ABSTRACT
Background and study aim: Magnifying endoscopy enables the diagnosis of advanced neoplasia throughout the gastrointestinal tract. The unified magnifying endoscopic classification (UMEC) framework unifies optical diagnosis criteria in the esophagus, stomach, and colon, dividing lesions into three categories: non-neoplastic, intramucosal neoplasia, and deep submucosal invasive cancer. This study aims to ascertain the performance of North American endoscopists when using the UMEC. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, five North American endoscopists without prior training in magnifying endoscopy independently diagnosed images of gastrointestinal tract lesions using UMEC. All endoscopists were blinded to endoscopic findings and histopathological diagnosis. Using histopathology as the gold standard, the endoscopists' diagnostic performances using UMEC were evaluated. Results: A total of 299 lesions (77 esophagus, 92 stomach, and 130 colon) were assessed. For esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranged from 65.2% (95%CI: 50.9-77.9) to 87.0% (95%CI: 75.3-94.6), 77.4% (95%CI: 60.9-89.6) to 96.8% (95%CI: 86.8-99.8), and 75.3% to 87.0%, respectively. For gastric adenocarcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranged from 94.9% (95%CI: 85.0-99.1) to 100%, 52.9% (95%CI: 39.4-66.2) to 92.2% (95%CI: 82.7-97.5), and 73.3% to 93.3%. For colorectal adenocarcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranged from 76.2% (95%CI: 62.0-87.3) to 83.3% (95%CI: 70.3-92.5), 89.7% (95%CI: 82.1-94.9) to 97.7% (95%CI: 93.1-99.6), and 86.8% to 90.7%. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated good to excellent reliability. Conclusion: UMEC is a simple classification that may be used to introduce endoscopists to magnifying narrow-band imaging and optical diagnosis, yielding satisfactory diagnostic accuracy.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: There have been significant advances in the management of large (≥20 mm) laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) or nonpedunculated colorectal polyps; however, there is a lack of clear consensus on the management of these lesions with significant geographic variability especially between Eastern and Western paradigms. We aimed to provide an international consensus to better guide management and attempt to homogenize practices. METHODS: Two experts in interventional endoscopy spearheaded an evidence-based Delphi study on behalf of the World Endoscopy Organization Colorectal Cancer Screening Committee. A steering committee comprising six members devised 51 statements, and 43 experts from 18 countries on six continents participated in a three-round voting process. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations tool was used to assess evidence quality and recommendation strength. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement (strongly agree or agree) on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Forty-two statements reached consensus after three rounds of voting. Recommendations included: three statements on training and competency; 10 statements on preresection evaluation, including optical diagnosis, classification, and staging of LSTs; 14 statements on endoscopic resection indications and technique, including statements on en bloc and piecemeal resection decision-making; seven statements on postresection evaluation; and eight statements on postresection care. CONCLUSIONS: An international expert consensus based on the current available evidence has been developed to guide the evaluation, resection, and follow-up of LSTs. This may provide guiding principles for the global management of these lesions and standardize current practices.
ABSTRACT
In tracheobronchomalacia, the structural weakening of the airway results in altered ventilatory mechanics. This case report describes a patient with known tracheobronchomalacia who experienced expiratory central airway collapse and dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) to treat symptomatic achalasia. We discuss the physiological considerations and potential complications of a POEM procedure with superimposed tracheobronchomalacia and present perioperative strategies for the prevention and management of this potentially deleterious combination. Although tracheobronchomalacia was a known condition in our patient, it is likely an underdiagnosed condition that may first present intraoperatively.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Myotomy , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Myotomy/methods , Tracheobronchomalacia/surgery , Female , Middle Aged , MaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of submucosal endoscopic dissection (ESD) in management of invasive esophageal cancer (EC) remains unclear. In this case series, we evaluate the clinical and technical outcomes of patients who underwent ESD with pathologically staged T1b EC. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent ESD between December 2016 and April 2023 with pathologically staged T1b EC. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and ESD technical outcomes were analyzed. Patients were followed to determine disease-free survival and tumor recurrence rates. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with a total of 17 pathologically staged T1b ECs were included in this case series with a median follow-up time of 28 months [range 3-75]. ESD had high en-bloc (100%) and R0 (82.3%) resection rates. 16/17 patients (94.1%) were discharged the same day, and there were no immediate perioperative complications. 4/17 patients (23.5%) had curative ESD resections with no tumor recurrence. Among those with non-curative resections (n = 13), 5 patients had ESD only, 6 had ESD + surgery, and 2 underwent ESD + chemoradiation. In the ESD only group, 2/5 patients (40%) had tumor recurrence. In the ESD + surgery group, one patient died from a surgical complication, and 1/5 (20%) had tumor recurrence at follow-up. There was no tumor recurrence among patients who had ESD + chemoradiation. CONCLUSION: ESD is safe with high en-bloc and R0 resection rates in T1b EC. Recurrence rates are low but patients need close monitoring. Larger-scale studies are needed to determine the long-term clinical efficacy of ESD in T1b EC.
