Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
2.
J Neurooncol ; 168(2): 225-235, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664311

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The efficacy of systemic therapies for glioblastoma (GBM) remains limited due to the constraints of systemic toxicity and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. Temporoparietal fascial flaps (TPFFs) and vascularized peri cranial flaps (PCF) are not restricted by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), as they derive their vascular supply from branches of the external carotid artery. Transposition of a vascularized TPFF or PCF along a GBM resection cavity may bring autologous tissue not restricted by the BBB in close vicinity to the tumor bed microenvironment, permit ingrowth of vascular channels fed by the external circulation, and offer a mechanism of bypassing the BBB. In addition, circulating immune cells in the vascularized flap may have better access to tumor-associated antigens (TAA) within the tumor microenvironment. We conducted a first-in-human Phase I trial assessing the safety of lining the resection cavity with autologous TPFF/PCF of newly diagnosed patients with GBM. METHODS: 12 patients underwent safe, maximal surgical resection of newly diagnosed GBMs, followed by lining of the resection cavity with a pedicled, autologous TPFF or PCF. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Secondary analysis of efficacy was examined as the proportion of patients experiencing progression-free disease (PFS) as indicated by response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria and overall survival (OS). The study was powered to determine whether a Phase II study was warranted based on these early results. For this analysis, subjects who were alive and had not progressed as of the date of the last follow-up were considered censored and all living patients who were alive as of the date of last follow-up were considered censored for overall survival. For simplicity, we assumed that a 70% PFS rate at 6 months would be considered an encouraging response and would make an argument for further investigation of the procedure. RESULTS: Median age of included patients was 57 years (range 46-69 years). All patients were Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype. Average tumor volume was 56.6 cm3 (range 14-145 cm3). Resection was qualified as gross total resection (GTR) of all of the enhancing diseases in all patients. Grade III or above adverse events were encountered in 3 patients. No Grade IV or V serious adverse events occurred in the immediate post-operative period including seizure, infection, stroke, or tumor growing along the flap. Disease progression at the site of the original tumor was identified in only 4 (33%) patients (median 23 months, range 8-25 months), 3 of whom underwent re-operation. Histopathological analyses of those implanted flaps and tumor bed biopsy at repeat surgery demonstrated robust immune infiltrates within the transplanted flap. Importantly, no patient demonstrated evidence of tumor infiltration into the implanted flap. At the time of this manuscript preparation, only 4/12 (33%) of patients have died. Based on the statistical considerations above and including all 12 patients 10/12 (83.3%) had 6-month PFS. The median PFS was 9.10 months, and the OS was 17.6 months. 4/12 (33%) of patients have been alive for more than two years and our longest surviving patient currently is alive at 60 months. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that insertion of pedicled autologous TPFF/PCF along a GBM resection cavity is safe and feasible. Based on the encouraging response rate in 6-month PFS and OS, larger phase II studies are warranted to assess and reproduce safety, feasibility, and efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION FOR PROSPECTIVELY REGISTERED TRIALS: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03630289, dated: 08/02/2018.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Surgical Flaps , Humans , Glioblastoma/surgery , Glioblastoma/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Adult , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies
3.
J Craniofac Surg ; 2024 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38260961

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ventricular shunting is one of the most common procedures in neurosurgery. However, complications and revisions are frequent. Patients requiring multiple revisions often suffer secondary issues with scalp healing over hardware. Many common ventricular shunt valves have an obligate thickness that creates a visible protrusion and can potentially cause local tissue ischemia and breakdown in the setting of repeated surgery. The authors present a simple technique for recessing the shunt valve into the underlying bone to alleviate protrusion in high-risk cases. Three example cases utilizing this technique are presented. METHODS: The skull directly underlying the planned valve site is uniformly recessed with a cutting burr several millimeters as desired while maintaining the inner cortical bone layer. The valve is fixed with standard cranial plating hardware. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: Three patients are reported who underwent shunt valve recession as an adjunct to their shunt revision with neuroplastic surgery assistance. All patients had undergone multiple prior surgeries that had resulted in thin and high-risk fragile scalp. In 1 patient, the prior valve was eroding through the scalp before the described revision. All patients had satisfactory cosmetic outcomes, and there were no revisions in the 2-month follow-up period. DISCUSSION: Complex and high-risk ventricular shunt patients should be considered for shunt valve recession into the bone to reduce wound-related complications and enhance healing. This is a technically simple, safe, and effective technique to include as a neuroplastic adjunct.

