ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of Barrett's esophagus (BE) in France is unknown. However, the management of dysplastic BE in expert centers is recommended and reduces the risk of developing invasive adenocarcinoma. Our aim was to determine the burden of BE patients in the Paris Region. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using the data from electronic medical records from the data warehouse of the 39 Greater Paris public hospitals (Entrepôt de données de santé de l' Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris) for the year 2018, and used natural language processing to search for occurrences of Barrett's esophagus in endoscopy and pathology reports. RESULTS: we observed a 2.2 % prevalence of Barrett's esophagus. Patients with Barrett's esophagus were older, more frequently males, with a hiatal hernia, proton pump inhibitor users, and less frequently infected by H. Pylori. Gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms were not more frequently encountered in Barrett's patients. Eleven percent of patients with Barrett's esophagus had dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. DISCUSSION: Over 200 000 patients with Barrett's esophagus are expected in the Paris Region, of which 11 % harbor dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. This data should be taken into account to tailor healthcare offer in France.
Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Barrett Esophagus/epidemiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Paris/epidemiology , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Prevalence , Hernia, Hiatal/epidemiology , Hernia, Hiatal/complications , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Given the high prevalence of antibiotic prescription during pregnancy in France and previous studies suggesting an increased risk of infection in offspring with such exposures, our study aimed to investigate the association between prenatal exposure to systemic antibiotics and serious infections in full-term infants during their first year of life. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study on singleton, full-term liveborn non-immunocompromised infants, using the French National Health Data System (SNDS) between 2012 and 2021. Systemic antibiotic dispensing in ambulatory care settings during pregnancy defined the exposure. Outcomes concerned serious infections (i.e., infections requiring hospitalization) in offspring identified between 3 and 12 months of life, hence excluding infections of maternal origin. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were estimated using logistic regression with multivariate models to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 2,836,630 infants included, 39.6% were prenatally exposed to systemic antibiotics. Infants prenatally exposed to antibiotics had a higher incidence of serious infections compared with unexposed infants {aOR 1.12 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.11-1.13]}. Similar associations were observed according to the timing of exposure during pregnancy, antibiotic class, and site of infections. The strongest association was observed when infants were prenatally exposed to three or more antibiotic courses during pregnancy [aOR 1.21 (95% CI 1.19-1.24)]. Limitations include residual confounders, such as genetic susceptibility to infections and the role of the underlying pathogen agent. CONCLUSION: Prenatal exposure to systemic antibiotics is very common and is associated with a weak yet significant associations with subsequent serious infectious events during the first year of life. While our study revealed associations, it is important to note that causation cannot be established, given the acknowledged limitations, including potential confounding by indication.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Pregnancy , Infant , Female , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/chemically induced , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects/epidemiology , France/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Describe the trends of exposure to harmful drugs during pregnancy over recent years in France. DESIGN: Nationwide cohort study. SETTING: The French National administrative health Data System (SNDS). POPULATION: Pregnancies starting between 2013 and 2019 and outcomes corresponding to live births, medical terminations of pregnancy, and stillbirths. METHODS: Each pregnancy was divided into a preconceptional period of 90 days before conception and three trimesters from conception to birth. Harmful drugs were defined according to their risks to the fetus: teratogenicity or fetotoxicity. Exposure was defined using the critical period during pregnancy for each type of harmful drug: preconceptional period or first trimester for teratogenic drugs and second or third trimesters for fetotoxic drugs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of pregnancies exposed to at least one harmful drug. RESULTS: Among 5,253,284 pregnancies, 204,402 (389 per 10,000) pregnancies were exposed to at least one harmful drug during the critical periods: 48,326 (92 per 10,000) pregnancies were exposed to teratogenic drugs during the preconceptional period or the first trimester, and 155,514 (299 per 10,000) pregnancies were exposed to fetotoxic drugs during the second or third trimesters. Teratogenic drugs were mainly retinoids for topical use (44 per 10,000 pregnancies), antiepileptics (13 per 10,000 pregnancies) and statins (13 per 10,000 pregnancies). Fetotoxic drugs were mainly non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), for systemic (128 per 10,000 pregnancies) and topical use (122 per 10,000 pregnancies). Exposure to teratogenic drugs decreased from the preconceptional period to the first trimester. Exposure to fetotoxic drugs decreased from the second to the third trimester. Between 2013 and 2019, we found a decrease in harmful drug exposure overall, mainly for topical and systemic NSAIDs and for topical retinoids. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide study, about one in 25 pregnancies was exposed to at least one harmful drug, mainly NSAIDs and topical retinoids. Although the prevalence of harmful drug exposure decreased over the study period, NSAID exposure in the second and third trimester remains of concern.
Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Anticonvulsants , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Cohort Studies , France/epidemiology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Retinoids , TeratogensABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Even though systemic vasculitides (SVs) affect primarily patients over 50 years of age, they can occur among women of childbearing age. Preterm birth (PTB) and hypertensive disorders are frequent complications of pregnancy in SVs. This study aims to evaluate the risk of hypertensive disorders and PTB among pregnant women with SVs, and to identify associated risk factors. METHOD: Using the French health insurance data warehouse, we conducted a nationwide cohort study including all pregnancies between 2013 and 2018 in women with SVs. Theses pregnancies were matched to pregnancies among women without SVs. We estimated risk of hypertensive disorders and PTB risk during pregnancy among women with SVs and investigated associated risk factors using a nested case-control design. RESULTS: Among 3,155,723 pregnancies, we identified 646 pregnancies in women with SVs, matched to 3,230 controls. SVs were significantly associated with hypertensive disorders (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.3-2.2) and PTB (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3). Chronic renal failure before pregnancy, history of or treated arterial hypertension, the occurrence of vasculitides flare during pregnancy, and the subgroup of SVs were independently associated with the occurrence of hypertensive disorders. Maternal age at delivery, chronic renal failure before conception, and the occurrence of vasculitides flare during pregnancy were independently associated with the occurrence of PTB. CONCLUSION: About one of seven pregnancies in women with SVs is associated with hypertensive disorders or preterm birth. The occurrence of vasculitides flare was associated with these complications. Our findings support the importance of prepregnancy counseling to ensure disease stability.
Subject(s)
Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Premature Birth , Systemic Vasculitis , Vasculitis , Pregnancy , Female , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Middle Aged , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Pregnant Women , Cohort Studies , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/epidemiology , Systemic Vasculitis/epidemiology , Vasculitis/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Immunotherapy (IT) is a major therapeutic strategy for lymphoma, significantly improving patient prognosis. IT remains ineffective for a significant number of patients, however, and exposes them to specific toxicities. The identification predictive factors around efficacy and toxicity would allow better targeting of patients with a higher ratio of benefit to risk. PRONOSTIM is a multicenter and retrospective study using the Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) of the Greater Paris University Hospitals network. Adult patients with Hodgkin lymphoma or diffuse large-cell B lymphoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or CAR T (Chimeric antigen receptor T) cells between 2017 and 2022 were included. Analysis of covariates influencing progression-free survival (PFS) or the occurrence of grade ≥3 toxicity was performed. In total, 249 patients were included. From this study, already known predictors for response or toxicity of CAR T cells such as age, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and elevated C-Reactive Protein at the time of infusion were confirmed. In addition, male gender, low hemoglobin, and hypo- or hyperkalemia were demonstrated to be potential predictive factors for progression after CAR T cell therapy. These findings prove the attractiveness of CDW in generating real-world data, and show its essential contribution to identifying new predictors for decision support before starting IT.
