Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Food Chem ; 196: 76-82, 2016 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26593467

ABSTRACT

The influence of intramuscular fat content (high - HI versus low - LI) and fatty acid composition on pork cooked cured ham flavour was analysed by gas chromatography-olfactometry using nasal impact frequency (GC-O/NIF) and quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA). Potential relationships were studied by principal component analysis (PCA). Sixteen and fourteen odourants were identified by GC-O/NIF in LI and HI cooked hams, respectively. The two ham types differed in lipid oxidation odourants: polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) derivatives hexanal, 1-octen-3-one and (E,E)-2,4-decadienal were higher in LI ham; while monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) derivative decanal was higher in HI. HI samples resulted in higher values for odour-active aroma compounds from Maillard reaction, which are related to roast flavour and a higher overall flavour liking. In summary, our results suggest that Maillard derived odour-active aroma compounds were partially inhibited in LI samples (high in PUFA), resulting in lower positive sensory ratings.


Subject(s)
Fatty Acids, Unsaturated/chemistry , Red Meat/analysis , Animals , Cooking , Fatty Acids, Unsaturated/analysis , Female , Maillard Reaction , Odorants/analysis , Swine
2.
Food Chem ; 185: 75-83, 2015 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25952843

ABSTRACT

The purpose of our research was to optimise the extraction conditions of the stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) targeting the identification of lipid compounds particularly medium and long-chain free fatty acids in cooked cured pork ham exudates. The analytical conditions of extraction (including sample volume, extraction time, stirring speed, pH and dilution of the sample) were checked using the Simplex method approach. As a result of the SBSE optimisation, improved detection limits and linear ranges for hexanoic, heptanoic, octanoic, nonanoic, decanoic, dodecanoic and tetradecanoic fatty acids were obtained. When comparing results with those obtained by the commonly used SPME methodology, optimisation of SBSE achieved better results for volatile compounds of low volatility, such as medium and long-chain free fatty acids, whereas compounds with high volatility and polarity were only detected by SPME. SBSE also confirmed its potential as a tool to help identify undesirable contaminants/residues in meat products.


Subject(s)
Chemical Fractionation/methods , Fatty Acids, Nonesterified/analysis , Food Analysis/methods , Meat Products/analysis , Calibration , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Limit of Detection , Linear Models , Odorants/analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Solid Phase Extraction/methods , Volatilization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL