Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 26
Filter
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(9): 5391-5402, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37537518

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Rectangular collimation is a popular method used in intraoral radiography to reduce patient exposure to ionizing radiation. One of the perceived drawbacks of rectangular collimation is the possibility of an increase in cone cut errors ultimately impacting the diagnostic value of the radiographs. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the frequency of cone cut errors in radiographs taken using a rectangular collimator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographs taken using PSP plates at Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam in the Netherlands by staff and students from January to December 2015 were assessed for cone cut errors. The radiographs were grouped as bitewings, front teeth, inferior premolars and molars, and superior premolars and molars and categorized as no cone cut, cone cut but diagnostically usable, and cone cut but diagnostically not usable. The results were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 53,684 radiographs were assessed, 79% had no cone cut errors and consequently 21% had some degree of cone cut. However, the diagnostic value was unaffected in 18% of the radiographs with cone cut. Only 3% of the radiographs were deemed diagnostically unusable due to cone cut. The most common area of cone cut was in the premolar and molar areas while cone cut in the front teeth was least likely to be diagnostically unusable. CONCLUSION: Cone cut from the use of a rectangular collimator does not seem to result in an increase of diagnostically unusable radiographs. Thus, rectangular collimation should be preferred as it decreases the amount of radiation exposure to the patient while producing diagnostically usable radiographs and thus allowing the dental professional to adhere to the ALADA principle and practice radiation stewardship. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Scientific rationale for the study: rectangular collimation is a method used to reduce patient exposure to ionizing radiation; however, this benefit is negligible if radiographs must be retaken due to cone cut errors that make the radiograph diagnostically unusable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the frequency of cone cut in radiographs taken using a rectangular collimator. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: cone cut was observed in 21% of the radiographs; however, only 3% of the radiographs were considered diagnostically unusable. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: rectangular collimation does not result in a high number of diagnostically unusable radiographs and should be used to reduce patient exposure to ionizing radiation.


Subject(s)
Radiation Exposure , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Radiography , Netherlands , Radiography, Dental/methods
2.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd ; 129(10): 449-453, 2022 Oct.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36222449

ABSTRACT

Portable intraoral X-ray devices are marketed as an alternative for conventional wall mounted devices. On the basis of a recent clinical trial the diagnostic quality of portables appears to measure up to the conventional devices. When CE-certified portable devices are used with rectangular collimation and a backshatter radiation shield with adapted technique resulting in a beam parallel to the ground, operator exposure stays well within dose limits. However, the dose to the operator is higher than when using conventional devices. Therefore, in the Netherlands, guidelines restrict the use of portable devices to ambulant use outside the dental clinic while deploying additional radiation protection measures. If presumed advantages of increased control over the exposure due to proximity to the patient would be substantiated by research, this restricted use could be reconsidered. Dentists should be aware of online availability of non-CE-certified portable intra-oral X-ray devices that are potentially unsafe.


Subject(s)
Radiation Protection , Radiography, Dental , Humans , Netherlands , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Dental/methods , X-Rays
3.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd ; 129(7-8): 323-326, 2022 Jul.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35833280

ABSTRACT

During intraoral radiography of the upper anterior teeth, the dose the patient is exposed to can be reduced by shielding the thyroid area by using a thyroid shield or collar. However, the dose to the patient is already low and it is questionable whether efforts to reduce this even further are sensible. A cost-utility analysis demonstrated that thyroid shielding is utile when it is used at least 24 times per year for upper anterior exposures in children.