Subject(s)
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Staging , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free SurvivalSubject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Esophageal Achalasia , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Myotomy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Esophagoscopy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/prevention & control , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Resection of colorectal polyps has been shown to decrease the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps are often referred to expert centers for endoscopic resection, which requires relevant information to be conveyed to the therapeutic endoscopist to allow for triage and planning of resection technique. The primary objective of this study was to establish minimum expected standards for the referral of large non-pedunculated colonic polyps for potential endoscopic resection. METHODS: A Delphi method was used to establish consensus on minimum expected standards for the referral of large colorectal polyps among a panel of international endoscopy experts. The expert panel was recruited through purposive sampling, and 3 rounds of surveys were conducted to achieve consensus. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed for each round. RESULTS: A total of 24 international experts from diverse continents participated in the Delphi study, resulting in consensus on 19 statements related to the referral of large colorectal polyps. The identified factors, including patient demographic characteristics, relevant medications, lesion factors, photodocumentation, and the presence of a tattoo, were deemed important for conveying the necessary information to therapeutic endoscopists. The mean scores for the statements, which were scored on a scale of 1 to 10, ranged from 7.04 to 9.29, with high percentages of experts considering most statements as a very high priority. Subgroup analysis according to continent revealed some variations in consensus rates among experts from different regions. CONCLUSIONS: The identified consensus statements can aid in improving the triage and planning of resection techniques for large colorectal polyps, ultimately contributing to the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.
ABSTRACT
Video 1Treatment of Bouveret syndrome with stone fragmentation using an endoscopic submucosal dissection knife. A 61-year-old man with a 3-decade history of recurrent cholecystitis presented to the community emergency department with severe right upper quadrant pain. A CT scan was performed and revealed gangrenous cholecystitis with likely cholecystoduodenal fistulous communication.After discussion with the patient and the HPB team, the plan was made to attempt endoscopic extraction of the obstructing stone. This would be performed in the operating room, such that if endoscopic extraction was not possible, surgical management would proceed.During the endoscopy, 1 L of liquid material was suctioned and the retained solids were cleared as best as possible. The large obstructing stone was then seen in the duodenal cap. In the cap, we could appreciate the obstructing stone and the fistulous tract.We then passed a guidewire distal to the stone and advanced a 15- to 20-mm extraction balloon over the guidewire. The balloon was passed distal to the stone and inflated to 20 mm. We then applied firm, steady traction in an attempt to extract the stone.With the double-channel gastroscope, we passed a second wire and extraction balloon distal to the stone to increase the amount of traction that could be applied. Both balloons were inflated distal to the stone, and steady, firm traction was again applied. Unfortunately, this was not successful either.We then decided to use a regular ERCP needle knife to incise the stone. Because the knife was delicate, it was easily deformable, so we decided to switch to a triangle-tip knife.Using the "PreciseSECT" mode on the electrosurgical unit, the stone was repeatedly incised. Particular care was taken to avoid flinging the knife and damaging the duodenal wall.Saline was used as the irrigation solution to ensure electrosurgical conductivity when the current was applied.At this point, we could appreciate fragmentation of the stones after repeated incision.After about 3 hours of stone incision and fragmentation, the guidewire was passed beyond the stone; the extraction balloon was advanced over the wire; and the balloon was again inflated with steady traction applied. This time, the stone was successfully extracted from the stomach.The duodenum was then examined. There were no remaining large pieces of stone or any significant mucosal damage or perforation.Using a mechanical lithotripter, the remaining larger fragments of stone were fragmented and extracted. However, because the stone had a large diameter, lithotripsy at the center was not initially possible, and the smaller lateral aspects had to be performed until the stone was completely fragmented.This case demonstrates the incision and fragmentation of a massive gallstone with the use of an endoscopic submucosal dissection knife and electrosurgical unit.With cautious application of this technique, successful endoscopic management of a large gallstone causing Bouveret syndrome was achieved. This technique avoided open surgical management and allowed for elective cholecystectomy at a later date with less morbidity.
