Improving management of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause: evaluation of a health system-based, cluster-randomized intervention.

BACKGROUND: Genitourinary symptoms are common in postmenopausal women and adversely affect the quality of life. National surveys and data collected from our healthcare system indicate that postmenopausal women with the genitourinary syndrome of menopause often fail to receive appropriate diagnosis or treatment. OBJECTIVE: To promote greater detection and treatment of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause, we created and tested a clinician-focused health system intervention that included clinician education sessions and a suite of evidence-based electronic health record tools. STUDY DESIGN: Using a cluster-randomized design, we allocated primary care (16) and gynecology (6) clinics to the intervention or control group. From September to November 2014, we provided training about the diagnosis and treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in face-to-face presentations at each intervention clinic and in an online video. We developed clinical decision support tools in the electronic health record that contained an evidence-based, point-of-care knowledge resource, a standardized order set, and a checklist of patient education materials for the patient's after visit summary. The tools aimed to facilitate accurate diagnostic coding and prescribing (SmartSet, SmartRx) along with relevant patient information (SmartText). Clinicians who only performed visits at control clinics received no training or notification about the tools. Our primary outcome was vulvovaginal diagnoses made at well visits for women at the age of 55 years and older from November 15, 2014 to November 15, 2015. We also assessed urinary diagnoses, vaginal estrogen prescriptions, and use of the electronic tools. There was departmental support for the intervention but no prioritization within the healthcare system to incentivize change. RESULTS: In the 1-year period, 386 clinicians performed 14,921 well visits for women at the age of 55 years and older. Among the 190 clinicians who performed well visits in the intervention clinics, 109 (57.4%) completed either in-person or online educational training. The proportion of visits that included a vulvovaginal (7.2% vs 5.8%; odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-2.51) or urinary diagnosis (2.5% vs 3.1%; odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.13) or vaginal estrogen prescription (4.5% vs 3.7%; odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-2.46) did not differ between study arms. There was a significant interaction for primary care and gynecology, which revealed more vulvovaginal diagnoses by gynecology but not primary care intervention clinics (odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.31), but there was no significant interaction for prescriptions. Clinicians in the intervention clinics were more likely to use decision support tools than those in control clinics-SmartSet (22.2% vs 1.5%; odds ratio, 18.8; 95% confidence interval, 5.5-63.8) and SmartText for patient information (38.0% vs 24.4%; odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.34). A per-protocol analysis revealed similar findings. CONCLUSION: Overall, the intervention did not lead to more diagnoses or prescription therapy for postmenopausal genitourinary symptoms but did result in greater distribution of patient information. Gynecology clinicians were more likely to address genitourinary symptoms generally and were more likely to make a vulvovaginal diagnosis after the intervention. Further efforts for improving care should consider ongoing clinician education beginning with enhanced menopause curricula in residency training. Additional interventions to consider include greater access for postmenopausal women to gynecologic care, addressing treatment barriers, and development of national performance metrics.

Clinician knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to management of vulvovaginal atrophy: variations in primary care and gynecology.

OBJECTIVE: Vulvovaginal atrophy is a common, but under-recognized condition affecting postmenopausal women. To guide development of an intervention to boost its detection and treatment, we surveyed primary care and gynecology clinicians practicing in an integrated healthcare system. METHODS: We constructed a three-part survey that contained (1) eight multiple-choice knowledge questions; (2) three Likert-scale questions regarding clinicians' likelihood of assessing for vulvovaginal atrophy symptoms at a routine (well) visit, confidence in advising patients about symptoms and counseling about therapy; and (3) a 12-item check list of potential barriers to diagnosis and treatment. Analyses were performed using multiple regression. RESULTS: Of the 360 clinicians who were sent an e-mail request, 119 (90 primary care, 29 gynecology) completed the survey (33%). Responders and nonresponders did not differ by age, specialty, or clinician type. The proportion with correct responses to knowledge questions differed between primary care (63%) and gynecology (77%) (adjusted mean difference [AMD] =16, 95% CI [10-22]). Primary care clinicians were less likely than gynecology clinicians to assess for symptoms (AMD = 1.04, 95% CI [0.55-1.52]), and were less confident about their ability to advise on symptoms (AMD = 0.66, 95% CI [0.33-0.99]) and to counsel patients about treatment (AMD = 0.76, 95% CI [0.42-1.10]). Lack of time (71%) and educational materials (44%) were the most common barriers to diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care and gynecology clinicians differ in their knowledge and confidence in managing vulvovaginal atrophy but report similar practice barriers. Addressing identified knowledge deficits and practice barriers may lead to improved management of vulvovaginal atrophy.

The impact of a group psychoeducational appointment on women with sexual dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: There is little evidence to support many treatment modalities for women with sexual dysfunction. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and bibliotherapy are associated with improved sexual outcomes. We evaluated the impact of a group psychoeducational intervention on sexual function outcome measures in women with sexual concerns. STUDY DESIGN: Women with concerns of sexual function were referred to a group sexuality appointment. Before the visit, the women completed the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Class participants completed the FSFI at 1-, 3-, and 6-months after the intervention to evaluate changes in sexual function. RESULTS: Thirty-three women attended the group appointment between January and December 2006. Twenty-five women with an age range from 28-70 years completed a demographic and baseline FSFI questionnaire. All participants showed a baseline FSFI score indicating sexual dysfunction. At least 1 postclass FSFI was completed by 64% of participants. Significant improvement in most FSFI domain scores and the full scale score (P = .0073) was seen in these women. CONCLUSION: Participating in a group sexuality appointment improved quantitative outcome measures in women with sexual dysfunction. This intervention may provide an effective means for women's health care clinicians with limited time and expertise about sexual function to meet the needs of their patients with sexual concerns.