Evaluation of the McGill-Tongji Blended Education Program for Teacher Leaders in General Practice: The importance of partnership and contextualization in International Primary Care Training Initiatives.

Purpose: Strong primary health care (PHC) systems require well-established PHC education systems to enhance the skills of general practitioners (GPs). However, the literature on the experiences of international collaboration in primary care education in low- and middle-income countries remains limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation and perceived impact of the McGill-Tongji Blended Education Program for Teacher Leaders in General Practice (referred to as the "Tongji Program"). Methods: In 2020-2021, the McGill Department of Family Medicine (Montreal, Canada) and Tongji University School of Medicine (TUSM, Shanghai, China) jointly implemented the Tongji Program in Shanghai, China to improve the teaching capacity of PHC teachers. We conducted an exploratory longitudinal case study with a mixed methods design for the evaluation. Quantitative (QUAN) data was collected through questionnaire surveys and qualitative (QUAL) data was collected through focus group discussions. Results: The evaluation showed that learners in Tongji Program were primarily female GPs (21/22，95%) with less than 4 years of experience in teaching (16/22，73%). This program was considered a successful learning experience by most participants (19/22, 86%) with higher order learning tasks such as critical thinking and problem-solving. They also agreed that this program helped them feel more prepared to teach (21/22，95%), and developed a positive attitude toward primary care (21/22，95%). The QUAL interview revealed that both the Tongji and McGill organizers noted that TUSM showed strong leadership in organization, education, and coordination. Both students and teachers agreed that by adapting training content into contextualized delivery formats and settings, the Tongji Program successfully overcame language and technology barriers. Conclusions: Committed partnerships and contextualization were key to the success of the Tongji Program. Future research should focus on how international primary care education programs affect learners' behavior in their practice settings, and explore barriers and facilitators to change.

Resident perceptions of Competency-Based Medical Education.

BACKGROUND: Residency training programs in Canada are undergoing a mandated transition to competency-based medical education (CBME). There is limited literature regarding resident perspectives on CBME. As upper year residents act as mentors and assessors for incoming cohorts, and are themselves key stakeholders in this educational transition, it is important to understand how they view CBME. We examined how residents who are not currently enrolled in a competency-based program view that method of training, and what they perceive as potential advantages, disadvantages, and considerations regarding its implementation. METHODS: Sixteen residents volunteered to participate in individual semi-structured interviews, with questions focussing on participants' knowledge of CBME and its implementation. We used a grounded theory approach to develop explanations of how residents perceive CBME. RESULTS: Residents anticipated improved assessment and feedback, earlier identification of residents experiencing difficulties in training, and greater flexibility to pursue self-identified educational needs. Disadvantages included logistical issues surrounding CBME implementation, ability of attending physicians to deliver CBME-appropriate feedback, and the possibility of assessment fatigue. Clear, detailed communication and channels for resident feedback were key considerations regarding implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Resident views align with educational experts regarding the practical challenges of implementation. Expectations of improved assessment and feedback highlight the need for both residents and attending physicians to be equipped in these domains. Consequently, faculty development and clear communication will be crucial aspects of successful transitioning to CBME.

CONTEXTE: Les programmes de résidence canadiens effectuent un passage obligatoire vers la formation médicale fondée sur les compétences (FMFC). Peu de littérature documente les perspectives des résidents sur la FMFC. Comme les résidents senior agissent comme mentors et évaluateurs pour les résidents qui débutent, et qu'ils sont eux-mêmes des participants clés dans cette transition éducative, il est important de comprendre comment ils perçoivent la FMFC. Nous avons examiné comment les résidents qui ne sont pas actuellement inscrits dans un programme fondé sur les compétences perçoivent cette méthode de formation et ce qu'ils perçoivent comme avantages et désavantages potentiels, ainsi que leurs réflexions concernant sa mise en œuvre. MÉTHODES: Seize résidents se sont portés volontaires pour participer à des entrevues individuelles semi-structurées, avec des questions ciblant les connaissances des participants relativement à la FMFC et à sa mise en œuvre. Nous avons eu recours à l'approche de la théorisation ancrée pour élaborer des explications sur la manière dont les résidents perçoivent la FMFC. RÉSULTATS: Les résidents s'attendaient à une amélioration de l'évaluation et de la rétroaction, à un repérage plus précoce des résidents éprouvant des difficultés dans leur formation, ainsi qu'à une plus grande souplesse pour ajuster la formation selon les besoins d'apprentissages auto-identifiés par les résidents. Les désavantages comprenaient des problèmes logistiques entourant la mise en œuvre de la FMFC, la capacité des médecins traitants à fournir une rétroaction appropriée axée sur les compétences, ainsi que la possibilité d'une lassitude à l'égard des évaluations. Une communication claire et détaillée ainsi que des canaux pour la rétroaction aux résidents étaient des considérations clés à propos de la mise en œuvre. CONCLUSIONS: Les opinions des résidents concordent avec celles des experts en éducation au sujet des défis pratiques de la mise en œuvre. Les attentes en ce qui a trait à une amélioration de l'évaluation et de la rétroaction soulignent le besoin, autant pour les résidents que pour les médecins traitants, d'être bien préparés dans ces domaines. Par conséquent, la formation professorale et une communication claire représenteront des aspects essentiels d'une transition réussie à la FMFC.