4.
Brain Spine ; 3: 102665, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38021023

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Technological advancements provided several preoperative tools allowing for precise preoperative planning in cranial neurosurgery, aiming to increase the efficacy and safety of surgery. However, little data are available regarding if and how young neurosurgeons are trained in using such technologies, how often they use them in clinical practice, and how valuable they consider these technologies. Research question: How frequently these technologies are used during training and clinical practice as well as to how their perceived value can be qualitatively assessed. Materials and methods: The Young Neurosurgeons' Committee (YNC) of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) distributed a 14-items survey among young neurosurgeons between June 1st and August 31st, 2022. Results: A total of 441 responses were collected. Most responders (42.34%) received "formal" training during their residency. Planning techniques were used mainly in neuro-oncology (90.86%), and 3D visualization of patients' DICOM dataset using open-source software was the most frequently used (>20 times/month, 20.34% of responders). Software for 3D visualization of patients' DICOM dataset was the most valuable technology, especially for planning surgical approach (42.03%). Conversely, simulation based on augmented/mixed/virtual reality was considered the less valuable tool, being rated below sufficiency by 39.7% of responders. Discussion and conclusion: Training for using preoperative planning technologies in cranial neurosurgery is provided by neurosurgical residency programs. Software for 3D visualization of DICOM datasets is the most valuable and used tool, especially in neuro-oncology. Interestingly, simulation tools based on augmented/virtual/mixed reality are considered less valuable and, therefore, less used than other technologies.

5.
J Clin Neurosci ; 117: 46-53, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37757653

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rarely, Pituitary adenomas (PA) can co-occur with intrasellar or intracavernous aneurysms. There is currently no clear guidance for the management of this dual pathology. We attempt to provide an algorithm to help guide clinical decision making for treatment of PAs co-occurring with adjacent cerebral aneurysms. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines using various databases. Search terms included "(Pituitary Adenoma OR Prolactinoma OR Macroadenoma OR Adenoma) AND (ICA OR Internal Carotid Artery OR paracliniod OR clinoid) Aneurysm AND (Intra-cavernous OR intracavernous OR intrasellar OR Cavernous)." RESULTS: A total of 24 studies with 24 patients were included. Twelve (50%) patients experienced visual symptoms. Ten patients (42%) had an aneurysm embedded within the adenoma. Fourteen patients (58%) had an aneurysm adjacent to the adenoma. Embedded aneurysms were significantly associated with rupture events. CONCLUSION: Vision loss is the most pressing determinant of treatment. In the absence of visual symptoms, the aneurysm should be treated first by coil embolization. If not amenable to coiling, place flow diverting stent followed by six months of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. If visual loss is apparent, the adenoma-aneurysm spatial relationship becomes critical. In cases of an adjacent aneurysm, the adenoma should be removed transsphenoidally with extreme care and aneurysm rupture protocols in place. If the aneurysm is embedded within the adenoma, then a BTO is favored with permanent ICA occlusion followed by transsphenoidal resection if adequate collateral supply is demonstrated. If there is inadequate collateral supply, then an open-approach for amenable aneurysms with transcranial adenoma debulking should be performed.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Cavernous Sinus , Intracranial Aneurysm , Pituitary Neoplasms , Humans , Pituitary Neoplasms/complications , Pituitary Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pituitary Neoplasms/surgery , Cavernous Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Cavernous Sinus/surgery , Cavernous Sinus/pathology , Adenoma/complications , Adenoma/diagnostic imaging , Adenoma/surgery , Intracranial Aneurysm/complications , Intracranial Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Intracranial Aneurysm/surgery , Algorithms
6.
J Neurooncol ; 164(1): 231-237, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37548850

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To outline the dose rationale for the first in-human intrathecal delivery of bevacizumab for LMS of GBM. METHODS: A 19-year-old female patient presented to Lenox Hill Hospital following thalamic GBM recurrence. She subsequently underwent two infusions of intra-arterial BEV (NCT01269853) and experienced a period of relative disease stability until progression in 2022. One month later, MRI disclosed diffuse enhancement representative of LMS of GBM. The patient subsequently underwent five cycles of IT BEV in mid-2022 (IND 162119). Doses of 25 mg, 37.5 mg, 50 mg, 50 mg, and 37.8 mg were delivered at two-week intervals between doses 1-4. The final 37.8 mg dose was given one day following her fourth dose, given that the patient was to be discharged, traveled several hours to our center, and was tolerating therapy well. Dosage was decreased due to the short interval between the final two treatments. Shortly after IT BEV completion, she received a third dose of IA BEV. RESULTS: Our patient did not show any signs of serious adverse effects or dose limiting toxicities following any of the treatments. It is difficult to determine PFS due to the rapid progression associated with LMS of GBM and rapid timeframe of treatment. CONCLUSION: LMS continues to be a devastating progression in many types of cancer, including GBM, and novel ways to deliver therapeutics may offer patients symptomatic and therapeutic benefits.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
7.
J Neurooncol ; 163(3): 515-527, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37395975

