pre-XDR TB patients. METHODS: endTB-Q is a phase III, multi-country, randomized, controlled, parallel, open-label clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a treatment strategy for patients with pre-XDR TB. Study participants are randomized 2:1 to experimental or control arms, respectively. The experimental arm contains bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine, and delamanid. The control comprises the contemporaneous WHO standard of care for pre-XDR TB. Experimental arm duration is determined by a composite of smear microscopy and chest radiographic imaging at baseline and re-evaluated at 6 months using sputum culture results: participants with less extensive disease receive 6 months and participants with more extensive disease receive 9 months of treatment. Randomization is stratified by country and by participant extent-of-TB-disease phenotype defined according to screening/baseline characteristics. Study participation lasts up to 104 weeks post randomization. The primary objective is to assess whether the efficacy of experimental regimens at 73 weeks is non-inferior to that of the control. A sample size of 324 participants across 2 arms affords at least 80% power to show the non-inferiority, with a one-sided alpha of 0.025 and a non-inferiority margin of 12%, against the control in both modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. DISCUSSION: This internally controlled study of shortened treatment for pre-XDR TB will provide urgently needed data and evidence for clinical and policy decision-making around the treatment of pre-XDR TB with a four-drug, all-oral, shortened regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT03896685. Registered on 1 April 2018; the record was last updated for study protocol version 4.3 on 17 March 2023.
Subject(s)
Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Humans , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Fluoroquinolones/adverse effects , Clofazimine/adverse effects , Linezolid/adverse effects , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Antitubercular Agents/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Treatment of multidrug- and rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) is expensive, labour-intensive, and associated with substantial adverse events and poor outcomes. While most MDR/RR-TB patients do not receive treatment, many who do are treated for 18 months or more. A shorter all-oral regimen is currently recommended for only a sub-set of MDR/RR-TB. Its use is only conditionally recommended because of very low-quality evidence underpinning the recommendation. Novel combinations of newer and repurposed drugs bring hope in the fight against MDR/RR-TB, but their use has not been optimized in all-oral, shorter regimens. This has greatly limited their impact on the burden of disease. There is, therefore, dire need for high-quality evidence on the performance of new, shortened, injectable-sparing regimens for MDR-TB which can be adapted to individual patients and different settings. METHODS: endTB is a phase III, pragmatic, multi-country, adaptive, randomized, controlled, parallel, open-label clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of shorter treatment regimens containing new drugs for patients with fluoroquinolone-susceptible, rifampin-resistant tuberculosis. Study participants are randomized to either the control arm, based on the current standard of care for MDR/RR-TB, or to one of five 39-week multi-drug regimens containing newly approved and repurposed drugs. Study participation in all arms lasts at least 73 and up to 104 weeks post-randomization. Randomization is response-adapted using interim Bayesian analysis of efficacy endpoints. The primary objective is to assess whether the efficacy of experimental regimens at 73 weeks is non-inferior to that of the control. A sample size of 750 patients across 6 arms affords at least 80% power to detect the non-inferiority of at least 1 (and up to 3) experimental regimens, with a one-sided alpha of 0.025 and a non-inferiority margin of 12%, against the control in both modified intention-to-treat and per protocol populations. DISCUSSION: The lack of a safe and effective regimen that can be used in all patients is a major obstacle to delivering appropriate treatment to all patients with active MDR/RR-TB. Identifying multiple shorter, safe, and effective regimens has the potential to greatly reduce the burden of this deadly disease worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02754765. Registered on 28 April 2016; the record was last updated for study protocol version 3.3, on 27 August 2019.
Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Preparations , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Antitubercular Agents/adverse effects , Bayes Theorem , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rifampin/adverse effects , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapySubject(s)
Carcinoid Tumor , Lung Neoplasms , Thymus Neoplasms , Carcinoid Tumor/diagnosis , Carcinoid Tumor/epidemiology , Carcinoid Tumor/therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Prognosis , Thymus Neoplasms/diagnosis , Thymus Neoplasms/epidemiology , Thymus Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
Highly proliferative lung carcinoids (HPLC) have been recently reported but information about this subset remains scarce. OBJECTIVES: Clinical and pathological data of 630 patients with lung carcinoids (LC) referred to Gustave Roussy Institute (GR) and European Institute of Oncology (IEO) were retrospectively reviewed to select HPLC and analyze their frequency, behavior and compare their outcome to conventional LC with Ki-67 ≤ 20 % and mitotic count (MC)≤10/2 mm2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Selection criteria were: diagnosis of LC confirmed by local pathologist, and available clinical and follow-up data. Patients with Ki-67 > 20 % and/or MC > 10/ 2 mm2 in primary or metastatic specimens were identified as HPLC. RESULTS: 30/514 patients (6%) met the selection criteria of HPLC. Based on primary tumor evaluation, 22/25 (88 %) were classified as atypical carcinoids (AC). Median MC was 4.5/2 mm2 (1-11) 6/2 mm2 (3-15) in primary tumors and metastasis, respectively. Median Ki-67 was respectively 23 % (15-65) and 25 % (8-60). Recurrence rate was 66 % (12/18) in HPLC and 9 % (33/352) in conventional LC. Median RFS was 24 (10-NR) months in HPLC, 288 (141-NR) months in LC with Ki-67 index≤5 % and NR (148-NR) months in LC with Ki-67 6-20% (p < 001). Median OS was 203 (83-NR) months in LC with Ki-67 index≤5%, 101 (79-NR) months in LC with Ki-67 index 6-20 % and 53 (39-NR) months in HPLC (p = 002). Among 20 metastatic patients with HPLC, median PFS under platinum-based chemotherapy, everolimus, alkylating-based chemotherapy, FOLFOX and PRRT was 5.1 (95 % CI 0.7-9.4), 12.1(95 %CI 0.3-24), 6.8 (95 % CI 0-14.9), 10.2 (95 % CI 0.4-19.9) and 14.2 months (95 % CI 0-30) respectively. Best response was stable disease (SD) under platinum-based chemotherapy and partial response (PR) under alkylating-based chemotherapy and FOLFOX. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the existence and rarity of HPLC. Their characteristics and clinical behavior are more similar to LC rather than neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), suggesting that this entity could be managed accordingly.
Subject(s)
Carcinoid Tumor , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine , Lung Neoplasms , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Carcinoid Tumor/diagnosis , Humans , Ki-67 Antigen , Lung , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective StudiesSubject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms , Adrenocortical Carcinoma , Pheochromocytoma , Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms/therapy , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/therapy , Adrenocortical Carcinoma/diagnosis , Adrenocortical Carcinoma/epidemiology , Adrenocortical Carcinoma/therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Pheochromocytoma/diagnosis , Pheochromocytoma/epidemiology , Pheochromocytoma/therapyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients with an unresectable primary tumor cannot benefit from curative surgery, and radioiodine treatment for locoregional and distant disease is not possible with the thyroid gland still in place. Due to local invasion, these patients cannot be included in clinical trials, so that treatment options are limited. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and the prognosis of patients with these locally unresectable DTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective and multicentric analysis of consecutive cases of unresectable DTC diagnosed between 2000 and 2015 was performed. RESULTS: The study population consisted in 22 patients, 13 females (59%); median age: 77 years (range: 52-91). Thyroid tumors were papillary in six, follicular in seven, Hürthle cell in one and poorly differentiated in eight patients. Patients were treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (57%), locoregional therapy of distant metastases (41%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (38%) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (33%). TKI treatment resulted in median disease control duration of 7 months with a grade 3-4 toxicity rate of 44%. Only one patient had a total thyroidectomy after neo-adjuvant EBRT. The 1, 3 and 5-year cumulative survival rate was 81%, 27.7% and 21.5%, respectively. The cause of death was DTC in 11 cases (local progression in 7), and to other causes in 7 cases; no patient died from treatment toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trials and approved treatments are lacking for unresectable DTC. TKI treatment may allow prolonged disease control with acceptable toxicity.