ABSTRACT
Video 1Gastrogastric intussusception and acute pancreatitis caused by a large pyloric gland adenoma treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection: A 75-year-old woman with a several-week history of intermittent postprandial nausea and vomiting presented to the emergency room after experiencing syncope, following several hours of persistent abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. A contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis was arranged. Axial images show gastrogastric intussusception with the intussusceptum, indicated by the dashed lines, telescoping into the intussuscipiens indicated by the arrowheads. There is a lobulated mass indicated by the asterisk, serving as the lead point for the intussusception, and there is also a small volume of fluid indicated by the arrow, which delineates the mass from the duodenum. In the coronal images, we can again see a long-segment intussusception indicated by the dashed line with a lobulated mass indicated by the asterisk serving as the lead point and extending into the proximal duodenum. Then the lobulated mass occupying and expanding the duodenal lumen can be seen, indicated by the asterisk. Upon entry into the stomach through endoscopy, the gastrogastric intussusception can be seen. The lobulated mass serving as the lead point can be seen being pulled distally. With air insufflation, the intussusception spontaneously resolved. With continued insufflation, within a few minutes, the native confirmation of the polyp was established. It was located in the proximal body along the greater curve with a lobulated appearance with a Paris 1sp morphology. In addition, there was panatrophy in the background mucosa, which was consistent with autoimmune atrophic gastritis that was subsequently confirmed on histopathology and positive anti-parietal cell antibiotics. An EUS was performed and did not show any evidence of T2 disease. Doppler showed large central feeding vessel. A plan was made for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The strategy for the ESD was an initial circumferential incision and trimming with subsequent application of multipoint traction. After a circumferential incision, a rich vascular supply is seen. After completion of the incision and trimming, the snare was advanced over the scope and the clip advanced through the instrument channel. Multiple clips were then used to secure the snare to the distal end of the lesion. With traction applied, access to the submucosa became much easier and the ESD proceeded easily. For the final remnant of submucosa, it was more easily dissected in a forward view. Chess is one of the merits of multipoint traction in that traction can be applied both proximally and distally to the lesion. The lesion was resected en bloc. The specimen was retrieved using the attached snare, but unfortunately, some of the friable head was fragmented because of its large size, yet the base remained intact. Final pathology demonstrated PGD+HGD with clear margins vertically and laterally along the base. This case of gastrogastric intussusception, causing gastric outlet obstruction and acute pancreatitis secondary to a large pyloric gland adenoma, highlights several rare clinical entities. First, gastrogastric intussusception in adults is an exceptionally rare phenomenon, with only a few documented cases reported in the literature. Second, in the case of large gastric neoplasms causing intussusception, rarely the neoplasm may extend down into the duodenum and obstruct the ampulla of Vater causing acute pancreatitis. Furthermore, pyloric gland adenomas are rare gastric neoplasms that tend to be polypoid in morphology and are associated with autoimmune gastritis, predominantly occurring in female patients, as in this case. Lastly, the traditional management for lesions causing gastroduodenal intussusception is surgical because of the risk of malignancy. However, in this case, the patient underwent successful curative and therapeutic endoscopic resection with ESD.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is carving out an increasing role in the treatment of esophageal neoplasia in the Western world. Contrary to Asia, most esophageal cancers in North America are associated with Barrett's esophagus. Patients with circumferential advanced neoplasia were previously managed by esophagectomy, but an increased experience with ESD has allowed for an endoscopic alternative. We present our experience with complete circumferential esophageal ESD at a North American referral center. METHODS: All patients undergoing 100% circumferential esophageal ESD between October 2016 and January 2023 at a single tertiary care center in Canada were included in the cohort. Demographics, procedural data, and lesion characteristics are presented in this series. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent 100% circumferential esophageal ESD during this period for Barrett's neoplasia. All patients had technically successful procedures with en-bloc resection. Nine patients (82%) had R0 resections, defined as clear lateral and deep margins on histologic examination. Two patients had positive deep margins on histologic examination and proceeded to esophagectomy. Seven patients (64%) had adenocarcinoma on the final pathology, of which 6 (86%) had upstaging from their initial biopsy sampling results. The median area of resected specimen was 48 cm2 (interquartile range [IQR], 26-80), and the median procedure time was 231 minutes (IQR, 180-246). Procedural efficiency was 4.0 min/cm2 (IQR, 2.7-5). Two patients (18%) developed refractory strictures after the procedure, which were endoscopically managed to resolution. CONCLUSIONS: Multifocal dysplastic Barrett's esophagus remains a challenging entity to treat. Circumferential ESD is a possible therapeutic option, with high procedural success and a low rate of adverse outcomes. This should be balanced against the risk of stricture development, as the optimal postprocedural prophylaxis regimen is investigated.