ABSTRACT
Background: The clinical characteristics, disease progression and outcome in children affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection appear significantly milder compared to older individuals. Nevertheless, the trends in hospitalization and clinical characteristics in the pediatric population seem to be different over time across the different epidemic waves. Objective: Our aim was to understand the impact of the different COVID-19 variants in the pediatric population hospitalized in the Pediatric Departments of the Public Hospital in the Greater Paris area by the analysis performed with the Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Health Data Warehouse. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study including 9,163 patients under 18 years of age, hospitalized from 1 March 2020 to 22 March 2022, in the Paris area, with confirmed infection by SARS-CoV-2. Three mutually exclusive groups with decreasing severity (Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome (PIMS), symptomatic infection, mild or asymptomatic infection) were defined and described regarding demography, medical history, complication of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, and treatment during admission. Temporal evolution was described by defining three successive waves (March-September 2020, October 2020-October 2021, and November 2021-March 2022) corresponding to the emergence of the successive variants. Results: In the study period, 9,163 pediatric patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were hospitalized in 21 AP-HP hospitals. The number of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection increased over time for each wave of the pandemic (the mean number of patients per month during the first wave was 332, 322 during the 2nd, and 595 during the third wave). In the medical history, the most associated concomitant disease was chronic respiratory disease. Patients hospitalized during the third wave presented a higher incidence of pulmonary involvement (10.2% compared to 7% and 6.5% during the first and second waves, respectively). The highest incidence of PIMS was observed during the first and second waves (4.2% in the first and second waves compared to 2.3% in the 3rd wave). Discussion: This analysis highlighted the high incidence of hospitalized children in the Greater Paris Area during the third wave of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic corresponding to the Omicron Covid-19 variant, which is probably an expression of a concomitant SARS-CoV-2, while a decreased incidence of PIMS complication was observed during the same period.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Systemic vasculitis (SV) rarely affects women of childbearing age and only small series have been reported to date in pregnant patients. The discovery of an unplanned pregnancy can be an urgent cause for modifying treatments. This study aimed to describe immunosuppressive drugs use before, during and after pregnancy in women with SV. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using the French nationwide claims database. We included all women with SV being pregnant between 2013 and 2018. Exposure of interest was defined as exposure to oral systemic or injectable immunosuppressive drug identified using out-hospital reimbursement data and in-hospital reimbursement for expensive drugs. RESULTS: Of 3,246,454 pregnancies, 649 pregnancies were observed in 606 women with SV. Immunosuppressant and glucocorticoids use decreased before pregnancy and then increased after pregnancy (48.4%, 40.7%, 50.4%, respectively before, during, after). Prevalence of glucocorticoids use was broadly stable during pregnancy from 27.9% to 27.6% and 23.7% in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters, respectively, with a daily dose of about 5 mg. The number of patients treated with non-recommended immunosuppressant during pregnancy gradually decreased before pregnancy and then increased after delivery, whereas proportion of systemic vasculitis flare, estimated from the glucocorticoids daily dose, did not increase significantly during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Immunosuppressants and glucocorticoids use decreased before pregnancy and remained stable throughout, suggesting a vasculitis control during this period. Our findings support the importance of pre-conceptional consultations to review medications, and switch not-recommended and teratogenic medications to drugs considered being safe during pregnancy.
Subject(s)
Systemic Vasculitis , Vasculitis , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Cohort Studies , Systemic Vasculitis/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Background: Prior research suggests that psychiatric disorders could be linked to increased mortality among patients with COVID-19. However, whether all or specific psychiatric disorders are intrinsic risk factors of death in COVID-19 or whether these associations reflect the greater prevalence of medical risk factors in people with psychiatric disorders has yet to be evaluated. Methods: We performed an observational, multicenter, retrospective cohort study to examine the association between psychiatric disorders and mortality among patients hospitalized for laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 at 36 Greater Paris University hospitals. Results: Of 15,168 adult patients, 857 (5.7%) had an ICD-10 diagnosis of psychiatric disorder. Over a mean follow-up period of 14.6 days (SD = 17.9), 326 of 857 (38.0%) patients with a diagnosis of psychiatric disorder died compared with 1276 of 14,311 (8.9%) patients without such a diagnosis (odds ratio 6.27, 95% CI 5.40-7.28, p < .01). When adjusting for age, sex, hospital, current smoking status, and medications according to compassionate use or as part of a clinical trial, this association remained significant (adjusted odds ratio 3.27, 95% CI 2.78-3.85, p < .01). However, additional adjustments for obesity and number of medical conditions resulted in a nonsignificant association (adjusted odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.84-1.23, p = .86). Exploratory analyses after the same adjustments suggested that a diagnosis of mood disorders was significantly associated with reduced mortality, which might be explained by the use of antidepressants. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the increased risk of COVID-19-related mortality in individuals with psychiatric disorders hospitalized for COVID-19 might be explained by the greater number of medical conditions and the higher prevalence of obesity in this population and not by the underlying psychiatric disease.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A strict lockdown was decided from 17/03/2020 to 11/05/2020 in France in order to tackle the first wave of the COVID19 pandemic. In the Great Paris region, several areas are severely affected by overcrowding, creating difficult conditions for children and their families during a period of nearly two months. The objective was to assess the effects of the 2020 spring lockdown on injuries, child abuse and neglect. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The central medical data warehouse was screened for all pediatric admissions at emergency and critical care departments of 20 hospitals, in a cohort of 12942 children. Specific keywords were used to screen for both injuries and child abuse and neglect. RESULTS: We found head and neck trauma (1.2% in 2020 vs. 0.7% in 2019, p<0.001), burns (0.6% in 2020 vs. 0.1% in 2019, p < 0.001), lacerations (0.5% in 2020 vs. 0.3% in 2019, p<0.001), fractures (0.5% in 2020 vs. 0.3% in 2019, p<0.017), dog bites (0.1% in 2020 vs. 0.0% in 2019, p<0.001), and child abuse and neglect (18 cases during the 2020 lockdown vs. 24 cases in 2019, p=0.005) were significantly more prevalent during this period than during the same control period in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that specific prevention measures are crucial if strict lockdowns are to be decided in the future.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Child Abuse , Animals , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , Communicable Disease Control , Dogs , Hospitalization , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is an extremely rare disease with polymorphic presentation and prognosis. OBJECTIVE: To further investigate EF features. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentre study of EF patients from 2013 to 2019, clustered patients using multivariate correspondence analysis, and sought prognosis factors. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight patients were included. Sixty-nine (50%) patients had skin sclerosis, and eosinophil count was increased in 71 (55%) patients. Multivariate correspondence analysis identified 3 clusters: a "mild," a "late-onset and hypereosinophilic," and a "fibrotic" cluster. Of 109 patients who followed up for more than 1 year, 49 (45%) presented a relapse, and 48 (44%) had sequelae. Multivariate analysis revealed that eosinophilia (hazard ratio = 1.56; P = .02) and fibrosis (hazard ratio = 4.02; P = .002) were predictive factors of relapse, whereas edema (odds ratio = 0.31; P = .03), relapse (odds ratio = 3.00; P = .04) and fibrosis (odds ratio = 1) were predictive factors of sequelae. Following relapse, treatment modifications consisted of an increase in glucocorticoids in 40 (82%) patients and the addition of methotrexate in 31 (63%) patients. These modifications led to clinical improvement and glucocorticoid withdrawal in 37 (76%) and 22 (45%) patients. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: EF patients can be divided into 3 homogenous clusters, which, along with fibrosis and eosinophilia, are prognosis factors of relapse and sequelae.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilia , Fasciitis , Cluster Analysis , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/drug therapy , Fasciitis/diagnosis , Fasciitis/drug therapy , Fibrosis , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Recurrence , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms appearing after a SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This was an observational cohort based on data available at the Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Clinical Data Warehouse (which includes data of more than 11 million patients treated in the 39 hospitals from AP-HP). The data collected included both ICD-10 codes in discharge summaries, and recurring wording expressions search on medical electronic documents. To be included in the analysis, patients had to have a positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 and be admitted in any department of AP-HP. Patients with previous history of any MSK condition were excluded. MSK conditions were considered if occurring up to 90days after the positive RT-PCR. Demographics and disease characteristics including treatment were compared in both groups (MSK yes/no) by t-test or Chi2 test, accordingly. RESULTS: In total, 17,771 patients had a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR at APHP and were admitted in any department of AP-HP. Among them, 15,601 had no previous history of MSK condition and among them, 1370 (8.8%) presented with MSK symptoms after the viral infection. The most prevalent MSK symptoms were back pain (32.9%), followed by arthralgia (29.9%), radicular pain (20.2%) and arthritis (22.8%). Patients with MSK symptoms (MSK+) were older (67 y vs. 64 y, P<0.01), more frequently obese (29% vs. 25%, P=0.03), hypertensive (34% vs. 30%, P<0.01) and with diabetes (21% vs. 18%, P<0.01). Treatment for SARS-CoV-2 was slightly different in both groups, with higher corticosteroids (40.7% vs. 29.0%, P<0.01), antivirals (21.5% vs. 15.3%, P<0.01) and immunosuppressors (8.5% vs. 4.5%, P<0.01) prescription rates in the MSK+ group. CONCLUSION: MSK symptoms occurred in almost 9% of patients admitted to the hospital after a SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in older and more comorbid patients. Further analysis evaluating whether these symptoms remain over time are needed.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Data Warehousing , Prevalence , France/epidemiology , HospitalsABSTRACT
