Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
Endoscopy ; 45(1): 35-41, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23136012

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Uncovered self-expanding metal stents offer effective relief for colonic obstruction. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMSs) in the treatment of benign colonic strictures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients presenting with a symptomatic benign colonic stricture (occlusion or subocclusion) during a 6-year study period were treated with FCSEMSs. The stents were placed and removed 4 - 6 weeks later at one of 10 endoscopy centers. The efficacy of the stent (clinical and radiological signs of colonic decompression within 48 hours), technical success, stent retrieval, safety, and recurrence of symptoms were evaluated during follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with clinical success, stent migration, and symptom recurrence. RESULTS: The study included 43 patients (24 men, 19 women; mean age 67.6 ± 10.4) with occlusive (n = 18) or subocclusive symptoms (n = 25) due to anastomotic (n = 40), post-ischemic (n = 2), or post-radiation (n = 1) strictures. Insertion was successful in all patients. Clinical success was obtained in 35 patients (81 %). Migration was observed in 27 patients (63 %). The median duration of stenting was 21 days (95 %CI 17.8 - 35.4 days). Multivariate analysis showed that stents more than 20 mm wide migrated significantly less often. Recurrence of obstructive symptoms was observed in 23 patients (53 %), irrespective of migration. No predictive factors for recurrence or clinical efficacy were found. CONCLUSIONS: FCSEMSs for treatment of symptomatic benign colonic strictures are safe and effective, despite a high rate of spontaneous migration.


Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases/therapy , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Intestinal Obstruction/therapy , Stents , Aged , Device Removal , Female , Foreign-Body Migration , Humans , Male , Metals , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
2.
Endoscopy ; 44(10): 911-6, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22893133

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In France, in about 5% of cases colonoscopies are incomplete or temporarily contraindicated.We tested the diagnostic yield of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, in 17 French centers, inclusion criteria were colonoscopy failure or general disease that excluded colonoscopy with anesthesia. Patients underwent CCE using the first-generation PillCam Colon capsule. The main end point was CCE diagnostic yield, defined as identification of a colorectal lesion that directly explained symptoms or necessitated a diagnostic or therapeutic examination. A secondary objective was to test a simplified Movi-Prep colon cleansing. Follow-up to identify missed symptomatic cancer was scheduled. RESULTS: CCE showed positive findings in 36 patients (diagnostic yield 33.6 %), among whom 23 subsequently underwent therapeutic intervention. Among 64 patients with negative capsule findings, 9 had a complementary procedure showing adenomas in only 1 case. CCE was incomplete in 7/107 patients. Colonoscopy was done in one patient to retrieve a capsule retained in the left colon, and sigmoidoscopy in 11 because the rectum was not reached. No colorectal cancer was diagnosed during the follow-up period. Colon cleansing with MoviPrep was rated good or excellent in 75.9% of cases. CONCLUSION: This study shows the feasibility and the usefulness of CCE in the situation of colonoscopy failure or contraindication. The colon capsule modality should be tested against other available approaches, such as virtual colonoscopy or repeat colonoscopy by an expert.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Capsule Endoscopy , Colonoscopy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Contraindications , Feasibility Studies , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Failure
3.
Endoscopy ; 44(4): 337-42, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22389234

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patients with obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding (OOGIB) are defined by overt hemorrhage and negative upper and lower endoscopy findings. At present, the place of emergency capsule enteroscopy in patients with severe OOGIB is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield and the impact of emergency capsule enteroscopy on further management in patients with severe OOGIB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2010, we retrospectively included all patients with severe OOGIB who underwent emergency capsule enteroscopy in the 24-48 h following negative urgent upper and lower endoscopy. Severe OOGIB was defined by ongoing bleeding with hemodynamic instability and/or the need for significant red blood cell transfusion. RESULTS: Out of 5744 patients hospitalized in our Gastrointestinal Bleeding Unit, 55 (1%) presented with severe OOGIB and underwent emergency capsule enteroscopy. Capsule enteroscopy showed blood in 41 patients (75%) and lesions in 37 patients (67%). Findings included small bowel angiodysplasia in 19 patients (35%), ulcers in 7 (13%), tumors in 5 (9%), small-bowel varices in 2 (3%), cecum angiodysplasia in 4 (7%), fresh blood in small bowel without identified lesion in 12 (22%). Specific diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were undertaken in 78 % of patients. Further management included endoscopy (54%), surgery (22%), and radiology (2%). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency capsule enteroscopy identified bleeding lesions in 67 % of patients with severe OOGIB. Emergency capsule enteroscopy seems to be a promising diagnostic tool with a subsequent impact on clinical management in patients with severe OOGIB.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopes , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Intestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Stomach Ulcer/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiodysplasia/complications , Angiodysplasia/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Emergencies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/complications , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans , Intestinal Diseases/therapy , Intestinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Intestine, Small , Male , Meckel Diverticulum/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Ulcer/complications , Stomach Ulcer/therapy
4.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol ; 34(11): 606-11, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20822872