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We systematically reviewed the current landscape of hippocampal-avoidance radiotherapy, focusing specifically on rates of hippocampal tumor recurrence and changes in neurocognitive function. METHODS: PubMed was queried for studies involving hippocampal-avoidance radiation therapy and results were screened using PRISMA guidelines. Results were analyzed for median overall survival, progression-free survival, hippocampal relapse rates, and neurocognitive function testing. RESULTS: Of 3709 search results, 19 articles were included and a total of 1611 patients analyzed. Of these studies, 7 were randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective cohort studies, and 8 retrospective cohort studies. All studies evaluated hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation treatment (WBRT) and/or prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with brain metastases. Hippocampal relapse rates were low (overall effect size = 0.04; 95% confidence interval [0.03, 0.05]) and there was no significant difference in risk of relapse between the five studies that compared HA-WBRT/HA-PCI and WBRT/PCI groups (risk difference = 0.01; 95% confidence interval [- 0.02, 0.03]; p = 0.63). 11 out of 19 studies included neurocognitive function testing. Significant differences were reported in overall cognitive function and memory and verbal learning 3-24 months post-RT. Differences in executive function were reported by one study, Brown et al., at 4 months. No studies reported differences in verbal fluency, visual learning, concentration, processing speed, and psychomotor speed at any timepoint. CONCLUSION: Current studies in HA-WBRT/HA-PCI showed low hippocampal relapse or metastasis rates. Significant differences in neurocognitive testing were most prominent in overall cognitive function, memory, and verbal learning. Studies were hampered by loss to follow-up.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Cranial Irradiation/adverse effects , Cranial Irradiation/methods , Brain Neoplasms/prevention & control , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Hippocampus/pathology
8.
J Clin Neurosci ; 114: 129-130, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37390776

ABSTRACT

Focused ultrasound (FUS) has emerged as a promising area of research in neuro-oncology. Preclinical and clinical investigation has demonstrated the utility of FUS in therapeutic applications including blood brain barrier disruption for therapeutic delivery, and high intensity FUS for tumor ablation. However, FUS as it exists today is relatively invasive as implantable devices are necessary to achieve adequate intracranial penetration. Sonolucent implants, composed of materials permeable to acoustic waves, have been used for cranioplasty and intracranial imaging with ultrasound. Given the overlap in ultrasound parameters with those used for intracranial imaging, and the demonstrated efficacy of sonolucent cranial implants, we believe that therapeutic FUS through sonolucent implants represents a promising avenue of future research. The potential applications of FUS and sonolucent cranial implants may confer the demonstrated therapeutic benefits of existing FUS applications, without the drawbacks and complications of invasive implantable devices. Here we briefly summarize existing evidence regarding sonolucent implants and describe applications for therapeutic FUS.


Subject(s)
Skull , Ultrasonic Therapy , Humans , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Skull/surgery , Blood-Brain Barrier/pathology , Ultrasonography , Ultrasonic Therapy/methods , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , RNA-Binding Protein FUS
9.
J Neurooncol ; 161(3): 617-623, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36745272