The acid sphingomyelinase (ASM)/ceramide system may provide a useful framework for better understanding SARS-CoV-2 infection and the repurposing of psychotropic medications functionally inhibiting the acid sphingomyelinase/ceramide system (named FIASMA psychotropic medications) against COVID-19. We examined the potential usefulness of FIASMA psychotropic medications in patients with psychiatric disorders hospitalized for severe COVID-19, in an observational multicenter study conducted at Greater Paris University hospitals. Of 545 adult inpatients, 164 (30.1%) received a FIASMA psychotropic medication upon hospital admission for COVID-19. We compared the composite endpoint of intubation or death between patients who received a psychotropic FIASMA medication at baseline and those who did not in time-to-event analyses adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric and other medical comorbidity, and other medications. FIASMA psychotropic medication use at baseline was significantly associated with reduced risk of intubation or death in both crude (HR = 0.42; 95%CI = 0.31-0.57; p < 0.01) and primary inverse probability weighting (IPW) (HR = 0.50; 95%CI = 0.37-0.67; p < 0.01) analyses. This association was not specific to one FIASMA psychotropic class or medication. Patients taking a FIASMA antidepressant at baseline had a significantly reduced risk of intubation or death compared with those taking a non-FIASMA antidepressant at baseline in both crude (HR = 0.57; 95%CI = 0.38-0.86; p < 0.01) and primary IPW (HR = 0.57; 95%CI = 0.37-0.87; p < 0.01) analyses. These associations remained significant in multiple sensitivity analyses. Our results show the potential importance of the ASM/ceramide system framework in COVID-19 and support the continuation of FIASMA psychotropic medications in these patients and the need of large- scale clinical trials evaluating FIASMA medications, and particularly FIASMA antidepressants, against COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Disorders , Adult , Hospitalization , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To identify which level of D-dimer would allow the safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism (PE) in COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on the COVID database of Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP). COVID-19 patients who presented at the ED of AP-HP hospitals between March 1 and May 15, 2020, and had CTPA following D-dimer dosage within 48h of presentation were included. The D-dimer sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for different D-dimer thresholds, as well as the false-negative and failure rates, and the number of CTPAs potentially avoided. RESULTS: A total of 781 patients (mean age 62.0 years, 53.8% men) with positive RT-PCR for SARS-Cov-2 were included and 60 of them (7.7%) had CTPA-confirmed PE. Their median D-dimer level was significantly higher than that of patients without PE (4,013 vs 1,198 ng·mL-1, p < 0.001). Using 500 ng·mL-1, or an age-adjusted cut-off for patients > 50 years, the sensitivity and the NPV were above 90%. With these thresholds, 17.1% and 31.5% of CTPAs could have been avoided, respectively. Four of the 178 patients who had a D-dimer below the age-adjusted cutoff had PE, leading to an acceptable failure rate of 2.2%. Using higher D-dimer cut-offs could have avoided more CTPAs, but would have lowered the sensitivity and increased the failure rate. CONCLUSION: The same D-Dimer thresholds as those validated in non-COVID outpatients should be used to safely rule out PE. KEY POINTS: ⢠The median D-dimer level was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients with PE as compared to those without PE (4,013 ng·mL-1 vs 1,198 ng·mL-1 respectively, p < 0.001). ⢠Using 500 ng·mL-1, or an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off to exclude pulmonary embolism, the sensitivity and negative predictive value were above 90%. ⢠Higher cut-offs would lead to a reduction in the sensitivity below 85% and an increase in the failure rate, especially for patients under 50 years.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The role of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), or other antihypertensive agents in the case of Covid-19 remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the association between antihypertensive agent exposure and in-hospital mortality in patients with Covid-19. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study on patients hospitalized between February 1 and May 15, 2020. All patients had been followed up for at least 30 days. RESULTS: Of the 8078 hospitalized patients for Covid-19, 3686 (45.6%) had hypertension and were included in the study. In this population, the median age was 75.4 (IQR, 21.5) years and 57.1% were male. Overall in-hospital 30-day mortality was 23.1%. The main antihypertensive pharmacological classes used were calcium channel blockers (CCB) (n=1624, 44.1%), beta-blockers (n=1389, 37.7%), ARB (n=1154, 31.3%), and ACEi (n=998, 27.1%). The risk of mortality was lower in CCB (aOR, 0.83 [0.70-0.99]) and beta-blockers (aOR, 0.80 [0.67-0.95]) users and non-significant in ARB (aOR, 0.88 [0.72-1.06]) and ACEi (aOR, 0.83 [0.68-1.02]) users, compared to non-users. These results remain consistent for patients receiving CCB, beta-blocker, or ARB as monotherapies. CONCLUSION: This large multicenter retrospective of Covid-19 patients with hypertension found a reduced mortality among CCB and beta-blockers users, suggesting a putative protective effect. Our findings did not show any association between the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and the risk of in-hospital death. Although they need to be confirmed in further studies, these results support the continuation of antihypertensive agents in patients with Covid-19, in line with the current guidelines.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Aged , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Calcium Channel Blockers/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
