An analysis of the rotator interval in patients with anterior, posterior, and multidirectional shoulder instability.

PURPOSE: To describe anatomic measurements of the rotator interval (RI) on magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) images and to assess the relationship between increased dimensions of the RI and instability conditions of the shoulder. METHODS: Three groups of patients with clinical instability were treated arthroscopically (anterior [A = 19 patients], posterior [P = 14 patients], and multidirectional [M = 13 patients]), and a group of 10 control patients without clinical instability were also identified. The MRAs of all groups were randomized, and 5 blinded reviewers recorded RI anatomic measurements of: (1) sagittal measures of the distance between the subscapularis (SSc) and supraspinatus (SS) tendons at 3 anatomic landmarks across the RI, and (2) the sagittal position of the long head of the biceps (LHB) relative to the most anterior aspect of the SS. RESULTS: The rotator interval distance between the SS and SSc tendons was nearly identical for all groups of instability, and was also not different from control groups. On the sagittal oblique sequences, the distance from the LHB tendon to the anterior edge of the SS tendon was significantly increased in posterior (7.4 mm) instability versus both the control group (2.4 mm; P = .025) and those with anterior instability (4.5 mm; P = .041), with the LHB in a consistent anterior position. The remainder of the measures was not statistically different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The distance between the SS and SSc and the overall size of the RI was well preserved in all instability patterns and control conditions. The LHB tendon assumes a more anterior position relative to the supraspinatus tendon in patients with posterior instability versus those patients with anterior instability or those without clinical instability. Additional work is necessary to further define objective radiographic evidence of RI insufficiency in patients with shoulder instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic case-control study.

An analysis of capsular area in patients with anterior, posterior, and multidirectional shoulder instability.

BACKGROUND: Although increased capsular volume has been implicated in shoulder instability, there is a paucity of clinical evidence to quantify the size of the capsule with specific instability conditions of the shoulder. HYPOTHESIS: Shoulder capsular area, as measured by magnetic resonance arthrography, is increased with specific patterns of shoulder instability. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: During an 8-month period, all patients with a diagnosis of anterior (n = 19), posterior (n = 14), or multidirectional (n = 13) instability of the shoulder and who were assessed with a magnetic resonance arthrogram were reviewed. A group of 10 control patients without clinical instability were also identified. The magnetic resonance arthrograms of all groups were randomly mixed, and 5 reviewers recorded measures of capsular length and area and determined labral abnormalities. The magnetic resonance arthrogram measurements were compared between groups, and interobserver agreement was determined. RESULTS: The cross-sectional area of the capsule was increased in patients with posterior (P = .017) or multidirectional instability (P = .021) versus controls, but not in patients with anterior instability. Additionally, the posteroinferior cross-sectional area was increased in patients with posterior (P = .001), multidirectional (P = .003), and anterior (P = .008) instability. In patients with a posterior labral tear, the mean axial (P = .043) and mean posteroinferior sagittal cross-sectional area (P = .011) was increased, but there were no differences in cross-sectional area for those with an anterior labral tear. The overall interobserver reliability was very good (correlation coefficient range, 0.68-0.94). CONCLUSION: Our results reinforce the concept that capsular elongation and laxity, either preexisting or acquired, play a role in certain instability conditions of the shoulder. Additional work is needed to determine how to correlate surgical decision making with the cross-sectional area measurements demonstrated in this study.

The diagnostic utility of midcarpal anesthetic injection in the evaluation of chronic wrist pain.