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Operative guidelines and use optimization for new surgical exoscopes are not well described in the literature. In this study, we evaluated use of the ORBEYE (Olympus) surgical exoscope system during 5-ALA fluorescence-guided resection of GBMs to optimize workflow and exoscope settings. METHODS: The ORBEYE exoscope system was fitted with a blue light filter for 5-ALA mediated fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS). Intraoperative images were obtained during 5-ALA FGS in 9 patients with primary or recurrent GBM. The exoscope was set up at constant, increasing focal distances from the target tissue, and light source intensity varied. High-resolution 4 K images were captured and analyzed. Comparisons of fluorescence to background were then generated for use optimization. RESULTS: Light intensity did not significantly influence tumor fluorescence (P = 0.878). However, focal distance significantly impacted relative fluorescent intensity (P = 0.007). Maximum average fluorescence was seen consistently at a focal length of 220 mm and a light intensity of approximately 75% maximum. Decreasing focal distance from 400 mm to 220 mm significantly increased visualized fluorescence (P = 0.0038). CONCLUSIONS: The ORBEYE surgical exoscope system with blue light filter is a powerful imaging tool for 5-ALA FGS in GBM. The ORBEYE blue filter performs optimally at shorter focal distance with moderate light intensity. Similar to microscope systems, decreasing focal distance significantly influences visualized fluorescence.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Humans , Glioblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Glioblastoma/surgery , Glioblastoma/pathology , Fluorescence , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Aminolevulinic Acid , Neurosurgical Procedures
10.
J Neurooncol ; 160(3): 669-675, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36370294

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) has demonstrated its utility as an intraoperative imaging adjunct during fluorescence guided resection of malignant gliomas. However, literature regarding 5-ALA-guided resection for brain metastases is limited. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of 5-ALA fluorescence for resection of metastatic brain tumors. METHODS: PubMed was queried for studies involving 5-ALA and brain metastases, and results were screened following PRISMA guidelines. Articles related to 5-ALA and brain metastasis were further assessed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and results were analyzed for 5-ALA fluorescence rates stratified by tumor primary sites and histological subtypes. RESULTS: Of 421 identified search results, 10 studies were included and a total of 631 patients analyzed. Of these studies, 60% were retrospective in design. The reported rates of 5-ALA fluorescence in included brain metastases ranged from 27.6 to 86.9%, with variability across and within tumor types. No studies concluded improved operative outcomes or survival outcomes related to 5-ALA use. CONCLUSIONS: Current studies regarding 5-ALA fluorescence in brain metastases are limited and do not confirm efficacy for improving extent of resection or post-operative survival. Fluorescence is variable across and within tumor types. Further studies are necessary to evaluate whether specific tumors may benefit from 5-ALA FGS or if changes in delivery protocols or fluorescence quantification may affect intraoperative utility.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioma , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Humans , Aminolevulinic Acid , Retrospective Studies , Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Glioma/pathology , Neuronavigation/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods
14.
Brain Spine ; 2: 100929, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36248173

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Modern technologies are increasingly applied in neurosurgical resident training. To date, no data are available regarding how frequently these are used in the training of neurosurgeons, and what the perceived value of this technology is. Research question: The aim was to benchmark the objective as well as subjective experience with modern- and conventional training technologies. Material and methods: The EANS Young Neurosurgeons Committee designed a 12-item survey. It was distributed to neurosurgical residents and board-certified neurosurgeons between 6th of February and April 13, 2022. Results: We considered 543 survey responses for analysis. Most participants (67%) indicated not having gained any training experience with modern technology. Most (40.7%) indicated lack of any modern or conventional training technology. Cadaver training was available to 27.6% while all modern training technology to <10%. Participants from countries with high gross domestic product per capita had more access to modern training technologies (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). The perceived value of the different technologies was highest for hands-on OR training, followed by cadaver lab. The value of these was rated higher, compared to all modern technologies (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Discussion and conclusion: Our survey reveals that cadaver labs are used more frequently than modern technologies for today's neurosurgical training. Hands-on training in the operating room (OR) was rated significantly more valuable than any conventional and modern training technology. Our data hence suggest that while modern technologies are well perceived and can surely add to the training of neurosurgeons, it remains critical to ensure sufficient OR exposure.

15.
J Neurooncol ; 158(3): 489-495, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35648307

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Terminated clinical trials are an inefficient use of financial, patient, and administrative resources. We reviewed ClinicalTrials.gov for completed and terminated clinical trials for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and compared reported characteristics of completed and terminated trials to identify factors associated with early trial termination. METHODS: ClinicalTrials.gov was queried to identify all completed and terminated GBM-related clinical trials. Trial characteristics were examined and the reason for trial termination was determined. Univariate analysis by Pearson's chi-square and a multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify independent predictors of early trial termination. RESULTS: We identified 886 completed and terminated GBM-related trials between 2003 and 2020. Of these, 175 (19.8%) were terminated prior to completion. The most common reason for termination was participant accrual difficulties, accounting for 63 (36.0%) terminated trials. Trial termination was associated with trials that reported a primary purpose of diagnosis relative to treatment (OR = 2.952, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early termination of clinical trials investigating interventions for the treatment of GBM is associated with diagnostic trials relative to therapeutic trials. Patient accrual difficulties are the most commonly identified reason for early trial termination. Predictors of trial termination should be considered when designing GBM-related clinical trials to minimize the odds of early trial termination.