Simulation-based evaluation of anaesthesia residents: optimising resource use in a competency-based assessment framework.

Introduction: Simulation training in anaesthesiology bridges the gap between theory and practice by allowing trainees to engage in high-stakes clinical training without jeopardising patient safety. However, implementing simulation-based assessments within an academic programme is highly resource intensive, and the optimal number of scenarios and faculty required for accurate competency-based assessment remains to be determined. Using a generalisability study methodology, we examine the structure of simulation-based assessment in regard to the minimal number of scenarios and faculty assessors required for optimal competency-based assessments. Methods: Seventeen anaesthesiology residents each performed four simulations which were assessed by two expert raters. Generalisability analysis (G-analysis) was used to estimate the extent of variance attributable to (1) the scenarios, (2) the assessors and (3) the participants. The D-coefficient and the G-coefficient were used to determine accuracy targets and to predict the impact of adjusting the number of scenarios or faculty assessors. Results: We showed that multivariate G-analysis can be used to estimate the number of simulations and raters required to optimise assessment. In this study, the optimal balance was obtained when four scenarios were assessed by two simulation experts. Conclusion: Simulation-based assessment is becoming an increasingly important tool for assessing the competency of medical residents in conjunction with other assessment methods. G-analysis can be used to assist in planning for optimal resource use and cost-efficacy.

Knowledge retention after focused cardiac ultrasound training: a prospective cohort pilot study / Retenção do conhecimento após treinamento de ultrassonografia cardíaca focada: estudo-piloto prospectivo de coorte

Abstract Background and objectives: Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FoCUS) has proven instrumental in guiding anesthesiologists' clinical decision-making process. Training residents to perform and interpret FoCUS is both feasible and effective. However, the degree of knowledge retention after FoCUS training remains a subject of debate. We sought to provide a description of our 4-week FoCUS curriculum, and to assess the knowledge retention among anesthesia residents at 6 months after FoCUS rotation. Methods: A prospective analysis involving eleven senior anesthesia residents was carried out. At end of FoCUS Rotation (EOR) participants completed a questionnaire (evaluating the number of scans completed and residents' self-rated knowledge and comfort level with FoCUS), and a multiple-choice FoCUS exam comprised of written- and video-based questions. Six months later, participants completed a follow-up questionnaire and a similar exam. Self-rated knowledge and exam scores were compared at EOR and after 6 months. Spearman correlations were conducted to test the relationship between number of scans completed and exam scores, perceived knowledge and exam scores, and number of scans and perceived knowledge. Results: Mean exam scores (out of 50) were 44.1 at EOR and 43 at the 6-month follow-up. Residents had significantly higher perceived knowledge (out of 10) at EOR (8.0) than at the 6-month follow-up (5.5), p = 0.003. At the EOR, all trainees felt comfortable using FoCUS, and at 6 months 10/11 still felt comfortable. All the trainees had used FoCUS in their clinical practice after EOR, and the most cited reason for not using FoCUS more frequently was the lack of perceived clinical need. A strong and statistically significant (rho = 0.804, p = 0.005) correlation between number of scans completed during the FoCUS rotation and 6-month follow-up perceived knowledge was observed. Conclusion: Four weeks of intensive FoCUS training results in adequate knowledge acquisition and 6-month knowledge retention.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: A ultrassonografia cardíaca no local de atendimento (USCLA) provou ser importante para orientar o processo de tomada de decisão clínica dos anestesiologistas. Treinar os residentes para fazer e interpretar uma USCLA é viável e eficaz. No entanto, o grau de retenção do conhecimento após o treinamento permanece um assunto de debate. Procuramos fornecer uma descrição do currículo de quatro semanas do treinamento de USCLA e avaliar a retenção do conhecimento entre os residentes de anestesia seis meses após a rotação em USCLA. Métodos: Uma análise prospectiva foi realizada com 11 residentes seniores de anestesia. Ao final da rotação em USCLA, os participantes preencheram um questionário (avaliando o número de exames ultrassonográficos concluídos, o conhecimento adquirido e o nível de conforto dos residentes com a USCLA) e fizeram um exame de múltipla escolha para USCLA, composto por perguntas escritas e baseadas em vídeo. Seis meses depois, os participantes preencheram um questionário de acompanhamento e um exame similar. A autoavaliação do conhecimento e os escores do exame foram comparados no final da rotação e após seis meses. Correlações de Spearman foram usadas para testar a relação entre o número de exames concluídos e os escores dos exames, o conhecimento percebido, os escores dos exames, o número de exames e o conhecimento percebido. Resultados: Os escores médios dos exames (50) foram: 44,1 no final da rotação e 43 após seis meses. Os residentes tiveram conhecimento percebido significativamente maior (10) no final da rotação (8,0) que após seis meses (5,5), p = 0,003. No final da rotação, todos os residentes se sentiram confortáveis usando o aparelho de USCLA e, aos seis meses, 10/11 ainda se sentiam confortáveis. Todos os residentes haviam usado o USCLA em sua prática clínica após o final da rotação e a razão mais citada para não usar o USCLA com mais frequência foi a falta de necessidade clínica percebida. Uma correlação forte e estatisticamente significativa (rho = 0,804, p = 0,005) foi observada entre o número de exames realizados durante a rotação em USCLA e o conhecimento percebido em seis meses de seguimento. Conclusão: Quatro semanas de treinamento intensivo de USCLA resultaram em aquisição e retenção adequadas do conhecimento por seis meses.

