Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 91(1): 22-29, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38515234

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, increased hand hygiene practices were implemented. Impaired skin health on the hands among healthcare workers has been reported previously. Knowledge of how worker in other occupations have been affected is scarce. OBJECTIVES: To investigate self-reported hand water-, and soap exposure and use of hand disinfectants, and hand eczema (HE) in frontline workers outside the hospital setting and in IT personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a questionnaire was sent out between 1 March and 30 April in 2021, to 6060 randomly selected individuals representing six occupational groups. RESULTS: A significant increase in water exposure and hand disinfectant use was shown: Relative position (RP) 19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.21 and RP = 0.38: 95% CI 0.36-0.41, respectively. Newly debuted HE was reported by 7.4% of the population, more frequently among frontline workers (8.6%) compared to IT personnel (4.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Water and soap exposure and use of hand disinfectants increased during COVID-19 pandemic, which may increase the risk of hand eczema. This highlights the importance of communication and implementation of preventive measures to protect the skin barrier also in occupations other than healthcare workers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis, Occupational , Eczema , Hand Dermatoses , Hand Disinfection , Self Report , Soaps , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Soaps/adverse effects , Male , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Female , Adult , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Eczema/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Water , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Disinfectants/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Hand Hygiene
2.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 21, 2024 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38182992

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Liver disorders are important adverse effects associated with antifungal drug treatment. However, the accuracy of Clinical International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes in identifying liver disorders for register based research is not well-established. This study aimed to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of the ICD-10 codes for identifying patients with toxic liver disease, hepatic failure, and jaundice among patients with systemic antifungal treatment. METHODS: Data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and the National Patient Register were utilized to identify adult patients who received systemic azole antifungal drugs and had a recorded diagnosis of toxic liver disease (K71.0, K71.1, K71.2, K71.6, K71.8, K71.9), hepatic failure (K72.0, K72.9), or jaundice (R17) between 2005 and 2016. The medical records of all included patients were reviewed. Prespecified criteria were used to re-evaluate and confirm each diagnosis, serving as the gold standard to calculate PPVs with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for each diagnostic group. RESULTS: Among the 115 included patients, 26 were diagnosed with toxic liver disease, 58 with hepatic failure, and 31 with jaundice. Toxic liver disease was confirmed in 14 out of 26 patients, yielding a PPV of 53.8% (95% CI 33.4-73.4%). Hepatic failure was confirmed in 26 out of 38 patients, resulting in a PPV of 62.1% (95% CI 48.4-74.5%). The highest PPV was found in jaundice, with 30 confirmed diagnoses out of 31, yielding a PPV of 96.8% (95% CI 83.3-99.9%). CONCLUSION: Among patients who received azole antifungal treatment and were subsequently diagnosed with a liver disorder, the PPV for the diagnosis of jaundice was high, while the PPVs for toxic liver disease and hepatic failure were lower.


Subject(s)
Jaundice , Liver Diseases , Liver Failure , Adult , Humans , Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Sweden , Azoles/adverse effects , Liver Diseases/diagnosis , Liver Failure/diagnosis , Liver Failure/epidemiology
3.
PLoS One ; 13(9): e0204456, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30260993

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the use of antimuscarinic drugs to treat overactive bladder (OAB) in Denmark, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (UK). METHODS: We identified new users of darifenacin, fesoterodine, oxybutynin, solifenacin, tolterodine, and trospium aged 18 years or older from the Danish National Registers (2004-2012), the Swedish National Registers (2006-2012), and UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2004-2012). Users were followed until disenrollment, cancer diagnosis, death, or study end. Treatment episodes, identified by linking consecutive prescriptions, were described with respect to duration, drug switch, and drug add-on. RESULTS: Mean age of OAB drug users was 66 years in Denmark (n = 72,917) and Sweden (n = 130,944), and 62 years in the UK (n = 119,912); 60% of Danish and Swedish patients and 70% of UK patients were female. In Denmark, of 224,680 treatment episodes, 39% were with solifenacin, and 35% with tolterodine; 2% were with oxybutynin. In Sweden, of 240,141 therapy episodes, 37% were with tolterodine and 35% with solifenacin; 5% were with oxybutynin. In the UK, of 245,800 treatment episodes, 28% were with oxybutynin, 27% with solifenacin, and 26% with tolterodine. In the three countries, 49%-52% of treatment episodes comprised one prescription and over 80% of episodes ended because of no refill; less than 20% ended because of a switch to another antimuscarinic. During the study years, we observed a change in OAB treatment preference from tolterodine to solifenacin. CONCLUSIONS: In these cohorts, persistence with antimuscarinic drugs was low. By 2012, the preferred drug was solifenacin; oxybutynin use was marginal in Nordic countries compared with the UK.


Subject(s)
Muscarinic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/drug therapy , Aged , Cohort Studies , Denmark , Drug Substitution , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Sweden , United Kingdom , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/epidemiology
4.
Clin Epidemiol ; 10: 705-715, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29950900

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Association between psoriasis severity and cerebro- and cardiovascular comorbidities has rarely been investigated. AIM: We aimed to investigate differences in cerebro- and cardiovascular comorbidities by psoriasis severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using Swedish nationwide health-care registers, new adult users of anti-psoriatic drugs (2007-2013) with a recorded diagnosis of psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis or a filled prescription for calcipotriol were included. Psoriasis severity was based on the type of anti-psoriatic treatment (topical/mild, non-biologic systemic/moderate-to-severe, and biologics/ severe). Age standardized prevalence rates of cerebro- and cardiovascular comorbidities and their risk factors were compared between the groups. RESULTS: We found that severe psoriasis patients (N=2147) were younger than moderate-to-severe (N=11,919) or mild (N=70,796) patients (median 44, 52, and 55 years). Prevalence of hypertension was 29.9%, 32.6%, and 36.5%, myocardial infarction was 2.5%, 2.3%, and 1.8%, and stroke was 2.4%, 2.2%, and 1.1% in mild, moderate-to-severe, and severe psoriasis patients, respectively. Diabetes prevalence was 7.6% in mild, 8.0% in moderate-to-severe, and 10.7% in severe psoriasis. CONCLUSION: Myocardial infarction and stroke were less common in patients with severe psoriasis while, despite being younger, they had a higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...