Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Genomics ; 114(3): 110361, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35378242

ABSTRACT

Deciphering the molecular architecture of coat coloration for a better understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying pigmentation still remains a challenge. We took advantage of a rabbit French experimental population in which both a pattern and a gradient of coloration from white to brown segregated within the himalayan phenotype. The whole experimental design was genotyped using the high density Affymetrix® AxiomOrcun™ SNP Array and phenotyped into 6 different groups ordered from the lighter to the darker. Genome-wide association analyses pinpointed an oligogenic determinism, under recessive and additive inheritance, involving genes already known in melanogenesis (ASIP, KIT, MC1R, TYR), and likely processed pseudogenes linked to ribosomal function, RPS20 and RPS14. We also identified (i) gene-gene interactions through ASIP:MC1R affecting light cream/beige phenotypes while KIT:RPS responsible of dark chocolate/brown colors and (ii) a genome-wide epistatic network involving several others coloration genes such as POT1 or HPS5. Finally, we determined the recessive inheritance of the English spotting phenotype likely involving a copy number variation affecting at least the end of the coding sequence of the KIT gene. Our analyses of coloration as a continuous trait allowed us to go beyond much of the established knowledge through the detection of additional genes and gene-gene interactions that may contribute to the molecular architecture of the coloration phenotype.


Subject(s)
DNA Copy Number Variations , Genome-Wide Association Study , Animals , Rabbits , Agouti Signaling Protein/genetics , Pigmentation/genetics , Phenotype , Extremities
2.
J Anim Breed Genet ; 136(3): 168-173, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30687950

ABSTRACT

The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the significance of neonatal environment on feed efficiency. For that purpose, rabbits from a line selected for residual feed intake (RFI) during 10 generations (G10 kits) were cross-fostered with non-selected control does (i.e., G0 line), and reciprocally. In parallel, sibs were fostered by mothers from their original line. Nine hundred animals were raised in individual (N = 456) or collective (N = 320) cages. Traits analysed in this study were body weight at 32 days and at 63 days, average daily gain (ADG), feed intake between weaning and 63 days (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and RFI. The maternal environment offered by does from the line selected for RFI deteriorated the FCR of the kits, independently of their line of origin, during fattening (+0.08 ± 0.02) compared to FCR of kits nursed by G0 does. The line, the type of housing and the batch were significant effects for all the measured traits: G10 kits were lighter than their G0 counterparts at 32 days (-82.9 ± 9 g, p < 0.0001) and at 63 days (-161 ± 16 g, p < 0.0001). They also had a lower ADG (-2.36 ± 0.36 g/day, p < 0.0001), RFI (-521 ± 24 g/day, p < 0.0001) and a lower FI (-855 ± 31 g, p < 0.0001), resulting in a more desirable feed efficiency (FCR: -0.35 ± 0.02). There was no significant difference in the contrast of G10 and G0 performances between collective and individual/digestive cages (p > 0.22): -2.35 g/day versus 2.94 g/day for ADG, -0.39 versus -0.40 for FCR, -577 g versus -565 g for RFI and -879 g versus -859 g for FI, respectively). Thus, no genotype-by-environment (housing) interaction is expected at the commercial level, that is, no re-ranking of the animals due to collective housing.


Subject(s)
Body Weight/genetics , Breeding , Maternal Inheritance/genetics , Weight Gain/genetics , Animal Feed , Animals , Eating/genetics , Genotype , Meat , Phenotype , Rabbits
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...