Evaluación de la atención farmacéutica y del envío domiciliario de medicación a pacientes con leucemia mieloide crónica: proyecto TICAFAN / Evaluation of pharmaceutical care and home delivery of medication to patients with chronic myeloid leukemia - TICAFAN Project

OBJETIVO: Describir y analizar los resultados obtenidos con el desarrollo del proyecto "Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación adaptadas a la Atención Farmacéutica No presencial" (TICAFAN). Confirmar la validez del modelo para prestar atención farmacéutica a pacientes con leucemia mieloide crónica. MÉTODO: Estudio antes-después del cambio en el modelo de dispensación y de atención farmacéutica. Se analizó la evolución de la enfermedad, las intervenciones farmacéuticas, la adherencia al tratamiento, el número de dispensaciones realizadas mediante envío domiciliario y sus incidentes desde el 1 de febrero del 2014 al 31 de octubre del 2016. En mayo del 2015 se realizó una encuesta de satisfacción. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 21 pacientes en el programa, la edad media en el momento de inclusión fue de 55 años (DE 17). Se realizaron 470 envíos, con una disminución del 80% (DE 15) en los desplazamientos de los pacientes al hospital. Hubo 2 incidentes, por olvido de los pacientes del día del envío. Se registraron 49 intervenciones farmacéuticas y se atendieron 30 consultas a demanda fuera de las programadas, lo que supuso un mayor número de intervenciones que en el periodo anterior. No hubo diferencias en la adherencia antes y después de la inclusión en el programa. La respuesta se mantuvo en 9 pacientes, mejoró en otros 9 y empeoró en 3, recuperándose posteriormente. La satisfacción de los pacientes con el proyecto fue de 9,7 (DE 0,6) sobre 10. CONCLUSIONES: El proyecto TICAFAN ha conseguido mantener la atención farmacéutica a los pacientes incluidos en el mismo, la adherencia y la respuesta al tratamiento, evitando desplazamientos al hospital para la dispensación de medicación

OBJECTIVES: To describe and analyze the results of the development of the "Information and communications technology adapted to remote pharmaceutical care" (TICAFAN, by its Spanish acronym) project and confirm its validity to provide pharmaceutical care to chronic myelogenous leukemia patients. METHODS: Before and after study of a modified pharmaceutical care model. The course of the disease, pharmaceutical interventions, treatment adherence, and number of home deliveries and their incidents were analyzed from February 1, 2014 to October 31, 2016. A satisfaction survey was conducted in May 2015. RESULTS: Twenty one patients were included in the program until October 31, 2016. The mean age at the time of inclusion was 55 years (SD 17). There were 470 home deliveries, with an 80% (SD 15) reduction in the trips to the hospital. There were 2 incidents owing to the fact that the patients did not remember the shipment date. Forty nine pharmaceutical interventions were registered and 30 on-demand inquiries were answered, apart from the scheduled monthly consultations. This meant a greater number of interventions than in a previous period. There were no differences in adherence before and after the inclusion in the program. Response was maintained in 9 patients, improved in 9 and worsened, but recovered afterwards, in 3 patients. Patients gave the project a score of 9.7 (SD 0.6) out of 10. CONCLUSIONS: The TICAFAN project has managed to keep providing pharmaceutical care as well as to maintain adherence and treatment response, reducing hospital visits for drug collection

Heterogeneity in allergy to mollusks: a clinical-immunological study in a population from the North of Spain

Background: Allergy to mollusks has been the focus of fewer studies than allergy to crustaceans. Furthermore, allergy to mollusks is less well characterized. Objectives: To describe the clinical characteristics of mollusk-allergic patients, to identify the responsible allergens, and to assess crossreactivity. Methods: We performed a prospective multicenter study including 45 patients with mollusk allergy, which was diagnosed based on a suggestive clinical history and a positive skin test result with the agent involved. Fractions were identified using SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. The proteins responsible were subsequently identified using mass spectrometry. ELISA inhibition studies were performed with mollusks, dust mites, and crustaceans. Results: We found that 25 patients (55%) were allergic to cephalopods, 14 (31%) to bivalves, and 11 (24%) to gastropods. Limpet was the third most frequent cause of allergy (15% of cases). In 31 patients (69%), the manifestation was systemic; 10 (22%) exhibited oral allergy syndrome, and 7 (15%) experienced contact urticaria. Most major allergens were found between 27 kDa and 47 kDa. ELISA inhibition assays revealed a high degree of inhibition of cephalopods and bivalves from all the groups of mollusks, mites, and crustaceans. Mass spectrometry identified tropomyosin, actin, and myosin as the major allergens. Conclusions: Cephalopods, especially squid, are the mollusks that most frequently trigger allergic symptoms. The very frequent occurrence of allergy to limpets is striking, given their low consumption in our area. It is worth highlighting the heterogeneity observed, exemplified by the gastropods. Tropomyosin appears to be responsible for the high cross-reactivity found between mollusks, mites, and crustaceans. Three new mollusk allergens were also identified, namely, actin, enolase, and a putative C1q domain-containing protein (AU)