[Knowledge retention after focused cardiac ultrasound training: a prospective cohort pilot study]. / Retenção do conhecimento após treinamento de ultrassonografia cardíaca focada: estudo­piloto prospectivo de coorte.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FoCUS) has proven instrumental in guiding anesthesiologists' clinical decision-making process. Training residents to perform and interpret FoCUS is both feasible and effective. However, the degree of knowledge retention after FoCUS training remains a subject of debate. We sought to provide a description of our 4-week FoCUS curriculum, and to assess the knowledge retention among anesthesia residents at 6 months after FoCUS rotation. METHODS: A prospective analysis involving eleven senior anesthesia residents was carried out. At end of FoCUS Rotation (EOR) participants completed a questionnaire (evaluating the number of scans completed and residents' self-rated knowledge and comfort level with FoCUS), and a multiple-choice FoCUS exam comprised of written- and video-based questions. Six months later, participants completed a follow-up questionnaire and a similar exam. Self-rated knowledge and exam scores were compared at EOR and after 6 months. Spearman correlations were conducted to test the relationship between number of scans completed and exam scores, perceived knowledge and exam scores, and number of scans and perceived knowledge. RESULTS: Mean exam scores (out of 50) were 44.1 at EOR and 43 at the 6-month follow-up. Residents had significantly higher perceived knowledge (out of 10) at EOR (8.0) than at the 6-month follow-up (5.5), p=0.003. At the EOR, all trainees felt comfortable using FoCUS, and at 6 months 10/11 still felt comfortable. All the trainees had used FoCUS in their clinical practice after EOR, and the most cited reason for not using FoCUS more frequently was the lack of perceived clinical need. A strong and statistically significant (rho=0.804, p=0.005) correlation between number of scans completed during the FoCUS rotation and 6-month follow-up perceived knowledge was observed. CONCLUSION: Four weeks of intensive FoCUS training results in adequate knowledge acquisition and 6-month knowledge retention.

School travel planning: mobilizing school and community resources to encourage active school transportation.

BACKGROUND: Active school transport (AST), school travel using an active mode like walking, may be important to children's overall physical activity. A "school travel plan" (STP) documents a school's transport characteristics and provides an action plan to address school and neighborhood barriers to AST. METHODS: We conducted a pilot STP intervention at 12 schools in 4 Canadian provinces. Facilitators and school personnel created and implemented AST action plans. Parent's self-reports (N = 1489) were the basis for evaluating the intervention. A content analysis identified type, frequency, and perceived success of initiatives. RESULTS: School travel plans emphasized education and promotion, and AST activities and events. Capital improvement projects were more common at schools in older suburban neighborhoods, whereas enforcement was more common at schools in newer suburban neighborhoods. Rates of active transportation increased from 43.8% to 45.9%. At follow-up, 13.3% of households reported less driving. Parents/caregivers cited weather, convenience, and trip chaining as primary reasons for continued driving. CONCLUSION: The STP process may facilitate changes to patterns of school travel. An STP can expand a school's capacity to address transportation issues through mobilization of diverse community resources. Future STP initiatives may benefit from addressing convenience, safety through enforcement, and by examining how schools can be supported in implementing infrastructure improvements.