From Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension to Patient Experience with the Care Received: Should We Be More Aware of Current Patient Needs?

INTRODUCTION: Self-perceived health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and their experience with the care received are important for improving their management. We conducted a study to assess both patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and how they interrelate. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational study of consecutive patients with PAH and CTEPH attending pulmonary hypertension (PH)-specialized units at 25 hospitals in Spain. PRO measurements used included CAMPHOR/EQ-5D-5L questionnaires (HRQoL) and IEXPAC (healthcare experience). Patient characteristics were collected. Relationships were analysed with Pearson's correlation coefficient and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients with PAH and 93 patients with CTEPH aged 54.4 ± 14.4 and 64.8 ± 13.4 years were included: 63.6% and 72% were functional class (FC) I-II; median time from diagnosis was 3 and 2 years, respectively. Most patients with PAH received combination oral therapy. CAMPHOR scores indicated moderate-to-high impairment in the "activity" scale (PAH 21.6 ± 6.8; CTEPH 21.0 ± 6.3). EQ-5D-5L index and visual analogue scale (VAS) score (PAH 0.59 ± 0.15 and 65.55 ± 21.54; CTEPH 0.59 ± 0.13 and 66.95 ± 18.71, respectively) indicated moderate HRQoL impairment. HRQoL was mostly affected by FC. IEXPAC scores (PAH 7.08 ± 1.56 and CTEPH 7.13 ± 1.61) indicated good healthcare experience. In patients with PAH, the CAMPHOR "symptom" and "QoL" domains inversely correlated with the IEXPAC "patient self-management" factor. CONCLUSION: In patients with long-standing PAH and CTEPH with good disease control, functional limitations greatly impact HRQoL while symptoms and generic QoL were less affected. Healthcare received was perceived as good; however, use of information and communication technologies, patient associations and promotion of self-management should improve for enhanced patient experience.

Assessment of risk scores in Covid-19.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the accuracy of commonly used risk scores (PSI and CURB-65) in predicting mortality and need for ICU admission in Covid-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study of patients diagnosed with Covid-19 pneumonia. Patients were followed until home discharge or death. PSI, CURB-65, SMART-COP and MuLBSTA severity scores were assessed on admission. Risk scores were related to mortality and ICU admission. RESULTS: About 249 patients, 143 males (57.4%) were included. The mean age was 65.6 + 16.1 years. Factors associates with mortality in the multivariate analysis were age > 80 years (OR: 13.9; 95% CI 3.8-51.1) (P = .000), lymphocytes < 800 (OR: 2.9; CI 95% 1.1-7-9) (P = .040), confusion (OR: 6.3; 95% CI 1.6-24.7) (P = .008) and NT-proBNP > 500 pg/mL (OR: 10.1; 95% CI 1.1-63.1) (P = .039). In predicting mortality, the PSI score: AUC 0.874 (95% CI 0.808-0.939) and the CURB-65 score: AUC 0.852 (95% CI 0.794-0.909) were the ones that obtained the best results. In the need for ICU admission, the SMART-COP score: AUC 0.749 (95% CI 0.695-0.820) and the MuLBSTA score: AUC 0.777 (95% CI 0.713-0.840) were the ones that obtained better results, with significant differences with PSI and CURB-65. The scores with the lowest value for ICU admission prediction were PSI with AUC of 0.620 (95% CI 0.549-0.690) and CURB-65 with AUC of 0.604 (95% CI 0.528-0.680). CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis scores routinely used for CAP (PSI and CURB-65) were good predictors for mortality in patients with Covid-19 CAP but not for need of hospitalisation or ICU admission. In the evaluation of Covid-19 pneumonia, we need scores that allow to decide the appropriate level of care.

Correlation between short-term air pollution exposure and unprovoked lung embolism. Prospective observational (Contamina-TEP Group).

BACKGROUND: The aim was to analyze the temporal relationship between short-term air pollution exposure and acute symptomatic unprovoked pulmonary embolism (PE). PATIENTS/METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicenter study in consecutive patients diagnosed with acute symptomatic unprovoked PE from February 2012 to January 2013. We analyzed demographic and clinical data, patients' addresses, meteorological and air pollutants data (PM10, SO2, CO, NO2, ozone emission data). We considered the number of days the patient had symptoms, and the study period constituted the previous 30 days. Likewise, the mean annual data of the reference season were calculated as well as the data of the 30-day study period corresponding to the same dates in the previous 3 years in order to obtain the monthly mean of the different pollutants for each period. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients with acute symptomatic PE were recruited (43.2% unprovoked PE). The air pollutants could be determined in 50% of the patients with unprovoked PE, and a final analysis was performed in 35 patients. In the multiple comparison analysis to verify a possible correlation between the study period and the annual median, only NO2 showed a statistically significant association (p = 0.009). When comparing the study period with the previous 3 years, only NO2 maintained a statistically significant association for the 3 study periods. CONCLUSIONS: We found a relationship between short-term exposure to NO2 and the presence of unprovoked PE.

Evolution of Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Starting Macitentan After the Discontinuation of Other Endothelin-Receptor Antagonists: Results of a Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Macitentan is the latest endothelin-receptor antagonist (ERA) approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), presenting enhanced properties over previous ERAs. OBJECTIVE: We describe the clinical and echocardiographic evolution of patients with PAH who started macitentan after discontinuing bosentan/ambrisentan. METHODS: This was a retrospective series of patients with different etiologies who started macitentan after the suspension of other ERAs under routine clinical practice at five Spanish hospitals. World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), levels of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and cardiac imaging data were collected and described at baseline (before macitentan initiation) and after 3, 6, and 12 months, when available. RESULTS: In total, 12 patients (ten women; mean age 65.63 ± 13.27 years) were observed. At baseline, most patients were receiving concomitant PAH medications, and five patients were classed as WHO-FC III. After 3 months of macitentan treatment, WHO-FC had improved in four patients, 6MWD increased in eight patients, and NT-proBNP levels and right atrial area were lowered in seven and eight patients, respectively. Similar results were observed after 6 and 12 months. Macitentan was well-tolerated, with no PAH hospitalizations, septostomies, transplants, or deaths registered. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that switching to macitentan in patients with PAH who discontinued bosentan/ambrisentan was well-tolerated and effective. Further studies are needed to confirm these observations.