Subject(s)
Iodine Radioisotopes , Thyroid Neoplasms , Aged , Female , Humans , Iodine Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Thyroidectomy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate a strategy that used thermal-ablation of vertebral metastases (VM) to prevent vertebral related events (VRE) in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). METHODS: This single center study retrospectively reviewed records and post-operative imaging of all DTC patients treated with thermal-ablation for asymptomatic VMs. Rate of local tumor control at first post-operative imaging, 12 and 24 months after thermal-ablation and rate of VREs at 12 and 24 months among the treated VMs were reported. New VMs that occurred during the follow-up and were not considered for additional thermal-ablation were moniroted and VREs were reported. RESULTS: Thermal-ablation was used to achieve local control of 41 VMs in 28 patients. Median post-treatment follow-up was 22 months [range: 12-80] and the mean delay for first post-operative imaging was 2 months [range: 0.6-7.5]. Local control at first post-operative imaging, 12 and 24 months was achieved in 87.8%, 82.9% and 75.6%, respectively. Among the treated VMs the rates of VRE was 7.3% at 2 years, significantly lower if local control was achieved at first post-operative imaging than if it was not (0% vs 30%, p = 0.011, OR = 0.184 [95%CI = 0.094-0.360]). After thermal-ablation procedures, 19 news VMs occurred in 11 patients (39.2%) with a median interval of 8 months [range 1-26] and remained untreated. Among these untreated VMs, the rate of VREs at 2 years was significantly higher compared to the treated VMs: (36.8% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.008, OR = 0.135, [95%CI = 0.030-0.607]). CONCLUSION: local tumor control of VMs using thermal-ablation decreases the risk of VREs in DTC patients.
Subject(s)
Ablation Techniques/methods , Hyperthermia, Induced/methods , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sacrum/surgery , Spinal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Breakdown of the quantum Hall effect (QHE) is commonly associated with an electric field approaching the inter-Landau-level (LL) Zener field, the ratio of the Landau gap and the cyclotron radius. Eluded in semiconducting heterostructures, in spite of extensive investigation, the intrinsic Zener limit is reported here using high-mobility bilayer graphene and high-frequency current noise. We show that collective excitations arising from electron-electron interactions are essential. Beyond a noiseless ballistic QHE regime a large super-Poissonian shot noise signals the breakdown via inter-LL scattering. The breakdown is ultimately limited by collective excitations in a regime where phonon and impurity scattering are quenched. The breakdown mechanism can be described by a Landau critical velocity as it bears strong similarities with the roton mechanism of superfluids. In addition, we show that breakdown is a precursor of an electric-field induced QHE-metal transition.
ABSTRACT
Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and in most cases steroid hormone-producing tumor with variable prognosis. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide clinicians with best possible evidence-based recommendations for clinical management of patients with ACC based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. We predefined four main clinical questions, which we judged as particularly important for the management of ACC patients and performed systematic literature searches: (A) What is needed to diagnose an ACC by histopathology? (B) Which are the best prognostic markers in ACC? (C) Is adjuvant therapy able to prevent recurrent disease or reduce mortality after radical resection? (D) What is the best treatment option for macroscopically incompletely resected, recurrent or metastatic disease? Other relevant questions were discussed within the group. Selected Recommendations: (i) We recommend that all patients with suspected and proven ACC are discussed in a multidisciplinary expert team meeting. (ii) We recommend that every patient with (suspected) ACC should undergo careful clinical assessment, detailed endocrine work-up to identify autonomous hormone excess and adrenal-focused imaging. (iii) We recommend that adrenal surgery for (suspected) ACC should be performed only by surgeons experienced in adrenal and oncological surgery aiming at a complete en bloc resection (including resection of oligo-metastatic disease). (iv) We suggest that all suspected ACC should be reviewed by an expert adrenal pathologist using the Weiss score and providing Ki67 index. (v) We suggest adjuvant mitotane treatment in patients after radical surgery that have a perceived high risk of recurrence (ENSAT stage III, or R1 resection, or Ki67 >10%). (vi) For advanced ACC not amenable to complete surgical resection, local therapeutic measures (e.g. radiation therapy, radiofrequency ablation, chemoembolization) are of particular value. However, we suggest against the routine use of adrenal surgery in case of widespread metastatic disease. In these patients, we recommend either mitotane monotherapy or mitotane, etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin depending on prognostic parameters. In selected patients with a good response, surgery may be subsequently considered. (vii) In patients with recurrent disease and a disease-free interval of at least 12 months, in whom a complete resection/ablation seems feasible, we recommend surgery or alternatively other local therapies. Furthermore, we offer detailed recommendations about the management of mitotane treatment and other supportive therapies. Finally, we suggest directions for future research.