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Margins of Excision , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Background/Aims: Achalasia is a disorder characterized by impairment in lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and esophageal aperistalsis, caused primarily by loss of inhibitory innervation. However, little is known about associated changes in esophageal smooth muscle. We examined the contractile phenotype and innervation of the circular smooth muscle, as well as inflammatory status, and correlated these with patient-specific parameters. Methods: Circular smooth muscle biopsies were obtained in consecutive patients with achalasia undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy. Axonal innervation and neurotransmitter subtypes were determined with immunocytochemistry, and this was used with quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) to characterize smooth muscle proliferation and cellular phenotype, as well as collagen expression. These were compared to control tissue obtained at esophagectomy and correlated with patient demographic factors including age, onset of symptoms, and Eckhardt score. Results: Biopsies of smooth muscle were obtained from 25 patients with achalasia. Overall, there was increased mast cell number and collagen deposition but increased smooth muscle cell proliferation vs control. There was a striking drop in axon density over controls, with no differences among subtypes of achalasia. Immunocytochemical analysis showed increased expression of the contractile marker α-smooth muscle actin, principally in Type 1 achalasia, that increased with disease duration, while qPCR identified increased mRNA for smoothelin with decreased myosin heavy chain and collagen 3a1, but not collagen 1a1. Conclusions: The thickened circular smooth muscle layer in achalasia is largely denervated, with an altered contractile phenotype and fibrosis. Biopsies obtained during peroral endoscopic myotomy provide a means to further study the pathophysiology of achalasia.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Video analysis has emerged as a potential strategy for performance assessment and improvement. We aimed to develop a video-based skill assessment tool for peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). METHODS: POEM was deconstructed into basic procedural components through video analysis by an expert panel. A modified Delphi approach and 2 validation exercises were conducted to refine the POEM assessment tool (POEMAT). Twelve assessors used the final POEMAT version to grade 10 videos. Fully crossed generalizability (G) studies investigated the contributions of assessors, endoscopists' performance, and technical elements to reliability. G coefficients below .5 were considered unreliable, between .5 and .7 as modestly reliable, and above .7 as indicative of satisfactory reliability. RESULTS: After task deconstruction, discussions, and the modified Delphi process, the final POEMAT comprised 9 technical elements. G analysis showed low variance for endoscopist performance (.8%-24.9%) and high interrater variability (range, 63.2%-90.1%). The G score was moderately reliable (≥.60) for "submucosal tunneling" and "myotomy" and satisfactorily reliable (≥.70) for "active hemostasis" and "mucosal closure." CONCLUSIONS: We developed and established initial content and response process validity evidence for the POEMAT. Future steps include appraisal of the tool using a wider range of POEM videos to establish and improve the discriminative validity of this tool.
Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Esophageal Achalasia , Myotomy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Esophageal Sphincter, LowerABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patient navigation (P.N.) is designed to eliminate barriers to care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a novel P.N. program on timeliness of care in patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study compared the timeliness of care for esophageal cancer patients before (January 2014-March 2018) and after the implementation of a novel P.N. program (April 2018-March 2020), called EDAP, at a tertiary care center. The primary outcome was time from biopsy to first treatment; secondary outcomes included time from biopsy to complete staging, biopsy to complete preoperative workup, and referral to the first point of contact. The outcomes were evaluated in the entire cohort and then in a subgroup of patients undergoing curative multimodality therapy. RESULTS: There were 96 patients in the pre-EDAP group and 98 patients in the post-EDAP group. There was no significant difference between pre- and post-EDAP in the time from biopsy to first treatment and time from biopsy to staging in the overall cohort. In the subgroup of patients undergoing curative multimodality therapy, there was a significant decrease in time from biopsy to first treatment postnavigation (60-51 days, p = 0.02), in addition to a significant decrease in time from biopsy to preoperative workup and time from biopsy to staging. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating that a novel P.N. program for patients with esophageal cancer improved timeliness of care. The group of patients who benefited most were those undergoing curative multimodality therapy, likely given the extensive coordination of services required by this group.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Patient Navigation , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Biopsy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
