[Abdominoplasties: Do we still need to drain in 2021?] / Abdominoplasties : faut-il encore les drainer en 2021 ?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to consider the use of drainage when performing an abdominoplasty with regards to postoperative complications for two groups of patients. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From January 1st 2017 to December 31th 2019, 215 patients underwent an abdominoplasty in our institution. In this retrospective, comparative, single institution study, patients were divided into two groups: "drainage" D (n=162) when suction completed abdominoplasty, "no drainage" ND (n=53) when suction didn't completed abdominoplasty. Early and distant complications were retrieved for each group and compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning the occurrence of seroma postoperatively (8% of patients in group D and 11.3% of patients in group AD). The drainage group D experienced more seroma's punctures (2,3± 1,0) and the mean of punctured fluid was higher (386,5ml±350,4ml) compared to the no drainage group ND (1,3+- 0,5 number of punctures with a mean punctured fluid of 165,8mL± 224,2mL). The mean hospital stay was shorter for group ND (2,9± 1,8 days) than for group D (4,4+- 1,7 days), P<0,0001. CONCLUSION: Performing an abdominoplasty with quilting suture but drainless doesn't seem to increase postoperative complications statistically. The authors recommend, under the guise of a quilting suture, not to systematically drain the abdominoplasties and to reserve this technique for patients at risk of complications (high BMI, significant weight loss and co-morbidities).

[Surgical management of a series of pressure ulcers: Report of 61 cases]. / Prise en charge chirurgicale d'une série d'escarres : à propos de 61 cas.

INTRODUCTION: Retrospective study about pressure ulcers surgical treatments in a series of 61 in 43 patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the management of pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury patients who had been operated in our institution. RESULTS: On the 61 pressure ulcers, location was ischial in 35 cases, sacral in 15 cases, trochanteric in 7 cases, lateral malleolar in 2 cases, on the heel in 1 case, and 1 was located lateral to the fibular head. Comorbidities were searched pre- and postoperatively. Fifty-five muscular, cutaneous flaps or myocutaneous, 5 fasciocutaneous and 1 excision/suture were realized. The mean follow-up was 8.6 years, and we observed 9 pressure ulcers recurrences (14.8%). We had a total result of 15 (24.6%) complicated pressure ulcers, with 8 early complications (13.1%) and 7 delay (11.5%). Antibiotic therapy was prescribed in 54 (88.5%) surgery cases and 7 were operated without any (11.5%). CONCLUSION: Pressure ulcers are major public health focus that need to be improved. A multidisciplinary care, mixed with education of patients are mandatory to achieve these goals: reduce complications and recurrences. Thanks to muscle sparring, perforators flap should become the gold standard of pressure ulcers surgery.

[Lower bodylift after massive weight loss: Retrospective study of satisfaction, complications and quality of life. About 76 patients over 4years]. / Bodylift inférieur après amaigrissement massif : étude rétrospective de la satisfaction, des complications et de la qualité de vie. À propos de 76 patients sur 4ans.

INTRODUCTION: Massive weight loss leads to important cutaneous deformities with physical and psychological repercussions for patients. Lower bodylift is a procedure, which can restore the body contour. The aim of this study is to evaluate satisfaction and quality of life in patients who underwent lower bodylift and to review the complications of these procedures. MEANS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 76 patients who underwent lower bodylift between 2012 and 2016. We reviewed the complications of these procedures. Satisfaction and quality of life were assessed using Body-QoL questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included with a mean age of 39.2years. The average body mass index was 27.6kg/m2 with a mean weight of 71.2kg at the time of surgery and a mean weight loss of 48.6kg. Twenty-three patients developed one complication: 22 minor and 1 major. Forty-eight patients answered the questionnaire. Satisfaction was rated "very good" by 41 patients (85.4%) and "good" by 5 patients (10.4%). The Body-QoL questionnaire's analysis showed an improvement of quality of life socially, sexually, in the body regard and in physical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Lower bodylift is the only procedure, which can restore circumferential body contour. Despite the minor complications reviewed, the degree of satisfaction of the patients is very high. The quality of life of these patients, after massive weight loss, is also highly improved by these procedures. With the worldwide development of obesity and bariatric surgery, this study demonstrated that the operation should be proposed to patients with massive weight loss to improve quality of life.

[Fat grafting in breast reconstruction. Retrospective study of satisfaction and quality of life about 68 patients]. / Lipofilling en reconstruction mammaire. Étude rétrospective de la satisfaction et de la qualité de vie à propos de 68 patientes.

BACKGROUND: Evaluate the aesthetic clinical results, satisfaction and quality of life related to health in patients who underwent breast reconstruction by exclusive lipofilling or in addition to other surgical techniques. MEANS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried between 2009 and 2014 in four groups of patients who underwent a lipofilling by the same operator either after a conservative treatment (group 1), or exclusively (group 2), or after a flap (group 3) or implants (group 4). The sociodemographic data related to lipofilling or tumor pathology were collected and reported in a software designed for this study. Satisfaction and quality of life after lipofilling was assessed using the questionnaire Q BREAST(©) postoperative reconstruction module. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy lipofilling procedures were performed in 68 patients. The average volume transferred was 1421.2cm(3) for the exclusive lipofilling group and the average number of sessions was 4.9 spread over a period of 15.6months on average. In adjuvant technique or conservative surgery, the average total volume transferred was 212.2cm(3) and the average number of sessions was 1.4. The abdomen was the site most used donor and the posterior thigh exclusively used in exclusive reconstruction. The cytosteatonecrosis rate was 8.8 % (n=6). A single case of infection was noted. The tumor recurrence at ten months after lipofilling concerned two patients. The response rate was 80.8 %. The lipofilling improves the final cosmetic result with a rate of 91.1 % of patients satisfied or very satisfied with their breast. In all, 95.4 % of patients in the exclusive lipofilling group found a secondary benefit after surgery. Quality of life after lipofilling is also improved socially and sexually in the four groups with better results in patients who underwent conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: The lipofilling is a simple, reliable technique, requiring a learning curve, improving the final aesthetic result and the quality of life it is used exclusively or to complement other techniques.