Subject(s)
Radiation Protection , Thyroid Gland , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Radiation Dosage
4.
J Evid Based Dent Pract ; 22(1): 101665, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35219456

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of clinical and radiographic measurements of infrabony periodontal defects. METHODS: The MEDLINE-Pubmed and Cochrane-CENTRAL electronic databases were searched from initiation to May 2020. The inclusion criteria were clinical trials, human subjects with at least one infrabony defect, measurements of clinical attachment level (CAL), radiographic bone level (rBL), and intraoperative bone level (iBL) used as the reference standard. RESULTS: In total, 11 studies including 17 comparisons were included in this meta-analysis. All 17 comparisons showed that the values of the CAL and rBL measurements underestimated the iBL values. For CAL, the analysis showed a significant difference of means of -1.22 (P < .00001; 95%CI: [-1.49; -0.95]) and for rBL -1.10 (P < .00001; 95%CI: [-1.34; -0.85]). No significant DiffM were observed between the CAL and rBL measurements (DiffM -0.05; P = .76; 95%CI: [-0.39; 0.28]). CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that both clinical and radiographic measurements substantially underestimate the bone level when compared to intraoperative level measurements. However, there was no significant difference in the results between the clinical attachment level measurements and the radiographic observation.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods , Humans
5.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 51(2): 20210305, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34860560
6.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd ; 126(5): 237-245, 2019 May.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31081834

ABSTRACT

Opacities in the orofacial soft tissue rather than the bone are frequently seen on panoramic radiographs. The differential diagnosis of these opacities is diverse and concerns frequently occurring disorders but also rare ones. Due to the diversity of diagnoses, the clinical interpretation of a soft tissue opacity is often difficult. A distinction is made among heterotopic calcifications, heterotopic ossifications, and foreign bodies. Heterotopic calcifications are subdivided into 3 groups, i.e. dystrophic, idiopathic and metastatic calcifications. In this article, stress is placed on the radiographic and clinical characteristics of heterotopic ossifications and foreign bodies, and how they can be recognised on a panoramic radiograph. Besides this, attention will be paid to the need for possible additional imaging techniques and indications regarding treatment option.


Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies , Ossification, Heterotopic , Radiography, Panoramic/methods , Calcinosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Ossification, Heterotopic/diagnostic imaging
7.
PLoS One ; 14(4): e0215092, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30986268

ABSTRACT

Recent improvements in additive manufacturing technologies may facilitate the use of customized 3D printed grafts for horizontal and vertical augmentation of the atrophic alveolar ridge. The accurate fit of such grafts could reduce the clinical treatment time and contribute optimal bone regeneration. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of 3D printed resin grafts as they could be used for alveolar ridge augmentation. Alveolar ridge morphologic data were derived from the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans of six patients with alveolar bone defects. These data were transferred to a segmentation program to produce virtual 3D reconstructions of the alveolar ridge models. Using a Computer Aided Design (CAD) program, the alveolar bone defects were defined and customized grafts were designed and both the defects as well as the grafts generated (CAM) as 3D projects. These projects were imported into a 3D printer and were manufactured in resin. Hereafter, the grafts were fitted to the defect sites of the corresponding models and new CBCT scans were performed. Based on these scans, measurements were made at the marginal and internal part of the fitted grafts to evaluate the marginal and internal fit, respectively. The statistical analysis revealed that the mean marginal fit was significantly better (P < 0.05) than the mean internal fit. The fit of the grafts was dependent on the shape and on the size of the grafts. Specifically, the total void surface between the fitted graft and the corresponding defect site was significantly larger in the large-defect grafts than the small-defect grafts (P < 0.05). Within the limitations of the study, it could be demonstrated that it is possible to fabricate 3D printed resin grafts with acceptable fit in customized shapes, when combining CBCT scans and computer aided design and 3D printing techniques.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Bone Transplantation/instrumentation , Computer-Aided Design , Printing, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Bone Regeneration , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Dental Prosthesis Design , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Pilot Projects
8.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd ; 126(4): 199-205, 2019 Apr.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30994116

ABSTRACT

Opacities not in the bone but in the orofacial soft tissue, are frequently seen on panoramic radiographs. The differential diagnosis of these opacities is diverse and concerns frequently occurring disorders but also rare ones. Due to the diversity of diagnoses, the clinical interpretation of a soft tissue opacity is often difficult. A distinction is made among heterotopic calcifications, heterotopic ossifications, and foreign bodies. Heterotopic calcifications are subdivided into 3 groups, i.e. dystrophic calcifications, idiopathic calcifications, and metastatic calcifications. In this article, stress is placed on the radiographic and clinical characteristics ofidiopathic calcifications and how they can be recognised on a panoramic radiograph. Besides this, attention will be paid to the need for possible additional imaging techniques and indications regarding treatment options. Idiopathic calcification results from deposition of calcium salts in healthy tissue without an apparent cause. Calcium and phosphate levels in the serum are normal in these cases.