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is an effective method for investigating the small bowel, especially in cases of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), although the long-term outcome of patients with a negative CE is generally not known. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For 49 patients with OGIB and a negative CE, their referring physicians filled out a follow-up questionnaire to assess bleeding recurrence and any repeat investigations after negative video capsule endoscopy (VCE). RESULTS: A minimum follow-up duration of one year (median: 15.9 months) was available for 35 patients with an overall rebleeding rate of 23% (n=8). Of these eight patients, four women presented with recurrence prior to new investigations. In the four remaining patients, repeat endoscopy work-ups after negative CE were performed and revealed previously missed lesions with bleeding potential, mainly in the stomach. Overall, 13 patients, with or without rebleeding, had repeat endoscopy work-ups after a negative CE, leading to a definitive diagnosis in nine patients, with lesions located in the stomach and colon in eight of them. CONCLUSION: Patients with OGIB and a negative CE had a low rate of rebleeding. This study highlights the importance of the initial endoscopy work-up, and suggests that CE be proposed after a minimum of two gastroscopies and one complete colonoscopy.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Intestinal Diseases/complications , Intestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Humans , Intestinal Diseases/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Occult Blood , Predictive Value of Tests , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Endoscopy ; 42(2): 93-7, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20140825

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: A video capsule similar to that used in small-bowel capsule endoscopy is now available for esophageal exploration. The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of upper endoscopy (esophageal gastroduodenoscopy [EGE]) with esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) in patients at risk of esophageal squamous cell cancer (SCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 68 patients at risk of SCC secondary to a history of head and neck neoplasia were included in this comparison of techniques for detecting SCC and dysplasia. ECE was done using the first generation Pillcam ESO and EGE was performed in accordance with the usual practice of each center, followed by examination with 2 % Lugol staining and biopsy of unstained areas (39 neoplasia comprising 5 low grade dysplasia, 8 high grade dysplasia and 26 SCC). RESULTS: Compared with EGE with and without Lugol staining, the sensitivities of ECE for neoplasia diagnosis were 46 % and 54 %, respectively. On a per-patient basis, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of ECE were 63 %, 86 %, 77 % and 76 %, respectively, compared with EGE without staining, and 61 %, 86 %, 77 % and 73 % compared with EGE with iodine staining. Neither the ECE transit time nor the distance between the esopharyngeal line and the neoplastic lesion differed between the 21 false-negative and 18 true-positive cases diagnosed by ECE; the only difference was a smaller median diameter among false negatives ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a cohort at high risk for esophageal SCC, ECE is not sensitive enough to diagnose neoplastic lesions.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy/methods , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 30(4): 399-405, 2009 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19485979

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mallory-Weiss syndrome (MWS) with active bleeding at endoscopy may require endoscopic haemostasis the modalities of which are not well-defined. AIM: To compare the efficacy of endoscopic band ligation vs. hemoclip plus epinephrine (adrenaline) in bleeding MWS. METHODS: From 2001 to 2008, 218 consecutive patients with a MWS at endoscopy were hospitalized in our Gastrointestinal Bleeding Unit. In 56 patients (26%), an endoscopic haemostasis was required because of active bleeding. Band ligation was performed in 29 patients (Banding group), while hemoclip application plus epinephrine injection was performed in 27 patients (H&E group). Treatment efficacy and early recurrent bleeding were retrospectively compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Primary endoscopic haemostasis was achieved in all patients. Recurrent bleeding occurred in 0% in Banding group vs. 18% in H&E group (P = 0.02). The use of hemoclips plus epinephrine (OR = 3; 95% CI = 1.15-15.8) and active bleeding at endoscopy (OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.04-5.2) were independent predictive factors of early recurrent bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Haemostasis by hemoclips plus epinephrine was an independent predictive factor of rebleeding. This result suggests that band ligation could be the first choice endoscopic treatment for bleeding MWS, but requires further prospective assessment.