Importance: Infection transmission following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can occur due to persistent contamination of duodenoscopes despite high-level disinfection to completely eliminate microorganisms on the instrument. Objective: To determine (1) contamination rates after high-level disinfection and (2) technical performance of duodenoscopes with disposable elevator caps compared with those with standard designs. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this parallel-arm multicenter randomized clinical trial at 2 tertiary ERCP centers in Canada, all patients 18 years and older and undergoing ERCP for any indication were eligible. Intervention: The intervention was use of duodenoscopes with disposable elevator caps compared with duodenoscopes with a standard design. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes were persistent microbial contamination of the duodenoscope elevator or channel, defined as growth of at least 10 colony-forming units of any organism or any growth of gram-negative bacteria following high-level disinfection (superiority outcome), and technical success of ERCP according to a priori criteria (noninferiority outcome with an a priori noninferiority margin of 7%), assessed by blinded reviewers. Results: From December 2019 to February 2022, 518 patients were enrolled (259 disposable elevator cap duodenoscopes, 259 standard duodenoscopes). Patients had a mean (SD) age of 60.7 (17.0) years and 258 (49.8%) were female. No significant differences were observed between study groups, including in ERCP difficulty. Persistent microbial contamination was detected in 11.2% (24 of 214) of standard duodenoscopes and 3.8% (8 of 208) of disposable elevator cap duodenoscopes (P = .004), corresponding to a relative risk of 0.34 (95% CI, 0.16-0.75) and number needed to treat of 13.6 (95% CI, 8.1-42.7) to avoid persistent contamination. Technical success using the disposable cap scope was noninferior to that of the standard scope (94.6% vs 90.7%, P = .13). There were no differences between study groups in adverse events and other secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, disposable elevator cap duodenoscopes exhibited reduced contamination following high-level disinfection compared with standard scope designs, without affecting the technical performance and safety of ERCP. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04040504.
Subject(s)
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Duodenoscopes , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Duodenoscopes/adverse effects , Duodenoscopes/microbiology , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/instrumentation , Elevators and Escalators , Disinfection , Data CollectionABSTRACT
Achalasia is an esophageal motor disorder characterized by impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and absent peristalsis in the smooth muscle esophageal body. As a result, patients typically experience dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, and weight loss. Over the past 10-15 years, there has been a resurgence of interest in the evaluation of therapies for achalasia. Unfortunately, little progress in the development of effective pharmacological treatments has been made. Botulinum toxin injection provides some relief of symptoms in many patients but requires periodic reinjection that may provide progressively less benefit over time. There are now three well-established, safe, and effective therapies for the treatment of achalasia: pneumatic dilation (PD), laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) which can lead to marked symptom improvement in most patients. Each treatment has a specific constellation of risks, benefits, and recurrence rate. The first-line treatment used will depend on patient preference, achalasia subtype, and local expertise. The recent impressive advances in both the art and science of achalasia therapy are explored with a comprehensive review of the various treatment modalities and comparative controlled clinical trials. In addition, key technical pearls of the procedural treatments are demonstrated.
Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Esophageal Achalasia , Heller Myotomy , Laparoscopy , Humans , Esophageal Achalasia/diagnosis , Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background and Aims: Although usually mild to moderate in severity, postoperative pain after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is common. There are no studies that have addressed minimizing postoperative pain in patients undergoing POEM for achalasia. We hypothesized that intraoperative topical intra-tunnel irrigation with ropivacaine would result in a significant reduction in pain scores in the postoperative period. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the Kingston Health Sciences Center. Patients received either 30 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine or 30 mL of placebo irrigated topically into the POEM tunnel after completing the myotomy and prior to closing the mucosal incision. The primary outcome was pain post-POEM at 6 h assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary objectives included assessing pain score at 0.5, 1, 2, 4 h post-POEM and on discharge, Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scores at discharge, narcotic requirement, adverse events, and patients' willingness to have the procedure done on an outpatient basis. Results: A total of 20 patients were enrolled. For the primary outcome of pain post-POEM at 6 h, the NRS was 1.1 in the placebo group and 2.4 in the ropivacaine group (95% CI of the difference: -3.2 to 0.6, P = 0.171). No statistical difference was seen in the pain scores. Overall usage of post-procedural narcotics was low with no differences between the two groups. Fifty percent of patients in both groups were willing to have the procedure done as an outpatient. Conclusion: The addition of intra-procedural tunnel irrigation with 30 mL 0.2% ropivacaine did not lead to reduced post-POEM pain.