Subject(s)
Glioblastoma , Glioblastoma/therapy , Humans , Logistic Models , Research Design
16.
J Vis Exp ; (183)2022 05 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35604202

ABSTRACT

The present protocol describes a standardized paradigm for rodent brain tumor resection and tissue preservation. In clinical practice, maximal tumor resection is the standard-of-care treatment for most brain tumors. However, most currently available preclinical brain tumor models either do not include resection, or utilize surgical resection models that are time-consuming and lead to significant postoperative morbidity, mortality, or experimental variability. In addition, performing resection in rodents can be daunting for several reasons, including a lack of clinically comparable surgical tools or protocols and the absence of an established platform for standardized tissue collection. This protocol highlights the use of a multi-functional, non-ablative resection device and an integrated tissue preservation system adapted from the clinical version of the device. The device applied in the present study combines tunable suction and a cylindrical blade at the aperture to precisely probe, cut, and suction tissue. The minimally invasive resection device performs its functions via the same burr hole used for the initial tumor implantation. This approach minimizes alterations to regional anatomy during biopsy or resection surgeries and reduces the risk of significant blood loss. These factors significantly reduced the operative time (<2 min/animal), improved postoperative animal survival, lower variability in experimental groups, and result in high viability of resected tissues and cells for future analyses. This process is facilitated by a blade speed of ~1,400 cycles/min, which allows the harvesting of tissues into a sterile closed system that can be filled with a physiologic solution of choice. Given the emerging importance of studying and accurately modeling the impact of surgery, preservation and rigorous comparative analysis of regionalized tumor resection specimens, and intra-cavity-delivered therapeutics, this unique protocol will expand opportunities to explore unanswered questions about perioperative management and therapeutic discovery for brain tumor patients.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Rodentia , Animals , Brain/surgery , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Microsurgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Stereotaxic Techniques
17.
J Craniofac Surg ; 33(6): 1648-1654, 2022 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35245275

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty is critical to cerebral protection and restoring intracranial physiology, yet this procedure is fraught with a high risk of complications. The field of neuroplastic surgery was created to improve skull and scalp reconstruction outcomes in adult neurosurgical patients, with the hypothesis that a multidisciplinary team approach could help decrease complications. OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes from a cohort of cranioplasty surgeries performed by a neuroplastic surgery team using a consistent surgical technique and approach. METHODS: The authors reviewed 500 consecutive adult neuroplastic surgery cranioplasties that were performed between January 2012 and September 2020. Data were abstracted from a prospectively maintained database. Univariate analysis was performed to determine association between demographic, medical, and surgical factors and odds of revision surgery. RESULTS: Patients were followed for an average of 24 months. Overall, there was a reoperation rate of 15.2% (n = 76), with the most frequent complications being infection (7.8%, n = 39), epidural hematoma (2.2%, n = 11), and wound dehiscence (1.8%, n = 9). New onset seizures occurred in 6 (1.2%) patients.Several variables were associated with increased odds of revision surgery, including lower body mass ratio, 2 or more cranial surgeries, presence of hydrocephalus shunts, scalp tissue defects, large-sized skull defect, and autologous bone flaps. importantly, implants with embedded neurotechnology were not associated with increased odds of reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: These results allow for comparison of multiple factors that impact risk of complications after cranioplasty and lay the foundation for development of a cranioplasty risk stratification scheme. Further research in neuroplastic surgery is warranted to examine how designated centers concentrating on adult neuro-cranial reconstruction and multidisciplinary collaboration may lead to improved cranioplasty outcomes and decreased risks of complications in neurosurgical patients.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Adult , Humans , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Skull/surgery
18.
J Craniofac Surg ; 33(6): 1641-1647, 2022 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35288504