Subject(s)
Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Hemostasis, Endoscopic/methods , Mallory-Weiss Syndrome/therapy , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Female , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemostasis, Endoscopic/standards , Humans , Ligation , Male , Mallory-Weiss Syndrome/complications , Middle Aged , Surgical Instruments , Treatment Outcome
7.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 104(5): 1112-8, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19337246

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the standard method for the diagnosis of esophago-gastric varices. The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the PillCam esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) for this indication. METHODS: Patients presenting with cirrhotic or noncirrhotic portal hypertension underwent ECEfollowed by EGD at the time of diagnosis. Capsule recordings were blindly read by two endoscopists. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (72 males, mean age: 58 years; mean Child-Pugh score: 7.2) were included. Esophageal varices were detected in 74 patients. No adverse event was observed after either EGD or ECE. Seven (6%) patients were unable to swallow the capsule. The mean recording time was 204 s (range 1-876). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of ECE for the detection of esophageal varices were 77%, 86%, 69%, and 90%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of ECE for the indication of primary prophylaxis (esophageal varices > or = grade 2 and/or red signs) were 77, 88, 90, and 75%, respectively, and 85% of the patients were adequately classified for the indication (or not) of prophylaxis. Interobserver concordance for ECE readings was 79.4% for the diagnosis of varices, 66.4% for the grading of varices, and 89.7% for the indication of prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: This large multicenter study confirms the safety and acceptable accuracy of ECE for the evaluation of esophageal varices. ECE might be proposed as an alternative to EGD for the screening of portal hypertension, especially in patients unable or unwilling to undergo EGD.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopy/methods , Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/diagnosis , Hypertension, Portal/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/etiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Hypertension, Portal/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Patient Satisfaction , Probability , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Safety , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method
9.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 25(8): 955-63, 2007 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17403000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Double stenting of oesophagus and airways may be required in palliative treatment of patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer. AIM: To assess feasibility, efficacy and complications occurring in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer receiving both oesophagus and airways stenting. METHODS: In one single centre between 1997 and 2005, among 180 patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer treated by the palliative placement of a self-expanding metal stent, patients requiring double stenting of oesophagus and airways were identified. Clinical efficacy, complications and survival were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (8.3% of 180) required a double stenting at follow-up. Symptomatic efficacy of oesophagus and airways stenting was 86.7% for dysphagia and 100% for dyspnoea. Median survival after the second stent insertion was 99 days. Life-threatening early complications occurred in three patients after double stenting (20%), including two deaths following oesophageal perforation and massive haemoptysis, respectively. Procedure-related mortality was 13.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Double stenting of oesophagus and airways is feasible in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer, with a relevant clinical efficacy. However, early major complications including procedure-related death may occur in as many as 20% of patients. This treatment should be reserved to very selected patients with severe symptoms and end-stage disease.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Palliative Care/methods , Stents/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Deglutition Disorders/prevention & control , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Palliative Care/standards , Stents/standards , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
10.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 23(12): 1693-702, 2006 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16817912

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Self-expanding metal stents are used routinely to palliate dysphagia due to oesophageal cancer. STUDY AIM: To compare the frequency of life-threatening complications after self-expanding metal stent insertion, depending on whether patients received prior chemoradiotherapy or no treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 7 years, 116 consecutive patients were treated at a single centre in a palliative intent by insertion of self-expanding metal stent for dysphagia due to an oesophageal cancer. Patients were retrospectively separated into two groups: patients with chemoradiotherapy before self-expanding metal stent insertion (group 1, n = 56) and patients with no treatment before or after self-expanding metal stent insertion (group 2, n = 60). Life-threatening complications were compared and predictive risk factors of postprocedure complications were identified. RESULTS: Median dysphagia was significantly improved during the first month (grade 3 to grade 1 in the two groups). Early and late major complications occurred more frequently in group 1 (23.2% vs. 3.3%; P < 0.002 and 21.6% vs. 5.1%; P < 0.02 respectively). Prior chemoradiotherapy was the only independent predictive factor of postprocedure major complications, with an odds ratio of 5.59 (CI 95% 1.7-18.1). CONCLUSIONS: Life-threatening complications after palliative self-expanding metal stent placement seem to occur more frequently in patients with prior chemoradiotherapy. Prevention of these severe complications should be considered before stenting.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Stents , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
12.
Gut ; 55(7): 978-83, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16401689

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Following ileocolonic resection for Crohn's disease (CD), early endoscopic recurrence predicts recurrence of symptoms. The aim of the study was to compare ileocolonoscopy and wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) for the detection of postoperative recurrence in CD. METHODS: WCE and ileocolonoscopy were performed within six months following surgery in 32 prospectively enrolled patients. Two independent observers interpreted the results of WCE. Recurrence in the neoterminal ileum was defined by a Rutgeerts score>or=1. When observers at WCE did not concur, WCE results were considered as either true negative or true positive and sensitivity and specificity were calculated according to both assumptions. RESULTS: Recurrence occurred in 21 patients (68%) and was detected by ileocolonoscopy in 19 patients. Sensitivity was 90% and specificity 100%. Sensitivity of WCE was 62% and 76% and specificity was 100% and 90%, respectively, depending on assumptions. There was a correlation between the severity of the lesions measured by both methods (p<0.05). Lesions located outside the scope of conventional endoscopy were detected by WCE in two thirds of patients with excellent interobserver agreement (kappa>0.9) for all lesions with the exception of ulceration (kappa=0.7). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of WCE in detecting recurrence in the neoterminal ileum was inferior to that of ileocolonoscopy. In contrast, WCE detected lesions outside the scope of ileocolonoscopy in more than two thirds of patients. Additional follow up studies are needed to assess the clinical relevance of such lesions. At the present time, it seems that WCE cannot systematically replace ileocolonoscopy in the regular management of patients after surgery.


Subject(s)
Colon/pathology , Colonoscopy/methods , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Ileum/pathology , Adult , Aged , Capsules , Colon/surgery , Crohn Disease/surgery , Female , Humans , Ileum/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Sensitivity and Specificity
13.
Endoscopy ; 37(9): 801-7, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16116529

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: The main complication of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is the blocking of the capsule by a gastrointestinal stenosis. The "patency capsule" is a self-dissolving capsule that is the same size as the video capsule. It contains a radiofrequency identification (RFID) tag that allows it to be detected by a scanning device placed on the abdominal wall. When its passage is blocked by a stenosis, the patency capsule dissolves in 40-80 hours after ingestion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of this system in patients with suspected intestinal stenosis but also requiring VCE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 22 patients (16 men; 46 +/- 18 years; 15 with diagnosed or suspected Crohn's disease, two with suspected intestinal tumor, and two on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) were first investigated with an abdominal CT plus enteroclysis (entero-CT, n = 15) or a small-bowel follow-through (SBFT, n = 7). The patency capsule was then administered at around 09.00 to fasting patients. The presence of the patency capsule in the digestive tract was assessed 30 hours later using the hand-held scanner. When the patency capsule was detected, a plain abdominal film was obtained, and this was repeated every 24 hours until capsule expulsion. RESULTS: At 30 hours after ingestion, the patency capsule was detected in 17 patients (72.3 %): in the area of the small intestine (n = 6) and in the colon (n = 11). In all the patients in whom the capsule was blocked in the small intestine, the stenosis had been suspected on CT or SBFT. In three patients, the delay in progression of the patency capsule led to cancellation of the VCE procedure. In three patients, the patency capsule induced a symptomatic intestinal occlusion, which resolved spontaneously in one and required emergency surgery in two. Although these two patients would have been obliged to undergo operation for their primary disease in any case, the procedure had to be brought forward. In one patient, the capsule passed through the stenosis without symptoms. All patients in whom the progression of the patency capsule was delayed had an established or suspected diagnosis of Crohn's disease. CONCLUSIONS: The current technical development of the patency capsule limits its use in clinical practice, as it did not detect stenoses undiagnosed by CT or SBFT. The start of dissolution at 40 hours after ingestion is too slow to prevent episodes of intestinal occlusion. Patients with Crohn's disease are most likely to be at risk of blockage of progression of the capsule and should benefit from a CT investigation before VCE. However, a careful interview eliciting the patient's medical history and symptoms remains the most useful indicator with regard to suspicion of an intestinal stenosis.