Subject(s)
Calcinosis , Radiography, Panoramic , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans
9.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd ; 126(2): 79-88, 2019 Feb.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30785987

ABSTRACT

Opacities in the orofacial soft tissue rather than the bone are frequently seen on panoramic radiographs. The differential diagnosis of these opacities is diverse and comprises abnormalities both frequently seen and rare. On account of this diversity, the clinical interpretation of a soft tissue opacity is often difficult. Heterotopic calcifications, heterotopic ossifications, and foreign bodies are distinguished. Heterotopic calcifications are subdivided into 3 groups, i.e. dystrophic calcifications, idiopathic calcifications, and metastatic calcifications. In this article, the emphasis will be on radiological and clinical characteristics of dystrophic calcifications and how to recognize these on panoramic radiographs. In dystrophic calcification, calcium salts are deposited in chronically inflamedor necrotic tissue.


Subject(s)
Calcinosis , Radiography, Panoramic , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans
10.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd ; 123(4): 211-8, 2016 Apr.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27073811

ABSTRACT

The diagnostic use of oral radiology is an essential part of daily dental practice. Due to the potentially harmful nature of ionising radiation, the clinical use of oral radiology in the Netherlands is framed by clinical practice guidelines and regulatory requirements. Undergraduate students receive intensive theoretical and practical training in practical and theoretical radiology, with the aim of obtaining the 'Eindtermen Stralingshygiëne voor Tandartsen en Orthodontisten'-certificate, which is required for legal permission to use oral radiology in dental practice. It is recommended that the curriculum be expanded to include the areas of knowledge required to qualify for the 'Eindtermen Stralingshygiëne voor het gebruik van CBCT-toestellen door tandartsen' (the certificate for the use of conebeam radiology by dentists). The general dental practitioner is faced with changing laws and regulations in all areas of practice. One of the most significant legal changes in the field of dental radiology was the introduction of the new radiation protection and safety rules in 2014. Moreover, a large group of dentists is also being confronted with the transition from conventional to digital images, with all its challenges and changes in everyday practice.


Subject(s)
Education, Dental, Continuing , General Practice, Dental/education , Legislation, Dental , Radiography, Dental/standards , Clinical Competence , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Education, Dental , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Netherlands , Radiation Dosage
11.
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd ; 122(5): 263-70, 2015 May.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26210218

ABSTRACT

Optimization of radiation protection began soon after the discovery of X-rays. The optimization-concept has been refined more and more as a result of increa-sing knowledge of radiation and its effect on people. Since 1973 the acronym ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) has been used to designate the optimization of X-ray doses. For the dentist the ALARA-principle entails the obligation to minimize the radiation dose to patient and surroundings to a level as low as reasonably achievable. Currently in radiology the acronym ALADA is also used: As Low As Diagnostically Acceptable. To establish ALARA goals Diagnostic Reference Levels are employed in medical radiology. These Diagnostic Reference Levels are also being introduced in dental radiology. Practical measures for ALARA/ALADA in dental practice comprise an awareness of the field of view (for all types of imaging, including cone beam computed tomography) exposure time, and relation to anatomy and diagnostic justification, and shielding.