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Craniectomies requiring skull reconstruction are indicated following oncological resection of masses involving the underlying brain and/or skull. Immediate cranioplasties have previously been performed using suboptimal hand-bending or molding techniques using "off - the - shelf" products. Today with computer - aided design, customized craniofacial implants have become widely available for personalized reconstruction of resected bone and soft tissue. We present here the largest series to date of single stage reconstruction using alloplastic biomaterials in consecutive patient series with oversized customized implants. METHODS: A single-surgeon, retrospective, 8-year study was conducted on all consecutive patients undergoing single stage cranioplasty with prefabricated implants using a myriad of biomaterials. All outcomes were analyzed in detail and compared with previous studies utilizing similar alloplastic implants. RESULTS: In total, 56 patients underwent resection of skull neoplasms and subsequent cranioplasty reconstruction using customized implants. The most common neoplasms were meningiomas (39%). The most common complications seen among patients were dehiscence - (7%), and extrusion of implant - (3.5%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between patients who had postoperative chemotherapy/radiotherapy versus those that did not (22.2% versus 13.1%, P = 0.39). One-year follow-up revealed acceptable cranial contour and symmetry in all 56 cases. CONCLUSIONS: This is a consecutive case series of prefabricated single-stage cranioplasty, following resection of brain tumors with bone extension or skull bone neoplasm, demonstrating excellent results with regards to safety and patient satisfaction. There are several advantages such as comprehensive resection and reconstruction plan using 3D models, shorter operative time, and better restoration of complex anatomy.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Skull Neoplasms , Biocompatible Materials , Humans , Prostheses and Implants , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Skull/surgery , Skull Neoplasms/surgery
19.
World Neurosurg ; 150: 42-53, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33771750

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracerebral hematoma (ICH) is a common disease with a dismal overall prognosis. Recent development of minimally invasive ICH evacuation techniques has shown promising results. Commercially available tubular retractors are commonly used for minimally invasive ICH evacuation yet are globally unavailable. METHODS: A novel U.S. $7 cost-effective, off-the-shelf, atraumatic tubular retractor for minimally invasive intracranial surgery is described. Patients with acute spontaneous ICH underwent microsurgical tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive ICH evacuation using the novel retractor. Patient outcome was retrospectively analyzed and compared with open surgery and with commercial tubular retractors. RESULTS: Ten adult patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH and median preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale score of 10 were included. ICH involved the frontal lobe, parietal lobe, occipitotemporal region, and solely basal ganglia in 3, 3, 2, and 2 patients, respectively. Mean preoperative ICH volume was 80 mL. Mean residual hematoma volume was 8.7 mL and mean volumetric hematoma reduction was 91% (median, 94%). Seven patients (70%) underwent >90% volumetric hematoma reduction. The total median length of hospitalization was 26 days. On discharge, the median Glasgow Coma Scale score was 12.5 (mean, 11.7). Thirty to 90 days' follow-up data were available for 9 patients (90%). The mean follow-up modified Rankin Scale score was 3.7 and 5 patients (56%) had a modified Rankin Scale score of 3. CONCLUSIONS: The novel cost-effective tubular retractor and microsurgical technique offer a safe and effective method for minimally invasive ICH evacuation. Cost-effective tubular retractors may continue to present a valid alternative to commercial tubular retractors.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Hemorrhage/surgery , Hematoma/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/instrumentation , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Aged , Cerebral Hemorrhage/complications , Craniotomy/methods , Female , Hematoma/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/economics , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/economics , Treatment Outcome
20.
World Neurosurg ; 138: e381-e388, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32145412

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The necessity and timing of early postoperative imaging (POI) are debated in many studies. Despite the consensus that early POI does not change patient management, these examinations are routinely performed. This is the first prospective study related to POI. Our aims were to assess the necessity of early POI in asymptomatic patients and to verify accuracy of the presented algorithm. METHODS: This was an algorithm-based prospective single-center study. The algorithm addressed preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative considerations, including estimated pathology type, device placement, and postoperative neurologic change. Early computed tomography scans were obtained in all patients, but if postoperative algorithm indications did not recommend a scan, the treating team was blinded to them, and patient management was conducted based on clinical examinations alone. A neuroradiologist and study-independent neurosurgeon reviewed all the scans. RESULTS: Of 103 enrolled patients, 88 remained asymptomatic, and 15 experienced symptoms postoperatively. Pathology was present on POI in 1% of the asymptomatic patients and 53% of the symptomatic patients (P < 0.001). In the asymptomatic group, no treatment modifications were made postoperatively. Blinding of the surgical team was not removed, and 20% of the symptomatic patients returned to the operating room because of imaging and neurologic findings. The goal of <5% algorithm failure was reached with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic postoperative patients in whom early imaging is not performed for oncologic indications, device placement verification, or similar reasons, POI is unnecessary and does not change the management of these patients.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Craniotomy/methods , Neuroimaging , Postoperative Care , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...