(1) Background: Based on its antiviral activity, anti-inflammatory properties, and functional inhibition effects on the acid sphingomyelinase/ceramide system (FIASMA), we sought to examine the potential usefulness of the H1 antihistamine hydroxyzine in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. (2) Methods: In a multicenter observational study, we included 15,103 adults hospitalized for COVID-19, of which 164 (1.1%) received hydroxyzine within the first 48 h of hospitalization, administered orally at a median daily dose of 25.0 mg (SD = 29.5). We compared mortality rates between patients who received hydroxyzine at hospital admission and those who did not, using a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for patients' characteristics, medical conditions, and use of other medications. (3) Results: This analysis showed a significant association between hydroxyzine use and reduced mortality (AOR, 0.51; 95%CI, 0.29-0.88, p = 0.016). This association was similar in multiple sensitivity analyses. (4) Conclusions: In this retrospective observational multicenter study, the use of the FIASMA hydroxyzine was associated with reduced mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials of hydroxyzine for COVID-19 are needed to confirm these results, as are studies to examine the potential usefulness of this medication for outpatients and as post-exposure prophylaxis for individuals at high risk for severe COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The impact of chronic liver disease on outcomes in patients with COVID-19 is uncertain. Hence, we aimed to explore this association. METHODS: We explored the outcomes of all adult inpatients with COVID-19 in France, in 2020. We computed adjusted odds ratios to measure the associations between chronic liver disease, alcohol use disorders, mechanical ventilation and day-30 in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The sample comprised 259,110 patients (median [IQR] age 70 (54-83) years; 52% men), including 15,476 (6.0%) and 10,006 (3.9%) patients with chronic liver disease and alcohol use disorders, respectively. Death occurred in 38,203 (15%) patients, including 7,475 (28%) after mechanical ventilation, and 2,941 (19%) with chronic liver disease. The adjusted odds ratios for mechanical ventilation and day-30 mortality were 1.54 (95% CI 1.44-1.64, p <0.001) and 1.79 (1.71-1.87, p <0.001) for chronic liver disease; 0.55 (0.47-0.64, p <0.001) and 0.54 (0.48-0.61, p <0.001) for mild liver disease; 0.64 (0.53-0.76; p <0.001) and 0.71 (0.63-0.80, p <0.001) for compensated cirrhosis; 0.65 (0.52-0.81, p <0.001) and 2.21 (1.94-2.51, p <0.001) for decompensated cirrhosis; 0.34 (0.24-0.50; p <0.001) and 1.38 (1.17-1.62, p <0.001) for primary liver cancer; and 0.82 (0.76-0.89; p <0.001) and 1.11 (1.05-1.17; p <0.001) for alcohol use disorders. Chronic viral hepatitis; non-viral, non-alcoholic chronic hepatitis; organ, including liver, transplantation, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome were not associated with COVID-19-related death. CONCLUSION: Chronic liver disease increased the risk of COVID-19-related death in France in 2020. Therapeutic effort limitation may have contributed to COVID-19-related death in French residents with a liver-related complication or an alcohol use disorder. LAY SUMMARY: We studied the outcomes, including mechanical ventilation and day-30 mortality, of all adults with COVID-19 who were discharged from acute and post-acute care in France in 2020 (N = 259,110). Patients with mild liver disease; compensated cirrhosis; organ, including liver, transplantation; or acquired immunodepression syndrome were not at increased risk of COVID-19-related mortality. Patients with alcohol use disorders, decompensated cirrhosis, or primary liver cancer were at increased risk of COVID-19-related mortality but were less likely to receive mechanical ventilation. Our results suggest that therapeutic effort limitation may have contributed to the excess mortality in French residents with a liver-related complication or an alcohol use disorder.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis B, Chronic/epidemiology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Liver Diseases, Alcoholic/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Transplantation , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcoholism/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/virology , Comorbidity , Disease Progression , Female , France/epidemiology , Hepatitis B, Chronic/virology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/virology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Several medications commonly used for a number of medical conditions share a property of functional inhibition of acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), or FIASMA. Preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that the ASM/ceramide system may be central to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We examined the potential usefulness of FIASMA use among patients hospitalized for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in an observational multicenter study conducted at Greater Paris University hospitals. Of 2,846 adult patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19, 277 (9.7%) were taking an FIASMA medication at the time of their hospital admission. The primary end point was a composite of intubation and/or death. We compared this end point between patients taking vs. not taking an FIASMA medication in time-to-event analyses adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and medical comorbidities. The primary analysis was a Cox regression model with inverse probability weighting (IPW). Over a mean follow-up of 9.2 days (SD = 12.5), the primary end point occurred in 104 patients (37.5%) receiving an FIASMA medication, and 1,060 patients (41.4%) who did not. Despite being significantly and substantially associated with older age and greater medical severity, FIASMA medication use was significantly associated with reduced likelihood of intubation or death in both crude (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.58-0.87, P < 0.001) and primary IPW (HR = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.46-0.72, P < 0.001) analyses. This association remained significant in multiple sensitivity analyses and was not specific to one particular FIASMA class or medication. These results show the potential importance of the ASM/ceramide system in COVID-19 and support the continuation of FIASMA medications in these patients. Double-blind controlled randomized clinical trials of these medications for COVID-19 are needed.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/enzymology , COVID-19/mortality , Hospitalization/trends , Intubation, Intratracheal/mortality , Intubation, Intratracheal/trends , Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase/antagonists & inhibitors , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 Testing/trends , Cohort Studies , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Retrospective Studies , Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase/metabolism , Young Adult , COVID-19 Drug TreatmentABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Chlorpromazine has been suggested as being potentially useful in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the grounds of its potential antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the association between chlorpromazine use and mortality among adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted an observational, multicenter, retrospective study at Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Greater Paris University hospitals. Study baseline was defined as the date of first prescription of chlorpromazine during hospitalization for COVID-19. The primary endpoint was death. Among patients who had not been hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs), we compared this endpoint between those who received chlorpromazine and those who did not, in time-to-event analyses adjusted for patient characteristics, clinical markers of disease severity, and other psychotropic medications. The primary analysis used a Cox regression model with inverse probability weighting. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 14,340 adult inpatients hospitalized outside ICUs for COVID-19, 55 patients (0.4%) received chlorpromazine. Over a mean follow-up of 14.3 days (standard deviation [SD] 18.2), death occurred in 13 patients (23.6%) who received chlorpromazine and 1289 patients (9.0%) who did not. In the primary analysis, there was no significant association between chlorpromazine use and mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-5.40; p = 0.163). Sensitivity analyses included a Cox regression in a 1:5 ratio matched analytic sample that showed a similar result (HR 1.67, 95% CI 0.91-3.06; p = 0.100) and a multivariable Cox regression that indicated a significant positive association (HR 3.10, 95% CI 1.31-7.34; p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that chlorpromazine prescribed at a mean daily dose of 70.8 mg (SD 65.3) was not associated with reduced mortality.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Chlorpromazine/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIMS: To examine the association between dexamethasone use and mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: We examined the association between dexamethasone use and mortality at AP-HP Greater Paris University hospitals. Study baseline was defined as the date of hospital admission. The primary endpoint was time to death. We compared this endpoint between patients who received dexamethasone and those who did not in time-to-event analyses adjusted for patient characteristics (such as age, sex and comorbidity) and clinical and biological markers of clinical severity of COVID-19, and stratified by the need for respiratory support, i.e. mechanical ventilation or oxygen. The primary analysis was a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: Of 12 217 adult patients hospitalized with a positive COVID-19 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction test, 171 (1.4%) received dexamethasone orally or by intravenous perfusion during the visit. Among patients who required respiratory support, the end-point occurred in 10/63 (15.9%) patients who received dexamethasone and 298/1129 (26.4%) patients who did not. In this group, there was a significant association between dexamethasone use and reduced mortality in the primary analysis (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.96, P = .039). Among patients who did not require respiratory support, there was no significant association between dexamethasone use and the endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicentre observational study, dexamethasone use administered either orally or by intravenous injection at a cumulative dose between 60 mg and 150 mg was associated with reduced mortality among patients with COVID-19 requiring respiratory support.