The evaluation of chronic wrist pain can be a diagnostic dilemma. Lidocaine injections combined with corticosteroids are often used for both diagnosis and therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine if a midcarpal injection of lidocaine could serve as a diagnostic tool in patients with chronic wrist pain. Specifically, the relationship of pain relief from the injection and improvement of grip strength were compared to the presence of intracarpal pathology as confirmed by wrist arthroscopy. Forty-five patients with chronic wrist pain underwent a midcarpal injection of lidocaine with or without corticosteroids. Forty of the 45 underwent comcomitant steroid injections; a majority of the 40 patients reported relief of pain for two or more weeks. Improvement of pain and improvement of grip strength were determined. Each of these patients subsequently underwent a radiocarpal and midcarpal arthroscopy, and the pathologic findings of arthroscopy were compared to the improvement of pain and grip strength. These data were compared to a cohort of six volunteers without history of wrist pain or trauma that underwent midcarpal injection of lidocaine. Statistical analysis was performed using Receiver-Operator-Characteristic analysis. The average age of patients with chronic pain was 30.3 years, with an average of 9.8 months of wrist pain. The ultimate diagnoses included 35 patients with carpal instability dissociative, two with nondissociative instability, seven with complex instability of the carpus, three with extensor carpi ulnaris tendonitis and one with deQuervain's tenosynovitis. After lidocaine injection, the normal cohort had a mean loss of 2 kg (-5.3%) (p = 0.02) in grip strength, whereas the experimental cohort had a mean improvement in grip strength of 5.73 kg (34.4%). Improvement of pain after injection did not correlate with pathologic arthroscopic findings (p = 0.92). Improvement in grip strength after midcarpal lidocaine injection of 6 kg or 28% had a 73% sensitivity and a 70% specificity (p = 0.02) of having intracarpal pathology at the time of arthroscopy. Of the chronic wrist pain patients, only four had a normal arthroscopy, and the remainder had at least one area of significant pathology attributing to their pain. We conclude that a midcarpal injection of lidocaine can serve as an effective diagnostic tool in the evaluation of the patient with chronic wrist pain. Improvement of grip of 28% with or without relief of pain is highly correlated with intracarpal pathology.

Twenty-six-year results after Broström procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability.

BACKGROUND: The procedure described by Broström has been used to address chronic lateral ankle instability; the long-term results of this procedure have not been reported. HYPOTHESIS: The Broström procedure provides good results over the long term for active patients with chronic lateral ankle instability. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Thirty-one male patients (32 ankles) who underwent the Broström procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability while enrolled as students at the United States Naval Academy were identified. Each patient was mailed a questionnaire that included a functional outcome measure as described by Roos et al, a score described by Good et al, and a single-number ankle functional assessment. The mean age was 20.7 years (range, 18-23 years) at the time of operation. A functional outcome score was completed on each patient, with a mean follow-up of 26.3 years (range, 24.6-27.9 years). RESULTS: The follow-up included 22 of the 31 original patients. The mean numeric score for overall ankle function was 91.2 of 100 (standard deviation, 10.2). The foot and ankle outcome score (described by Roos et al) was 92.0 (92%; standard deviation, 12.8) averaged over 5 functional areas. Ninety-one percent of the patients described their ankle function as good or excellent using the scale devised by Good et al. CONCLUSION: The long-term results of the Broström procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability are excellent with 26-year follow-up.

Arthroscopic treatment of posterior shoulder instability: results in 33 patients.

BACKGROUND: Posterior shoulder instability is a relatively rare condition and a surgical challenge. Arthroscopic techniques have allowed for a potential improvement as well as diagnosis and management of this condition. PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic posterior shoulder stabilization and to evaluate preoperative and intraoperative variables as predictors of success. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with a mean age of 25 years (range, 19-34 years) who underwent posterior arthroscopic shoulder stabilization with suture anchors (mean, 3 anchors) or suture capsulolabral plication (mean, 5.3 stitches) or both were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 39.1 months (range, 22-60 months). Shoulder outcomes rating scores were determined using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Rating Scale, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, the Subjective Patient Shoulder Evaluation, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. RESULTS: There were 7 failures: 4 for recurrent instability and 3 for symptoms of pain. Overall, outcomes scores demonstrated mean values of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Rating Scale of 94.6, Subjective Patient Shoulder Evaluation of 20.0, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index of 389.4 (81.5% of normal), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation of 87.5. Patients with voluntary instability demonstrated worse outcomes (P = .025), and those with prior surgery of the shoulder also did worse (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic treatment of posterior shoulder instability is an effective means to improve symptoms associated with recurrent posterior subluxation of the shoulder. It can provide predictable success in the setting of unidirectional, nonvoluntary posterior instability without prior surgery.

Soft tissue procedures.

Soft tissue procedures for PTT dysfunction and adult acquired flat foot improve function and preserve joint motion. These procedures can only be applied to patients who have correctable deformities. The durability of these procedures, without the addition of bone realignment procedures, has been questioned and needs to be investigated further. Reconstruction of the spring ligament complex corrects the flat foot in cadavers but has not been studied clinically. There is still much to be learned in this condition so we are able to provide optimal care for our patients.