Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(4): 472-4, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26763179

ABSTRACT

Outpatient hemodialysis bloodstream infection rates, now used for performance measurement and were significantly higher for manual compared with automated surveillance (P<.001), largely owing to the absence of blood culture data in the dialysis electronic health record. Improvement in data sharing between hospitals and outpatient dialysis centers is necessary.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Infection Control/methods , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital , Population Surveillance/methods , Renal Dialysis , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Electronic Health Records , Humans , Outpatients , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 62(1): 45-52, 2016 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26338787

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Significant progress has been made in reducing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections among hospitalized patients. However, the decreases in invasive MRSA infections among recently discharged patients have been less substantial. To inform prevention strategies, we assessed risk factors for invasive MRSA infection after acute-care hospitalizations. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, matched case-control study. A case was defined as MRSA cultured from a normally sterile body site in a patient discharged from a hospital within the prior 12 weeks. Eligible case patients were identified from 15 hospitals across 6 US states. For each case patient, 2 controls were matched for hospital, month of discharge, and age group. Medical record reviews and telephone interviews were performed. Conditional logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for postdischarge invasive MRSA. RESULTS: From 1 February 2011 through 31 March 2013, 194 case patients and 388 matched controls were enrolled. The median time between hospital discharge and positive culture was 23 days (range, 1-83 days). Factors independently associated with postdischarge MRSA infection included MRSA colonization (matched odds ratio [mOR], 7.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.60-16.51), discharge to a nursing home (mOR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.41-4.99), presence of a chronic wound during the postdischarge period (mOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 2.14-9.09), and discharge with a central venous catheter (mOR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.13-4.99) or a different invasive device (mOR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.24-7.39) in place. CONCLUSIONS: Prevention efforts should target patients with MRSA colonization or those with invasive devices or chronic wounds at hospital discharge. In addition, MRSA prevention efforts in nursing homes are warranted.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
3.
JAMA Intern Med ; 173(21): 1970-8, 2013 Nov 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24043270

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Estimating the US burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is important for planning and tracking success of prevention strategies. OBJECTIVE: To describe updated national estimates and characteristics of health care- and community-associated invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in 2011. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Active laboratory-based case finding identified MRSA cultures in 9 US metropolitan areas from 2005 through 2011. Invasive infections (MRSA cultured from normally sterile body sites) were classified as health care-associated community-onset (HACO) infections (cultured ≤ 3 days after admission and/or prior year dialysis, hospitalization, surgery, long-term care residence, or central vascular catheter presence ≤ 2 days before culture); hospital-onset infections (cultured >3 days after admission); or community-associated infections if no other criteria were met. National estimates were adjusted using US census and US Renal Data System data. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: National estimates of invasive HACO, hospital-onset, and community-associated MRSA infections using US census and US Renal Data System data as the denominator. RESULTS: An estimated 80,461 (95% CI, 69,515-93,914) invasive MRSA infections occurred nationally in 2011. Of these, 48,353 (95% CI, 40,195-58,642) were HACO infections; 14,156 (95% CI, 10,096-20,440) were hospital-onset infections; and 16,560 (95% CI, 12,806-21,811) were community-associated infections. Since 2005, adjusted national estimated incidence rates decreased among HACO infections by 27.7% and hospital-onset infections decreased by 54.2%; community-associated infections decreased by only 5.0%. Among recently hospitalized community-onset (nondialysis) infections, 64% occurred 3 months or less after discharge, and 32% of these were admitted from long-term care facilities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: An estimated 30,800 fewer invasive MRSA infections occurred in the United States in 2011 compared with 2005; in 2011 fewer infections occurred among patients during hospitalization than among persons in the community without recent health care exposures. Effective strategies for preventing infections outside acute care settings will have the greatest impact on further reducing invasive MRSA infections nationally.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Long-Term Care , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing Homes , Renal Dialysis , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 57(10): 1393-400, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23964088

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15 700 invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections occurred in US dialysis patients in 2010. Frequent hospital visits and prolonged bloodstream access, especially via central venous catheters (CVCs), are risk factors among hemodialysis patients. We describe the epidemiology of and recent trends in invasive MRSA infections among dialysis patients. METHODS: We analyzed population-based data from 9 US metropolitan areas from 2005 to 2011. Cases were defined as MRSA isolated from a normally sterile body site in a surveillance area resident who received dialysis, and were classified as hospital-onset (HO; culture collected >3 days after hospital admission) or healthcare-associated community-onset (HACO; all others). Incidence was calculated using denominators from the US Renal Data System. Temporal trends in incidence and national estimates were calculated controlling for age, sex, and race. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2011, 7489 cases were identified; 85.7% were HACO infections, and 93.2% were bloodstream infections. Incidence of invasive MRSA infections decreased from 6.5 to 4.2 per 100 dialysis patients (annual decrease, 7.3%) with annual decreases of 6.7% for HACO and 10.5% for HO cases. Among cases identified during 2009-2011, 70% of patients were hospitalized in the year prior to infection. Among hemodialysis cases, 60.4% of patients were dialyzed through a CVC. The 2011 national estimated number of MRSA infections was 15 169. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a substantial decrease in invasive MRSA infection incidence among dialysis patients. Most cases had previous hospitalizations, suggesting that efforts to control MRSA in hospitals might have contributed to the declines. Infection prevention measures should include improved vascular access and CVC care.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Renal Dialysis/statistics & numerical data , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacteremia/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Bacterial/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
5.
JAMA Intern Med ; 173(14): 1359-67, 2013 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23780507

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been increasingly reported among healthy individuals in the community. Recent data suggest that community-associated CDI represents one-third of all C difficile cases. The epidemiology and potential sources of C difficile in the community are not fully understood. OBJECTIVES: To determine epidemiological and clinical characteristics of community-associated CDI and to explore potential sources of C difficile acquisition in the community. DESIGN AND SETTING: Active population-based and laboratory-based CDI surveillance in 8 US states. PARTICIPANTS: Medical records were reviewed and interviews performed to assess outpatient, household, and food exposures among patients with community-associated CDI (ie, toxin or molecular assay positive for C difficile and no overnight stay in a health care facility within 12 weeks). Molecular characterization of C difficile isolates was performed. Outpatient health care exposure in the prior 12 weeks among patients with community-associated CDI was a priori categorized into the following 3 levels: no exposure, low-level exposure (ie, outpatient visit with physician or dentist), or high-level exposure (ie, surgery, dialysis, emergency or urgent care visit, inpatient care with no overnight stay, or health care personnel with direct patient care). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence of outpatient health care exposure among patients with community-associated CDI and identification of potential sources of C difficile by level of outpatient health care exposure. RESULTS: Of 984 patients with community-associated CDI, 353 (35.9%) did not receive antibiotics, 177 (18.0%) had no outpatient health care exposure, and 400 (40.7%) had low-level outpatient health care exposure. Thirty-one percent of patients without antibiotic exposure received proton pump inhibitors. Patients having CDI with no or low-level outpatient health care exposure were more likely to be exposed to infants younger than 1 year (P = .04) and to household members with active CDI (P = .05) compared with those having high-level outpatient health care exposure. No association between food exposure or animal exposure and level of outpatient health care exposure was observed. North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (NAP) 1 was the most common (21.7%) strain isolated; NAP7 and NAP8 were uncommon (6.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Most patients with community-associated CDI had recent outpatient health care exposure, and up to 36% would not be prevented by reduction of antibiotic use only. Our data support evaluation of additional strategies, including further examination of C difficile transmission in outpatient and household settings and reduction of proton pump inhibitor use.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Clostridioides difficile/classification , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/statistics & numerical data , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/transmission , Feces/microbiology , Female , Histamine H2 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Typing , Multivariate Analysis , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
6.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 17(1): 12-9, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21135656

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the severity of 2009 H1N1 influenza disease, enhanced surveillance of patients hospitalized with influenza was conducted during the 2009-2010 influenza season in New York State through existing Emerging Infections Program surveillance and a newly established sentinel hospital surveillance program. The 2 surveillance systems were compared to determine consistency across surveillance modalities and reveal the strengths and weaknesses of each to accomplish comprehensive influenza surveillance. DESIGN: Similar variables from the aggregate data collected from each system were compared and differences were analyzed in detail. SETTING: New York State. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized adult and pediatric patients detected through 2 influenza surveillance programs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Significant differences in age distribution, timing of illness onset, illness complications, underlying medical conditions, critical care admissions, use of mechanical ventilation, and illness outcomes. RESULTS: Both surveillance systems saw the highest numbers of confirmed influenza infection among patients hospitalized in early fall 2009, with sharp declines thereafter. Sentinel hospital surveillance continued to detect hospitalizations for influenza-like illness that were not due to 2009 H1N1 influenza well into March 2010. Compared to influenza surveillance conducted through the Emerging Infections Program, the sentinel hospital influenza surveillance program tended to detect a sicker population of children and adults, including a higher rate of critical illness and mechanical ventilation, and among adults, higher rates of some underlying medical conditions. There were no differences in disease outcomes detected between the 2 systems. CONCLUSIONS: Although the 2 surveillance systems were complementary, inherent methodologic variations revealed important differences at season conclusion. The lessons learned should be used to determine the best way to allocate resources to meet the needs of future state and national influenza surveillance efforts.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Sentinel Surveillance , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/complications , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/diagnosis , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/virology , Data Collection , Female , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Infant , Influenza, Human/complications , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/virology , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , New York/epidemiology , Program Evaluation , Severity of Illness Index
7.
Ann Emerg Med ; 55(1): 32-9, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20116012

