Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Nat Aging ; 2024 Aug 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39122839

ABSTRACT

The Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) program is a healthcare pathway that uses a screening test for intrinsic capacity (IC) as its entry point. However, real-life data informing on how IC domains cluster and change over time, as well as their clinical utility, are lacking. Using primary healthcare screening data from more than 20,000 French adults 60 years of age or older, this study identified four clusters of IC impairment: 'Low impairment' (most prevalent), 'Cognition+Locomotion+Hearing+Vision', 'All IC impaired' and 'Psychology+Vitality+Vision'. Compared to individuals with 'Low impairment', those in the other clusters had higher likelihood of having frailty and limitations in both activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), with the strongest associations being observed for 'All IC impaired'. This study found that ICOPE screening might be a useful tool for patient risk stratification in clinical practice, with a higher number of IC domains impaired at screening indicating a higher probability of functional decline.

2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676323

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) approach was developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) aiming to shift the traditional focus of care based on diseases to a function- and person-centered approach, focused on maintaining and monitoring intrinsic capacity (IC). This study aimed to investigate the ability of the ICOPE screening tool to identify older people with clinically meaningful impairments in IC domains. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis included 603 older adults, participants (mean age 74.7 [SD = 8.8] years, women 59.0%) of the INSPIRE Translational (INSPIRE-T) cohort. Responses at screening were compared to results of the subsequent in-depth assessment (ie, Mini-Mental State Examination, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Short Physical Performance Battery, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and clinical investigation of vision problems) to determine its predictive capacity for impairments at the IC domains (ie, cognition, psychological, sensory (vision), vitality, and locomotion). RESULTS: The ICOPE screening items provided very high sensitivity for identifying abnormality in vision (97.2%) and varied from 42.0% to 69.6% for the other domains. High specificity (>70%) was observed for all the IC domains, except for vision (2.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The ICOPE screening tool can be a useful instrument enabling the identification of older people with impairments in IC domains, but studies with different populations are needed. It should be considered as a low-cost and simple screening tool in clinical care.


Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Mass Screening/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Predictive Value of Tests , Cohort Studies
3.
Maturitas ; 185: 107976, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537388

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the World Health Organization introduced the concept of intrinsic capacity (IC) to define the individual-level characteristics that enable an older person to be and do the things they value. This study developed an intrinsic capacity score for UK Biobank study participants and validated its use as a tool for health outcome prediction, understanding healthy aging trajectories, and genetic research. METHODS: Our analysis included data from 45,208 UK biobank participants who had a complete record of the ten variables included in the analysis. Factor adequacy was tested using Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin, Barthelt's, and the determinant of matrix tests, and the number of factors was determined by the parallel analysis method. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were employed to determine the structure and dimensionality of indicators. Finally, the intrinsic capacity score was generated, and its construct and predictive validities as well as reliability were assessed. RESULTS: The factor analysis identified a multidimensional construct comprising one general factor (intrinsic capacity) and five specific factors (locomotor, vitality, cognitive, psychological, and sensory). The bifactor structure showed a better fit (comparative fit index = 0.995, Tucker Lewis index = 0.976, root mean square error of approximation = 0.025, root mean square residual = 0.009) than the conventional five-factor structure. The intrinsic capacity score generated using the bifactor confirmatory factor analysis has good construct validity, as demonstrated by an inverse association with age (lower intrinsic capacity in older age; (ß) =-0.035 (95%CI: -0.036, -0.034)), frailty (lower intrinsic capacity score in prefrail participants, ß = -0.104 (95%CI: (-0.114, -0.094)) and frail participants, ß = -0.227 (95%CI: -0.267, -0.186) than robust participants), and comorbidity (a lower intrinsic capacity score associated with increased Charlson's comorbidity index, ß =-0.019 (95%CI: -0.022, -0.015)). The intrinsic capacity score also predicted comorbidity (a one-unit increase in baseline intrinsic capacity score led to a lower Charlson's comorbidity index, ß = 0.147 (95%CI: -0.173, -0.121)) and mortality (a one-unit increase in baseline intrinsic capacity score led to 25 % lower risk of death, odds ratio = 0.75(95%CI: 0.663, 0.848)). CONCLUSION: The bifactor structure showed a better fit in all goodness of fit tests. The intrinsic capacity construct has strong structural, construct, and predictive validities and is a promising tool for monitoring aging trajectories.


Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment , UK Biobank , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Cognition , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Healthy Aging , Reproducibility of Results , United Kingdom
4.
J Urban Health ; 101(1): 181-192, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38236430

ABSTRACT

Pedestrian injuries from falls are an understudied cause of morbidity. Here, we compare the burden of pedestrian injuries from falls occurring on streets and sidewalks with that from motor vehicle collisions. Data on injurious falls on streets and sidewalks, and pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions, to which Emergency Medical Services responded, along with pedestrian and incident characteristics, were identified in the 2019 National Emergency Medical Services Information System database. In total, 118,520 injurious pedestrian falls and 33,915 pedestrians-motor vehicle collisions were identified, with 89% of the incidents occurring in urban areas. Thirty-two percent of pedestrians struck by motor vehicles were coded as Emergent or Critical by Emergency Medical Services, while 19% of pedestrians injured by falls were similarly coded. However, the number of pedestrians whose acuity was coded as Emergent or Critical was 2.1 times as high for injurious falls as compared with pedestrians-motor vehicle collisions. This ratio was 3.9 for individuals 50 years and older and 6.1 for those 65 years and older. In conclusion, there has been substantial and appropriate policy attention given to preventing pedestrian injuries from motor vehicles, but disproportionately little to pedestrian falls. However, the population burden of injurious pedestrian falls is significantly greater and justifies an increased focus on outdoor falls prevention, in addition to urban design, policy, and built environment interventions to reduce injurious falls on streets and sidewalks, than currently exists across the USA.


Subject(s)
Pedestrians , Wounds and Injuries , Humans , Walking , Accidents, Traffic , Motor Vehicles , Built Environment , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology
5.
Nat Aging ; 4(1): 1-4, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38177328
12.
Bull. W.H.O. (Print) ; 91(9): 707-709, 2013-9-01.
Article in English | WHO IRIS | ID: who-271375
13.
Bull. W.H.O. (Print) ; 91(9): 630-639, 2013-9-01.
Article in English | WHO IRIS | ID: who-271361

Subject(s)
Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL