Pain and Hazardous Alcohol Use in Veterans in Primary Care: The Role of Affective Pain Interference and Alcohol Pain-Coping Perceptions.

Chronic pain and unhealthy alcohol use commonly co-occur and are associated with negative health outcomes. Veterans may be particularly vulnerable to these conditions, yet limited research has examined factors involved in their co-occurrence. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the role of affective pain interference and alcohol pain-coping perceptions in the relationship between pain and hazardous alcohol use. As informed by the catastrophizing, anxiety, negative urgency, and expectancy model, we hypothesized that the relationship between pain and hazardous alcohol consumption is mediated by affective pain interference and stronger among those with greater perceptions that alcohol helps cope with pain. Participants were 254 VA primary care patients (87.8% male, Mage = 64.03, 76.4% White) with a history of chronic musculoskeletal pain, past-year alcohol use, and past-week pain. Veterans completed a mailed survey including measures of pain, affective pain interference, alcohol pain-coping perceptions, and hazardous alcohol use. Hypotheses were tested with regression models and PROCESS macros. As hypothesized, affective pain interference mediated the pain-hazardous alcohol use association. Contrary to hypotheses, results showed no moderating effect of alcohol pain-coping perceptions. Findings partially support relationships among theorized constructs and suggest that for Veterans with co-occurring pain and alcohol use it may be important to target pain-related affective interference and perceptions that alcohol helps cope with pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a test of factors involved in the pain and alcohol relationship, as informed by the CANUE model. Findings suggest that for Veterans with co-occurring pain and past-year alcohol use, it may be important to target pain-related affective interference and perceptions that alcohol helps cope with pain.

(RE-)AIMing for Rapid Uptake: Pilot Evaluation of a Modified Hub and Spoke Model of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is an effective, evidence-based treatment, but significant gaps in implementation remain. We evaluate one novel approach to address this gap: a Hub and Spoke model to increase buprenorphine access and management. METHODS: This outcome evaluation was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework using secondary data analysis of clinical and administrative data to characterize program outcomes for program Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, and Maintenance. Implementation was assessed through a chart review of provider progress notes and through key informant interviews with program staff to understand why this site was able to introduce a novel approach to MOUD. RESULTS: Nearly half of patients with opioid use disorder (45.48%, n=156) were reached by the program over 2 years. Of those, 91.67% had 1 or more program visits after an initial intake appointment, and 78.85% had a buprenorphine prescription. Patients in the program were 2.44 times more likely to have a buprenorphine prescription than those in comparator site that did not have a Hub and Spoke program (95% CI: 1.77-3.37; P <0.001). There was significantly greater program reach in year 1 than year 2, suggesting rapid initial uptake followed by modest program growth. Key informant interviews illustrated several themes regrading program implementation, including the importance of process champions, the beneficial impact of MOUD for patients, and addressing facility performance metrics. A supportive organizational culture and a receptive climate were also key factors for implementation. CONCLUSIONS: This program led to rapid improvement in MOUD uptake across the facility. Future efforts should focus on improving program maintenance, including supporting the exchange of patients from the hub to appropriate spokes.

Headache Disorders in VHA Primary Care: Prevalence, Psychiatric Comorbidity, and Health Care Utilization.

Military veterans are at increased risk for headache disorders compared to the general population, yet the prevalence and burden associated with headache disorders among veterans is not yet well understood. In this electronic medical record study, we examined the prevalence of headache disorders among veterans seen in a northeastern network of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) primary care during 2017-2018. We also examined rates of psychiatric comorbidity and health care utilization of veterans with headache disorders for the year following the date of the first headache code in the medical record. Of the total population of veterans in the network, 1.3% had a headache disorder and another 3.5% had a possible headache disorder. Migraine and chronic migraine represented the majority of cases. Posttraumatic stress disorder was the most frequent psychiatric comorbidity. Having a headache disorder was associated with higher rates of primary care, neurology, pain clinic, and mental health service use but not higher rates of emergency department or Whole Health (e.g., patient-centered, holistic health services) use. Prevalence findings are comparable to those previously found among veterans, but a substantial proportion of veterans may have been misdiagnosed. Veterans with headache disorders have high rates of psychiatric comorbidity and use several types of health services at higher rates. Findings highlight the need for interdisciplinary care and further education and support for primary care providers. Primary care settings that integrate evidence-based behavioral and Whole Health services may be an optimal way of providing more holistic care for headache disorders.

Collaborative Care Models to Improve Pain and Reduce Opioid Use in Primary Care: a Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Collaborative care management (CCM) is an empirically driven model to overcome fractured medical care and improve health outcomes. While CCM has been applied across numerous conditions, it remains underused for chronic pain and opioid use. Our objective was to establish the state of the science for CCM approaches to addressing pain-related outcomes and opioid-related behaviors through a systematic review. METHODS: We identified peer-reviewed articles from Cochrane, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed databases from January 1, 1995, to October 31, 2022. Abstracts and full-text articles were screened for study inclusion, resulting in 18 studies for the final review. In addition, authors used the Patient-Centered Integrated Behavioral Health Care Principles and Tasks Checklist as a tool for assessing the reported CCM components within and across studies. We conducted this systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. RESULTS: Several CCM trials evidenced statistically significant improvements in pain-related outcomes (n = 11), such as pain severity and pain-related activity interference. However, effect sizes varied considerably across studies and some effects were not clinically meaningful. CCM had some success in targeting opioid-related behaviors (n = 4), including reduction in opioid prescription dose. Other opioid-related work focused on CCM to facilitate buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (n = 2), including improved odds of receiving treatment and greater prevalence of abstinence from opioids and alcohol. Uniquely, several interventions used CCM to target mental health as a way to address pain (n = 10). Generally, there was moderate alignment with the CCM model. CONCLUSIONS: CCM shows promise for improving pain-related outcomes, as well as facilitating buprenorphine for opioid use disorder. More robust research is needed to determine which aspects of CCM best support improved outcomes and how to maximize the effectiveness of such interventions.

Feasibility and acceptability of a brief intervention to improve mild traumatic brain injury recovery: Problem-solving training-concussion.

OBJECTIVE: Mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) are common among Veterans. Although the majority of neurobehavioral symptoms resolve following mTBI, studies with Veteran samples demonstrate a high frequency and chronicity of neurobehavioral complaints (e.g., difficulties with attention, frustration tolerance) often attributed to mTBI. Recent opinions suggest the primacy of mental health treatment, and existing mTBI practice guidelines promote patient-centered intervention beginning in primary care (PC). However, trial evidence regarding effective clinical management in PC is lacking. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a brief, PC-based problem-solving intervention to reduce psychological distress and neurobehavioral complaints. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Mixed method open clinical trial of 12 combat Veterans with a history of mTBI, chronic neurobehavioral complaints, and psychological distress. Measures included qualitative and quantitative indicators of feasibility (recruitment and retention metrics, interview feedback), patient acceptability (treatment satisfaction, perceived effectiveness), and change in psychological distress as measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory-18. RESULTS: The protocol was successfully delivered via in-person and telehealth treatment modalities (4.3 sessions attended on average; 58% completed the full protocol). Patient interview data suggested that treatment content was personally relevant, and patients were satisfied with their experience. Treatment completers described the intervention as helpful and reported corresponding reductions in psychological distress (ES = 1.8). Dropout was influenced by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Further study with a more diverse, randomized sample is warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Barriers to and facilitators of using evidence-based, cognitive-behavioral anxiety interventions in integrated primary care practice.

Cognitive-behavioral treatment for anxiety disorders and symptoms remains underutilized in integrated primary care (IPC), in part because the many treatments developed for specialty care are not readily translated to this unique setting. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to behavioral health providers (BHPs) delivering evidence-based cognitive--behavioral anxiety interventions within IPC practice. We conducted semistructured interviews with a national sample of 18 BHPs (50% psychologists, 33% social workers, 17% registered nurses) working in IPC in the Veterans Health Administration. We assessed barriers to and facilitators of using psychoeducation, exposure, cognitive therapy, relaxation training, mindfulness/meditation, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based interventions, and problem-solving therapy. Qualitative coding and conventional content analysis revealed barriers and facilitators at three levels: IPC, provider, and patient. Themes suggested key barriers of poor fit with the IPC model, BHP training deficits, and lack of patient buy-in, and key facilitators of good perceived fit of the intervention (e.g., scope, duration) with the IPC model, BHPs feeling well equipped, and utility for patients. BHPs select interventions based on fit for the individual patient. Some results were consistent with prior work from specialty care, but the IPC model itself introduces significant implementation challenges. BHPs would benefit from flexible intervention options and training on IPC treatment goals and how to deliver the essence of evidence-based interventions in small doses. Our findings will help to inform adaptation of behavioral anxiety interventions to better fit IPC practice and development of beneficial training and resources for BHPs to reduce implementation challenges. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Randomized Clinical Trial of Brief Primary Care-Based Mindfulness Training Versus a Psychoeducational Group for Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Objective: Individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms are often reluctant to engage in traditional mental health care but do seek primary care services. Alternative strategies are needed to develop emotional regulation skills among individuals with PTSD symptoms. This study examined the feasibility and effectiveness of Primary Care Brief Mindfulness Training (PCBMT) compared to a psychoeducational group for reducing PTSD symptoms.Methods: Primary care patients (n = 55) with DSM-5 PTSD symptoms but not engaged in PTSD psychotherapies were randomized to 4-week PCBMT or a PTSD psychoeducation group (EDU). Both groups were cofacilitated by mental health providers and veteran peer specialists. Between January 2019 and March 2020, assessments were completed at baseline, post-treatment, and 16- and 24-week follow-up.Results: PCBMT participants had significantly larger decreases in PTSD symptoms from pre- to post-treatment (d = 0.57) and depression from pre-treatment to 16- and 24-week follow-ups (d = 0.67, 0.60) compared to EDU. PCBMT participants also reported significantly greater improvements in health responsibility (d = 0.79), stress management (d = 0.99), and not feeling dominated by symptoms (d = 0.71). Both interventions resulted in the majority of participants "stepping up" to a higher level of PTSD care.Conclusions: Brief mindfulness training is effective for reducing psychiatric symptoms and improving broader recovery outcomes and health promoting behaviors. For individuals who are not yet willing to engage in trauma-focused PTSD treatment, PCBMT may be preferable and more effective than psychoeducational classes as preliminary treatments. Further research is needed to confirm the effectiveness of PCBMT in a larger sample and investigate factors that will support wider implementation in primary care settings.Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03352011.

Prevalence, Impact, and Trajectories of Sleep Disturbance in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A NARRATIVE REVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR EVALUATION AND TREATMENT.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to summarize literature examining the prevalence, impact, and trajectories of sleep disturbance in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients and discuss how CR programs may incorporate targeted evaluation and interventions to promote sleep health. REVIEW METHODS: A narrative review of literature allowed for an examination of the prevalence of sleep disturbance in CR patients, the effects of sleep disturbance on CR outcomes, and trajectories of sleep disturbance in CR. SUMMARY: Sleep disturbance is prevalent in CR patient populations and is related to clinical and functional outcomes. Sleep may be an important biobehavioral process to target in CR to improve important patient outcomes and achieve secondary prevention goals.

What is the recipe for PCBH? Proposed resources, processes, and expected outcomes.

What is the Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model of service delivery? Clinician innovators, administrators, and researchers have continued to refine the answer to this question. In the same way a recipe for mac n cheese provides the resources needed (i.e., ingredients), processes to make the dish, and expected outcomes (e.g., number of servings), a comprehensive operational definition for PCBH is needed to help improve the rigor of research being conducted. This recipe can also help clinicians/administrators identify a basic recipe for PCBH that standardizes the necessary components and amounts to achieve the expected outcomes. In this editorial, we provide a comprehensive operational recipe for PCBH based on current research. We are calling people to assist us by (a) utilizing the recipe to help improve the reporting and rigor of PCBH research and (b) applying the proposed operational definitions and targets within the recipe to help us refine and validate them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Researching warm hand-offs: Should we give a WHOot?

This article discusses warm hand-offs (WHOs) in behavioral services and PCBH models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Patients' perspectives of brief cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain: Treatment satisfaction, perceived utility, and global assessment of change.

Introduction: Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (Brief CBT-CP) is a biopsychosocial treatment designed to improve access to nonpharmacological pain care in primary care. Results from a clinical demonstration project in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) clinics showed rapid improvement in pain outcomes following Brief CBT-CP treatment in Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH). As part of this larger project, the current work aimed to understand patients' perspectives of Brief CBT-CP via a self-report survey completed posttreatment. Method: Thirty-four primary care patients received Brief CBT-CP as part of their usual VHA care and subsequently completed an anonymous survey that included questions regarding treatment modality, intervention content, utility, and satisfaction, as well as global assessment of change in pain-related functioning. Results: Participants reported that Brief CBT-CP content was useful (91%) and that they were satisfied with the intervention overall (89%), including appointment length, frequency of encounters, and comprehensibility of content. On average (M = 4.50, SD = 1.71), participants reported "somewhat better" to "moderately better" pain-related functioning following treatment. Exploratory descriptive analysis indicated that self-reported change in function following treatment may vary by patient characteristics, including gender and opioid use history. Discussion: Patients were receptive to Brief CBT-CP, were satisfied with their experience during treatment, and reported benefit in pain-related functioning after treatment. Further development and evaluation of Brief CBT-CP as a feasible biopsychosocial treatment option for pain in primary care clinics using the PCBH model of integration is warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

A Practical Guide to Applying the Delphi Technique in Mental Health Treatment Adaptation: The Example of Enhanced Problem-Solving Training (E-PST).

Expert consensus methods, such as the Delphi procedure, are commonly employed in consumer, education, and health services research. However, the utility of this methodology has not widely been described in relation to mental health treatment adaptation efforts. This gap is noteworthy given that evidence-based treatments are often modified in terms of core intervention content, method of delivery, and target populations. Expert consensus methods such as the Delphi procedure offer multiple practical benefits (e.g., flexibility, resource-efficiency) for psychologists who need to adapt existing treatments to meet new research and clinical practice needs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief overview of the Delphi procedure, and to offer a practical guide to using this method for treatment adaptation. An example is offered using our team's application of a three-round Delphi procedure to render content and context modifications to an existing problem-solving intervention to optimize its use with a new treatment population. Data were collected from Department of Veterans Affairs clinical subject matter experts. Round 1 utilized semi-structured interviews to determine necessary protocol features and modifications. Rounds 2-3 utilized a forced-choice survey and feedback loop to evaluate expert consensus. More than 91% of rated items reached consensus following Round 2, with the remainder following Round 3. Recommended modifications included minor structural and content edits, and re-balancing time allotments. We conclude that consensus methods may facilitate treatment adaptation efforts, enhance treatment feasibility, and promote content and ecological validity. Considerations for future Delphi-based treatment adaptations are offered.

Primary care and mental health providers' perceptions of implementation of pharmacogenetics testing for depression prescribing.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacogenetic testing (PGx) has the potential to improve the quality of psychiatric prescribing by considering patients' genetic profile. However, there is limited scientific evidence supporting its efficacy or guiding its implementation. The Precision Medicine in Mental Health (PRIME) Care study is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a specific commercially-available pharmacogenetic (PGx) test to inform antidepressant prescribing at 22 sites across the U.S. Simultaneous implementation science methods using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) are integrated throughout the trial to identify contextual factors likely to be important in future implementation of PGx. The goal of this study was to understand providers' perceptions of PGx for antidepressant prescribing and implications for future implementation. METHODS: Qualitative focus groups (n = 10) were conducted at the beginning of the trial with Primary Care and Mental Health providers (n = 31) from six PRIME Care sites. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed and data were analyzed using rapid analytic procedures organized by CFIR domains. RESULTS: Analysis revealed themes in the CFIR Intervention Characteristics domain constructs of Evidence, Relative Advantage, Adaptability, Trialability, Complexity, and Design that are important for understanding providers' perceptions of PGx testing. Results indicate: 1) providers had limited experience and knowledge of PGx testing and its evidence base, particularly for psychiatric medications; 2) providers were hopeful that PGx could increase their precision in depression prescribing and improve patient engagement, but were uncertain about how results would influence treatment; 3) providers were concerned about potential misinterpretation of PGx results and how to incorporate testing into their workflow; 4) primary care providers were less familiar and comfortable with application of PGx testing to antidepressant prescribing than psychiatric providers. CONCLUSIONS: Provider perceptions may serve as facilitators or barriers to implementation of PGx for psychiatric prescribing. Incorporating implementation science into the conduct of the RCT adds value by uncovering factors to be addressed in preparing for future implementation, should the practice prove effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03170362 ; Registered 31 May 2017.

Validation of an Expanded Measure of Integrated Care Provider Fidelity: PPAQ-2.

This study aimed to validate the factor structure of the expanded Primary Care Behavioral Health Provider Adherence Questionnaire (PPAQ-2), which is designed to assess provider fidelity to both the Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) and collaborative care management (CCM) models of integrated primary care. Two-hundred fifty-three integrated care providers completed self-reports of professional background, perceptions of clinic integration and related practice barriers, and the PPAQ-2. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to assess the theorized factor structure and criterion validity was assessed through correlational analysis. Factor analyses demonstrated adequate fit with the data and acceptable to excellent composite reliabilities across five PCBH domains and five CCM domains. Validity was demonstrated by correlations between adherence scores and measures of clinic integration and barriers to fidelity. The PPAQ-2 is a psychometrically sound measure that can be used in future integrated care dismantling studies to identify provider behaviors that best predict patient outcomes.

Evaluating time in health care: What are we busy about?

At the end of the day, there are both economic and less tangible benefits to having predictable clinic operations in which people's medical and behavioral health needs are met. These different benefits, stemming from changes in how time is used, are relevant to a wide range of stakeholders including administrators, clinicians, and patients. In short, time is one of our most important resources in health care. Therefore, time studies have a crucial role to play in advancing the implementation of integrated care. In this editorial we describe several methods for measuring time and invite readers to consider which of these (or another method you're aware of) balances your needs for precision and feasibility of measurement. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy For Chronic Pain: Results From a Clinical Demonstration Project in Primary Care Behavioral Health.

OBJECTIVES: Although cognitive behavioral therapy is an effective intervention for chronic pain, it is a lengthy treatment typically applied only in specialty care settings. The aim of this project was to collect preliminary effectiveness data for Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (Brief CBT-CP), an abbreviated, modular form of treatment designed for use in primary care. METHODS: A clinical demonstration project was conducted in which Brief CBT-CP was delivered to primary care patients by 22 integrated care providers practicing in the Primary Care Behavioral Health model of Veterans Health Administration primary care clinics. Brief measures were used at each appointment to collect patient-reported clinical outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients provided sufficient data for analysis (male, 75%; mean age, 51.4 y). Multilevel modeling suggested that a composite measure of pain intensity and functional limitations showed statistically significant improvements by the third appointment (Cohen's d=0.65). Pain-related self-efficacy outcomes showed a similar pattern of results but of smaller effect size (Cohen's d=0.22). The exploratory analysis identified that Brief CBT-CP modules addressing psychoeducation and goal setting, pacing, and relaxation training were associated with the most significant gains in treatment outcomes. DISCUSSION: These findings provide early support for the effectiveness of Brief CBT-CP when delivered by providers in every day Primary Care Behavioral Health settings. Results are discussed in relation to the need for additional research regarding the potential value of employing safe, population-based, nonpharmacological approaches to pain management in primary care.

Functional concerns and treatment priorities among veterans receiving VHA Primary Care Behavioral Health services.

INTRODUCTION: The Primary Care-Mental Health Integration program is a component of the Veterans Health Administration's patient-centered medical home, which emphasizes comprehensive, patient-centered care. One model of primary care-mental health integration, known as Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH), positions trained behavioral health providers as members of the primary care team. Whereas patient perspectives are essential to effective patient-centered care, little empirical information exists regarding patients' goals and priorities for addressing their biopsychosocial concerns in PCBH. METHOD: A regional mail survey of Veterans Health Administration patients was used. We collected data from 281 veterans (27% response rate) who received PCBH services in a northeastern region. RESULTS: Respondents identified difficulty with sleep (80%), low energy/amotivation (78%), and managing stress (72%) as the most prevalent individual concerns, although the majority endorsed concerns in multiple domains of functioning. Overwhelmingly, patients who endorsed any biopsychosocial problem area reported that they did (53-93%) or would like to (56-81%) address that concern with a behavioral health provider. Respondents most frequently identified anger as a top priority for future care, followed by stress management, energy/motivation, and sleep disturbance. Whereas sample means signaled neutral or better quality of life in most individual domains, total Quality of Life Inventory scores suggested very low (32%) to average (30%) overall quality-of -life ratings for most participants. DISCUSSION: In addition to symptom-focused PCBH assessments, providers should gather biopsychosocial data to identify and monitor functional and quality-of -life concerns and evaluate patient preferences in addressing these concerns over the course of clinical care. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Opportunities to improve measurement-based care practices in mental health care systems: A case example of electronic mental health screening and measurement.

INTRODUCTION: Measurement-based care (MBC) involves the systematic collection of data to inform clinical decision-making and monitor treatment outcomes. In addition to benefitting patients and providers, data on MBC implementation can also be used to inform quality improvement efforts within existing health care systems. METHOD: The method was retrospective chart review. We collected data on electronic mental health (MH) screens and symptom measures recorded by MH providers. Patients were 28,376 veterans who received MH services in a northeastern region. RESULTS: Although rates varied by MH condition and clinic type, screening for alcohol misuse, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder appeared to occur with regularity. MH symptom measurement was less frequent than screening but included measures of alcohol and substance use, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and suicidal ideation. Patient demographics (e.g., age, military service era, sex, MH diagnosis) and frequency of clinic contact emerged as significant predictors of symptom measurement. DISCUSSION: In this article, we illustrate how data on MH screening and measurement can be organized, analyzed, and interpreted to identify opportunities to enhance MBC practices in MH care. We conclude with a discussion of how large data set analyses can contribute to programmatic MBC initiatives. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Facilitators and Barriers to Seeking Mental Health Care Among Primary Care Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Although posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common in primary care patients, many do not seek mental health treatment. Existing research on barriers and facilitators to receiving PTSD treatment are not specific to primary care patients. In this study, we sought to understand the psychosocial concerns, treatment barriers, and treatment facilitators among non-treatment-seeking primary care veterans with PTSD who reside in both rural and urban settings. Using a concurrent triangulation design, we collected qualitative focus group and quantitative self-report data concurrently, analyzed them separately, and merged the results for interpretation. In total, 27 veteran primary care patients with PTSD participated in 1 of 4 focus groups. A modified conventional content analysis approach was used. Team-based coding began with three broad primary codes (psychosocial concerns, barriers, and facilitators) and subcodes were allowed to emerge from the data. Self-report measures were used to collect clinical characteristics and barriers to care. The results expanded upon existing models of PTSD treatment initiation by (a) specifying treatment preferences, such as patient-centered care, peer support services, and open access scheduling, and (b) presenting concerns, such as anger and core symptoms of PTSD. Results also indicated that a commonly used quantitative barriers measure may offer an incomplete picture of why veterans do not seek treatment as it does not assess how past negative treatment experiences may affect utilization. Strategies to help veterans overcome barriers to care may benefit from a focus on negative treatment-seeking beliefs and tailoring based on a veteran's rural or urban status.