Subject(s)
Dentistry/standards , Patient Safety , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Dental/standards , Dentistry/methods , Humans , Radiation Monitoring , Radiation Protection , Radiography, Dental/instrumentation
12.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 44(9): 20150158, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26119214

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To find a method that is suitable for providing an objective assessment of the cost effectiveness of a dose-reducing measure used for diagnostic dental X-ray exposures. METHODS: Three cost-utility analysis (CUA) methods were evaluated by comparing their assessments of two dose-reduction measures, a rectangular collimator and the combination of two devices that reduce the radiation dose received during orthodontic lateral cephalography. The following CUA methods were used: (1) the alpha value (AV), a monetary valuation of dose reduction used in the nuclear industry; (2) the value of a statistical life for valuation of the reduction in stochastic adverse effects; and (3) the time-for-time method, based on the postulate that risk reduction is effective when the number of years of life gained is more than the years that an average worker must work to earn the costs of the risk-reducing measure. The CUA methods were used to determine the minimum number of uses that was required for the dose-reducing device to be cost effective. The methods were assessed for coherence (are comparable results achieved for comparable countries?) and adaptability (can the method be adjusted for age and gender of specific patient groups?). RESULTS: The performance of the time-for-time method was superior to the other methods. Both types of dose-reduction devices tested were assessed as cost effective after a realistic number of uses with all three methods except low AVs. CONCLUSIONS: CUA for the methods of X-ray dose reduction can be performed to determine if investment in low dose reduction is cost effective. The time-for-time method proved to be a coherent and versatile method for performing CUA.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiography, Dental/methods , Age Factors , Algorithms , Cephalometry/economics , Cephalometry/instrumentation , Cephalometry/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Radiation Injuries/economics , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/economics , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiography, Dental/economics , Radiography, Dental/instrumentation , Sex Factors , Stochastic Processes , Value of Life
13.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 44(6): 20140343, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25710118

ABSTRACT

Handheld portable X-ray devices are increasingly used for intraoral radiography. This development introduces new challenges to staff and patient safety, for which new or revised risk assessments must be made and acted upon prior to use. Major issues might be: difficulties in using rectangular collimation with beam aiming devices, more complex matching of exposure settings to the X-ray receptor used (e.g. longer exposure times), movements owing to the units' weight, protection of the operator and third persons, and the use in uncontrolled environments. These problems may result in violation of the "as low as reasonably achievable'', that is, ALARA principle by an increase in (re)exposures compared with the other available intraoral X-ray devices. Hence, the use of handheld portable X-ray devices should be considered only after careful and documented evaluation (which might be performed based on medical physics support), when there is evidence that handheld operation has benefits over traditional modalities and when no new risks to the operators and/or third parties are caused. It is expected that the use of handheld portable X-ray devices will be very exceptional, and for justified situations only. Special attention should be drawn to beam-aiming devices, rectangular collimation, the section of the X-ray receptor, focus-skin distance, and backscatter shielding, and that the unit delivers reproducible dose over the full set of environmental conditions (e.g. battery status and temperature).


Subject(s)
Radiography, Dental/instrumentation , Humans , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Patient Safety , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring , Radiation Protection , Scattering, Radiation
14.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 44(5): 20140432, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25690425

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the extracranial and intracranial calcification depiction of the internal carotid artery (ICA), incidentally found in CBCT examinations in adults, and to discuss the conspicuous clinical implications. METHODS: Out of a series of 1085 CBCT examinations, 705 CBCT scans were selected according to pre-defined criteria. The extra- and intracranial calcifications depicted along the course of the ICA were documented according to a comprehensive set of descriptive criteria. RESULTS: In total, 799 findings were detected, 60.1% (n = 480) were intracranially and 39.9% (n = 319) were extracranially allocated. The χ(2) test showed associations between all variables (p < 0.001). Also, most of the combinations of variables showed statistically significant results in the McNemar's test (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that a significant correlation exists between extra- and intracranial calcifications of the ICA. It is clear that in cases of the presence of a calcification in the ICA extracranially, the artery's intracranial portion has an increased risk of showing the same findings. CBCT imaging is widely used as a diagnostic tool, thus, our results contribute to the identification of a subgroup of patients who should undergo further medical evaluation of the atherosclerosis of the ICAs.


Subject(s)
Carotid Artery, Internal/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
15.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 44(4): 20140260, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25564885

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To test the dose-reducing capabilities of a novel thyroid protection device and a recently introduced cranial collimator to be used in orthodontic lateral cephalography. METHODS: Cephalographic thyroid protector (CTP) was designed to shield the thyroid while leaving the cervical vertebrae depicted. Using a RANDO(®) head phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) equipped with dosemeters and a Proline XC (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) cephalograph, lateral cephalograms were taken, and the effective dose (ED) was calculated for four protocols: (1) without shielding; (2) with CTP; (3) with CTP and anatomical cranial collimator (ACC); and (4) with a thyroid collar (TC). RESULTS: The ED for the respective protocols was (1) 8.51; (2) 5.39; (3) 3.50; and (4) 4.97 µSv. The organ dose for the thyroid was reduced from 30.17 to 4.50 µSv in Protocols 2 and 3 and to 3.33 µSv in Protocol 4. CONCLUSIONS: The use of just the CTP (Protocol 2) resulted in a 36.8% reduction of the ED of a lateral cephalogram. This was comparable to the classical TC (Protocol 4). A 58.8% reduction of the ED was obtained when combining CTP and ACC (Protocol 3). The dose to the radiosensitive thyroid gland was reduced by 85% in Protocols 2 and 3 and by 89% in Protocol 4.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry/methods , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Algorithms , Brain/radiation effects , Cephalometry/instrumentation , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cheek/radiation effects , Equipment Design , Esophagus/radiation effects , Humans , Mandible/radiation effects , Mouth Floor/radiation effects , Neck Muscles/radiation effects , Orbit/radiation effects , Orthodontics , Parotid Gland/radiation effects , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiography , Skull/radiation effects , Submandibular Gland/radiation effects , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Thyroid Gland/radiation effects
16.
Biomed Res Int ; 2015: 596858, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26881200

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if software simulation is practical for quantifying random error (RE) in phantom dosimetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied software error simulation to an existing dosimetry study. The specifications and the measurement values of this study were brought into the software (R version 3.0.2) together with the algorithm of the calculation of the effective dose (E). Four sources of RE were specified: (1) the calibration factor; (2) the background radiation correction; (3) the read-out process of the dosimeters; and (4) the fluctuation of the X-ray generator. RESULTS: The amount of RE introduced by these sources was calculated on the basis of the experimental values and the mathematical rules of error propagation. The software repeated the calculations of E multiple times (n = 10,000) while attributing the applicable RE to the experimental values. A distribution of E emerged as a confidence interval around an expected value. CONCLUSIONS: Credible confidence intervals around E in phantom dose studies can be calculated by using software modelling of the experiment. With credible confidence intervals, the statistical significance of differences between protocols can be substantiated or rejected. This modelling software can also be used for a power analysis when planning phantom dose experiments.


Subject(s)
Computer Simulation/standards , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiometry/standards , Software
17.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 43(3): 20130396, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24720607

ABSTRACT

The use of an anatomically shaped cranial collimator (ACC) to reduce patient dose in orthodontic lateral cephalography was investigated in this study. The aim was to evaluate the potential interference of the ACC on landmark identification for orthodontic cephalometry. Consecutive orthodontic patients underwent a total of 100 cephalograms using an ACC mounted on a Veraviewepocs(®) 3D X550 (J. Morita Co., Kyoto, Japan) X-ray unit. 10 observers were asked whether the identification of 5 landmarks close to the collimated area was hindered or rendered impossible by the presence of the collimator. Of the 500 landmarks that were judged by the 10 observers, 496 (99.2%) were reported to lack hindrance. In three landmarks, a minority of the observers reported hindrance. In 1 landmark, 8 of the 10 observers reported hindrance by the collimator. In no instance did the observers state that the identification of landmarks was impossible as a result of the collimation. Application of the ACC on the cephalostat of the X-ray unit is a viable way of reducing patient dose, as it only marginally interferes with the diagnostic yield of the exposure. The need to retake images when the ACC is applied was found to be extremely low.


