Anatomical risk factors for spermatic cord torsion and their involvement in the choice of orchidopexy technique.

OBJECTIVE: We aim by this article to present a literature review on the anatomical risk factors for spermatic cord torsion and their involvement the different techniques of orchidopexy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature review was conducted following PRISMA check-list, using PubMed database and the Mesh terms: testis, torsion, anomaly, orchidopexy. Techniques of surgical management provided by the EMC (French medico-surgical encyclopedia) were also used. RESULTS: Database research identified 500 articles, and 16 mores articles were added from the review of the references lists of relevant articles. At the end, 42 articles were useful for our review including 6 reviews, 5 cross-sectional studies, 14 cohorts, 10 case reports, 1 meta-analysis, 1 letter, and 5 experimental studies. High insertion of the tunica vaginalis, a long mesorchium, deficient attachment of the epididymis to the testis, and anomalies of the gubernaculum testis are the anatomical predispositions for spermatic cord torsion. After reduction of torsion, many surgical techniques for the fixation of the testis have been suggested including: conventional technique by triangulation with or without fasciotomy, window orchidopexy, scrotal pouch, and vaginal eversion with or without dartos fixation. CONCLUSION: The most common anatomical factor associated with spermatic cord torsion is the high insertion of the tunica vaginalis. Vaginal eversion with fixation to the dartos might be superior to other known techniques and seems promising to become standard.

Postoperative assessment of nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 after robotic surgical procedures during the pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To assess potential nosocomial coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) transmission in patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures during the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopy in urology or gynaecology within 2 academic hospitals. Patients underwent local preoperative COVID-19 screening using a symptoms questionnaire. Patients with suspicious screening underwent coronavirus real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and were excluded from robotic surgery if positive. Patients with symptoms postsurgery were systematically tested for coronavirus by RT-PCR. One-month postsurgery, all patients had a telephone consultation to evaluate COVID-19 symptoms. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients underwent robotic surgery during the study period (median age: 63-years [IQR: 53-70], 1.8 male: female ratio). Oncology was the main indication for robotic surgery (n = 62, 91.2%) and 26 patients (38.2%) received a chest CT-scan prior to surgery. Eleven patients (16.2%) were symptomatic after surgery of whom only 1 tested positive for coronavirus by RT-PCR (1.5%) and was transferred to COVID-19 unit with no life-threatening condition. No attending surgeon was diagnosed with COVID-19 during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery seemed safe in the era of COVID-19 as long as all recommended precautions are followed. The rate of nosocomial COVID-19 transmission was extremely low despite the fact that we only used RT-PCR testing in symptomatic patients during the preoperative work-up. Larger cohort is needed to validate these results.