Subject(s)
Humans , Radiotherapy , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic , Catheter Ablation , Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms/therapy , Adrenocortical Carcinoma , Adrenocortical Carcinoma/therapy , Adrenalectomy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Doxorubicin/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms , Adrenocortical Carcinoma/diagnosis , Adrenocortical Carcinoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Mitotane/therapeutic use , Neoplasm MetastasisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the natural history of MEN1-related bronchial endocrine tumors (br-NETs) and to determine their histological characteristics, survival and causes of death. br-NETs frequency ranges from 3 to 13% and may reach 32% depending on the number of patients evaluated and on the criteria required for diagnosis. METHODS: The 1023-patient series of symptomatic MEN1 patients followed up in a median of 48.7 [35.5-59.6] years by the Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines was analyzed using time-to-event techniques. RESULTS: br-NETs were found in 51 patients (4.8%, [95% CI 3.6-6.2%]) and were discovered by imaging in 86% of cases (CT scan, Octreoscan, Chest X-ray, MRI). Median age at diagnosis was 45 years [28-66]. Histological examination showed 27 (53%) typical carcinoids (TC), 16 (31%) atypical carcinoids (AC), 2 (4%) large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC), 3(6%) small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (SCLC), 3(6%) TC associated with AC. Overall survival was not different from the rest of the cohort (HR 0.29, [95% CI 0.02-5.14]). AC tended to have a worse prognosis than TC (p = 0.08). Seven deaths were directly related to br-NETs (three AC, three SCLC and one LCNEC). Patients who underwent surgery survived longer (p = 10-4) and were metastasis free, while 8 of 14 non-operated patients were metastatic. There were no operative deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Around 5% of MEN1 patients develop br-NETs. br-NETs do not decrease overall survival in MEN1 patients, but poorly differentiated and aggressive br-NETs can cause death. br-NETs must be screened carefully. A biopsy is essential to operate on patients in time.
Subject(s)
Bronchial Neoplasms/pathology , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Adult , Aged , Bronchial Neoplasms/diagnosis , Bronchial Neoplasms/mortality , Cause of Death , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/diagnosis , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1/mortality , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/mortality , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and management of poorly differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) remain challenging. Recent studies suggest prognostic heterogeneity. We designed within the French Group of Endocrine Tumours a prospective cohort to gain insight in the prognostic stratification and treatment of GEP-NEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of GEP-NEC between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2013 could be included in this national cohort. Adenoneuroendocrine tumours were excluded. RESULTS: 253 patients from 49 centres were included. Median age was 66 years. Main primary locations were pancreas (21%), colorectal (27%), oesophagus-stomach (18%); primary location was unknown in 20%. Tumours were metastatic at diagnosis in 78% of cases. Performance status (PS) at diagnosis was 0-1 in 79% of patients. Among the 147 (58%) cases reviewed by an expert pathological network, 39% were classified as small cell NEC and 61% as large cell NEC. Median Ki67 index was 75% (range, 20-100). Median overall survival was 15.6 (13.6-17.0) months. Significant adverse prognostic factors in univariate analysis were PS > 1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.5), metastatic disease (HR = 1.6), NSE>2 upper limit of normal [ULN]; HR = 3.2), CgA>2 ULN (HR = 1.7) and lactate dehydrogenase >2 ULN (HR = 2.1). After first-line palliative chemotherapy (CT1) with platinum-etoposide (n = 152), objective response, progression-free survival and overall survival were 50%, 6.2 and 11.6 months; they were 24%, 2.9 and 5.9, respectively, after post-CT1 FOLFIRI regimen (n = 72). CONCLUSIONS: We report a large prospective series of GEP-NEC which show the predominance of large cell type and advanced stage at diagnosis. Prognosis was found more homogeneous than previously reported, mainly impacted by PS and tumour burden.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/pathology , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/mortality , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Female , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/mortality , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Metastasis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , PrognosisABSTRACT
Background: In the phase 3 RADIANT-2 study, everolimus plus octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) showed improvement of 5.1 months in median progression-free survival versus placebo plus octreotide LAR among patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors associated with carcinoid syndrome. The progression-free survival P-value was marginally above the prespecified threshold for statistical significance. Here, we report final overall survival (OS) and key safety update from RADIANT-2. Patients and methods: The RADIANT-2 trial compared everolimus (10 mg/day, orally; n = 216) versus placebo (n = 213), both in conjunction with octreotide LAR (30 mg, intramuscularly, every 28 days). Patients, unblinded at the time of progression or after end of double-blind core phase following primary analysis, were offered open-label everolimus with octreotide LAR (open-label phase). In the open-label phase, patients had similar safety and efficacy assessments as those in the core phase. For OS, hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs using unadjusted Cox model and a Cox model adjusted for prespecified baseline covariates were calculated. Results: A total of 170 patients received open-label everolimus (143 crossed over from the placebo arm; 27 in the everolimus arm continued to receive the same treatment after unblinding). The median OS (95% CI) after 271 events was 29.2 months (23.8-35.9) for the everolimus arm and 35.2 months (30.0-44.7) for the placebo arm (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92-1.49). HR adjusted for baseline covariates was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.84-1.38). The most frequent drug-related grade 3 or 4 AEs reported during the open-label phase were diarrhea (5.3%), fatigue (4.7%), and stomatitis (4.1%). Deaths related to pulmonary or cardiac failure were observed more frequently in the everolimus arm. Conclusion: No significant difference in OS was observed for the everolimus plus octreotide LAR and placebo plus octreotide LAR arms of the RADIANT-2 study, even after adjusting for imbalances in the baseline covariates. Clinical Trial Number: NCT00412061, www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/drug therapy , Everolimus/administration & dosage , Malignant Carcinoid Syndrome/drug therapy , Octreotide/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/mortality , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/pathology , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Everolimus/adverse effects , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Malignant Carcinoid Syndrome/mortality , Malignant Carcinoid Syndrome/pathology , Octreotide/adverse effects , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare and represent a heterogeneous disease. PNET can be functioning or non-functioning with different clinical presentations and different prognosis based on WHO and pTNM classifications. The role of imaging includes the localization of small functioning tumor, differentiation of these tumors from adenocarcinoma, identification of signs of malignancy and evaluation of extent. PNETs have a broad spectrum of appearance. On CT and MRI, most of functioning PNETs are well defined small tumors with intense and homogeneous enhancement on arterial and portal phases. However, some PNETs with a more fibrous content may have a more delayed enhancement that is best depicted on the delayed phase. Other PNETs can present as purely cystic, complex cystic and solid tumors and calcified tumors. Non-functioning PNETs are larger with less intense and more heterogeneous enhancement. Functional imaging is useful for disease staging, to detect disease recurrence or the primary but also to select patient candidate for peptide receptor radiometabolic treatment. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) (Octreoscan®) is still the most available technique. Gallium 68-SST analogue PET have been demonstrated to be more sensitive than SRS-SPEC and it will be the future of functional imaging for NET. Finally, 18FDG PET/CT is indicated for more aggressive PNET as defined either by negative SRS and huge tumor burden or ki67 above 10% or poorly differentiated PNEC tumors.
Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Endosonography , Gastrinoma/diagnostic imaging , Gastrinoma/pathology , Humans , Insulinoma/diagnostic imaging , Insulinoma/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnostic imaging , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , PrognosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the efficacy of gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (gemox) or 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin (folfox) in the treatment of metastatic pulmonary carcinoid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 45 patients were included in two tertiary referral centers between January 1999 and January 2013. Typical, atypical carcinoids or not otherwise specified carcinoids were diagnosed according to WHO criteria in 19%, 57%, and 24% of cases by two expert pathologists. Patients had synchronous (38%) or metachronous (62%) metastastic disease (median of 2 (1-5) metastatic sites). Seventy-nine percent had progressive disease before start of chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of: gemcitabine 1000mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 100mg/m(2) every 2 weeks (gemox regimen, n=24) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (400mg/m(2) in bolus injection and 5-FU 2400mg/m(2) in 46h-infusion) and oxaliplatin 85mg/m(2) (folfox regimen, n=21) every 2 weeks. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST criteria every 8-12 weeks. Progression free survival and overall survival were assessed using Kaplan Meier curves. RESULTS: Patients received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line (20%), second-line (33%), or post-second-line (47%) systemic treatment. The median number of cycles was 8 (1-12). Nine (20%) stopped oxaliplatin before 8 cycles because of toxicity. Nine patients (20%) had a partial response and 29 (64%) had stable disease. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 15 (6-25) months. Median overall survival (OS) was 34 (21-49) months. No significant difference was observed in response and PFS between either regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that either gemcitabine-oxaliplatin or 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin combinations are attractive chemotherapy regimen in metastatic pulmonary carcinoid tumors.