Subject(s)
Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Cephalometry/instrumentation , Facial Bones/diagnostic imaging , Orthodontics/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Cephalometry/methods , Child , Ear Canal/diagnostic imaging , Equipment Design , Female , Forehead/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Nasal Bone/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiography , Sella Turcica/diagnostic imaging , Skull Base/diagnostic imaging
18.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 43(1): 20130203, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24170799

ABSTRACT

Lateral cephalograms in orthodontic practice display an area cranial of the base of the skull that is not required for diagnostic evaluation. Attempts have been made to reduce the radiation dose to the patient using collimators combining the shielding of the areas above the base of the skull and below the mandible. These so-called "wedge-shaped" collimators have not become standard equipment in orthodontic offices, possibly because these collimators were not designed for today's combination panoramic-cephalometric imaging systems. It also may be that the anatomical variability of the area below the mandible makes this area unsuitable for standardized collimation. In addition, a wedge-shaped collimator shields the cervical vertebrae; therefore, assessment of skeletal maturation, which is based on the stage of development of the cervical vertebrae, cannot be performed. In this report, we describe our investigations into constructing a collimator to be attached to the cephalostat and shield the cranial area of the skull, while allowing the visualization of diagnostically relevant structures and markedly reducing the size of the irradiated area. The shape of the area shielded by this "anatomically shaped cranial collimator" (ACC) was based on mean measurements of cephalometric landmarks of 100 orthodontic patients. It appeared that this collimator reduced the area of irradiation by almost one-third without interfering with the imaging system or affecting the quality of the image. Further research is needed to validate the clinical efficacy of the collimator.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Anatomic Landmarks/anatomy & histology , Cephalometry/methods , Computer-Aided Design , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Orthodontics/instrumentation , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiography, Panoramic/instrumentation , Skull/anatomy & histology , Surface Properties
19.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 42(6): 20120423, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23412462

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: During a cone beam CT scan, the patient is in an upright or supine position. This position depends on the brand and type of the scanner. The aims of this study are: (1) to investigate if the head position has an effect on cephalometric evaluation of the soft-tissue facial profile, comparing the recordings in natural head position (NHP) and supine head position (SHP) and (2) to investigate if age, gender and body mass index (BMI) are contributing factors to the effect of the head position. METHODS: 90 subjects were photographed in profile both in NHP and in SHP. 12 soft-tissue angular and linear cephalometric values were calculated. Two-way random intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine observer reliability. Paired t-tests and linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the differences between the head positions and the influence of age, gender and BMI. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability was generally high. Paired t-tests showed significant changes as a result of head positioning (p < 0.0001) in 9 of the 12 measurements. These differences were small and clinically not relevant, except for the "lower face-throat angle". Regression analysis revealed no relevant influence of age, gender and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Cephalometric soft-tissue evaluation from a recording in SHP is generally reliable, except for the throat-chin area where a clinically relevant difference was found. The contour of the submandibular tissues in SHP causes the chin to appear more prominently. This can cause incorrect orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry/methods , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Face/anatomy & histology , Head/anatomy & histology , Adult , Age Factors , Body Mass Index , Cephalometry/statistics & numerical data , Chin/anatomy & histology , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Neck/anatomy & histology , Observer Variation , Photography/methods , Posture/physiology , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Supine Position/physiology , Young Adult
20.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 37(6): 325-9, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18757717

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of the scanning resolution of storage phosphor plate (SPP) radiographs on the detection of proximal caries lesions. METHODS: 10 dentists evaluated 72 proximal surfaces of premolars with respect to caries from SPP radiographs scanned with theoretical spatial resolutions of: (1) the Digora FMX at 7.8 lp mm(-1); (2) the Digora Optime at both 7.8 lp mm(-1) and 12.5 lp mm(-1); and (3) the Dürr VistaScan at 10 lp mm(-1) and 20 lp mm(-1), respectively. The lesions were validated by histological examination. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed. RESULTS: The A(z) value for the radiographs scanned with the Dürr VistaScan at 10 lp mm(-1) is significantly lower than those for the other series of radiographs (P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: For SPP radiographs, an increased theoretical spatial resolution per se is not related to an improved detection of proximal caries.


Subject(s)
Dental Caries/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Dental, Digital/instrumentation , X-Ray Intensifying Screens , Adolescent , Bicuspid/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , ROC Curve
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...