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Influenza causes significant widespread illness each year. Emergency department (ED) clinicians are often first-line providers to evaluate and make treatment decisions for patients presenting with influenza. We sought to better understand ED clinician testing and treatment practices in the Emerging Infections Program Network, a federal, state, and academic collaboration that conducts active surveillance for influenza-associated hospitalizations. METHODS: During 2007, a survey was administered to ED clinicians who worked in Emerging Infections Program catchment area hospitals' EDs. The survey encompassed the role of the clinician, years since completing clinical training, hospital type, influenza testing practices, and use of antiviral medications during the 2006 to 2007 influenza season. We examined factors associated with influenza testing and antiviral use. RESULTS: A total of 1,055 ED clinicians from 123 hospitals responded to the survey. A majority of respondents (85.3%; n=887) reported they had tested their patients for influenza during the 2006 to 2007 influenza season (Emerging Infections Program site range: 59.3 to 100%; P<.0001). When asked about antiviral medications, 55.7% (n=576) of respondents stated they had prescribed antiviral medications to some of their patients in 2006 to 2007 (Emerging Infections Program site range 32.9% to 80.3%; P<.0001). A positive association between influenza testing and prescribing antiviral medications was observed. Additionally, the type of hospital, location in which an ED clinician worked, and the number of years since medical training were associated with prescribing antiviral influenza medications. CONCLUSION: There is much heterogeneity in clinician-initiated influenza testing and treatment practices. Additional exploration of the role of hospital testing and treatment policies, clinicians' perception of influenza disease, and methods for educating clinicians about new recommendations is needed to better understand ED clinician testing and treatment decisions, especially in an environment of rapidly changing influenza clinical guidelines. Until influenza testing and treatment guidelines are better promulgated, clinicians may continue to test and treat influenza with inconsistency.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Emergency Medicine , Guideline Adherence , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/therapy , Mass Screening , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Drug Utilization , Humans , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , United States
8.
J Bone Miner Res ; 20(9): 1624-36, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16059634

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Runx proteins mediate skeletal development. We studied the regulation of Runx1 during chondrocyte differentiation by real-time RT-PCR and its function during chondrogenesis using overexpression and RNA interference. Runx1 induces mesenchymal stem cell commitment to the early stages of chondrogenesis. INTRODUCTION: Runx1 and Runx2 are co-expressed in limb bud cell condensations that undergo both cartilage and bone differentiation during murine development. However, the cooperative and/or compensatory effects these factors exert on skeletal formation have yet to be elucidated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Runx1/Cbfa2 and Runx2/Cbfa1 were examined at different stages of embryonic development by immunohistochemistry. In vitro studies used mouse embryonic limb bud cells and assessed Runx expressions by immunohistochemistry and real-time RT-PCR in the presence and absence of TGFbeta and BMP2. Runx1 was overexpressed in mesenchymal cell progenitors using retroviral infection. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry showed that Runx1 and Runx2 are co-expressed in undifferentiated mesenchyme, had similar levels in chondrocytes undergoing transition from proliferation to hypertrophy, and that there was primarily Runx2 expression in hypertrophic chondrocytes. Overall, the expression of Runx1 remained significantly higher than Runx2 mRNA levels during early limb bud cell maturation. Treatment of limb bud micromass cultures with BMP2 resulted in early induction of both Runx1 and Runx2. However, upregulation of Runx2 by BMP2 was sustained, whereas Runx1 decreased in later time-points when type X collagen was induced. Although TGFbeta potently inhibits Runx2 and type X collagen, it induces type II collagen mRNA and mildly but significantly inhibits Runx1 isoforms in the early stages of chondrogenesis. Virus-mediated overexpression of Runx1 in mouse embryonic mesenchymal cells resulted in a potent induction of the early chondrocyte differentiation markers but not the hypertrophy marker, type X collagen. Knockdown or Runx1 potently inhibits type II collagen, alkaline phosphatase, and Runx2 and has a late inhibitory effect on type X collagen. CONCLUSION: These findings show a distinct and sustained role for Runx proteins in chondrogenesis and subsequent chondrocyte maturation. Runx1 is highly expressed during chondrogenesis in comparison with Runx2, and Runx1 gain of functions stimulated this process. Thus, the Runx genes are uniquely expressed and have distinct roles during skeletal development.


Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation , Chondrocytes/metabolism , Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit/physiology , Mesoderm/metabolism , Alcian Blue/pharmacology , Animals , Blotting, Western , Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 , Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/metabolism , Bone and Bones , Cartilage/cytology , Cartilage/metabolism , Cell Proliferation , Collagen Type II/metabolism , Collagen Type X/metabolism , Coloring Agents/pharmacology , DNA Primers/chemistry , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization , Lac Operon , Limb Buds/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred C3H , Mice, Inbred ICR , Phenotype , Protein Isoforms , RNA/metabolism , RNA Interference , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , RNA, Small Interfering/metabolism , Retroviridae/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Stem Cells/cytology , Time Factors , Transforming Growth Factor beta/metabolism , Up-Regulation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...