ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Although early-detected cervical cancer is associated with good survival, the prognosis for late-stage disease is poor and treatment options are sparse. Mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) has surfaced as a predictor of prognosis and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor(s) in several cancer types, but its value in cervical cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to define the prevalence of MMR-D in cervical cancer and assess the prognostic value of MMR protein expression. METHODS: Expression of the MMR proteins MLH-1, PMS-2, MSH-2, and MSH-6 was investigated by immunohistochemical staining in a prospectively collected cervical cancer cohort (n=508) with corresponding clinicopathological and follow-up data. Sections were scored as either loss or intact expression to define MMR-D, and by a staining index, based on staining intensity and area, evaluating the prognostic potential. RNA and whole exome sequencing data were available for 72 and 75 of the patients and were used for gene set enrichment and mutational analyses, respectively. RESULTS: Five (1%) tumors were MMR-deficient, three of which were of neuroendocrine histology. MMR status did not predict survival (HR 1.93, p=0.17). MSH-2 low (n=48) was associated with poor survival (HR 1.94, p=0.02), also when adjusting for tumor stage, tumor type, and patient age (HR 2.06, p=0.013). MSH-2 low tumors had higher tumor mutational burden (p=0.003) and higher frequency of (frameshift) mutations in the double-strand break repair gene RAD50 (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: MMR-D is rare in cervical cancer, yet low MSH-2 expression is an independent predictor of poor survival.
Subject(s)
DNA Mismatch Repair , DNA-Binding Proteins , MutS Homolog 2 Protein , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/metabolism , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Middle Aged , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , MutS Homolog 2 Protein/metabolism , MutS Homolog 2 Protein/biosynthesis , MutS Homolog 2 Protein/genetics , Adult , Aged , Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2/metabolism , Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2/genetics , MutL Protein Homolog 1/metabolism , MutL Protein Homolog 1/genetics , MutL Protein Homolog 1/biosynthesisABSTRACT
Cervical cancer (CC) is a major global health problem with 570,000 new cases and 266,000 deaths annually. Prognosis is poor for advanced stage disease, and few effective treatments exist. Preoperative diagnostic imaging is common in high-income countries and MRI measured tumor size routinely guides treatment allocation of cervical cancer patients. Recently, the role of MRI radiomics has been recognized. However, its potential to independently predict survival and treatment response requires further clarification. This retrospective cohort study demonstrates how non-invasive, preoperative, MRI radiomic profiling may improve prognostication and tailoring of treatments and follow-ups for cervical cancer patients. By unsupervised clustering based on 293 radiomic features from 132 patients, we identify three distinct clusters comprising patients with significantly different risk profiles, also when adjusting for FIGO stage and age. By linking their radiomic profiles to genomic alterations, we identify putative treatment targets for the different patient clusters (e.g., immunotherapy, CDK4/6 and YAP-TEAD inhibitors and p53 pathway targeting treatments).
Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adult , Aged , RadiomicsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Assess the added prognostic value of the updated International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system, and to identify clinicopathological and radiological biomarkers for improved FIGO 2018 prognostication. METHODS: Patient data were retrieved from a prospectively collected patient cohort including all consenting patients with cervical cancer diagnosed and treated at Haukeland University Hospital during 2001-2022 (n = 948). All patients were staged according to the FIGO 2009 and FIGO 2018 guidelines based on available data for individual patients. MRI-assessed maximum tumor diameter and stromal tumor invasion, as well as histopathologically assessed lymphovascular space invasion were applied to categorize patients according to the Sedlis criteria. RESULTS: FIGO 2018 stage yielded the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) (0.86 versus 0.81 for FIGO 2009) for predicting disease-specific survival. The most common stage migration in FIGO 2018 versus FIGO 2009 was upstaging from stages IB/II to stage IIIC due to suspicious lymph nodes identified by PET/CT and/or MRI. In FIGO 2018 stage III patients, extent and size of primary tumor (p = 0.04), as well as its histological type (p = 0.003) were highly prognostic. Sedlis criteria were prognostic within FIGO 2018 IB patients (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of cross-sectional imaging increases prognostic precision, as suggested by the FIGO 2018 guidelines. The 2018 FIGO IIIC stage could be refined by including the size and extent of primary tumor and histological type. The FIGO IB risk prediction could be improved by applying MRI-assessed tumor size and stromal invasion.