Circulating cell-free DNA: a promising marker of regional lymphonode metastasis in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: We undertook the current study with untreated breast cancer to (1) role the variations in the plasma levels of cfDNA and the size distribution in early stage, (2) determine the frequency in plasma of methylation of three candidate genes, RASSF1A, MAL, and SFRP1, and (3) to determine whether detection of cfDNA variations and methylation changes in plasma might have specific clinical utility. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-nine patients woman patients (median age 64 years; range, 36-90 years) who underwent surgery for primary BR and 49 healthy females' subjects (control group without any breast lesion) were evaluated. The cfDNA levels were analyzed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction of ß-globin. Based on the ALU repeats, the cfDNA was considered as either total (fragments of 115 bp, ALU115) or tumoral (fragments of 247 bp, ALU247). The association between the levels of the ALU247, ALU115 repeat, and ALU 247/115and the pathologic tumor characteristics was analyzed. Used methylight qPCR method, cfDNA from plasma samples of healthy donors and patients with breast cancer were evaluated for the diagnotic value of the methylation status of three genes (RASSF1A, MAL, SFRP1) frequently methylated in breast cancer. RESULTS: The baseline levels of cfDNA were significantly higher in the patients with cancer, and the level of ALU247 was the most accurate circulating cfDNA marker in discriminating the cancer from non-cancer subjects. A high statistical significance was found by considering the T stage and patients with regional LN metastasis positive cancers showed significantly higher cfDNA level of ALU247. Moreover, patients with methylation of at least one of the gene under investigate showed a higher quantity of cfDNA ALU115 (p< 0.0001) and ALU247 level (p< 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that necrosis could be a potential source of circulating tumour-specific cfDNA ALU247; and that cfDNA ALU247 and methylated cfDNA (RASSF1A, MAL and SFRP1) are both a phenotypic feature of tumour biology.

Separate cavity margins excision as a complement to conservative breast cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Positive lumpectomy margins (LM) usually mandate re-excision. However, approximately half of these patients have no residual tumour in the re-excision specimen. The aim of this study was to investigate if separate cavity margin (CM) excision can safely reduce the need of re-operation. METHODS: Rate of re-operation for margin involvement and incidence of residual tumour in the re-excision specimen were retrospectively evaluated in 237 patients (group A) who underwent lumpectomy alone, and in 271 patients (group B) treated by lumpectomy and CM excision. Patients with positive LM (group A) or CM (group B) underwent re-excision. RESULTS: In the group A, 50/237 patients (21.1%) had LM+ and underwent re-excision. In the group B, 74/271 patients (27.3%) had LM+, but tumour was found within the CM specimen in 46 patients (17.0%), 24 LM+ and 22 LM-, and reached the CM cut edge in only 15 (5.5%), who finally underwent re-excision. Residual tumour was found in the re-excision specimen in 28/50 patients (56.0%) of the group A and in 7/15 patients (46.7%) of the group B. CONCLUSIONS: Separate CM excision strongly decreases the rate of re-operation for involved margin. However, the finding of various combinations of LM and CM status and the evidence that CM excision does not improve the positive predictive value of margin involvement suggest prudent conclusions. Only long term follow up of patients treated according to the CM status can exclude that the reduced rate of re-operations allowed by this procedure would expose to an increased risk of local recurrence.

Clinical impact of false-negative sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

AIMS: To evaluate the incidence of false-negative (FN) sentinel lymph node (SLN) cases, their correlation with a series of clinico-pathologic parameters and their impact on adjuvant treatment indications and on clinical axillary relapse in the setting of a multicentric clinical trial comparing SLN biopsy with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). METHODS: A series of 697 patients with primary breast cancer < or = 3 cm were randomized to SLN biopsy associated with ALND (ALND arm) or to SLN biopsy followed by ALND only if the SLN was metastatic (SLN arm). The FN SLN rate was assessed in the ALND arm. A series of 11 clinico-pathological parameters were tested for a possible association with FN results. The indications for adjuvant treatments were evaluated by considering both the FN nodal stages, as indicated by the SLN, and the true positive axillary status, as indicated by completion ALND. The occurrence of clinically evident axillary recurrences was evaluated in the two arms. RESULTS: The FN rate was 16.7%. Of the clinico-pathologic parameters tested, only a tumour size < or = 2 cm and the presence of a single metastatic axillary node was significantly associated with a risk of FN (p = 0.033 and p = 0.018, respectively). The FN SLN would have led to different adjuvant therapy indications in 12/18 cases. At 56 months, no clinically evident axillary nodal recurrences were present in the ALND arm patients, whereas one case of axillary recurrence was detected in the SLN arm patients. CONCLUSIONS: FN SLN biopsy is not uncommon, especially in the presence of a small primary tumour with a single nodal metastasis. An FN finding can lead to less than optimal adjuvant treatment. However, the clinical impact of FN in terms of axillary recurrence at 56 months was minimal.

Morbidity comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus conventional axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients: results of the sentinella-GIVOM Italian randomised clinical trial.

AIMS: To compare physical morbidity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in breast cancer patients who received standard axillary dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), followed by axillary dissection only in the case of sentinel-node positivity, within a randomised clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with early breast cancer < or =3cm and clinically negative axilla were randomly allocated to ALND or SLNB. All patients underwent physical examination every 6 months in order to assess any arm-related symptoms. A subset of patients completed the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire and the Psychological General Well Being Index (PGWBI) before randomisation, at 6 and 12 months after surgery and yearly thereafter. Results of the first 24 months are reported. RESULTS: Six-hundred and seventy-seven patients were available for analysis: 341 patients randomised to the ALND group and 336 to the SLNB group. Six months after surgery, the SLNB group had significantly less lymph-oedema, movement restrictions, pain and numbness with respect to the ALND group. Lymph-oedema was also significantly reduced at 12 months and numbness remained significantly less frequent in the SLNB arm at all time points. Three-hundred and ten patients participated in the HRQOL assessment. The mean scores of the PGWB questionnaire general index and anxiety domain were significantly better in the SLNB group than in the ALND group but the difference ceased to be significant at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: The SLNB is associated with reduced arm morbidity without evidence of a negative impact on psychological well being. While waiting for long-term results of ongoing randomised clinical trials, the SLNB may be proposed for early stage breast cancer patients after adequate information on the expected advantages and the possible risks.

[Prevalence and determinants of low back pain in hospital workers]. / Prevalenza e fattori determinanti delle lombalgie tra i dipendenti dell'ospedale di Terni.

This study evaluated the prevalence and determinants of low back pain (LBP) in Terni hospital workers. Each ward sister completed a questionnaire about potential determinants of LBP associated with physical loads. Moreover, a trained ward sister administered a questionnaire about the characteristics of low back pain to 512 subjects. In the previous year the prevalence of LBP was 58.8%. It was more common in subjects under 45 years of age. >3 LBP episodes annually were more frequent in operating rooms and medical wards. LBP lasted >1 week in 29% of females and in 23% of males. LBP caused change of duties or time off work in 11% of females and in 8% of males.