Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 62(2): e0133923, 2024 02 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38275299

ABSTRACT

Measles and rubella serological diagnoses are done by IgM detection. The World Health Organization Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network previously endorsed Siemens Enzygnost enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay kits, which have been discontinued. A recommended replacement has not been determined. We aimed to search for suitable replacements by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of IgM detection methods that are currently available for measles and rubella. A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, Global Health, Cochrane Central, and Scopus on March 22 and on 27 September 2023. Studies reporting measles and/or rubella IgM detection with terms around diagnostic accuracy were included. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS tools. Meta-DiSc and R were used for statistical analysis. Clinical samples totalling 5,579 from 28 index tests were included in the measles meta-analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual measles studies ranged from 0.50 to 1.00 and 0.53 to 1.00, respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of all measles IgM detection methods were 0.94 (CI: 0.90-0.97) and 0.94 (CI: 0.91-0.97), respectively. Clinical samples totalling 4,983 from 15 index tests were included in the rubella meta-analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual rubella studies ranged from 0.78 to 1.00 and 0.52 to 1.00, respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of all rubella IgM detection methods were 0.97 (CI: 0.93-0.98) and 0.96 (CI: 0.93-0.98), respectively. Although more studies would be ideal, our results may provide valuable information when selecting IgM detection methods for measles and/or rubella.


Subject(s)
Measles , Rubella , Humans , Rubella virus , Antibodies, Viral , Immunoglobulin M , Measles/diagnosis , Rubella/diagnosis , Serologic Tests
2.
3.
Paediatr Child Health ; 17(4): e32-3, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23543773

ABSTRACT

In the midst of a local measles outbreak, a recently immunized child was investigated for a new-onset measles-type rash. Nucleic acid testing identified that a vaccine-type measles virus was being shed in the urine. Clinically differentiating measles from a nonmeasles rash is challenging, but can be supported by a thorough medical history evaluation. Rashes are expected to occur after immunization; nucleic acid testing can be used when it is difficult to differentiate between wild and attenuated strains.


Pendant une flambée locale de rougeole, un enfant récemment vacciné a subi des examens en raison d'une éruption rougeoleuse de novo. Le test d'acide nucléique a établi qu'un virus rougeoleux de type vaccinal était excrété dans l'urine. Il est difficile d'obtenir la différenciation clinique de la rougeole et d'une éruption non rougeoleuse, mais on peut l'étayer par une évaluation approfondie des antécédents médicaux. Des éruptions peuvent se produire après la vaccination. Le test d'acide nucléique peut être utile lorsqu'il est difficile de différencier les souches sauvages des souches atténuées.

4.
J Infect Dis ; 204 Suppl 1: S514-23, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21666208

ABSTRACT

A critical component of laboratory surveillance for measles is the genetic characterization of circulating wild-type viruses. The World Health Organization (WHO) Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (LabNet), provides for standardized testing in 183 countries and supports genetic characterization of currently circulating strains of measles viruses. The goal of this report is to describe the lessons learned from nearly 20 years of virologic surveillance for measles, to describe the global databases for measles sequences, and to provide regional updates about measles genotypes detected by recent surveillance activities. Virologic surveillance for measles is now well established in all of the WHO regions, and most countries have conducted at least some baseline surveillance. The WHO Global Genotype Database contains >7000 genotype reports, and the Measles Nucleotide Surveillance (MeaNS) contains >4000 entries. This sequence information has proven to be extremely useful for tracking global transmission patterns and for documenting the interruption of transmission in some countries. The future challenges will be to develop quality control programs for molecular methods and to continue to expand virologic surveillance activities in all regions.


Subject(s)
Global Health , Measles virus/classification , Measles virus/genetics , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/virology , Databases, Factual , Genotype , Humans , Molecular Epidemiology , World Health Organization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...