Introducción: La alergia a moluscos ha sido menos estudiada y está peor caracterizada que la alergia a crustáceos. Objetivo: Describir las características clínicas de pacientes alérgicos a moluscos, identificar los alérgenos responsables y estudiar la reactividad cruzada entre ellos. Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico, prospectivo. Se incluyen 45 pacientes con alergia a moluscos, definida como una clínica sugestiva y prueba cutánea positiva con el molusco sospechoso. Se identificaron las bandas alergénicas mediante SDS-PAGE e inmunodetección. Las proteínas responsables se identificaron utilizando espectrometría de masas. Se realizaron ensayos de inhibición de ELISA entre moluscos, ácaros y crustáceos. Resultados: Veinticinco (55%) de los pacientes eran alérgicos a cefalópodos, 14 (31%) a bivalvos y 11 (24%) a gasterópodos. La lapa resultó ser la tercera causa de alergia (15% de los casos). Los síntomas fueron sistémicos en 31 pacientes (69%), diez (22%) tuvieron síndrome de alergia oral y siete (15%) urticaria de contacto. La mayoría de las bandas alergénicas estaban entre 27 y 47 kDa. Los ensayos de inhibición de ELISA mostraron un alto grado de inhibición de cefalópodos y bivalvos por parte de moluscos, ácaros y crustáceos. Mediante espectometría de masas se identificaron tropomiosina, actina y miosina como los alérgenos mayoritarios. Conclusiones: Los moluscos que con más frecuencia provocan reacciones alérgicas son los cefalópodos, especialmente el calamar. Llama la atención la elevada frecuencia de alergia a la lapa, a pesar de su bajo consumo. También hay que resaltar la heterogeneidad observada, por ejemplo en los gasterópodos. La tropomiosina parece ser responsable de la elevada reactividad cruzada encontrada entre moluscos, ácaros y crustáceos. Se han identificado tres nuevos alérgenos en los moluscos: actina, enolasa y putative C1q domain-containing protein (AU)

Allergenicity and cross-reactivity of pine pollen.

BACKGROUND: Pine pollen has long been considered a non-allergenic pollen. The large size of the grain and its low levels of proteins are the main reasons invoked to explain this low allergenicity. The aim of this study was to describe the main allergenic bands of Pinus radiata (PR) and its cross-reactivity with other pine species, other conifers and grass pollen. METHODS: Sixty-five pine-pollen-allergic patients (51% also sensitized to grass pollen) were studied. Skin prick tests (SPT) to a battery of allergens including PR, Pinus pinea, Pinus sylvestris, Pinus nigra and Cupressus sempervirens pollens and specific IgE determination to PR and Pinus strobus were performed. IgE-immunoblotting to a PR extract and other pine pollens was also carried out. UniCAP inhibition and immunoblotting inhibition studies were performed to assess the cross-reactivity between different pollens. RESULTS: The SPTs were positive with all the pine pollen extracts tested in 69% of the patients. Specific IgE was positive to PR or P. strobus in 77% of the patients, and to Lolium perenne in 51%. Nine different allergenic bands were detected. The two main allergens were a 42 kDa band recognized by 85% of the patients and a band of approximately 6-8 kDa recognized by 40%. A high degree of cross-reactivity was observed between different pine pollen species, but not between pines and C. sempervirens pollen. A partial cross-reactivity could be seen between pine and grass pollens only in patients also sensitized to L. perenne. CONCLUSIONS: Pine pollen should be considered as a potential allergenic pollen especially where this pollen is abundant. The detection of a high number of patients that were monosensitized to pine pollen suggests the possibility of treating these patients with specific immunotherapy.