Subject(s)
Capsules , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Constriction, Pathologic , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Female , Humans , Intestinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
14.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 16(12): 1315-8, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15618838

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We evaluate prospectively effectiveness, tolerance, predictive factors of failure and complications of argon plasma coagulation (APC) in the treatment of hemorrhagic radiation proctitis (HRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were treated by APC for HRP. Eight patients needed blood transfusion before APC. Six patients were anti-coagulated and one had severe thrombocytopenia. APC was performed without sedation in 25/27 patients. Before APC treatment, bowel preparation was performed by enema (n = 19 sessions), polyethylene glycol or sodium phosphate (n = 53 sessions). APC treatment was performed every 5 weeks. Effectiveness of APC was based on clinical and endoscopic score and biological status before and after APC treatment. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 13.6 months (range, 3-31 months). After one to seven sessions of APC (average, 2.66 sessions), twenty-five patients (92%) had no recurrence of bleeding. The bleeding score decreased from 3.03 to 0.42 (P < 0.001) and the endoscopic score from 3.08 to 0.73 (P < 0.001). Out of the eight patients requiring blood transfusion prior to APC sessions, only one required blood transfusion after APC (P < 0.05). One late relapse was observed and successfully re-treated by APC. Side effects were anal or rectal pain (n = 3) and vagal symptoms (n = 2). Three colonic explosions occurred, with perforation leading to surgery in one case. The incidence of bowel explosion was higher after local preparation (3/19 sessions) compared with oral preparation (0/53 sessions) (P < 0.05). No stricture due to APC appeared, even if telangiectasias coagulated during a session were circumferential. CONCLUSION: Coagulation by APC is an effective and safe treatment of HRP if a complete cleansing preparation is performed to avoid explosion.


Subject(s)
Electrocoagulation/methods , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/surgery , Proctitis/surgery , Radiation Injuries/surgery , Administration, Oral , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Argon , Blood Transfusion , Cathartics/administration & dosage , Colon/radiation effects , Electrocoagulation/adverse effects , Enema/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Phosphates/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Proctitis/etiology , Prospective Studies , Radiation Injuries/complications , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Solvents/administration & dosage
15.
Endoscopy ; 35(3): 223-5; discussion 225, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12584641

ABSTRACT

Delayed transpyloric impaction is a very rare complication of esophageal metallic stent placement. Authors report different endoscopic removal techniques, but none of these has been validated yet because of their variable success, time-consuming nature, and risk of perforation and hemorrhage. We report that a "wait-and-see" approach is a safe and effective policy in patients with permeable transpyloric impacted esophageal stents.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Foreign-Body Migration/diagnostic imaging , Stents , Aged , Esophageal Stenosis/therapy , Humans , Male , Metals , Palliative Care , Radiography , Time Factors
16.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol ; 25(5): 463-7, 2001 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11521099

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Several endoscopic procedures have been used to avoid a colostomy in palliative treatment of occlusive colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate in intent to treat the long term effectiveness and safety of self-expanding metal stents as a palliative treatment in patients with neoplastic colonic obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1997 to June 2000, seventeen patients were treated with 21 colonic stents. Sites of obstruction were high rectum in 3, sigmoid in 11 and left colon in 3. RESULTS: Stent placement was successful in 16/17 patients (94%). Relief of bowel obstruction occurred in 13 patients (74%) in the first 48 hours. Expandable metal stent achieved an effective bowel transit until death in 9 of the 17 patients (53%). Clinical complications occurred in 6 patients (35%): 2 perforations, 2 migrations, 1 rectal bleeding and 1 dislocation of the stent. Subsequent colostomy was done in 5 patients. CONCLUSION: Colonic stenting is an alternative palliative treatment in malignant colorectal stricture. However, morbidity and need for subsequent colostomy should be taken into account.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/complications , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/complications , Stents , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colostomy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Stents/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...