Occupational asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis from inhalation of dried cow's milk caused by sensitization to alpha-lactalbumin.

A chocolate candy worker was diagnosed as having occupational asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis on the basis of clinical record and methacholine challenge. Positive conjunctival and bronchial challenge tests with lactalbumin showed that this protein was the pathogenetic agent. Type I hypersensitivity mechanism is demonstrated by means of skin prick test and RAST.

Allergic reactions to betalactams: studies in a group of patients allergic to penicillin and evaluation of cross-reactivity with cephalosporin.

A group of 34 penicillin-allergic patients was studied to determine skin test reactivity to the different penicillins involved in inducing the allergic reaction and the cross-reactivity with side-chain-related and side-chain-unrelated cephalosporins. All the subjects selected for the study had to be skin test positive to at least one of the following determinants: benzyl-penicilloyl-polylysine (BPO-PLL), minor-determinant mixture (MDM), amoxicillin (AX), or ampicillin (AMP), or to possess in vitro IgE to the following conjugates: benzyl-penicilloyl-human-serum albumin (BPO-HSA), ampicilloyl-human-serum albumin (AMP-HSA), and amoxicilloyl-human-serum albumin (AX-HSA). Cephalexin (CE) and ceftazidime (CEF) were used to assess cross-reactivity. If skin tests to any of these compounds were positive, the patient was considered to be allergic; if negative, a challenge test was performed. Sixteen patients (47%) were skin test positive to BPO and/or MDM, and nine (26%) exclusively to AX and/or AMP. In three cases (8%), the RAST was positive although the skin test was negative; one to BPO-HSA and two to AX-HSA and AMP-HSA. Six patients (17%) needed to be challenged with the penicillin involved to establish the diagnosis. In five patients (14%), the skin tests were positive to CE and in none to CEF. In all the others, the skin tests were negative to both cephalosporins, and the patients tolerated the drugs when challenged. These results indicate the relevance of side-chain-specific minor determinants in betalactams allergy and provide support for the role of this chemical structure in the evaluation of cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins.

Seasonal versus perennial immunotherapy: evaluation after three years of treatment.

We have performed a comparative study to evaluate seasonal and perennial schedules after 3 years of immunotherapy. Sixty patients suffering from rhinitis and/or asthma due to grass pollen sensitization were randomly allocated to receive a semi-depot extract of Phleum pratense according to a perennial or seasonal schedule. The last year of the study, 14 patients were recruited as a control group without immunotherapy. The cumulative dose was 602 BU in the perennial group and 372 BU in the seasonal group. The frequency and severity of side-effects were similar and very low in both treated groups. The IgE level was significantly lower after perennial immunotherapy at the end of the first 2 years. A seasonal decrease in specific IgG levels was observed in patients who interrupted immunotherapy, while this was not observed in patients under the perennial schedule. Symptoms and medication scores did not show differences between groups. Nevertheless, we found a significant difference between treated patients and the control group.

Sensitization from chestnuts and bananas in patients with urticaria and anaphylaxis from contact with latex.

We present eight patients allergic to latex and fruit (chestnut and banana), seven of whom are women, and aged 17 to 42 years (mean 25 years). Four had family and five personal atopic histories. The total IgE varied from 41 to 520 Ku/L (mean 263). The symptoms followed ingestion of fruit (anaphylaxis) in four patients and contact with rubber (contact urticaria and anaphylaxis) in the other four. Skin prick test (SPT) with latex and radioallergosorbent test to latex were positive in all the patients. Histamine release (HR) to latex was carried out on six patients and was positive in three. In the six patients with symptoms after having eaten chestnuts the SPT was positive and specific IgE was detected in five of them. Histamine release to chestnuts was positive in three of the six patients tested and one of them (-SPT and + IgE) tolerated the fruit. Two out of five patients with symptomatic banana allergy had negative SPT with banana while the test was positive in one patient who tolerated this fruit, this being the only case with specific IgE to banana. Histamine release with banana was only positive in one case. The important correlation between SPT, RAST, and HR results to latex and chestnut together with the total inhibition of the chestnut RAST with a serum pool by preincubation with latex suggests cross-reactivity among these allergens.